Hong Kong opens probe into AI-generated porn scandal at university
Three people alleged over the weekend that a University of Hong Kong (HKU) law student fabricated pornographic images of at least 20 women using artificial intelligence, in what is the first high-profile case of its kind in the Chinese financial hub.
The university sparked outrage over a perceived lenient punishment after it said Saturday it had only sent a warning letter to the student and demanded he apologise.
But Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data said Tuesday that disclosing someone else's personal data without consent, and with an intent to cause harm, could be an offence.
The watchdog 'has begun a criminal investigation into the incident and has no further comment at this stage', it said, without mentioning the student.
The accusers said in a statement Saturday that Hong Kong law only criminalises the distribution of 'intimate images', including those created with AI, but not the generation of them.
There is no allegation so far that the student spread the deepfake images, and so 'victims are unable to seek punishment... through Hong Kong's criminal justice system', they wrote.
The accusers said a friend discovered the images on the student's laptop.
Experts warn the alleged use of AI in the scandal may be the tip of a 'very large iceberg' surrounding non-consensual imagery.
'The HKU case shows clearly that anyone could be a perpetrator, no space is 100 percent safe,' Annie Chan, a former associate professor at Hong Kong's Lingnan University, told AFP.
Women's rights advocates said Hong Kong was 'lagging behind' in terms of legal protections.
'Some people who seek our help feel wronged, because they never took those photos,' said Doris Chong, executive director at the Association Concerning Sexual Violence Against Women, referring to cases at the group's crisis centre.
'The AI generations are so life-like that their circulation would be very upsetting.'
Asked about the case at a Tuesday press briefing, Hong Kong leader John Lee said most of the city's laws 'are applicable to activities on the internet'.
HKU said on Saturday it will review the case and take further action if appropriate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
South Korea court ends long legal battle for Samsung chief
SEOUL, South Korea: South Korea's Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision acquitting Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee of charges related to a controversial 2015 merger, ending one of the most high-profile legal battles in the country's corporate history. The ruling clears Lee of accounting fraud and stock manipulation charges tied to the US$8 billion merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries. Prosecutors argued that the deal was engineered to consolidate Lee's control over the conglomerate following his father's incapacitation. The Supreme Court's decision affirms two earlier rulings, including one from an appeals court that found no wrongdoing in the merger. Lee's legal team welcomed the outcome, saying in a statement they were "sincerely grateful" to the court and that the ruling confirmed the merger was legal. The case had cast a long shadow over Lee's leadership at Samsung for nearly a decade, beginning shortly after the 2014 heart attack that left his father, Samsung patriarch Lee Kun-hee, in a coma. The merger laid the foundation for Lee's succession at the helm of the tech empire. While the verdict had been widely anticipated, it arrives at a pivotal time. Samsung is in a race to close the gap in AI chip development, facing fierce global competition in a fast-evolving semiconductor industry. The Supreme Court's decision removes a lingering legal distraction, allowing Lee to focus entirely on steering Samsung through one of its most strategically significant periods. Samsung Electronics shares were modestly higher after the ruling, rising 1.7 percent.
CBC
15 hours ago
- CBC
Ottawa weighs plans on AI, copyright as OpenAI fights Ontario court jurisdiction
Social Sharing Canada's artificial intelligence minister is keeping a close watch on court cases in Canada and the U.S. to determine next steps for Ottawa's regulatory approach to AI. Some AI companies have claimed early wins south of the border, and OpenAI is now fighting the jurisdiction of an Ontario court to hear a lawsuit by news publishers. Evan Solomon's office said in a statement he plans to address copyright "within Canada's broader AI regulatory approach, with a focus on protecting cultural sovereignty and how [creators] factor into this conversation." But there are no current plans for a standalone copyright bill, as Solomon's office is "closely monitoring the ongoing court cases and market developments" to help chart the path forward. It's unclear how long it will take for those court cases to determine whether artificial intelligence companies can use copyrighted content to train their AI products. : Canadian news organizations, including CBC, sue ChatGPT creator 8 months ago CBC/Radio-Canada, Postmedia, Metroland, the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, and The Canadian Press have launched a joint lawsuit against ChatGPT creator OpenAI, for using news content to train its ChatGPT generative artificial intelligence system. The news organizations say OpenAI breaches copyright by 'scraping content' from their websites. The sole Canadian case to pose the question was launched late last year by a coalition of news publishers and the Ontario Superior Court is set to hear a jurisdictional challenge in September. The coalition — which includes The Canadian Press, Torstar, the Globe and Mail, Postmedia and CBC/Radio-Canada — is suing OpenAI for using news content to train its generative artificial intelligence system. The news publishers argue OpenAI is breaching copyright by scraping large amounts of content from Canadian media, and then profiting from the use of that content without permission or compensation. They said in court filings that OpenAI has "engaged in ongoing, deliberate and unauthorized misappropriation of [their] valuable news media works." "Rather than seek to obtain the information legally, OpenAI has elected to brazenly misappropriate the News Media Companies' valuable intellectual property and convert it for its own uses, including commercial uses, without consent or consideration." OpenAI challenging jurisdiction OpenAI has denied the allegations, and previously said its models are trained on publicly available data, and "grounded in fair use and related international copyright principles." The company, which is headquartered in San Francisco, is challenging the jurisdiction of the Ontario court to hear the case. It argued in a court filing that it's not located in Ontario and does not do business in the province. WATCH | U.S. media companies sue OpenAI in late 2023: New York Times sues OpenAI, Microsoft for copyright infringement 2 years ago OpenAI also argued the Copyright Act doesn't apply outside of Canada. OpenAI is asking the court to seal some documents in the case. The court is scheduled to hold a hearing on the sealing motion on July 30, according to a schedule outlined in court documents. It asked the court to seal documents containing "commercially sensitive" information, including about its corporate organization and structure, its web crawling and fetching processes and systems, and its "model training and inference processes, systems, resource allocations and/or cost structures." "The artificial intelligence industry is highly competitive and developing at a rapid pace," says an affidavit submitted by the company. "Competitors in this industry are many and range from large, established technology companies such as Google and Amazon, to smaller startups seeking to establish a foothold in the industry. "As recognized leaders in the artificial intelligence industry, competitors and potential competitors to the defendants would benefit from having access to confidential information of the defendants." A lawyer for the news publishers provided information on the court deadlines, but did not provide comment on the case. Numerous lawsuits dealing with AI systems and copyright are underway in the United States, some dating back to 2023. In late June, AI companies won victories in two of those cases. In a case launched by a group of authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman, a judge ruled AI systems' use of published work was fair use and the authors didn't demonstrate that use would result in market dilution. But the judge also said his ruling affects only those specific authors — whose lawyers didn't make the right arguments — and does not mean Meta's use of copyrighted material to train its systems was legal. Judge Vince Chhabria noted in his summary judgment that in "the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited." In a separate U.S. case, a judge ruled the use by AI company Anthropic of published books without permission to train its systems was fair use. But Judge William Alsup also ruled Anthropic "had no entitlement to use pirated copies." Jane Ginsburg, a professor at Columbia University's law school who studies intellectual property and technology, said it would be too simplistic to just look at the cases as complete wins for the AI companies. "I think both the question of how much weight to give the pirate nature of the sources, and the question of market dilution, are going to be big issues in other cases."
CTV News
16 hours ago
- CTV News
Canada will feel the impact ‘severely' if NASA cuts funding: expert
York University's Paul Delaney breaks down how $6-billion in cuts to NASA's funding may pave the way for China to dominate the space race. As NASA faces the threat of US$6 billion in cuts under U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request, one astronomy expert says Canada will certainly feel the impact if the drastic financial reductions go through. Paul Delaney, former director of the Allan I. Carswell Astronomical Observatory, told CTV Your Morning on Thursday the budget cuts will severely impact every single program in NASA, making it the largest financial assault on the space agency in history. In turn, it could position other countries, namely China, to take the lead in space exploration. China is swiftly pushing forward in space exploration, with plans to put humans on the moon by early 2030. 'There is little doubt that…(NASA) will take second place,' Delaney said. He also expects that the financial threat to the space agency will lead to more privatization in the sector. Delaney said the cuts to NASA's budget will directly impact not just the Canadian Space Agency, but all researchers that are involved in space science. One item that Delaney says may be on the chopping block is the latest version of the Canada Arm, or Canadarm3, which is the country's contribution to the U.S.-led Gateway project, a space station in lunar orbit. 'The impact on Canada, in terms of both hardware generation, as well as research, could be extremely significant, forcing us of course to go elsewhere to lend our expertise,' he said. Delaney adds that the fall out from the budget cuts will run deeper than putting 'boots on Mars'. 'Your cellphone technology has been powered in very large measure by the types of activities we've developed going into space,' he said. 'The spin-offs are almost incalculable.' CNN reported on Thursday that more than 2,000 agency employees are set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's 'deferred resignation' program, introduced by former Trump ally Elon Musk, who is CEO of NASA's largest contractor, SpaceX.
