Oregon corporate kicker may go to school maintenance
'That bond was going to be used to build a new middle school and do some other really much needed, improvements and upgrades throughout the district,' interim superintendent Kim Kellison told KOIN 6 News. 'Roofing, we have several buildings that need roofing improvements, ADA accessibility improvements, windows. So there's just a lot of deferred maintenance and different upgrades that need to happen for students.'
'I am not a waste of money': Fired federal employees speak out in Portland Town Hall
Kellison is hopeful House Bill 3360 can get passed this session in the Oregon legislature as she has seen first-hand how districts are left in a tough spot when bonds do not get approved.
'Districts across the state are scrambling to try and, you know, get their budgets adjusted,' she said. 'We really don't have a ton of room in our budget for deferred maintenance and, capital improvements. We are trying to set aside align this year for capital improvements in case we can't pass a bond. But that's really difficult.'
A public hearing on HB 3360 was held in Salem Monday to discuss the bill that proposes redirecting the corporate kicker from the state's general fund for public education and instead using it to fund construction and maintenance grants for school districts that have not been able to get bonds approved.
Bonds help schools complete necessary, expensive projects, but often get voted down. The Oregon School Board Association said only about half of district and community college grants have been passed in the last four years.
Portland councilor: 'Families scared' over Trump's use of 1798 law
Now lawmakers are considering redirecting the corporate kicker to give districts with unfinished projects a chance to secure the funding to get them done. This would only be available for districts that submitted general obligation bonds during the last three years, have not gotten voter approval for general obligation bonds in the last 10 years, and reserves of less than 8% of its budget.
Right now the corporate kicker is going to the state school fund which keeps schools running as they are. But if the kicker was to go towards these infrastructure projects, the state would still have to make sure the state fund is meeting the current service level.
Bill sponsor Representative Zach Hudson said it is not that voters are against improving schools, they just cannot always afford to pay for it themselves. He said if the corporate kicker was dedicated to infrastructure, they would not have to pay.
'So many schools around Oregon have infrastructure needs, have a leaking roof have mold in the walls or lead in the water, or they're not earthquake safe, and they would literally come down in a quake,' he said.
Hudson said he is confident the bill will get passed because it has bipartisan support.
'We can make sure that this money, which is supposed to go to education, really goes to the districts who need it most,' he said.
Hudson said if the corporate kicker can be put towards infrastructure, then it will go to education like voters wanted but voters will not have to pay for the improvements.
'I don't think any voter would say no, I don't want the school to replace their HVAC system or replace their boiler,' he said. 'I think they're saying, no, I just can't afford this this year.'
There are two other kicker bills being proposed. A Senate bill says the state should go back to mailing checks instead of offering a credit, and another is proposing to get rid of the kicker altogether. Neither are scheduled for a public hearing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Criminal justice advocates unsatisfied with state budget
Advocates, Gov. Tony Evers and Republican lawmakers have conflicting views about the Department of Corrections funding in the 2025-27 state budget. (Photo by) For criminal justice advocates in Wisconsin, the new state budget leaves much to be desired. Although the $111 billion two-year budget signed by Gov. Tony Evers earlier this month will help eventually close the beleaguered Lincoln Hills juvenile prison, some feel that it missed opportunities to reform the state's justice system. 'Wisconsin's elected officials, including Gov. Evers and state legislators, have once again failed to take meaningful action to overhaul the state's broken and inhumane carceral system,' Mark Rice, statewide coordinator for WISDOM's Transformative Justice Campaign, wrote in a statement released July 11. 'The recently passed state budget ignores the deep harm caused by mass incarceration and falls far short of what is needed to address the humanitarian crisis unfolding inside Wisconsin's prisons.' Evers' original budget proposal released in February contained a number of proposals that were removed or reduced by the Legislature's Republican-led Joint Finance Committee, including $8.9 million to support alternatives to revocation. Another pitch by Evers for $4 million to fund community reentry centers was cut in half by Joint Finance. His proposed $3.19 million in supportive housing service beds for people under DOC supervision was removed. Over $1 million in funding for six positions on the DOC's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance team was also removed by JFC. Evers proposed a total increase of $519 million to the Department of Corrections budget over the next two years. The final budget deal instead increased the DOC budget by $461 million over the two-year period. The budget's capital projects plan, passed by the Legislature and signed by Evers, allocated $225 million to the Department of Corrections (DOC), as well as another $15 million towards construction planning for facilities, with the goal of closing the Green Bay Correctional Institution by 2029. Evers used his partial veto to strike the 2029 deadline for closing Green Bay. 'We need more compromise on that,' said Evers, who added that he supports closing the prison, one of Wisconsin's oldest, but called the timeline unrealistic: 'Saying we're going to do Green Bay by '29 doesn't mean a damn thing.' In his veto message, Evers said that he objected to the Legislature 'assigning a date' to close the Green Bay prison 'while providing virtually no real, meaningful, or concrete plan to do so.' 'I support closing Green Bay Correctional Institution,' Evers wrote. 'Indeed, my administration spent years working on a comprehensive corrections reform plan to be able to close Green Bay Correctional Institution quickly, safely, and cost efficiently, which was included in the biennial budget I introduced months ago. I proposed a 'domino' series of facility changes, improvements, and modernization efforts across Wisconsin's correctional institutions while improving public safety by expanding workforce training opportunities to reduce the likelihood that people might reoffend after they are released. Under that plan, Green Bay Correctional Institution would be closed in 2029. Instead, the Legislature sent this budget with the same deadline and no plan of which to speak.' Lincoln Hills, Wisconsin's notoriously troubled juvenile prison, which still houses 79 boys according to the DOC's most recent population report, blew years past its own closure deadline. Now, the budget provides $130.7 million to build a new Type 1 juvenile facility in Dane County to help facilitate the closure of Lincoln Hills. Plans for a second Type 1 facility in Milwaukee County ran into roadblocks from local resistance and political disagreements in the Capitol, though the facility's completion is still planned. Green Bay's prison was originally built in 1898. Plaques embedded in its outer wall commemorate that the wall was 'erected by inmates' in 1921. Over 1,100 people are incarcerated in the prison, which is designed to hold only 749, according to the DOC's most recent weekly population report. In late June, prison reform advocates from JOSHUA, a local affiliate of WISDOM, held a monthly vigil and prayer service outside the prison, where people are held in 'disciplinary separation' for the longest periods in any of DOC's adult facilities. Protesters included people whose loved ones have died inside the prison, some by suicide due to a lack of mental health support. In late August, 19-year-old Michah Laureano died in the prison after he was attacked by his cell mate. Although the budget aims to close Green Bay, how that will be accomplished remains hazy. Rice wrote that the budget 'includes no plan' to close the prison, 'despite overwhelming evidence that the facility is beyond repair.' Instead, Rice wrote in a statement that 'some legislators continue to push for more studies and planning tactics that will only delay justice while people continue to suffer and die behind bars. This is unacceptable.' That sentiment was echoed by the Ladies of SCI, an advocacy group formed by women with loved ones at the Stanley Correctional Institution. Although the group appreciated that closing Green Bay was part of the budget discussion, 'we also agree that does not mean much without funding an actual plan,' the group wrote in an email to Wisconsin Examiner. 'The [Joint Finance Committee] committed that the plan presented by [DOC] Secretary [Jared] Hoy's team in the Governor's initial budget was 'just an idea' and yet, the JFC also just put an 'idea' in the budget. Yes, they put in dollars for a plan to be developed, but this has already been done several times over.' Studies for closing Green Bay, Waupun, and other old and blighted facilities have been recommended as far back as 1965, Ladies of SCI wrote in the statement. 'Here we are, 60 years later, STILL discussing it. The most recent study was done in 2020 and called out almost $1 billion in projects to increase capacity across our facilities to just handle that population level…We are well above that population level today.' The group asks, 'Is $15 million actually enough to finally get tangible actions to deal with our Corrections crisis? We'd like to know what the magic combination of dollars and opinions are needed to finally address issues that have been identified over and over.' Ladies of SCI said 'setting aside money for yet another study and plan development is rinse and repeat of history…The bottom line is our state's prison population is too big for what we currently have.' Rice concurred, writing in his own statement that prisons like Green Bay, Waupun (the state's oldest prison where multiple deaths have occurred in recent years), and the Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility (MSDF) 'are notorious for inhumane conditions and should have been shut down years ago.' Rice added that 'there is no justification for continuing to pour hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into maintaining or expanding a failed prison system.' Instead, he believes that the state should commit to reducing the prison population by expanding treatment alternatives to incarceration, commuting 'excessive and unjust sentences,' granting 'fair access to parole and early release,' and stopping the practice of locking people up for 'technical or convictionless revocations.' When Evers wrote his message vetoing the deadline for closing Green Bay, there were 362 people working at the prison and more than 1,100 incarcerated adults. 'As of this writing, Wisconsin has the capacity to house 17,638 individuals at its correctional institutions but there are 23,275 people living in [DOC] institutions across Wisconsin;' Evers wrote, 'the Legislature provides no steps whatsoever to stabilize the state's skyrocketing prison population.' Referring to the saga of Lincoln Hills, Evers added, 'Wisconsin already has about a decade's worth of painful experience learning how well it works in practice to set unrealistic, artificial timelines and due dates for closing prison facilities without a complete and thorough plan for implementation. It would be foolish and dangerous to attempt to take a similar approach with a maximum-security institution like Green Bay Correctional Institution.' Just over one-third of the 2,727 new prison admissions statewide between January and April were people sent back to prison for issues like violating the rules of community supervision, and without a new crime committed or sentence issued, according to the DOC's dashboard. Over the same period of time, there were more than 63,435 people on community supervision, probation, or parole. Sean Wilson, senior director of organizing and partnerships at criticized the cuts to proposals to expand alternatives to incarceration, 'clean-slate' legislation and expungement reforms that were left out of the final budget deal. 'I think that there continues to be a lack of re-entry investments, which should be pretty high on the list,' Wilson told Wisconsin Examiner. For years, criminal justice advocates have pushed for support for housing, access to mental health care and jobs, 'those things were not included in the budget.' With less than 3,000 people housed between Green Bay, Waupun, and MSDF, Rice feels that 'these prisons could be emptied and closed within months' and that 'doing so would not only alleviate human suffering but it would also free up critical resources' which 'must be reinvested in the communities most harmed by incarceration.' From providing living-wage jobs and stable housing to creating educational opportunities and violence prevention, Rice wrote in his statement, 'that is how we build true public safety.' The path forward is clear: Care, not cages. Communities, not prisons. – Mark Rice, statewide coordinator for WISDOM's Transformative Justice Campaign Wilson declared that 'the biggest elephant in the room' was that 'there's no real movement on closing outdated prisons or reducing the DOC's footprint.' He stressed that 'we are beyond design capacity…with 5,000 additional bodies [beyond the number] this system was designed for.' Without a concrete roadmap and deadline, he says the budget commitment to closing the Green Bay prison doesn't mean much. Over 20 years ago, Wilson spent time in the Green Bay prison, which he remembers as 'a dilapidated hellhole…It was a trauma pressure cooker in my opinion.' 'But the fact that they're talking about just studying it, that really made me livid as someone who spent time in that facility, and is currently in communication with many individuals who are still housed there today,' he added. Wilson said he doesn't see focused funding to reduce racial disparities in incarceration, nor is there funding to support people who have been directly impacted by the criminal justice system and are trying to lead a reform effort. 'I think if you look at the movement at large for the last 20 years, it's been led by directly impacted leadership,' said Wilson. 'Because we believe in the words of Glenn Martin that those closest to the problem are closest to the solution.' People with personal experience need to be brought to the table to offer both critiques and solutions, he said. Ladies of SCI called the building plans in the budget 'just one of the steps our lawmakers must take to address things,' and pointed to separate legislation introduced by Republican Senator Andre Jacque (R-DePere) and Rep. Paul Tittl (R-Manitowoc), which the group believed would have put needed investments into rehabilitation 'instead of warehousing people in our crumbling facilities.' Evers said the budget was an exercise of compromise and cooperation. 'We need to work together,' he said after signing the budget less than an hour after the Assembly passed it. 'Compare that to what's going on in Washington, D.C., and it's significantly different, so I'm very proud to sign it,' Evers said of the bipartisan compromise. In order to retain $1 billion per year in federal Medicaid matching funds, legislators on both sides of the aisle worked to finalize the bill before the federal reconciliation bill was signed by President Donald Trump. Another one of Evers' partial vetoes stirred discussion around juvenile incarceration. The Senate version of the budget specified that state juvenile correctional facilities would operate at a rate of $912,000 in 2025-26 per kid, per year, before increasing to over $1 million per kid per year for 2026-27. Evers' partial vetoes lowered the rates to $182,865 per kid in 2025-26, and $275,670 per kid in the following years. Over the last decade the cost of housing for each young person in youth corrections in Wisconsin has quadrupled from $303 per day in 2014 to $1,268 per day in 2024, largely due to a lower population of incarcerated youth and higher staffing needs. In his veto message, Evers objected to the Legislature's plan to continue expanding the costs of the existing youth incarceration system during a time of 'uncertainty,' and delays in closing youth prisons. Sen. Van Wanggaard (R-Racine) criticized Evers for using a veto to cut housing expenditures for juvenile offenders. 'Evers' veto of this provision is unsustainable and he knows it,' said Wanggaard. 'The statutory daily rate is not a number that we come up with out of thin air. It's simple math – the total cost to operate our juvenile facilities divided by the average population.' Wanggaard added that 'up until now, a county sending a juvenile to a state facility paid for those costs…Governor Evers just decided unilaterally to turn it on its head and have the state pick up the vast majority of costs. It flips the entire funding of juvenile corrections without debate or discussion. It's irresponsible.' Wanggaard also said that Evers' refusal to utilize the expansion of the Mendota Juvenile Treatment Center to house more youth offenders is driving costs higher. Children can only be placed in Mendota when it's clinically appropriate, however. The facility was never intended to replace Lincoln Hills, or augment bed space for incarcerated kids. In his veto message, Evers explained why he shifted the cost burden from local communities to the state, writing that he objected 'to establishing a daily rate that is unaffordable to counties.' He continued that, 'I have heard loud and clear from counties that the current daily rate is burdensome and will detrimentally impact public safety. Unbelievably, despite that clear message from the counties, the Legislature has chosen to increase that rate by over $1,000 per day. This increase and funding model is untenable, and counties have expressed that this unaffordable increase will have serious and detrimental effects on other county services.' Evers urged the Legislature to 'revisit this issue in separate legislation and appropriate those additional GPR funds to the department.' Criminal justice advocates around the state say viable solutions must go beyond incarceration. Lincoln Hills continues to be under a court-ordered monitor due to a successful lawsuit that brought attention to the harms done to both incarcerated youth and reports of abuse within the facility. Waupun's prison has yet to recover from a string of deaths which ultimately led to charges against the prison's warden and several staff. Green Bay is also notorious for inhumane conditions and deaths behind bars. 'We don't need more studies, we need action,' said Wilson. When he was incarcerated at Green Bay between the years 2000 and 2005, he added, 'I watched people get battered by each other. I saw individuals get beaten by staff. I see the paint peeling, the walls are sweating. The prison cells are outdated. You're talking about a facility that was built in the 1800's…And you're putting people in this facility in 2025 and you are expecting them to come home sane. You are expecting them to navigate this space in a rational way. You expect them to interact with one another in a humane way when you are housing them, or caging them, as if they were animals. Wisconsin should stop wasting taxpayer money by keeping people in cages that should've been shuttered decades ago!' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI and Perplexity's New Browsers Make the Monopoly Claims About Google Look Foolish
The private sector is showing the flimsiness of the Justice Department's argument that Google has a monopoly on the search engine market. On July 9, Perplexity AI launched Comet, a web browser that promises a browsing experience "as fluid and responsive as human thought itself." Comet offers a choice of artificial intelligence models, including OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini, allowing for tailored results, complete with citations and links. Meanwhile, OpenAI is "close to releasing an AI-powered web browser that will challenge Alphabet's market-dominating Google Chrome," according to Reuters. The introduction of these two browsers comes as the Justice Department looks to punish Google for its alleged market monopoly. In October 2020, the department sued Google for violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act by "unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services." The case was decided in the government's favor in August 2024, despite U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta's statement that Google had not "achieved market dominance by happenstance." Instead, he added, "It has hired thousands of highly skilled engineers, innovated consistently, and made shrewd business decisions. The result is the industry's highest quality search engine, which has earned Google the trust of hundreds of millions of daily users." As covered by Reason's Jack Nicastro, when the Justice Department won its antitrust case against Google in 2024, one proposed remedy was a forced divestiture of Chrome from Google's portfolio, aiming to create a level playing field and "open up the market for rivals and new entrants to emerge." Antitrust experts and smaller search engines, such as Mozilla's Firefox, have opposed the proposed divestiture. Even if it were to go through, "Google would still dominate the [general search engine] market," explains Nicastro, who points out that people would still use the search engine on Safari, Firefox, and Edge. Today, Google controls 68 percent of the global browser market, and a 89.6 percent share of the global search engine market, its lowest share in over two decades. Advances in technology and shifts in consumer behavior have led to increased competition in the space. OpenAI has already reached $10 billion in annual revenue, with 500 million users engaging with ChatGPT on a weekly basis, according to CNBC. Perplexity, which launched in 2022, has received backing from several high-profile investors, including NVIDIA, Apple, and Meta (the latter two have sought to acquire Perplexity, according to CNN). The company's run rate, a forecast of its future performance based on current revenue and financial data, is expected to be more than double its 2024 rate of $80 million by the end of 2025. With over 22 million active users and 13.9 million app downloads, Perplexity appears to be a potential competitor to Google in the market. The success of companies like Perplexity and OpenAI should demonstrate to the Justice Department that the market is capable of handling dominant companies without heavy-handed government intervention. The post OpenAI and Perplexity's New Browsers Make the Monopoly Claims About Google Look Foolish appeared first on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
This most walkable of cities trips up when it comes to fixing sidewalks
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up A world-class city is only as good as its infrastructure. And there are those who question the city's priorities with its construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of bike lanes even as the backlog of sidewalk complaints lingers. Advertisement 'Every neighborhood should have nice smooth streets and sidewalks. Why are we so far behind?' City Councilor Erin Murphy asked in an interview with the editorial board. 'What other things have become priorities? Bike lanes? Free bus lanes? White Stadium?' Murphy filed an order for a council hearing on the sidewalk issue in April after getting a pile of messages from angry constituents about unanswered 311 complaints about hazardous sidewalks. The hearing is scheduled for July 22, and when she announced that on her Advertisement Like this one from Kristen Sweeney Berry of Roslindale, whose husband uses a wheelchair. 'Boston's sidewalks aren't just inconvenient — they're often impassable and frequently violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. 'Cracked pavement, missing curb cuts, and blocked pathways don't just inconvenience residents — they exclude an entire community from full participation in city life.' Ruthie Burton complained that repeated 311 requests about sidewalks in the Tommy's Rock section of Roxbury have gone unanswered. In fact, the city acknowledges that of the At the time a Then, of course, once a pedestrian has navigated the cracked sidewalk and the deteriorated curb ramp, there's the Advertisement The asphalt hodgepodge lurking at the corner of Tremont and School streets is an obvious one. And Murphy said she is still nursing a sore knee from an unfortunate encounter with a pothole in the Blackstone Block Historic District right near City Hall. All three — sidewalks, curbs, and potholes — are sure to become issues in the mayoral election — right up there with, and not unrelated to, bike lanes. Mayor Michelle Wu's chief rival, Josh Kraft, who has already vowed a The city does have a And it has budgeted some $55 million in its five-year Capital Plan for sidewalk and ramp reconstruction to 'enhance walkability, meet ADA standards, and create a safer, more inclusive public right-of-way.' When it comes to bike lanes, it's not either-or: The city can have bike lanes and safe sidewalks, but that would be an easier case for the mayor to make if the city started meeting its commitments on sidewalks. Advertisement Boston has always ranked high among the nation's Sure, Boston has winters that are rough on infrastructure and a construction and repair season that is shortened by those sometimes long winters. But faulty sidewalks are a scourge that has spared no neighborhood. And while, according to a The city has acknowledged the scope of the problem — and an $800 million backlog is no small problem. If people keep filing 311 complaints but don't seem to get results — well that's a real problem and it cries out for more than a Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
