Mike Waltz vows to make the UN 'great again'
Appearing for a confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr Waltz criticised the UN for what he described as bloated bureaucracy, anti-American bias, and a record of inefficiency in preventing conflict.
'UN revenue has quadrupled in the last 20 years, yet world peace has not increased in equal measure,' he said.
Mr Waltz said he would make it his mission to target the 'waste, fraud, and abuse endemic to the UN system'.
He defended Secretary General Antonio Guterres, saying he didn't think the UN chief would have his UN80 reform initiative 'already on the table if he didn't take President Trump very seriously'.
'It's worth remembering that despite budget reductions, the United States remains by far the most generous nation in the world,' he added.
He singled out the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, and UN-run schools in Gaza for promoting what he called 'anti-Semitic hate'.
Mr Waltz also defended Washington's decision not to pay its full assessed dues last year, which left the US among 41 countries in arrears.
The US, which is assessed at 22 per cent of the UN's regular budget, remains its largest single contributor. China's share is 20 per cent.
US Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the committee's top Democrat, expressed concern that reducing US engagement at the UN would allow adversaries, such as China, to fill the void.
'If we walk away from international bodies like the UN, the result won't be reforms that advance American interests,' she said. 'I don't think most Americans want to live in a world where the Chinese Communist Party is driving the agenda.'
Ms Shaheen urged Mr Waltz to work with Congress to preserve American leadership.
'We cannot shape these organisations or even push for reforms unless we're at the table,' she said.
Mr Waltz said it was 'absurd' that China continued to be treated as a developing nation and received favourable status at the UN.
Richard Gowan, UN director at the International Crisis Group said it was striking that Mr Waltz and Democratic senators agreed on the need to counter Chinese influence at the UN as a top priority.
'Containing Beijing at the UN is a cross-party priority in Washington, but Chinese-US tensions could gum up UN deal-making in future,' he added.
Mr Trump's former national security adviser defended his use of a group chat to discuss military plans as he faced accusations of mishandling sensitive information at Tuesday's hearing.
The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine said in March that Mr Waltz had mistakenly added him to a Signal group chat that included senior US officials discussing impending American air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen.
The misstep drew widespread criticism and culminated in Mr Waltz's dismissal from the role in May.
He acknowledged the error but insisted that no classified material was shared. Mr Waltz said he had followed the same encrypted messaging practices in place under the Biden administration and denied that the chat breached any internal security procedures.
'This was a mistake in contact management, not a breach of national security,' he said.
The committee is expected to vote on Mr Waltz's nomination in the coming weeks.
If confirmed, Mr Waltz will be joined by Morgan Ortagus at the UN, where she will advise on policy. Until recently, she served as deputy special envoy to the Middle East and was overseeing the Lebanon portfolio.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
24 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
There is widespead concern that Syria might break up
The ceasefire brokered by the US, Turkey, and Jordan appears to have ended a week of violence in Syria's southern province of Sweida where Druze militiamen battled Sunni Bedouin tribesmen bolstered by Sunni factional militiamen from elsewhere. Clashes erupted on the 13th following the Bedouin kidnapping of a Druze merchant travelling to Damascus. The number of people killed in Sweida is 940, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, and scores were injured. When the Syrian army began to intervene mid-week, Israel bombed the defence ministry in Damascus, fired missiles near the presidential palace and struck Syrian troops entering Sweida. Israel's involvement was not welcomed by Arab, Turkish and US mediators. Even Donald Trump expressed rare criticism of Israel. Syrian Druze constitute the largest Druze community in the world and the third largest minority in that country. The monotheistic faith evolved from Shiism in the 11th century and has long been a separate religion. As Druze have been persecuted for centuries, they have, as a matter of survival, adopted the practice of taqiya, dissimulation, by appearing to merge with the local population while remaining Druze. Druze number about 700,000 and constitute about 3 per cent of Syria's population. While they are concentrated in the Druze majority province of Sweida, Druze have also settled around Damascus and elsewhere in the country. About 300,000 Druze live in Lebanon and a small number in Jordan. The Druze have played important roles in the independence struggles of both Syria and Lebanon and have assumed active political careers in these states since then. Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt has followed the example of his father and acted as a kingmaker in Lebanon. Respected as a voice for Druze in the region, he condemned Israel's intervention in Sweida and convened a meeting of Lebanese Druze leaders with the aim of countering possible spillover of Syrian Druze-Sunni violence. Another prominent Arab Druze, Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, joined his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan to demand an urgent end to Israel's involvement. While Syrian Druze and Bedouin have sparred for decades, the latest bout of violence did not begin as a sectarian confrontation but over farmland, a traditional issue. After Bashar al-Assad assumed power in 2000, the government initiated economic and agricultural reforms. Farm subsidies were gradually withdrawn and restrictions on water usage and land access were imposed. While Druze villagers protested Bedouin farmers did not, generating hostility against their community. However, Druze and Bedouin farmers came together to protest over neglect by the government due to the lack of services and security. Following Assad 's ouster in December last year, Druze have been divided over their approach to the Sunni fundamentalist Hay 'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) government. Some Druze factions have tried to negotiate a new relationship with Damascus, others resist merging their militias with the country's armed forces, and many reject the presence of Syrian security personnel and soldiers in Sweida. Meanwhile, Druze and Bedouin antagonism to the government increased. Bedouin were angered by the appointment of Druze Amjad Bahr as agriculture minister, while Druze did not see this as providing them with sufficient influence in Damascus. In the absence of firm state control since the takeover by HTS under interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, there have been frequent clashes between Bedouin and Druze, who insist that Sweida must enjoy autonomy, and security must be provided by Druze militia factions — both demands rejected by Bedouin. Syria's southernmost, Sweida is a strategic province with a population of 540,400, 91 per cent Druze, according to the UN. The Druze demand for autonomy amounts to a major challenge to the government at a time the northeast, 25 per cent of Syrian territory, is ruled by Syrian Kurds who also seek self-rule within Syria. There is concern that Syria — which with Iraq makes up the Eastern Arab heartland — could fracture. This has been the goal of Israel since its creation by war 77 years ago. In a bid to weaken Damascus grip on Syrian territory, Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has warned against deploying the Syrian army in the southern border regions. Last December, Israeli troops invaded and occupied the UN-patrolled buffer zone in the Golan Heights established by a 1974 agreement with Syria. Israel occupied the Syrian Golan Heights in 1967 and annexed the territory, which has a Druze population of 20,000, most of whom retain Syrian citizenship. About 130,000 Druze live in Israel, have Israeli citizenship and many have served in the Israeli army and the Knesset. Israeli Druze protested in 2018 after adopting a law defining Israel as the "nation state" of the Jewish people. Druze, who count for 1.6 per cent and Palestinian Arabs 21 per cent, cried foul as this law transformed them into "second-class citizens." The normally loyal Druze protested in the streets. Although Druze are prominent in literature, politics, business, and the military in Israel their voices fell on deaf ears. Druze have emigrated to the US, UK, Europe, and Latin America although many retain communal connections and an active interest in the affairs of this conflicted region. One of the founders in 1968 of American Near East Refugee Aid, ANERA, was Jim Sams (Abu Samra) whose family comes from the 12th century Lebanese Chouf Mountain Druze village of Baakleen. The most high-profile Druze on the global scene today is British-born international lawyer Amal Alamuddin who is married to US actor George Clooney. The couple have founded the Clooney Foundation for Justice which operated in 40 countries in defence of free speech and women's rights.
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Bridging Africa's financing gaps through better planning
With just five years left to meet global and continental development targets, African governments are shifting the way they plan and finance national priorities. The focus is turning toward long-term, integrated planning that links policy ambition with realistic budgeting and resource strategies. This evolving approach was the focus of a side event at the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF), co-organized by the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), UN DESA and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (ECA). The session explored how African countries are applying future-oriented planning methods to address persistent financing challenges and accelerate progress on the Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2063. Rather than tackling development bottlenecks in isolation, participants stressed the importance of systems thinking, looking at the broader structures that give rise to gaps in infrastructure, development financing and social spending. Linking planning with budgeting, implementation and institutional capacity was presented as essential for making better use of limited resources 'Long-term planning pushes countries to think beyond the immediate, ensuring that development strategies are more adaptive, coordinated and resilient,' said Nassim Oulmane, Chief of the Green and Blue Economy Section at ECA. Country examples reinforced this message. Ethiopia is implementing a ten-year national plan supported by new tax and revenue measures. Uganda is aligning its national planning processes with the SDGs. Sierra Leone is applying long-term approaches at the sector level, and Nigeria is coordinating development plans across both national and state institutions. All four countries are also participating in follow-up to the Seville Financing for Development (FfD4) conference, where domestic resource mobilization featured prominently. To support these efforts, ECA and APRM are promoting practical tools like the Integrated Regional Planning Toolkit (IRPT), which helps governments embed long-term planning into national strategies and financial frameworks. The session also underscored the broader economic stakes. Africa continues to lose significant capital through leakages and inefficiencies, undermining development even in countries with strong growth potential. By planning more strategically and investing in anticipatory systems, countries can position themselves to mobilize internal resources and build more resilient economies. With global financing under strain and aid flows declining, participants agreed that better planning is not just a technical fix but a strategic necessity. As Africa moves through the Decade of Acceleration, how governments plan, and how effectively those plans are linked to implementation, may well determine the pace of progress. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA).
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
From Apollo 11 to Artemis: Why Nasa's legacy is under threat
Fifty-six years after Neil Armstrong 's historic first step on the Moon, Nasa is leading the drive to send astronauts to the lunar surface once more, though it is feared at the expense of its own scientific programmes. The agency is marking Moon Day on July 20, the anniversary of the famous Apollo 11 landing, as it navigates a period of transition without a Senate-confirmed administrator. While US President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' secures funding for Artemis, Nasa's flagship Moon exploration programme, the White House spending plan slashes the budget for the agency's Earth science, astrophysics and planetary research divisions by nearly half. Scientists and space policy experts told The National that the US is sacrificing some of its most ambitious scientific projects to keep the lunar return on track. Dr Gordon Osinski, an Earth sciences professor at the Western University in Ontario, Canada, and a geology team member for Artemis III, said he is concerned about the long-term effect these cuts could have. 'While Artemis II appears to be on schedule for a spring 2026 launch, I am concerned about US budget cuts, the big exodus of senior Nasa employees and what this means for returning humans to the surface of the Moon in the Artemis III mission,' he said. Some Nasa employees are set to hold a protest on Moon Day in Washington DC in a bid to save the agency's science divisions. "We're fighting for science, engineering and exploration," the protest website reads. "Tell Congress to push back on the 2025 Presidential Budget Request that cuts Nasa science by 47 per cent, Stem education by 100 per cent, and Nasa's full budget by 25 per cent." Artemis boost but science takes hit The Trump administration has made crewed exploration a centrepiece of its space agenda. The 'Big Beautiful Bill', signed into law on July 4, features billions of dollars in additional funding for the Space Launch System, Orion capsule and Lunar Gateway projects. But the White House's proposed budget cuts would reshape programmes in favour of crewed exploration, slashing funding for climate monitoring satellites, planetary missions such as the Mars Sample Return and major space telescopes in development. Dr Dimitra Atri, scientist at NYUAD, said current space policy lacks the clarity and consistency that helped propel the Apollo missions. 'The public's relationship with space exploration has changed dramatically since Apollo's collective wonder in 1969,' he said. 'Today's achievements, while technically sophisticated, struggle to capture that same imagination, especially when delays and setbacks dominate headlines. 'Apollo went from [US president John F] Kennedy's 1961 announcement to lunar landing in eight years, while Artemis has spent over a decade working to return astronauts to lunar orbit, something we accomplished 50 years ago with far less capabilities.' Nasa has been a global leader in explorative space science for decades, responsible for some of the most ground-breaking missions in history. The Hubble Space Telescope, for example, revolutionised astronomy by capturing deep-space images that reshaped our understanding of the universe. Nasa's fleet of Mars rovers, including Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity and Perseverance, uncovered evidence of past water activity and potential habitability on the Red Planet. The James Webb Space Telescope, launched in 2021, is offering unprecedented views of the early universe and distant exoplanets. On Earth, the Terra and Aqua satellites have played a key role in monitoring climate change. Rising global competition While Nasa deals with the reshaping of its programmes, other countries are making steady progress with their Moon plans and scientific space missions. China completed the first lunar far side sample return with its Chang'e-6 mission and is planning a crewed Moon landing before 2030. Fifty-four countries are part of the US-led Artemis Accords, an international agreement on peaceful and transparent lunar exploration. Dr Osinski said Moon Day should remind the world of the value of international co-operation and science-driven exploration. 'Moon Day is an excellent way to focus the world's attention on the past, present and future of lunar exploration,' he said. 'While its date is based on the first US landing on the surface of the Moon, it has grown to represent much more than this and to be a global celebration. 'International collaboration is key to space exploration and so Moon Day can provide some sorely needed inspiration and an example of the good that can come about when countries work with each other, not against.' Shift to commercial space Nasa's increasing reliance on commercial partners is also shaping how it now approaches exploration. SpaceX's Starship is central to Artemis III's landing plan and Axiom Space is developing the new generation of lunar spacesuits. Dave Barnhart, chief executive of California space infrastructure company Arkisys, said the rise of commercial space is a natural evolution, one that can benefit science in the long run. 'Nasa was the pioneer to create the environment for commercial cargo to the ISS, which is now leading to development of commercial space stations,' he said. 'Likewise, they contracted several companies to lead new vehicle development and test flights to the Moon, which has encouraged true investment.' He said that even if Nasa's scientific leadership weakens in the short term, global and private-sector collaboration could generate even greater returns. 'We are going to gain far more than just what one government organisation could apply to the problems,' he said.
