PINS vs. SNAP: TD Cowen Picks the Better Social Media Stock Ahead of Q2 Earnings
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Both platforms are also benefiting from uncertainty over the future of Chinese short-form video app TikTok's operations in the U.S., as well as from leadership issues at rival platform X following CEO Linda Yaccarino's abrupt departure.
First, Let's Understand the Background
The advertising segments of these companies were expected to be impacted by the U.S. trade tariffs announced in Q1, due to the removal of the de minimis exemption for goods under $800 from China. However, SNAP relies more heavily on Chinese advertisers, while Pinterest benefits from a diverse advertiser base in Europe and other regions, helping it offset losses from China.
With this in mind, the analyst raised the model estimates and price targets for both stocks. Blackledge increased the PINS price target from $40 to $43, implying 19.5% upside potential from current levels. Meanwhile, he lifted SNAP's price target from $9 to $10, representing 4.8% upside potential from current levels.
Notably, Blackledge is a five-star analyst on TipRanks, ranking #307 out of 9,861 analysts tracked. He boasts a 60% success rate and an average return per rating of 13.60%.
PINS Stock Benefits from Higher Advertising Uptake
In Q2, Blackledge expects Pinterest's revenues to grow 14.6% year-over-year to $977.9 million, driven by improved monetization and a growing contribution from the company's new Performance+ advertising tools. The firm's Ad Check showed strong uptake of Pinterest's Creative & Automated Bidding offerings so far. Meanwhile, advertisers are increasing their ad spend on Pinterest, with some seeing their spending grow by 66% compared to the same period last year.
These are the highlights of Blackledge's optimistic view on PINS stock:
Pinterest's Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) are estimated to reach 578 million in Q2, up 10.7% year-over-year and 1.4% over Q1.
Nearly 40% of U.S. Pinterest users visit the app or site to search for or shop for products, which is more than double the same metric for other social networks, including Snapchat, Reddit (RDDT), X, and Meta's (META) Facebook and Instagram apps.
The survey shows steady growth in the overall time spent and user penetration on PINS compared to both Q1FY25 and the same period last year.
SNAP Is Benefiting from Growing Subscriber Base
In Q2, Blackledge expects Snapchat's revenues to grow 12.4% year-over-year to $1.4 billion. This growth is mainly driven by increased advertiser spending on Direct Response (DR) ads and a higher number of users paying for Snapchat+ subscriptions, which are expected to contribute about 37% of new revenue growth in Q2. Moreover, the analyst stated that the impact of tariffs was not as bad as feared, further improving the company's outlook.
These are the highlights of Blackledge's optimistic view on SNAP stock:
Snap's Daily Active Users (DAUs) are estimated to reach 468 million in Q2, up 7.3% year-over-year and 1.7% over Q1.
Snapchat is benefiting from the shift in some advertiser spending from TikTok to Snap due to ongoing uncertainty regarding TikTok's U.S. operations.
Snap's brand advertising business remains weak, with most growth coming from DR ads and higher subscriptions.
Ending Thoughts
Overall, while both Snap and Pinterest show promising growth drivers ahead of Q2 earnings, TD Cowen's analysis suggests Pinterest currently holds a stronger position as the better social media stock to watch. According to the TipRanks Stock Comparison Tool, PINS stock has a 'Strong Buy' consensus rating, reflecting Wall Street's bullish outlook on the stock.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
43 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Meta faces legal battle in South Africa over illicit content involving minors
The decision comes as South Africa grapples with rising cybercrime, including WhatsApp scams and the spread of illegal content. This development follows a high-profile legal case initiated by social media law expert Emma Sadleir, who took action against the tech giant after discovering over 30 Instagram accounts and at least six WhatsApp channels distributing illicit content and personal information of South African schoolchildren. Court documents revealed that new accounts were being created "every few minutes" to distribute the material, indicating an organized and persistent campaign that has sparked nationwide concern and urgent legal action. Sadleir, representing The Digital Law Company, emphasized the importance of protecting vulnerable children. She said, " This is about protecting vulnerable children. Full compliance with the court order is critical to identifying the perpetrators.' In support of the lawsuit, the Pretoria High Court ordered Meta to discontinue the identified accounts and provide subscriber information, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and IP addresses used at account creation and last login. Despite the urgency, Meta's initial refusal to comply prompted the legal team to file a contempt of court application. The tech giant however argued that the filing had misidentified legal entities, thereby delaying the process. Critics claimed that Meta was avoiding accountability despite having the technical means to respond. Amid growing public and legal pressure, Meta agreed to a settlement on July 18, specifically due to the threat of imprisonment for Meta's Southern Africa representative, Thabiso Makenete. The company has since deactivated over 60 accounts and promised to provide the requested data within three business days under strict confidentiality. Emma Sadleir, founder of The Digital Law Company, described the agreement as unprecedented, she said, " This may be the first time in South Africa that a global tech company has formally agreed in writing to provide such data in compliance with a local court order." Regulatory compliance mars Meta, SA relations Notably, this is not the first time both entities have conflicted. South Africa's Information Regulator has previously had disputes with Meta over compliance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). In 2024, WhatsApp was criticized for vague privacy terms and unauthorized data-sharing with Meta and third parties. This case adds another layer on recent security concerns, testing Meta's willingness to balance privacy obligations with public safety demands. While child protection advocates have welcomed the ruling as a major step toward digital accountability, digital rights organizations have warned about the broader implications. "We must ensure that data disclosures do not set a precedent for unchecked surveillance," a spokesperson for the South African Digital Rights Forum noted.
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
The US can have tariffs on baby safety products or a baby boom, but not both
President Trump has voiced a desire to ignite a new 'baby boom' in America, floating a $5,000 baby bonus and other policies aimed at spurring family formation. But the administration's tariff policies are now undercutting that vision — even in the wake of a U.S.–China trade deal that brings some clarity to parents and industry, but not nearly enough relief. The recently finalized trade framework sets a nominal 55 percent tariff on most Chinese imports, including baby and child safety products, down from the 126.5 percent peak earlier this spring. That's a welcome improvement, but it is still more than double the rate from before the trade war began. For essential products such as cribs, car seats, strollers and safe sleep spaces, that's a huge added cost; one that shows no signs of going away. These aren't luxury goods. Many are legally required. All are foundational to the health and safety of young children. Yet the White House has confirmed it will maintain the 55 percent rate, with no exemptions currently planned for baby products and no clear timetable for further relief. This leaves families facing steep prices and mounting uncertainty, just as the administration is trying to encourage more Americans to have children. The good news is, the White House can fix this without derailing its deal with China. All it needs to do is exempt from the tariffs all products essential to the care and protection of babies and children. The first Trump administration exempted these products in 2018, and the current administration floated doing so again a few months ago. But now the pause seems to have put such an exemption on the backburner. That's a mistake. Baby and childcare products are uniquely vulnerable to tariff pressure: More than 90 percent are imported from Asia, with the overwhelming majority manufactured in China. Even with the new framework in place, U.S. importers remain hesitant. They don't know if the deal will hold, and they don't want to ramp up orders only to see tariffs spike again. A permanent exemption for baby products would eliminate that uncertainty, and protect families from sudden price shocks. Otherwise, the severe price increases we have seen are likely to continue. Before the new deal, strollers had risen in price by anywhere from $150 to $450. A popular UPPABaby car seat has increased in price by more than 40 percent, despite efforts to absorb cost. The vast majority of brands and products are facing similar increases. We anticipate an average overall price increase of around 30 percent across critical baby and child products. Beyond the price crisis is a looming product shortage. Manufacturers who slowed production during the tariff surge are now in limbo. Retailers are stockpiling inventory where they can. As one told us, 'If I could fill a warehouse with car seats and strollers right now, I would.' Without relief, families will be forced into painful — and risky — choices. Picture a single mother whose car seat is damaged in a minor crash. She is legally required to replace it, but she either can't afford a new one or can't find one in stock. She considers buying a used or counterfeit seat of questionable safety or continuing to use the damaged one. Parents should not be forced to gamble with their children's safety. Although the administration's goal of reducing America's reliance on foreign manufacturing is understandable, the realities of this sector require a different approach. Baby and child safety products are highly regulated and built through decades-long partnerships with specialized factories abroad. These supply chains can't be replicated domestically overnight, nor can most families afford the price increases that would come with reshoring. A 2021 Pew survey found that cost was the most commonly cited reason non-parents were unlikely to have children, and those costs have increased steadily since. A 2022 report from the Brookings Institution found that inflation had added more than $26,000 to the cost of raising a child, hitting low-income families hardest and pushing many to delay or scale back their plans for children altogether. Tariffs shouldn't make that burden worse. A broad exemption for all essential baby and child products would provide certainty regardless of how the broader China deal unfolds. It would support struggling families, stabilize the industry and bolster the administration's pro-family goals. Without the exemption, the consequences won't be measured in dollars alone, but also in risks no parent should have to take.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China plans crackdown on zero-mileage used car sales
SHANGHAI (Reuters) -China's industry ministry is planning to ban the resale of cars within six months of their initial registration as part of efforts to combat sales of so-called zero-mileage used cars, an industry association publication reported on Saturday. Zero-mileage used cars have emerged in China as a result of the uniquely cutthroat competition for sales in the world's largest auto market, which is reeling from a brutal, years-long price war caused by chronic overcapacity. The practice involves insuring a new vehicle before it is sold, allowing automakers and their dealers to meet sales targets. But it can create hassles for customers. Auto Review, a publication run by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, reported the plan in an editorial published on its WeChat account. It said that the China Automobile Dealers Association, another industry group, had separately proposed a code system for exports of used cars. The editorial added that Chery and BYD were among companies planning to hold dealers accountable for violations, including licensing cars before they are sold. The measures, if enforced, would mark the first policy action taken by the Chinese government to stop the practice, which became a nationwide issue after Great Wall Motor CEO Wei Jianjun called it out in May. Since then, there have been several signs China's central government was preparing a crackdown, from a Communist Party newspaper condemning zero-mileage used cars last month to the country's cabinet pledging on Friday that it would control "irrational" competition in the domestic auto industry. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
