
New charity to address ‘hidden homicides' receives calls within hours of launch
Independent charity The Katie Trust was founded by retired detective sergeant James Brannigan in memory of murdered showjumper Katie Simpson.
It has been supported by her family, who said they believe the demand is there and want to help others going through what they suffered.
Ms Simpson, 21, who was from Tynan, Co Armagh, died in Altnagelvin hospital almost a week after an incident in Gortnessy Meadows, Lettershandoney, on August 3 2020.
Police originally thought she had taken her own life.
It was not until the following year that Jonathan Creswell, the partner of Ms Simpson's sister, was arrested on suspicion of murder.
The trial of 36-year-old Creswell for the murder of Ms Simpson ended in April last year following his sudden death.
Northern Ireland's Police Ombudsman found the initial police investigation was flawed and had failed Ms Simpson's family.
The ombudsman is currently examining another complaint around the case.
Mr Brannigan described the murder investigation as one of the most challenging he ever worked on, and said he believes there are many 'hidden homicides' out there.
He told media in Belfast on Friday that they started to receive inquiries from families just after they launched online on Thursday.
'There are two cases being sent to me as we speak, and the shocking thing these families that I'm trying to help is they were put to me by police officers, and police officers who felt that they could not go internally to get the answers for these families,' he said at the offices of KRW Law in Belfast.
'That is what we have to do as this charity – pose the question to police.
'We're not going to circumvent the role of the ombudsman, that's got to do with the behaviour and conduct of police officers, where no investigation has taken place, we will go in and ask the questions.'
Mr Brannigan described The Katie Trust as having been born from tragedy, and the 'devastating failings that followed in how her case was treated'.
'I've spoken with far too many families who've endured the same pain – where a death is labelled as suicide, accident, or disappearance before the facts are fully known, and where concerns raised by loved ones are too easily dismissed,' he said.
Mr Brannigan said the charity will support families who have lost someone suddenly and feel something is not right, by bringing in specialist investigators, search advisers and family liaison officers to independently examine the circumstances of a death.
'If we find failings, we will act, pushing for further inquiry and accountability, and if no foul play is found, we will give families the peace of mind they deserve,' he said.
'This trust is here to listen when so many have not. It is here to ask the hard questions when others will not, and above all, it is here to stand beside families not in opposition to law enforcement but in service of justice and truth.
'This charity is Katie's legacy, but it will serve every family that needs a voice, a path to answers and the dignity of being heard.'
Two of Ms Simpson's aunts, Paula Mullan and Colleen McConville, said the setting up of the charity 'means so much to us'.
Ms Mullan said they are very proud of Mr Brannigan setting it up.
'It means a lot to us to know that families are going to get help that we didn't get,' she said.
Ms McConville said they do not want other families to go through what they did.
'It was so distressing, we felt so let down. Family members didn't know where to turn, and it felt as if no-one was listening, it was awful,' she said.
'With people reaching out to the trust already, it goes to show, and it's so sad, but there is a demand for it.
'It will be life changing for families, it will really help them.'
Mr Brannigan said at this stage they are self-funding the charity but hope to go on to secure funding from the Department of Justice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Killers must reveal where victims are before they are released, say devastated families
Killers must be locked up for life if they refuse to disclose the location of the body, the families of two high-profile murder victims have said. Relatives of Arlene Fraser, whose husband Nat Fraser has twice been convicted of her murder following her 1998 disappearance in Elgin, spoke of the 'mental torture' they are having to endure because no trace of her has ever been found. The family of Suzanne Pilley, who was murdered in 2010 by her work colleague David Gilroy, who was given a life sentence for murder, also condemned his lack of remorse or rehabilitation as he continues to refuse to disclose the location of her remains. They both welcomed a commitment secured from Justice Secretary Angela Constance that this 'must' be taken into account by the Parole Board when making decisions about release and that this will be delivered before next year's election. But they are now pushing her to go further still and introduce a 'no body no parole' rule which means killers who don't disclose the remains can never be released on parole. Ministers will consider whether to go further on 'Suzanne's Law' as part of a consultation on parole which will be published imminently. Gail Fairgrieve, Suzanne Pilley's sister, said: 'I think that people need to understand, the Parole Board need to understand, that this crime was still continuing. It is perpetrating the crime against us. We are still dealing with this every day. 'Everyday events - you go into a card shop and you can't buy anything for your sister. It's there constantly and he has information that could just put us at ease and bring Suzanne home. 'I feel that this ruling had to consider now that he can't possibly be rehabilitated or show remorse if he is continuing to withhold this information. This information is a full part of his crime and he needs to give us that information, otherwise life imprisonment means life imprisonment.' She added: 'They have to consider it and when they look at all the considerations that the Parole Board look at to release a prisoner, (by) withholding that information from us he is not rehabilitating, there is no remorse, there is nothing.' Carol Gillies, the sister of Arlene Fraser, said: 'I feel that he (Nat Fraser) controlled Arlene when she was alive, and he is controlling her when she's dead as well. 'If the Parole Board can almost give them a choice - tell us more information or stay in jail - so he needs to make a choice, it's his choice what he does.' On the emotional impact of Arlene's body never being discovered, she said: 'It is a form of mental torture for us, it really is. I don't like using dramatic words but it is. He has that information, there is no doubt about it.' The families of the two victims yesterday spoke to journalists at an event organised by Victim Support Scotland following a meeting with Ms Constance. During the talks, Ms Constance gave a firm commitment that an amendment to the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill, which was added at stage two and ensures the Parole Board 'must' take into account when killers don't disclose the location of their victim's remains when making decisions, will be delivered. Choking back tears yesterday, Ms Fairgrieve described the difficulty of family events like birthdays, Christmases and weddings, and went on: 'It's the same with my kids, she had a niece and a nephew... and she wasn't there for it. He denied her that. 'I think I sometimes feel guilty that I have a life. She was only 33 when she was taken. She wouldn't want me to feel guilty, she would want me to live my life. But she has missed out on so much.' Sylvia Pilley, mother of Suzanne: 'I know Suzanne had justice when he was put in prison but her life has been cut short. She really wanted a family and she has never been given that, and we miss her. That's really why we are doing this.' Under current legislation, Gilroy will be eligible to be considered for parole in March 2030, while Nat Fraser - who was found guilty of killing his wife Arlene - will be eligible in October 2028. Describing why the families are fighting to deliver 'Suzanne's Law, Ms Fairgrieve said: 'We may never find where she is, and he may get out of prison and that is something we will have to learn to live with. But we can challenge the rules and the regulations now and we've got people that are committed to changing those. We will just hopefully improve the life for people if it happens to them.' Now the families are pushing alongside Victim Support Scotland for a 'no body no parole' rule to be introduced as part of an upcoming consultation on parole. Ms Fairgrieve said: 'Parole regulations are something that will effect the perpetrators in these cases but we would like to see the law changed initially so that when they come to trial they are well aware that if they never disclose where their remains or a body is there is no chance of parole. That is where the law needs to stand, we need to move towards that.' During yesterday's talks, Ms Constance is said to have pledged to consider the idea, similar to a system currently in place in Australia. Ms Gillies said: 'I think it should happen because when Nat was sentenced Lord Bracadale said 'you instigated this, you instructed this' and he obviously knows what happened: he disposed of Arlene in a very ruthless, efficient way. To just have Nat Fraser in front of the Parole Board and all they are considering is the risk or how he behaved in jail is just not enough. 'If he was to get out then it would be gone forever.' Ms Constance said: 'I am grateful to the families of Suzanne Pilley and Arlene Fraser for meeting with me today. They have suffered heartbreaking losses, compounded by not knowing the final resting place of their loved ones. My deepest sympathies remain with them. 'In March, I supported an amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform Bill that will mean the Parole Board, when making decisions about release, must take account of whether a prisoner has information about the disposal of a victim's remains, but has not disclosed it. 'At today's meeting, I reiterated my firm commitment to this change, which will become law if the Bill is passed in Parliament.'


BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
Coleraine: Three people escape injury in petrol bomb attack
The police are appealing for information after a petrol bomb was thrown through the window of a house in Coleraine, County incident happened on Maple Drive at about 01:30 BST on Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said three people were in the house at the time and managed to extinguish the fire."Thankfully, no one was injured as a result of the incident," said Det Sgt Higgins. "Enquiries to establish the circumstances of the report are underway, and we would appeal to anyone who has any information which could assist us, to get in touch," he added.


Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prince Harry attacks his former charity for invoking memory of Diana
The chairman of the Duke of Sussex's former charity has been accused of acting in the 'poorest possible taste' over a reference to his late mother. Sophie Chandauka vowed to honour the founding mission of the charity Sentebale in memory of Diana, Princess of Wales, after the Charity Commission ruled on Wednesday she could stay in post following a clash which forced the Duke and other trustees to resign. Allies of Prince Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, condemned her actions, saying his 'life's work' had been destroyed by her 'hostile takeover' of the charity, which they said had been her intention from the start. The Charity Commission issued a report on Wednesday into events at Sentebale, whose mission is to help children with HIV/Aids in Lesotho and Botswana. The Duke and other trustees, including co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, resigned en masse in March after accusing Ms Chandauka of mismanagement and calling on her to step down. She then claimed to have been a victim of bullying, harassment and misogynoir – discrimination against black women. On Wednesday, she said that the public spat had caused 'incalculable damage' to the charity and laid the blame on 'the unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned'.