logo
American Kids Have Become Increasingly Unhealthy Over Nearly Two Decades, New Study Finds

American Kids Have Become Increasingly Unhealthy Over Nearly Two Decades, New Study Finds

Al Arabiya07-07-2025
The health of US children has deteriorated over the past 17 years, with kids today more likely to have obesity, chronic diseases, and mental health problems like depression, a new study says.
Much of what researchers found was already known, but the study paints a comprehensive picture by examining various aspects of children's physical and mental health at the same time. 'The surprising part of the study wasn't with any single statistic, it was that there's 170 indicators, eight data sources, all showing the same thing: a generalized decline in kids' health,' said Dr. Christopher Forrest, one of the authors of the study published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought children's health to the forefront of the national policy conversation, unveiling in May a much-anticipated 'Make America Healthy Again' report that described kids as undernourished and overmedicated and raised concerns about their lack of physical activity. But the Trump administration's actions–including cuts to federal health agencies, Medicaid, and scientific research–are not likely to reverse the trend, according to outside experts who reviewed Monday's study. 'The health of kids in America is not as good as it should be, not as good as other countries, and the current policies of this administration are definitely going to make it worse,' said Dr. Frederick Rivara, a pediatrician and researcher at the Seattle Children's Hospital and UW Medicine in Seattle. He co-authored an editorial accompanying the new study.
Forrest and his colleagues analyzed surveys, electronic health records from 10 pediatric health systems, and international mortality statistics. Among their findings:
1. Obesity rates for US children 2–19 years old rose from 17 percent in 2007–2008 to about 21 percent in 2021–2023.
2. A US child in 2023 was 15 percent to 20 percent more likely than a US child in 2011 to have a chronic condition such as anxiety, depression, or sleep apnea, according to data reported by parents and doctors.
3. Annual prevalence rates for 97 chronic conditions recorded by doctors rose from about 40 percent in 2011 to about 46 percent in 2023.
4. Early onset of menstruation, trouble sleeping, limitations in activity, physical symptoms, depressive symptoms, and loneliness also increased among American kids during the study period.
5. American children were around 1.8 times more likely to die than kids in other high-income countries from 2007–2022. Being born premature and sudden unexpected death were much higher among US infants, and firearm-related incidents and motor vehicle crashes were much more common among 1–19-year-old American kids than among those the same age in other countries examined.
The research points to bigger problems with America's health, said Forrest, who is a pediatrician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. 'Kids are the canaries in the coal mine,' he said. 'When kids' health changes, it's because they're at increased vulnerability and it reflects what's happening in society at large.'
The timing of the study, he said, is completely fortuitous. Well before the 2024 presidential election, Forrest was working on a book about thriving over the life span and couldn't find this sort of comprehensive data on children's health.
The datasets analyzed have some limitations and may not be applicable to the full US population, noted Dr. James Perrin, a pediatrician and spokesman for the American Academy of Pediatrics, who wasn't involved in the study. 'The basic finding is true,' he said.
The editorial published alongside the study said while the administration's MAHA movement is bringing welcome attention to chronic diseases, it is pursuing other policies that will work against the interests of children. 'Those include eliminating injury prevention and maternal health programs, canceling investments in a campaign addressing sudden infant death, and fueling vaccine hesitancy among parents that may lead to a resurgence of deadly vaccine-preventable diseases,' authors wrote.
Officials from the US Health and Human Services Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Forrest said risks highlighted by the MAHA report, such as eating too much ultra-processed food, are real but miss the complex reality driving trends in children's health. 'We have to step back and take some lessons from the ecological sustainability community and say: 'Let's look at the ecosystem that kids are growing up in.' And let's start on a kind of neighborhood-by-neighborhood, city-by-city basis, examining it,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms

Al Arabiya

timea day ago

  • Al Arabiya

Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms

President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting reforms agreed last year to strengthen the World Health Organization's pandemic response, saying they infringed on national sovereignty. Trump, who returned to office on January 20, immediately began the country's withdrawal from the UN health body. The State Department said language adopted in 2023 would still have been binding on the United States despite the pullout. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime critic of vaccines, said in a joint statement the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' 'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said. Rubio and Kennedy formally disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations—legal instruments that guide global cooperation in combating disease—that were adopted at the 2023 World Health Assembly in Geneva. 'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X. He stressed that the reforms 'are clear about member states' sovereignty' and said the WHO 'cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures.' The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity,' and established a working group to assess the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. Countries have until Saturday to formally lodge objections to the reforms. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in the United States, Britain and Australia have led public campaigns against the changes, even as those nations' governments supported them. The amendments were passed after countries failed to agree on a more ambitious global pandemic treaty. Most member states finalized a version of that treaty in May 2025, though the United States did not participate as it was then in the process of leaving the WHO. Under President Joe Biden, the United States took part in negotiations during May–June 2024 but declined to support a final consensus, citing concerns about protecting US intellectual property rights related to vaccine development. Rubio's predecessor, Antony Blinken, had welcomed the WHO reforms as progress. But Rubio and Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to political influence and censorship—most notably from China—during outbreaks.' The WHO's Ghebreyesus said the organization 'is impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.'

Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms

Arab News

timea day ago

  • Arab News

Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting changes agreed last year for the World Health Organization on its pandemic response, saying they violated the country's sovereignty. Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the UN body, but the State Department said the language from last year would still have been binding on the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' 'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said in a joint statement. Rubio and Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. 'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X. He stressed the amendments 'are clear about member states sovereignty,' adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures. The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity' in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. Countries have until Saturday to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes. The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics. Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO. The United States, then under president Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations, but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress. In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks.' WHO's Ghebreyesus said the body is 'impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.'

Book Review: ‘When Breath Becomes Air'
Book Review: ‘When Breath Becomes Air'

Arab News

time2 days ago

  • Arab News

Book Review: ‘When Breath Becomes Air'

Published a year after the author's death aged 37 in 2015, 'When Breath Becomes Air' is an autobiography about the life and struggle with terminal lung cancer of Dr. Paul Kalanithi. In the book, Kalanithi, an American neurosurgeon at Stanford University, talks about his own journey from being a physician providing treatment to his patients to becoming a patient himself facing premature mortality. The narrative moves from talking about how Kalanithi saved lives to confronting the end of his own, reflecting on what makes life worth living in the face of death. Despite his diagnosis, Kalanithi continued working as a physician and even became a father, explaining to his readers how he embraced life fully until the very end. Unfortunately, the book had to be completed by his wife after his passing, and serves as a moving meditation on legacy, purpose, and the human experience. Among the book's strengths are its authenticity and depth of emotions, touching on everything from the day-to-day experiences of physicians to Kalanithi's own love of literature — originally, he had studied English at university. A fitting tribute, then, that his own work would go on to become a New York Times' bestseller. Neurosurgery, though, was in his words an 'unforgiving call to perfection' which not even his diagnosis could check. 'Before my cancer was diagnosed, I knew that someday I would die, but I didn't know when,' he wrote. 'After the diagnosis, I knew that someday I would die, but I didn't know when.' The book garnered praise upon publication, winning the Goodreads Choice Award for Memoir and Autobiography in 2016. Its run on the NYT's bestseller list lasted an impressive 68 weeks. Writing in the Guardian, Alice O'Keefe suggested: 'The power of this book lies in its eloquent insistence that we are all confronting our mortality every day, whether we know it or not. The real question we face, Kalanithi writes, is not how long, but rather how, we will live — and the answer does not appear in any medical textbook.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store