Brazil authorities raid Bolsonaro's home, require him to wear monitor
Police said in a statement Friday that they had issued search warrants ordered by the country's Supreme Court, but did not name Bolsonaro, who governed Latin America's largest country from 2019 to 2022.
Brazil's Supreme Court later confirmed the raid, quoting the country's prosecutor general as saying there was a 'concrete' possibility that Bolsonaro would flee the country amid his ongoing trial over alleged efforts to overturn President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's election victory in January 2023.
The court stated that Bolsonaro had been ordered to wear an ankle bracelet, cease using social media, and sever all contacts with foreign officials. He was also barred from approaching foreign embassies or consulates in Brazil.
The top court's statement also revealed that Brazilian police have accused Bolsonaro of working with his son, Eduardo, a Brazilian lawmaker who has been lobbying in Washington, DC, to influence the administration of US President Donald Trump to impose sanctions on Brazil.
The claim comes after Trump earlier this month threatened Brazil with a 50-percent tariffs on goods if Bolsonaro is not granted legal reprieve.
Responding to the latest actions, Bolsonaro's lawyers expressed 'surprise and indignation' at what they called 'severe precautionary measures imposed against him'. They added that Bolsonaro has so far complied with court orders.
In a post on social media, Eduardo Bolsonaro alleged that the legal actions were retaliation for a video his father posted on Thursday, thanking Trump for his support.
Speaking to reporters on Friday, the elder Bolsonaro denied that he was considering fleeing the country.
'The goal is supreme humiliation,' he said.
Trump tariff threats
In a Truth Social post last week, Trump claimed that Brazilian authorities have 'done nothing but come after [Bolsonaro], day after day, night after night, month after month, year after year!'
'He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE,' Trump wrote.
Brazilian Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet, in a 517-page document released late on Monday, called for Bolsonaro to be convicted for his alleged crimes, which could see the former leader spend decades behind bars.
'The evidence is clear: the defendant acted systematically, throughout his mandate and after his defeat at the polls, to incite insurrection and the destabilisation of the democratic rule of law,' Gonet said in the filing.
Trump himself faced four criminal indictments following his first term, including one related to his efforts to overturn his own 2020 election loss. He, like Bolsonaro, has repeatedly claimed he has been the victim of a political 'witch hunt'.
The US pressure campaign comes as Trump continues to threaten sweeping reciprocal tariffs on dozens of trade partners, although the threat against Brazil has stood out for its particularly personal tone.
Trump has maintained friendly ties with Bolsonaro, sometimes called the 'Trump of the Tropics', stretching back to the US president's first term from 2017 to 2021.
Speaking on Thursday, Lula said Trump's tariff threat lacked 'logic'.
'We cannot have President Trump forgetting that he was elected to govern the US, not to be the emperor of the world,' Lula said.
He added that Bolsonaro was not 'being judged personally' by the country's independent judiciary, but 'being judged by the acts he tried to organise a coup d'etat'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's big beautiful police state is here
On July 4, United States President Donald Trump signed into law his so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which will reduce taxes for the rich, punish the poor, and otherwise propel American plutocracy to ever more noxious heights. Just days earlier, Trump's Vice President JD Vance took to X to underline the key component of the legislation: 'Everything else — the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.' Indeed, the bill allocates the unprecedentedly ludicrous sum of $175bn to anti-immigration efforts, approximately $30bn of which will go directly to the notorious federal law enforcement agency ICE, known in long form as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Another $45bn is earmarked for the construction of new immigration detention centres, which, as the American Immigration Council notes, 'represents a 265 percent annual budget increase to ICE's current detention budget'. Thanks to these budgetary machinations, ICE now occupies the position of the largest US federal law enforcement agency in history, with more money at its annual disposal than the military of any country in the world apart from the US and China. Given that ICE agents have as of late made a name for themselves running around in masks and kidnapping people, however, one would be forgiven for seeing this sudden windfall to the agency as something less than, um, 'beautiful'. Of course, the fanatical increase in ICE funding is no surprise coming from a president whose obsession with the idea of deporting millions of people has not prompted him to contemplate how, precisely, a US economy fundamentally dependent on undocumented labour will continue to function in the absence of said labourers. Anyway, the arrangement means big bucks for the detention-industrial complex, including detention companies like GEO Group and CoreCivic that are contracted by ICE. A July 4 Washington Post article on ICE's impending 'detention blitz' reported that each company coincidentally happened to donate half a million dollars to Trump's inauguration in January. The Post article also provided other clues as to how US 'democracy' really works: 'On calls with Wall Street analysts this year, Geo Group executives have primed shareholders for a government contract bonanza that could boost annual revenue by more than 40 percent and profits by more than 60 percent.' But since the government cannot come right out and say this is all about money, it has to invent other narratives, such as that ICE is protecting the US from 'vicious criminal illegal aliens'. Never mind that the vast majority of those detained by the agency have no criminal record whatsoever. Among ICE's ever-growing list of victims is a six-year-old Honduran boy with leukaemia, who was arrested in late May at the Los Angeles immigration courthouse where he had come with his family for a scheduled asylum hearing. This month, massive ICE raids on two California farms resulted in more than 360 arrests and the death of 57-year-old Jaime Alanis, a Mexican farmworker who fell from a greenhouse roof during the upheaval. Nor are all of ICE's detainees undocumented; after all, it is hard to be discerning when you are scrambling to meet detention quotas, and when you are well aware of the fact that you are totally above the law. One of the detainees from the farm raids was 25-year-old security guard George Retes, a US Army veteran, no less, who was pepper-sprayed and then jailed for three days, missing his three-year-old daughter's birthday party. He was released with no explanation. Now imagine the landscape with an additional $175bn in 'ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions', to borrow Vance's words. As if manic and arbitrary detention operations and the elimination of due process were not cause enough for concern, ICE is also being utilised as a force for political repression and the criminalisation of dissent. This was seen in the recent spate of abductions of international scholars opposed to the ongoing US-backed Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, including 30-year-old Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student focusing on childhood development at Tufts University in Massachusetts. En route to an iftar dinner in March, Ozturk was surrounded by masked agents, forced into an unmarked vehicle, and disappeared to an ICE detention centre in Louisiana administered by GEO Group – all because she had co-authored an article for the university newspaper the previous year expressing solidarity with Palestinians. In a new essay for Vanity Fair, Ozturk reflects on her 45-day detention in appalling conditions that were only made bearable thanks to the solidarity of her fellow female detainees, hailing from an array of nations. Ozturk writes: 'One time, an officer came and took away all the cookie boxes, claiming we would use them to make weapons. Another time, we were shocked to witness an officer physically push two women in the kitchen.' When Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, recently had the nerve to refer to ICE as 'Trump's modern-day Gestapo', the US Department of Homeland Security threw a tantrum over his 'dangerous rhetoric', and issued a press release asserting that, 'while politicians like Gov. Walz fight to protect criminal illegal aliens, ICE officers will continue risking their lives to arrest murderers, kidnappers, and pedophiles'. This was itself 'dangerous rhetoric', no doubt, coming from the folks who are kidnapping doctoral students, six-year-old leukaemia patients, army veterans, and so on. Although undocumented workers might be the most immediate and visible victims of the super-funding of ICE stipulated by the One Big Beautiful Bill, the consequences for US society as a whole cannot be understated. At the end of the day, a rogue agency snatching people off the street while entire communities live in fear does not denote a 'land of the free', particularly when the president appears to view anyone who disagrees with him as potentially eligible for criminal punishment. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, has observed that 'you don't build the mass deportation machine without building the police state first'. And if we consider the Cambridge dictionary entry for police state – 'a country in which the government uses the police to severely limit people's freedom' – it seems the US already fits the definition to a big beautiful T. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Qatar Tribune
16 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump signs stablecoin regulations into law, a major crypto milestone
Agencies US President Donald Trump on Friday signed a law to create a regulatory regime for dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies known as stablecoins, a milestone that could pave the way for the digital assets to become an everyday way to make payments and move money. The bill, dubbed the GENIUS Act, passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 308 to 122, with support from nearly half the Democratic members and most Republicans. It had earlier been approved by the Senate. The law is a huge win for crypto supporters, who have long lobbied for such a regulatory framework in a bid to gain greater legitimacy for an industry that began in 2009 as a digital Wild West famed for its innovation and speculative chaos. 'This signing is a massive validation of your hard work and pioneering spirit,' said Trump at a signing event that included dozens of government officials, crypto executives and lawmakers. 'It's good for the dollar and it's good for the country.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in a statement, said the new technology would buttress the dollar's status as the global reserve currency, expand access to the dollar economy and boost demand for US Treasuries, which back stablecoins. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 US dollar peg, and their use has exploded, notably by crypto traders moving funds between tokens. The industry hopes they will enter mainstream use for sending and receiving payments instantly. The new law requires stablecoins to be backed by liquid assets - such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills - and for issuers to disclose publicly the composition of their reserves monthly. Crypto companies and executives argue such legislation will enhance stablecoins' credibility and make banks, retailers and consumers more willing to use them to transfer funds instantly. The stablecoin market, which crypto data provider CoinGecko said is valued at more than $260 billion, could grow to $2 trillion by 2028 under the new law, Standard Chartered bank estimated earlier this year. The law's passage culminates a long lobbying effort by the industry, which donated more than $245 million in last year's elections to aid pro-crypto candidates including Trump, according to Federal Election Commission data. The Republican president, who has launched his own coin, thanked executives for their support during the 2024 presidential campaign, saying, 'I pledged that we would bring back American liberty and leadership and make the United States the crypto capital of the world, and that's what we've done.' Democrats and critics have said the law should have blocked big tech companies from issuing their own stablecoins, which could increase the clout of an already powerful sector, contained stronger anti-money laundering protections and prohibited foreign stablecoin issuers. 'By failing to close known loopholes and protect America's digital dollar infrastructure, Congress has risked making the US financial system a global haven for criminals and adversarial regimes to exploit,' said Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International US. Big US banks are internally debating an expansion into cryptocurrencies as regulators give stronger backing to digital assets, but banks' initial steps will focus on pilot programs, partnerships or limited crypto trading, Reuters reported in May. Several crypto firms including Circle and Ripple are seeking banking licenses, which would cut costs by bypassing intermediary banks. Backers of the bill have said it could potentially give rise to a new source of demand for short-term US government debt, because stablecoin issuers will have to purchase more of the debt to back their assets. Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies, signing an executive order in March establishing a strategic bitcoin reserve. The president launched a meme coin called $TRUMP in January and partly owns crypto company World Liberty Financial.
Al Jazeera
17 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Could Trump's threats against Brazil backfire?
US threatens 50-percent tariffs unless Bolsonaro's prosecution is dropped. There's deepening conflict between the United States and Brazil over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro. US President Donald Trump threatened 50-percent tariffs – 'unacceptable blackmail', says Brazil's President Lula da Silva. So what's next? And who stands to win or lose? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Graziella Testa – Professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation Vinicius Rodrigues Vieira – Professor at the Armando Alvares Penteado Foundation Michael Shifter – Senior fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue
