The Windsurf Story So Far, Windsurf's Wild Ride : OpenAI, Google and Acquisition By Cognition
Nate B Jones explains the dramatic rise and fall of Windsurf, offering a rare glimpse into the high-stakes world of AI development. You'll discover how a company that once boasted $100 million in annual recurring revenue and a user base of over 1 million developers was brought to its knees by intellectual property disputes, competitive pressures, and shifting industry priorities. But this isn't just a story of failure—it's also one of reinvention. From Google's controversial talent grab to Cognition Labs' inclusive acquisition strategy, the Windsurf saga offers critical insights into the future of AI coding tools, the battle for top engineering talent, and the evolving power dynamics within the AI ecosystem. What does this mean for the future of AI-driven development? The answer lies in the lessons Windsurf's journey has to offer. Windsurf's Tumultuous 72 Hours Windsurf's Evolution: From GPU Optimization to AI-Native Development
Windsurf's journey began in 2021 under its original name, Exofunction, founded by MIT graduates Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen. Initially, the company focused on creating GPU optimization tools. However, recognizing the growing demand for AI-driven solutions, the company pivoted in 2024 to focus on AI coding assistance, rebranding itself as Windsurf and launching an AI-native development environment. This strategic shift positioned Windsurf as a direct competitor to Cursor, offering developers a more affordable premium tier and a streamlined coding experience.
By 2025, Windsurf had achieved several significant milestones that solidified its position in the market: FedRamp High certification: This enabled Windsurf to be used in U.S. government workloads, opening doors to regulated industries.
This enabled Windsurf to be used in U.S. government workloads, opening doors to regulated industries. $100 million in annual recurring revenue (ARR): A testament to its growing customer base and financial stability.
A testament to its growing customer base and financial stability. A user base of over 1 million developers: Including 350 enterprise customers, showcasing its widespread adoption.
These achievements reflected Windsurf's ability to adapt to the evolving needs of developers and enterprises, cementing its reputation as a leader in AI coding tools. The $3 Billion OpenAI Deal That Fell Apart
In April 2025, OpenAI announced its intention to acquire Windsurf for $3 billion, aiming to integrate the IDE into its ChatGPT developer suite. However, the deal fell apart due to complications surrounding Microsoft's intellectual property (IP) rights, which stemmed from a 2023 agreement between Microsoft and OpenAI. The situation worsened when Anthropic, a key partner, withdrew its Claude AI model from Windsurf, citing competitive concerns.
The fallout from the failed acquisition was swift and damaging: Developer migration: Many developers began moving to competing platforms, eroding Windsurf's user base.
Many developers began moving to competing platforms, eroding Windsurf's user base. Enterprise uncertainty: Contracts with enterprise customers faced delays and renegotiations, creating instability.
Contracts with enterprise customers faced delays and renegotiations, creating instability. Product roadmap disruptions: The company's plans for future development were stalled, leaving it vulnerable to competitors.
These challenges left Windsurf in a precarious position, struggling to regain momentum in a highly competitive market. The Rise and Fall of Windsurf: Lessons from a Failed AI Acquisition
Watch this video on YouTube.
Stay informed about the latest in AI coding assistant IDE by exploring our other resources and articles. Google's Reverse Acqui-Hire: A Controversial Move
Following the collapse of the OpenAI deal, Google stepped in with a $2.4 billion reverse acqui-hire. This deal focused on acquiring Windsurf's founders and 40 of its top engineers while licensing its technology on a non-exclusive basis. However, the remaining 250 employees were excluded from the deal, sparking widespread criticism on social media and within industry circles.
This move highlighted a growing trend in Silicon Valley: prioritizing top-tier talent with lucrative compensation packages while sidelining broader employee participation. The backlash underscored deeper issues within the startup ecosystem, where equity and inclusivity are becoming increasingly contentious topics. Google's approach, while strategic, raised questions about the long-term impact of such practices on organizational culture and employee morale. Cognition Labs' Acquisition: A More Inclusive Approach
Cognition Labs ultimately acquired Windsurf's remaining assets, including its intellectual property, product, and workforce. Unlike Google, Cognition Labs adopted a more inclusive approach, offering financial participation and vesting opportunities to all employees. This strategy not only boosted morale but also positioned the company as a more equitable player in the industry.
Cognition Labs announced plans to use Windsurf's strengths in several key areas: Integration with Devon AI: Windsurf's tools will be integrated with Cognition Labs' AI agent, Devon, to enhance its capabilities.
Windsurf's tools will be integrated with Cognition Labs' AI agent, Devon, to enhance its capabilities. Restoration of Anthropic's Claude model: Cognition Labs aims to rebuild partnerships and restore access to critical AI models.
Cognition Labs aims to rebuild partnerships and restore access to critical AI models. Expansion into regulated industries: Windsurf's FedRamp High certification will be used to target government and enterprise markets.
This inclusive and strategic approach positions Cognition Labs to capitalize on Windsurf's assets while addressing the gaps left by previous deals. Key Industry Takeaways
The Windsurf saga offers valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of the AI development industry. Several key trends and tensions have emerged: Model Makers vs. Tool Developers: The collapse of the OpenAI deal highlights the growing power imbalance between AI model creators, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, and tool developers like Windsurf. Model makers increasingly dictate the terms of collaboration, creating challenges for smaller players.
The collapse of the OpenAI deal highlights the growing power imbalance between AI model creators, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, and tool developers like Windsurf. Model makers increasingly dictate the terms of collaboration, creating challenges for smaller players. Talent Wars: Google's reverse acqui-hire underscores the escalating competition for top engineering talent in Silicon Valley. However, this approach often comes at the expense of broader employee equity and organizational cohesion.
Google's reverse acqui-hire underscores the escalating competition for top engineering talent in Silicon Valley. However, this approach often comes at the expense of broader employee equity and organizational cohesion. Advancing AI Coding Tools: Windsurf's evolution from GPU optimization tools to an AI-native IDE reflects a broader industry trend toward more integrated and sophisticated development solutions. This shift is reshaping how developers interact with AI in their workflows. Future Implications
Cognition Labs' acquisition of Windsurf signals a strategic focus on integrating advanced AI coding tools into regulated industries such as government and enterprise. By using Windsurf's FedRamp High certification and combining its tools with the Devon AI agent, Cognition Labs is well-positioned to carve out a competitive edge in the market.
At the same time, the competition between AI model makers and tool developers is expected to intensify. As AI coding agents become increasingly central to software development, the balance of power within the AI ecosystem will continue to shift. Windsurf's story serves as a reminder of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, offering valuable lessons for startups and established players alike.
Media Credit: AI News & Strategy Daily | Nate B Jones Filed Under: AI, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Westminster will never feel any heat from the FM's hot air and bluff
A credible plan that adds up and includes answers to the currency question and real figures for an independent Scottish budget. Is that too much to ask? READ MORE: Mike Small: I pored over John Swinney's strategy – here's what we must do now If this three-point plan is all we are to get from the SNP and its leadership between now and May 2026 then we are, at best, looking at ten or more years of trying, and increasingly failing, to make the devolution settlement add up. Scotland free by 2033, perhaps. Council Tax will be unaffordable for many households while radical and practical solutions like Annual Ground Rent will continue to be ignored. Jobs in vital industries will continue to be lost and the wind turbines which increasingly dominate our landscapes will continue to export their electricity to our southern neighbours. READ MORE: SNP must realise Yes groups aren't rivals – they're reinforcements John needs to wake up and smell the Scottish political coffee. It has gone well off the boil in the past 10 years. SNP support is falling well behind support for independence and this latest three-point plan will do nothing to close that gap. Apparently John is ready to 'turn the heat up on Westminster'. The last time I looked, [[Westminster]] had a massive Unionist majority – it always has and always will. They will never feel any heat from John's hot air and bluff. It is clear that the SNP's message is "keep the faith and vote for us in May so that we can just keep on doing the same as we have been doing for the past ten years for another ten years at least." John Baird Largs FRIDAY'S National devoted two full pages to 'John Swinney: Why I'm launching a renewed strategy for independence'. I firstly had to wonder if John penned this article himself, or was it the product of AI and the efforts of one of the Scottish Government's small army of special advisers, then simply approved by John? It is clear that the renewed strategy is cauld political porridge reheated and served up to try and fill the empty bellies of Scotland's independence supporters who are desperately hungry, virtually starving in fact, for new initiatives with hopefully a wee sprinkling of inspiration. I had to wait until I reached the very bottom scrapings of John's porridge bowl to find his scarce-in-detail three-part plan. The final 329 words to be exact. There are more words in this letter! READ MORE: John Swinney's plan can't be the final word on independence John claims that 'first, it will be a campaign designed to build the highest levels of support possible for independence as the best future for Scotland'. This is welcome but it's nothing new. The SNP have been trying to do it for almost 100 years. The real problem for John is that SNP support is now firmly anchored well below support for independence. Some might even argue it is dragging it down. Second in John's plan is 'building public pressure around Scotland's fundamental national rights. We are ready to turn the heat up on Westminster and its anti-democratic stance, mobilising the support, energy and the impetus of people in Scotland behind the simple idea: no ifs, no buts, Scotland has the right to choose'. This is fighting talk, just talk, but with the loss of almost all of the SNP's MPs just over a year ago, Westminster is not going to listen, John. The Scottish public need to hear what is the SNP's practical road map to independence – if they even have one. The third point: 'The way to deliver independence is only with an emphatic SNP win' is simply longhand for "vote SNP on both ballot papers so that the SNP can try to manage devolution for yet another five years." Is that the best we can hope for? Brian Lawson Paisley JOHN Swinney is asking us to imagine this and imagine that. What the hell for? It's a sure sign he is out of touch with Scotland. We don't need to imagine anything he is asking for. It might be in his imagination, but not ours. Just what does he think we have been doing since 2014? We, the people of Scotland, know what we want. So it's time he got out of his SNP bubble and talked to us through a national public convention. This is the diplomatic way forward, just to remind him. Not a dictatorial set of notions of his own making. And yes, I am still an SNP member. Alan Magnus-Bennett Fife READ MORE: Pro-independence politicians respond to John Swinney's strategy I HAVE a lot of sympathy for John Swinney. I think fundamentally he's a good guy with an almost impossible job to do. There's no doubt he's improved the SNP position since he took over. He's a good manager, but as a radical independence motivating force ... err no, that's not going to happen! I know it's been tried before (with the wrong people in my view ) but I believe John should appoint Stephen Flynn as indy minister. He already has a known media profile, he seems to have a bit of fire in him and is a bit of a disruptor. I don't know if that's a realistic possibility, but we desperately need someone from the [[SNP]] to be 100% dedicated to promoting the benefits of indy and the depressing reality of the union. We need someone to be working with other indy parties as a united front, someone who will attend rallies, etc. We need action urgently – time is running out, John!! Colin T Largs
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How a glitzy New York hotel became the epicenter of the migrant crisis
Standing on the corner of Manhattan's 45th Street and Madison Avenue, The Roosevelt Hotel was once the pinnacle of New York City glitz and glamor. However, in recent years, the once–posh and presidential establishment has seen struggles like never before, leading to the announcement of its permanent closure by NYC Mayor Eric Adams in February 2025. The iconic hotel's shutdown earlier this month came after it spent two years housing the hundreds of thousands of migrants flooding to the US during the peak of the country's immigration crisis. In 2022 Manhattan's historic Roosevelt Hotel was transformed into a shelter to house the asylum seekers in May 2023 and, over the course of the last two years, 155,000 people from 160 countries walked in and out of the hotel's doors. The situation was a far cry from the pomp and ceremony which marked the hotel's opening in 1924, in honor of President Theodore 'Teddy' Roosevelt. Set over 1,025 rooms, the opulent hotel boasted a luxury fitness center and an indoor swimming pool, and even sat atop a secret tunnel system. Over the next 101 years, the establishment played host to Hollywood legends, towering literary figures such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway, and influential lawmakers. In February of this year, in light of dwindling migrant numbers, Adams called time on the hotel–turned–shelter and it closed its doors for the last time in July. Now, as the Roosevelt Hotel stands empty, Daily Mail has taken a deep dive into its rich history. The Roosevelt Hotel first opened its doors on September 22, 1924, after overcoming setbacks due to the 1916 Zoning Resolution – the city's first citywide zoning code, enacted to prevent massive buildings from blocking light and fresh air. The hotel cost $12 million to build, equivalent to around $226.4 million today. Named after US President Theodore 'Teddy' Roosevelt, the hotel was originally operated by New–York United Hotels Inc., but when the company went bankrupt in 1934, Roosevelt Hotels Inc. took over until 1943, when it was acquired by Hilton. In December 1925, several members of the Roosevelt family dedicated a plaque in the lobby to the late president. The memorial featured a Ding Darling cartoon that appeared in the New–York Tribune the day of the former president's death. Architects George B. Post & Sons fashioned the hotel with an Italian Renaissance Revival–style façade. The group aimed to reflect the ideals of Roosevelt through its structure and building. In a nod to the president's dedication to public service, the architects envisioned the building to provide premium comfort and hospitality to visitors. Many of the architectural details were inspired by historic US buildings, according to Untapped New York. The stunning paneled walls and fluted pilasters of the hotel's primary dining hall are inspired by those in New York's City Hall. Elongated windows in the banquet hall are reminiscent of those in Annapolis's Chase House, a classic example of Georgian architecture. Other architectural features are nods to Kenmore, a colonial Virginia Mansion, and the Octagon House in Washington DC. The 19–story structure's ground floor largely contained shops, while the first floor featured the hotel lobby, dining rooms, and other public areas. Hotel rooms, which there were 1,025 of, began on the third floor and spread up to the 18th floor. Several novel features made the hotel stand out from others of its kind – including a kennel for guests' pets, a child–care service, and an in–house doctor. In the hotel's early years, it became known for hosting a multitude of events – from country musical recitals to car exhibits, athlete luncheons to coin displays, and even pet shows. The Roosevelt was also home to award shows of all varieties throughout the years, including the Peabody Awards and the Annual Writers Guild of America Awards – which was attended by the likes of Salma Hayek and Brad Pitt in 1998. Infamous band leader Guy Lombardo – who was responsible for making Auld Lang Syne the definitive song of New Year's Eve – also began leading the house band of the Roosevelt Grill in 1929. He held an annual New Year's Eve radio broadcast at the hotel with his band, the Royal Canadians. Several Republican Party candidates and campaigns used the Roosevelt Hotel for offices and headquarters. The National Republican Congressional Committee opened an office at the hotel in 1930, and Fiorello La Guardia operated a campaign office there during the 1941 New York City mayoral election. The Midtown hotel was not only popular with politicians, it had its fair share of celebrity guests. In fact, the latest star to stay the night at the historic hotel was Eva Mendes, who spent the night in the swanky Roosevelt Suite, according to the Gothamist. The Roosevelt Suite was home to American hotelier and businessman Conrad Hilton – of Hilton Hotels – while he lived in the building in the 1940s. Editor and magazine publisher Hugo Gernsback had his own room on the 18th floor where he created and recorded his very own radio station, WRNY. Not only did celebrities stay in the glamorous suites at the Roosevelt, many also filmed iconic movies within the hotel's walls. The hotel appeared in classics, such as 'The French Connection', 'Quiz Show', and 'Malcolm X'. In 'Wall Street', Michael Douglas's ruthless broker character Gordon Gekko delivered the infamous 'greed is good' speech from the Roosevelt's grand ballroom. The hotel was also used by Sacha Baron Cohen in his movie 'The Dictator' and by Martin Scorsese in his mob biopic 'The Irishman', which starred Robert De Niro and Al Pacino. Jennifer Lopez played the lead character Marisa Ventura in the 2002 RomCom 'Maid in Manhattan', which was filmed at the Roosevelt Hotel. Among its quirks: a secret tunnel three levels beneath the hotel once connected it to Grand Central Terminal. And unlike most hotels, its high-tech kitchen was proudly on display at street level. The hotel closed during the pandemic in 2020, reopened as a migrant shelter in 2023 under a $220 million deal, then closed again in July 2025. Adams said it would save taxpayers 'millions'. As the Roosevelt shut its doors, diapers remained stocked in the gift shop, and a handwritten map in Spanish reminded migrants: 'You are here.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
It's time to rethink how we measure labor in the US
Last week the Wall Street Journal reported that, as a result of the 'tougher environment' in the labor market, companies are 'in control again' and are warning applicants of 'long hours and few boundaries'. At the same time some industries are reporting worker shortages due to Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. And then there's artificial intelligence, which is about to devastate the jobs market – or is about to create new jobs. Amid all this change, what do we really know about the jobs market? Just the other week the Department of Labor said the economy added 147,000 new jobs to the economy. So that seems encouraging? But the official figures are subject to revision – and big ones too. The labor department has said its own numbers were overstated by as much as 818,000 during the first eight months of 2024. The payroll giant ADP is more in line with the some pessimists on Wall Street, saying that the private economy shrank by 33,000 in June. But their competitor, Paychex, reported that small business employment – which represents about half of the country's workers – has continued to 'hold steady' throughout this year. Job openings 'jumped' to a six-month high last month. Does anyone know how the labor market is actually doing? No economist, no government agency, no academic that I know has yet figured out how many Americans are working or not. Why? Because it's not just about jobs anymore. It's about income. The 'jobs' data we read isn't relevant. Last week a report in Fortune introduced us the concept of the 'over-employed'. These are workers – many in the tech industry – that are holding down more than one job at a time, with some making as much as $3,000 per day working for multiple employers. But the over-employed trend goes beyond this. That's because in the same week, new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed what we already knew: workers working remotely were logging two hours less hours per day than their counterparts coming into the office. So what are they doing with this extra time? Maybe they're watching Netflix. Others were generating more income for themselves doing other things, like starting their own businesses. According to new data from the Census Bureau: almost 460,000 applications were filed for new businesses in June alone, a level almost twice the amount of the monthly average before the pandemic. We all know these 'workers'. Some have multiple full-time jobs. Others have multiple part-time jobs. Many have multiple sources of income. They drive Ubers. They have Etsy shops. They're selling used sneakers on eBay and working late shifts under the table at the local bar. They write programs. They work with data. They do it all! Are we taking all of these people into consideration when analyzing the 'job market?' Some of the 'over-employed' and really just underpaid and need the extra work to make ends meet, unfortunately. According to a new NerdWallet data, nearly two in five Americans are aiming to make more money this year and 10% have started a side business or second job just to cover basic necessities. In this increasingly complicated 'jobs' market perhaps it is time for economists to stop evaluating the labor market in terms of jobs. This is quickly becoming obsolete. We need to measure income. How many people over the age of 18 in the US are earning more than, say $50,000 per year, taking into consideration all sources of income and inflation-adjusted? What percentage is that compared to the working-age population? How has that increased or decreased over time? Isn't this more relevant than the numbers we're getting now? And shouldn't the numbers come from actual, real data and not from an unreliable Department of Labor survey that's revised 10 times after it is initially published? Can't we get this information from tax returns, social security and private sources such as Etsy, Amazon, eBay, ADP and Paychex? Can't this be calculated and updated monthly and annually? Of course it can. Major economic policy decisions still hinge on the unemployment rate and jobs growth. Politicians get re-elected or ejected on this data. But in a job market that's being shaken by AI, immigration and the rapid rise of side gigs, it's time we rethought how we measure the health of the labor market.
