SC to hear plea against Madras HC order barring use of leaders' name in welfare schemes
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai agreed to hear the state's appeal on Wednesday after an urgent mentioning was made by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for the state.
Rohatgi said, 'This is a very unusual order of the Madras high court that requires urgent hearing,' pointing to the July 31 interim order passed while hearing a public interest litigation filed by member of parliament (MP) C V Shanmugam of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).
The HC in its order said, 'We are inclined to pass an interim order to the effect that while launching and operating government welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag of respondent No.4 shall not be included.'
As the court wished to know about the details of the order, Rohatgi said: 'According to the HC order, no scheme of government can have the name of the chief minister or any political figure. The order was passed on Thursday and we are in the process of filing an appeal. It requires urgent hearing as the high court has restrained us based on a wrong reading of judgments of this court.'
'We will have it on Friday,' CJI Gavai said, after Rohatgi pointed out that the scheme is intended for the benefit of the poor.
Shanmugam in his petition before the high court challenged a June 19 order of the state government for implementing a public outreach programme having the name of chief minister MK Stalin.
The scheme 'Ungaludan Stalin' was intended at taking the government's benefits and services to the doorstep of beneficiaries by organising nearly 10,000 camps at a proposed budget of ₹54.95 crore.
The HC order referred to Supreme Court decisions of 2014 and 2015 in Common Cause v Union of India which laid down guidelines to regulate governments from issuing advertisements to glorify their parties using state funds.
Citing these judgments, the HC said, 'The use of photographs of ideological leaders or former Chief Minister, prima facie, would be against the directives of the Supreme Court.' It noted a 2016 judgment of the top court which clarified that under certain exceptions, publication of the photograph of the incumbent CM is permissible.
As the SC had formed a central committee on content regulation in government advertising, the PIL in the high court had sought a direction to this committee along with the Election Commission of India to take action against the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the ruling party in the state under paragraph 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Revanth Reddy takes backward classes quota battle to Delhi, Vijay Deverakonda questioned by ED
This episode of Super 6 covers the Telangana government's push for a 42% reservation for backward classes, led by Chief Minister Revanth Reddy, who protested at Delhi's Jantar Mantar to demand presidential approval for bills passed by the state assembly in March 2025. The proposed legislation aims to increase the reservation quota to 67%, surpassing the Supreme Court's 50% cap, and faces opposition from the BJP over the inclusion of a Muslim quota and criticism from the BRS regarding the protest strategy. A controversy erupted after the Chief Minister warned that opposing Rahul Gandhi's stance would lead to political consequences in Telangana. Additionally, the bulletin highlights an investigation in Dharamsthala, Karnataka, where poisonous substances were found in skeletal remains from two sites, actor Vijay Deverakonda's questioning by the ED in online betting app case and much more.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Banke Bihari temple: HC to hear the matter on Aug 26
Prayagraj: In the matter related to creating government trust to control and supervise Mathura's Banke Bihari temple through 'The Uttar Pradesh Shri Banke Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025', the Allahabad high court has fixed August 26 for the next hearing. On Wednesday, when matter was taken up before the bench of Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, the court was informed that the petition challenging the validity of Ordinance is pending before the Supreme Court. At this, the court adjourned the hearing and fixed August 26 for the next hearing. Though the hearing was adjourned, Justice Agrawal asked UP additional advocate general Manish Goyal that it would be proper to get the Ordinance amended for the part which calls for the inclusion of bureaucrats in the proposed trust. The court was of view that by way of the Ordinance in question, the government wants to put a control over the temple, which cannot be permitted as it is in violation of Article 25 of the Constitution. The court was of the view that the state can control external management, but it would not be proper to put an IAS officer in trust.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Omar writes to all political parties for J&K's statehood, calls it ‘essential course correction'
SRINAGAR: Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah has written to all national parties, including BJP, asking for restoration of statehood to J&K. The CM said in his letter that a bill should be brought in the current session of Parliament for restoration of statehood. 'The restoration must not be viewed as a concession but as an essential course correction, one that prevents us from sliding down a dangerous and slippery slope where the statehood of our constituent states is no longer regarded as a foundational and sacred constitutional right but reduced instead to a discretionary favour bestowed at the will of the central govt,' Omar wrote in his letter. On Aug 5, 2019 the Centre had nullified the provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution and reorganised J&K state into two Union Territories — J&K UT and Ladakh UT. The Supreme Court had on Dec 11, 2023 upheld govt's decision nullifying Article 370 but had observed that J&K's statehood should be restored as soon as possible. National Conference president Dr Farooq Abdullah supported Omar's letter, saying Congress has convened a meeting of all opposition leaders in New Delhi on Thursday and that he would discuss the issue there. The opposition People's Democratic Party (PDP) welcomed Omar's letter 'for a collective push toward restoring statehood to J&K'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ranked: The 25 Best Cities To Live In The World Learn More Undo However, PDP said it was concerned about the 'selective focus on statehood'. 'The party wholeheartedly supports the call for statehood and stands ready to back any meaningful initiative that fulfils promises made to the people in Parliament, public forums, and before the Supreme Court, but it is disheartening to see that NC, under CM Omar Abdullah's leadership, has not demonstrated equal urgency or clarity on the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's special status,' PDP said. Dr Abdullah dismissed PDP's concerns and said it was PDP that had brought BJP to J&K by allying with it in 2015. Omar argued in his letter that federalism is anchored in the recognition of a state's right to exist and function with dignity, autonomy, and constitutional protection. 'If the Union were to assume and exercise the unilateral authority to downgrade a state to a UT, regardless of the justification it would mark a fundamental departure from the constitutional scheme. The circumstances may vary, but the precedent it sets is profound and unsettling. This is a constitutional red line, one that must never be crossed,' the letter said. 'It (statehood to J&K) is an issue that goes beyond regional interests and touches the very core of India's constitutional values and democratic ethos. The act of reducing J&K from a state to a Union Territory in 2019 and the prolonged delay in restoring its status as a full state, you would agree, has profound implications for the future of Indian polity.' On July 16, senior Congress politicians Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi had written a joint letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi pressing for restoration of J&K's statehood and had urged govt to introduce legislation in the current Monsoon Session of Parliament to restore statehood to J&K and grant constitutional safeguards under the Sixth Schedule to the UT of Ladakh.
