Enter the kill zone: Ukraine's drone-infested front slows Russian advance
A weary Ukrainian platoon commander speaks to the transformed nature of modern warfare as he's medically evacuated from the front lines.
Kamikaze drones. Surveillance drones. Bomber drones. Drones that kill other drones.
These machines swarm the skies in vast numbers. They're cheap, they're deadly and they're among the main reasons Ukraine believes it can hold out against advancing Russian forces this year and even beyond, according to a dozen Ukrainian commanders, officials and arms manufacturers involved in Kyiv's defence.
Ukrainian soldiers describe the drone-infested corridor covering about 10 km either side of the line of contact as the "kill zone" because remotely piloted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) deployed by both sides can swiftly spot and neutralise targets.
The war's evolution into the most drone-intensive conflict ever seen has eaten away at Russia's ability to exploit its traditional advantages in troop numbers, artillery and tanks, according to two Ukrainian battlefield commanders interviewed.
Any large vehicle operating near the front is now an obvious target, meaning Russian forces can no longer make the kind of rapid advances they did in 2022 with columns of armoured vehicles, according to the commanders as well as the founder of OCHI, a system which centralizes video feeds from over 15,000 Ukrainian military drone crews on the front lines.
"The enemy sees you completely," OCHI's Oleksandr Dmitriev added. "No matter where you go or what you are driving."
Russia has consequently adapted its tactics, the Ukrainian battlefield commanders said; its forces now typically attack in small groups of five or six - on foot or on motorbikes or quad bikes - in an attempt expose Ukrainian positions by drawing their fire and then launching drone strikes at them, they added.
Russia's defence ministry didn't respond to a request for comment on this article.
Despite the changes in warfare, Russian forces retain the ascendancy and are making slow but steady advances in the east and north of Ukraine. Russia has also caught up in UAV technology after falling behind early in the war, according to military analysts, and like its enemy is churning out drones domestically at a rate of millions a year.
Meanwhile, European leaders are trying to parse President Donald Trump's announcement this week that America would supply arms to Ukraine via NATO, with Europe picking up the bill. Many details remain unclear, including the types and quantity of weapons, how quickly they would be sent and precisely how they would be paid for, U.S. and European officials said this week.
The White House didn't respond to queries on the supply plan. Spokeswoman Anna Kelly said the war had gone on too long and Trump wanted to end the killing, and so is selling U.S. arms to NATO for Ukraine and threatening hefty sanctions on Russia.
The people interviewed for this article, who were speaking before Trump's weapons announcement, said they believed Ukraine could fight on and resist Russia even if no more U.S. aid was forthcoming, though they didn't give precise timelines.
Many cited the primacy of drones as having levelled the field to some degree and made Ukraine more self-sufficient, and also pointed to growing military supplies from European allies.
"We can hold out for months," said Oleksandr Kamyshin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's arms expert and strategic adviser, when asked about what would happen if U.S. weapons supplies ceased. "In 2023 or 2024, it would have been a lot worse – we would be talking about days or weeks."
Polish military analyst Konrad Muzyka, who has made numerous visits to the front lines, said Ukraine's focus was to sap the strength of Russian attacks, adding that Kyiv didn't currently have the capability to launch offensives of its own.
He said Ukraine would likely struggle in a long war of attrition due to its manpower shortages and Russia's superior resources. Although drones have changed the battlefield, he cautioned against overstating their ability to make up for an absence of artillery and mortars.
"To deliver the amount of damage that an artillery shell does to a target, you would need to launch tens of drones," he added. "Drones can fill in the gaps to some extent and give you some breathing space, but they are not a substitute for artillery."
DESTRUCTION RAINS FROM ABOVE
Drones are demons, at least for those in the kill zone that straddles the 1,000 km line of contact.
Reconnaissance UAVs from both sides - resembling shrunken airplanes, made of plastic or styrofoam and equipped with sophisticated cameras - can spot enemies from several kilometres away. They hover over the front lines, relaying back what they see in real time.
They find targets for the fleets of bomber drones - often hexacopters the size of coffee tables that can drop precision grenades with 3D-printed tailfins - as well as kamikaze drones, some with RPG warheads strapped on to pierce armour, which can fly into soldiers, tanks and weapons systems.
The platoon commander being evacuated from the front, a 35-year-old called Ivan who goes by the call sign "Atom", said soldiers on both sides now saw UAVs as the biggest threat to their lives, replacing shells, mines and enemy fighters which were the primary perils earlier in the war.
A medic with him on the bus, 34-year-old Olga Kozum, concurred: Most of the battlefield injuries she and her colleagues treat are caused by UAVs, she said.
According to internal Ukrainian estimates seen by Reuters, drones accounted for 69% of strikes on Russian troops and 75% of strikes on vehicles and equipment in 2024. About 18% of strikes on Russian infantry and 15% of strikes on vehicles and equipment were conducted with artillery, and even less with mortars, according to the same estimates.
The wartime UAV arms race has spawned many innovations; both sides are deploying short-range, fibre-optic drones that cannot be electronically jammed, as well as "interceptors" that hunt down and destroy enemy reconnaissance and attack drones.
Kyiv's planned production this year of 30,000 long-range UAVs, designed to attack targets deep inside Russia such as arms depots and energy facilities, gives Ukraine an increased offensive threat, according to Vadym Sukharevskyi, commander of the country's drone forces until early June.
The average cost of a long-range strike drone ranges from $50,000 to $300,000, about 10 times less than a missile of similar range, although a drone's warhead is smaller, Sukharevskyi said in an interview while still in the post.
"This is our asymmetrical answer," he said, adding that Ukraine started developing such drones "precisely because we lack missiles".
Kamyshin, President Zelenskiy's adviser, added: "You can't win a big war if you are only defending." Long-range drone strikes are "one of the main cards Ukraine can play against Russia right now".
WANTED: U.S. PATRIOTS AND INTEL
Ukraine's military-industrial base is expanding rapidly, and now accounts for around 40% of the weapons and equipment used, including drones, according to Zelenskiy, who on Wednesday set out a target to reach 50% in six months.
Kyiv has also sought to diversify its supplies and its European allies are providing growing amounts of munitions, potentially making the country more resilient to geopolitical shocks.
The Kiel Institute, a German-based economic research group, estimated in a report last month that Europe had surpassed the U.S. in total military aid provided over the course of the war for the first time since June 2022, reaching 72 billion euros compared with 65 billion euros from Washington.
The institute said aid flows to Ukraine shifted significantly in March and April as no new U.S. aid was allocated and European countries upped support.
While the U.S. has been - and remains - the largest sole supplier of artillery shells to Ukraine during the war, Europe is expanding capacity and has purchased hundreds of thousands of munitions from within and outside the continent.
Of around 420,000 artillery shells received by Ukraine from the start of this year until around mid-May, only 160,000 were from the United States, according to a European security source who requested anonymity to discuss confidential matters.
Kamyshin said Ukraine made around 2.4 million of its own shells in 2024, although these were mostly for mortars, which are shorter range.
Ukraine is nonetheless particularly reliant on the U.S. in the areas of air defences and intelligence sharing, military analysts said.
Kyiv particularly covets U.S. Patriot air defence systems, capable of intercepting ballistic missiles that Russia is firing with increasing frequency. As of April this year, Ukraine had seven fully operational systems, well short of the 25 that Zelenskiy has requested, according to analysts at Ukrainian publication Defence Express.
Long-range drone and missile attacks often rely on U.S. satellite intelligence. European countries can only go a small way to replacing were the United States to stop sharing it, the European Union Institute for Security Studies said. REUTERS

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Russia is gaining ground in Ukraine, but can its economy keep pace?
Analysts say Russia wants to methodically destroy the Ukrainian military, as Moscow slowly advances its own troops. KYIV - Russia's summer offensive in Ukraine is gaining ground as its forces attack on multiple fronts. In June, the country's numerical advantages in troops and air power produced its biggest monthly gains in territory since the beginning of the year. Russia's aims are not simply territorial. Analysts say it wants to methodically destroy the Ukrainian military, as Moscow slowly advances its own troops. The biggest challenge for Moscow may be far from the front lines, as the Russian economy can no longer keep pace with escalating military spending. For Ukraine, its ability to sustain the war may also be decided far away, as the Trump administration sends mixed signals about its desire and ability to continue arming Kyiv's forces. Earlier in July, President Donald Trump said that Nato countries would buy weapons from the United States to give to Ukraine. The ground war Over the past two months, Russian units have been able to step up their attacks on multiple fronts, from Ukraine's Sumy region in the north to the steppes of Zaporizhzhia in the south. Russia now controls more than two-thirds of Ukraine's Donetsk region – the main theatre of the ground war. Russian forces have carved out a 10-mile-deep pocket around the Ukrainian troops defending the crucial city of Kostiantynivka, partly surrounding them from the east, south and west. Russia has also entered the Dnipropetrovsk region of eastern Ukraine for the first time in more than three years of war. Ukrainian soldiers say the Russian army uses two main tactics to advance on the battlefield: pinning down Ukrainian troops with drones, shells and glide bombs before attacking enemy lines with relentless squad assaults. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 34 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay Ukraine responds by sending experienced, drone-equipped units to help plug the gaps, a tactic that has been compared to sending firefighters to contain flare-ups. But Russia's relentless attacks are placing a strain on Ukraine's outmanned army. Those attacks helped Russia make its largest territorial gains of the year in June. According to Deep State, a Ukrainian group that maps the conflict using drone footage and its links with the Ukrainian military, Russia gained more than 214 square miles of Ukrainian territory in June, up from 173 square miles in May. Putting those gains in context, Russia is capturing less than 0.1 per cent of Ukraine's vast territory each month. At that pace, it would take Moscow several years to occupy all of the four Ukrainian regions it declared annexed in 2022. The air war Away from the front lines, Russia has been increasing the toll it inflicts on the Ukrainian population at large by pummeling the country with mass-produced exploding drones. Over the past weeks, Russia has been setting records on the number of drones it sends into Ukraine. Russia recently launched 728 exploding drones and decoys in one nightly barrage, according to Ukraine's air force. As Russia builds up its drone-making infrastructure, military analysts expect Moscow to routinely launch more than 1,000 drones per volley by autumn. Kyiv was the main target earlier this month of an intense overnight bombardment, which killed at least two people and wounded 25 others, according to local officials. The Russian barrages also include cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. Ukraine has a variety of air-defence systems – including improvised systems like fishing nets to snare drones – but the ballistic missiles can be shot down by only one air-defence system in Ukraine's arsenal: American Patriot missiles. But after a series of reversals by the Trump administration – which paused military aid and then agreed to sell weapons to European allies, which will then give them to Ukraine – Ukrainians are hopeful but cautious about whether they can count on US military support. Officials in Nato countries have proposed a plan where the Trump administration could sell weapons to its allies, which would then give them to Ukraine. That would be a financial windfall for the United States, and could also shield Mr Trump from accusations of direct involvement in the war. Last week, Mr Trump said he intended to adopt that strategy. Russia's goals Russia is not only seeking to win new territory in Ukraine. 'Its goal is to destroy Ukraine's military potential, its army,' Mr Valery Shiryaev, an independent Russian military analyst, said in an interview with Redaktsiya, an independent Russian news channel. 'If there is no army – the state would be defenceless.' The Kremlin has repeatedly said that it would continue pressing on in Ukraine until it can coerce Kyiv into accepting Moscow's peace terms. Russia has demanded that Ukraine recognize Russian territorial gains, shrink its military, designate Russian as an official language in Ukraine and formally commit to Ukrainian neutrality, which would rule out joining Nato. These demands are considered completely unacceptable by Ukraine's political leadership and its citizens. The Russian economy Analysts say that Russia may be spending unsustainable sums to fund the war, fuelling inflation, even as its oil and gas industry suffers from low energy prices, caused in part by Trump's tariffs. Oil exports finance about a third of Russia's total federal budget. At the end of June, President Vladimir Putin said that Russia was spending 6.3 per cent of its gross domestic product, or US$172.5 billion (S$221 billion), on its military, which was 'a lot' and that the country had 'paid for it with inflation.' The country's central bank set interest rates at 20 per cent to keep prices in check. 'We are planning to cut the defence expenses next year and the year after, as well during the next three years,' Mr Putin said. If he follows this plan and Russia reduces military spending, its ability to wage war will inevitably suffer. M.M.I., a leading Russian news outlet on Telegram dedicated to the economy, called the situation with the country's budget a 'catastrophe.' Spurred by record-high military expenditures, Russia's budget deficit has reached US$47 billion over the first half of the year. Because of lower prices, oil and gas revenues have dropped by more than 16 per cent, the country's Finance Ministry said. Casualties After releasing a few official death tolls early in the war, Russia stopped publishing any information about its losses. But teams of researchers and experts have sifted through publicly available data, like obituaries and inheritance records, to identify and verify casualties. To date, they have confirmed more than 115,000 deaths in the Russian military. A study in June found that nearly 1 million Russian troops had been killed or wounded in the war. According to Mr Dmitri Kuznets, a military analyst with the Russian news outlet Meduza, which was outlawed by the Kremlin and operates from Latvia, both Ukraine and Russia are now losing between 250 and 300 service members each day, based on available data. In 2025, Russia has still been able to attract an average of about 30,000 new service members per month, according to government statements and an analysis of budgetary data conducted by Dr Janis Kluge, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. But it was able to do so only by spending lavishly on its military, offering outsize sign-up bonuses and salaries. 'Both sides have devoted last year to increase sustainability – so that they could continue fighting no matter what happens,' Mr Kuznets said. NYTIMES

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump's ambitions collide with Epstein, Fed and health concerns
For US President Donald Trump, whose political career has benefited from voter anxiety over Washington elites, the health of his predecessor and the riches of Wall Street, the past week offered a reversal of fortune. His efforts to escape the uproar over Jeffrey Epstein failed spectacularly, after the Wall Street Journal published a story alleging he once sent a suggestive birthday letter to the disgraced financier – a claim the president denied. The White House was forced to make a rare disclosure that Mr Trump was not in perfect health. And Mr Trump whipsawed on the fate of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, signalling to lawmakers that he would attempt to fire him before relenting after concern about a market backlash. Now, as Mr Trump gears up for a high-profile trip to Britain next week to finalise a trade deal with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, he finds himself looking slightly vulnerable. There was much Mr Trump hoped to harness in what he called a 'week of wins' – passage of his flagship tax-cut package earlier this month, approval of spending cuts this week, a run of favourable economic data, the signing of a stablecoin bill, and implementation of his aggressive tariff agenda. Instead, there were suddenly a few punctures in the armor of a president who at times in his second term has seemed irrepressible as he bent rival institutions, countries, and political opponents to his will. Mr Trump concluded the week posting angrily to social media and sueing one of his top allies in the press, Mr Rupert Murdoch, along with Dow Jones & Co. and News Corp for libel. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 34 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay The Journal reported on July 17 that Mr Trump had prepared a letter for a book compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday. The president said the letter was 'FAKE' and called the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory'. Still, the report threw gasoline on a simmering fire, particularly among members of Mr Trump's base, after the Justice Department claimed it had no evidence that Epstein had blackmailed political figures or kept a client list. That conclusion flew in the face of promises from some of the president's top aides that they would reveal substantial new details about a case many Trump loyalists see as a smoking gun proving the existence of a so-called Deep State. 'Weaklings' Trump supporters and FBI leaders Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are said to be at odds with Attorney General Pam Bondi, while the president has repeatedly tried – and so far failed – to quell the furore. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' he barked at a reporter earlier this month. 'People still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.' This week, he dismissed questions from his base and said those worried about Epstein are 'weaklings' and that 'I don't want their support anymore!' But what was once a potent political tool for Mr Trump – stoking conspiracies about Epstein, and Democrats' involvement – has now backfired, with his own supporters frustrated that his administration may be covering up details they hoped would be released. 'The emphasis on Epstein is truly the best intentions of your most loyal followers,' Charlie Kirk, a conservative media figure, said in a segment on his show addressed to the president. He said the Epstein case was a sort of linchpin in loyal Trump supporters' questions about the alleged Deep State. After the release of the Journal story, Mr Trump moved quickly. He directed Ms Bondi to pursue the release of some grand jury transcripts related to the case, though that stopped short of the full release of materials his allies have demanded. 'Same scam' Separately, Mr Trump's Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, directed the declassification of materials from the Obama administration that she argued showed evidence the former president and aides sought to politicise intelligence around Russia's role in the 2016 election. Mr Trump has repeatedly drawn an equivalence between the Russia controversy and the Epstein case, suggesting both amounted to conspiracy-mongering by his political opponents. A special counsel ultimately did not find evidence Mr Trump had coordinated with the Kremlin to interfere with the 2016 contest. 'It's all the same scam,' Mr Trump told Real America's Voice in an interview that aired on July 16. The Epstein saga is a rare example of Mr Trump struggling to successfully shift the narrative or change subjects in the news, according to one Trump ally, speaking on condition of anonymity. The ally predicted the matter would fizzle out by next year's elections but criticised the White House's move in February to hand right-wing influencers a binder called 'The Epstein Files' that was largely a rehash of previously released information. It even overshadowed the president's escalating campaign against Mr Powell, which has threatened to undermine longstanding conventions about Federal Reserve independence. Mr Trump mused about dismissing Mr Powell in a July 15 meeting with lawmakers, with one White House official saying on condition of anonymity they expected the president to act soon to fire the central bank chief. For Mr Trump, his war against Mr Powell serves an important political function, giving voice to homebuyers and borrowers who see lending costs impacting their wallets. But by July 16, Mr Trump said he would not remove Mr Powell unless the Fed chair was forced out for fraud, nodding to increasing efforts by the president's allies to pressure the chairman over questions about a bank renovation project . 'Winning everywhere' Mr Trump backed off his push to force Mr Powell out in part because of warnings that it would trigger a messy legal fight, according to one person familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. The issues are distracting from what the White House wants to steer attention to: a winning streak that includes passage of a package of spending cuts and the stablecoin bill Trump signed on July 18. 'We're winning everywhere,' Mr Trump said at a signing ceremony for the stablecoin legislation. 'It's not even close – not even close – and we're going to keep it going.' Even as he has notched long-sought policy victories – extending his tax-cut package, gutting government agencies and securing funding for his sweeping immigration crackdown – Republicans know that each carries substantial political risk and that he will need to focus on selling his agenda. Democrats have seized on provisions curtailing Medicaid eligibility and tax cuts benefiting the wealthy, to sharpen their economic critique of Mr Trump. And he is now two weeks away from his next tariff barrage due on Aug 1. The president has batted away economists' warnings that his tariffs will threaten growth, upend supply chains and amount to a fresh tax on consumers. BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US threatens Mexican flights over cargo, competition issues
The DOT alleges Mexico has violated a bilateral air agreement by slashing slots for passenger flights and forcing all-cargo carriers to relocate operations. WASHINGTON/MEXICO CITY - The Trump administration said on July 19 that it will take action against Mexico after the Mexican government cut flight slots and forced cargo carriers to relocate operations in Mexico City, affecting US airlines. US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement the department could disapprove flight requests from Mexico if the government fails to address US concerns over decisions made in 2022 and 2023. The Department of Transportation (DOT) is also proposing to withdraw antitrust immunity from Delta Air Lines' joint venture with Aeromexico to address competitive issues. Mexico is the most popular international destination for US airline travellers. Delta said if the DOT withdraws approval, it 'would cause significant harm to consumers traveling between the US and Mexico, as well as US jobs, communities, and trans-border competition'. Aeromexico said it was preparing a joint response to the order, which it plans to issue in the coming days. Mexico City shake-up The DOT alleges Mexico has violated a bilateral air agreement by slashing slots for passenger flights and forcing all-cargo carriers to relocate operations. Then-President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador defended the decisions, arguing that the capital's main airport was too crowded and that the new, farther-away Felipe Angeles International Airport (Aifa) could handle the extra traffic. Officials are rushing to renovate the ageing Benito Juarez International Airport (MEX) ahead of next year's football World Cup, for which Mexico is a host country. 'By restricting slots and mandating that all-cargo operations move out of MEX, Mexico has broken its promise, disrupted the market, and left American businesses holding the bag for millions in increased costs,' the DOT said. The Aifa is already at full capacity for cargo handling and needs to be expanded. For passenger flights, it lags far behind MEX as transportation to and from the city remains spotty. 'The move not only disrupted critical air cargo operations and set a dangerous precedent for how all-cargo carriers may be treated in global markets, it also created uncertainty about how potential safety emergencies could be handled,' said the Cargo Airline Association, which represents major UScargo carriers. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tampines regional centre set to get more homes, offices and public amenities Multimedia How to make the most out of small homes in Singapore Life US tech CEO Andy Byron resigns after viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' video Asia From toy to threat: 'Killer kites' bring chaos to Indonesian airspace Opinion I thought I was a 'chill' parent. Then came P1 registration Singapore 'God and government are the only things beyond our control,' says Group CEO Business Me and My Money: He overcomes a $100k setback to build a thriving online tuition business Asia At least 34 killed as tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam's Halong Bay Mexico's Transportation Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The measures The DOT issued orders requiring Mexican airlines to file schedules with the department for all their US operations by a late-July deadline while requiring prior US approval for large charter flights to or from the United States. Airlines set to be affected by the measures, including Volaris and Viva Aerobus, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. If the US rescinds antitrust approval for Delta and Aeromexico, they would be required to end their cooperation on pricing, capacity, and revenue sharing. Delta would be able to retain its equity stake in Aeromexico and continue other aspects of its partnership. The DOT also said it could take action against European countries over limitations at airports. REUTERS