Housing plan approved in Peterborough's Glinton village
The applicant, Alston Country Homes, had also sought listed building consent for works to a dovecote structure on the site, which will be incorporated into one of the homes."The resulting scheme respects important views and retains the visual prominence of the dovecote within the streetscape," the case officer said. While the case officer noted the proposed development was in a part of Glinton that has a "strong local identity and historic character", they decided the development would make "effective use of brownfield land" and the layout "responds positively to the key characteristics of the site and its surroundings".The case officer's report stated: "While the site lies within the Glinton Conservation Area and within the setting of the Grade II listed dovecote, the proposed development has been informed by a detailed understanding of the site's heritage value."Construction on the site must begin within three years.
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lloyds, Halifax, NatWest, and Bank of Scotland to shut 113 branches
Lloyds, Halifax, NatWest, and the Bank of Scotland are to shut 113 branches by the end of November. In total, 24 Lloyds, 31 Halifax, 46 NatWest, and four Bank of Scotland sites will close for good between August 20 and November 20. Dates are yet to be confirmed for the closures of a further eight NatWest branches. The Lloyds Banking Group in January cited the closures on customers moving away from banking in person to using mobile services. The move came weeks after the finance firm shook up its business to allow customers of Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland to use stores across any of its brands. In the wake of the Horizon IT scandal, the Post Office is also planning to close 115 branches, leaving many communities with nowhere to access their money or discuss financial issues in person. And Jenny Ross, money editor at consumer group Which?, said: 'Schemes introduced by the banking industry to protect these services, such as banking hubs, are a good start in plugging gaps left by closing physical branches, but they must be rolled out much more quickly if consumers are to feel their benefits. 'The government must hold banks' feet to the fire to ensure the commitments they've made to set up 350 hubs by 2029 are met - and should be prepared to review the target upwards if necessary.' While many people now use their bank's app or telephone banking to manage their cash, there remains a large proportion who are unable to do so. According to charity Age UK, only 14 per cent of those aged 85 and above bank online, - with 58 per cent relying on face-to-face banking. The ongoing wave of branch closures has triggered fears that elderly, isolated people risk being hit hardest. Bank bosses have been accused of 'engaging in a race to close branches', which resulted in the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) introducing measures to ensure a 'reasonable provision of cash deposit and withdrawal services' last year. NatWest Group, which comprises NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland and Ulster Bank, has closed 1,428 branches since January 2015 - the most of any banking group, research by Which? revealed. Lloyds Banking Group was hot on NatWest Group's heels, however, shutting down 1,243 locations over the same period. Which? also reported that Barclays was the individual bank that has most dramatically decreased its branch numbers, with 1,228 branches now closed over the last nine years.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Woman, 88, fears her clifftop home will be lost to the sea if nothing is done
A pensioner fears the clifftop home where she has lived for 25 years could be lost to the sea due to coastal erosion and said she would be heartbroken if that happened. Jean Flick, 88, remarried in 1999 after the death of her first husband from cancer and later bought the seaside property in Thorpeness, Suffolk, with her second husband for a fresh start. She said they were 'very happy' in their coastal home before her second husband also died of cancer. Ms Flick said coastal erosion has worsened in recent years, with a section of her garden wall dropping to the beach below earlier this year. Another home in her street was demolished in 2022, and Ms Flick fears she could lose her home too. She and her daughter Frances Paul, who lives nearby, are trying to secure planning permission for rock-filled cages called gabions to be placed at the foot of the cliffs to slow the erosion. This would be a self-funded project, after previous defences were washed away. Ms Flick said she has been told that if the cliff edge gets to within five metres of the house, the property will have to be demolished. 'If nothing is done, if it comes within five metres of the house it will be pulled down,' she said. 'No compensation, we have to pay for it to be pulled down and my heart will just break because it's my home. 'I know a lot of people have this problem (on) the coast and I sympathise with them because until it happens to you you don't realise the emotion that goes into the fact you're going to lose your home. 'Without any compensation, where do you buy a house with nothing? 'Your home is gone and it's just devastating really.' The house was built in 1928 and had five bedrooms, now four after one was turned into a sitting room for the sea view. 'I just absolutely love it,' said Ms Flick, who is from a farming family. 'It's my home, I know the people, it's a village, we have lots of things going on in the village.' The property is around two miles south of Sizewell, where a new nuclear power station is being built. Ms Flick said that Storm Babet in 2023 'really ravaged' the cliffs. 'It really came with full force and I think that weakened the whole system along because it is sandy and there's no way of making sand stay still,' she said. 'Sand erodes.' The policy in the Shoreline Management Plan – developed by agencies including the Environment Agency and the local authority – for the stretch of coast is of managed realignment. This means measures might be allowed that slow – but do not stop – the erosion. 'We're working with the council and all the other people who are involved in it but it's a job getting them all to meet together and agree together,' said Ms Flick. 'We would have liked to have carried on with rocks as our next door neighbour has but we're not allowed that.' She said it was a 'case now of getting paperwork signed which seems to be taking ages' before they could get permission for gabion defences. 'It's very urgent because most days you see another little bit gone,' Ms Flick said. 'It's the erosion coming underneath that brings the top down. 'My wall that was there is now on the beach.' She continued: 'You just don't know. 'When I draw the curtains in the morning it can be there, when I draw them the next morning another piece can be gone.' Her daughter Ms Paul, a retired retail worker, said: 'Even the low tides now are quite high.' She said that as they would need to fund defences themselves, if permission were granted it would then be 'a question of what's it going to cost, is it possible'. An East Suffolk Council spokesperson said: 'Our key priority is to keep people safe while managing a rapidly eroding coastline at Thorpeness. 'We are supporting affected residents to explore potential temporary, short-term interventions that could be applied within an achievable timescale while plans are explored for any possible longer-term solutions. 'We have been working closely with the community for a number of years and due to recent accelerated rates of erosion the options available are now quite limited.' Defences must accord with the Shoreline Management Plan policy of managed realignment and would only be permitted to slow erosion, the spokesperson said. 'Therefore, it is important to consider alternatives to hard defences, to adapt and become more resilient to the risks of climate change and sea level rise.' The village of Thorpeness was developed as a fantasy holiday resort by a wealthy friend of Peter Pan author JM Barrie. Scottish playwright and barrister Glencairn Stuart Ogilvie had inherited an estate there in 1908, and Thorpeness was officially opened in 1913. Thorpeness, with its large artificial boating lake and Peter Pan-inspired islands, is the earlier of two complete planned resort villages in Britain built before the advent of holiday camps such as Butlin's. The other is Portmeirion in North Wales, designed by Clough Williams-Ellis between 1925 and 1975.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
How could stamp duty and council tax be replaced with new ‘property taxes'?
Plans for a new tax on the sale of homes worth over £500,000 are reportedly being considered by the Treasury, potentially marking a major change to the stamp duty and council tax system. Ahead of the autumn Budget, chancellor Rachel Reeves has asked officials to calculate how a new 'proportional' property tax would work in the UK. The overhaul would see a national property tax replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes, sources told The Guardian. Council tax could also be replaced with a local property tax, helping to boost ailing local authority finances. The plans have reportedly drawn on the findings of a report from centre-right think tank Onward, published in August last year, which lays out criticism of stamp duty and council tax, and steps to replace them. Here's how the plans would change the UK tax landscape: What is stamp duty and how could it change? Under current rules, stamp duty is a levy paid by the buyer of residential property, varying based on the price of the property and whether it is their first purchase. Since April, first-time buyers have had to pay stamp duty when purchasing a home worth up to £300,000 thanks to 'stamp duty relief'. After this they will pay five per cent on the remaining amount, up to £500,000. Anything above this and the relief is voided. For anyone buying a second home, there is no stamp duty paid on the first £125,000, increasing to two per cent up to £250,000, five per cent up to £925,000, ten per cent up to £1.5m, and twelve per cent on everything above that. In 2023/24, the levy brought in £11.6 billion for the government. The speculated change would see this system change, introducing a new tax on the sale of a property when it is worth above £500,000. This levy would be proportionate to the property's value, and paid at a rate set by HMRC. This would be payable by the new owner of the property, only on the amount above £500,000. This would mean the owners of a property worth just over the threshold would pay a 'trivial' amount, Onward's report claims. Could council tax be replaced? Another mulled concept would see council tax replaced with a new local property tax, complimenting the 'national' property tax. It will be a tax on property value paid by the owner, the Onward report explains, and at a rate set by each local authority. This should be levied on values up to a cap of £500,000 in a bid to ensure that richest areas are not able to set far lower rates than those with less valuable properties. This would address a key criticism of the council tax system that how properties are valued is unfair and inaccurate. The 'band' of council tax that all properties pay is based on values last evaluated in 1990s, which have become drastically outdated in many places. The local property tax concept would instead see tax liable on properties based on their value at the last point they were sold, meaning valuation would be regularly updated. However, both of the proposed taxes have been criticised as a tax that will disproportionately hit people living in areas where property prices are higher. The effect would be particularly acute in London says Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, who told The Independent that it would amount to a 'London tax'. He said: 'Rightmove's latest figures for August show that the average price of a property in London is now £666,983. Upping taxes for properties over £500K is not making the wealthy pay their fair share, it's a tax on ordinary Londoners.' No final decisions have been made on the plans, and the government has not commented publicly on their veracity.
