March Madness expansion to 72 or 76 teams floated; change could come as soon as next season
'The still viable outcomes include the tournaments remaining at 68 teams or expanding the fields to either 72 or 76 teams in advance of the 2026 or 2027 championships," Dan Gavitt, the NCAA senior vice president of basketball, said in a statement Thursday.
The idea of expanding the tournament picked up steam in the spring when NCAA President Charlie Baker said it could add value and that he'd like to see the issue resolved in the next few months.
He said the NCAA has had 'good conversations' with TV partners CBS and Warner Bros., whose deal runs through 2032 at the cost of around $1.1 billion a year. Baker also mentioned increasingly difficult logistics involved with adding teams to what is now known as the 'First Four' — a series of four games played on Tuesday and Wednesday of the first week to place four teams into the 64-team bracket.
Though there has been no concrete plan for how expansion would work, speculation has centered on bringing more at-large teams, likely from major conferences, into the 64-team bracket. Such a move that would come at the expense of champions of lower-level conferences.
Currently, two of the First Four games involve 16 seeds — teams that automatically qualify by winning lower-ranked conferences — while two more involve at-large teams often seeded 11 or 12. For instance, in 2021, UCLA made the Final Four as an 11 seed that also played in the First Four.
'I don't accept that that model just continues in the future,' Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey said at league meetings in May.
He used the example of North Carolina State advancing to the Final Four as an 11 seed in 2023 as how bubble teams from big conferences can make long runs in the tournament.
'You could go ask my colleagues in the (automatic qualifier) conferences what should happen, and I'm certain they want that split to continue for life,' Sankey said. 'But you've got some really, really good teams ... that I think should be moved into the tournament.'
Any recommendation for expansion would have to be approved by the NCAA's Division I board, which next meets in August.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
11 minutes ago
- Associated Press
NCAA informs Michigan ruling on sign-stealing investigation will be released Friday, AP source says
ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — The NCAA has informed Michigan that the organization will announce the results of its sign-stealing investigation on Friday, a person familiar with the situation told The Associated Press. The person spoke Thursday on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to share the details. The NCAA alleged last year in a notice that current coach Sherrone Moore violated rules as an assistant under former coach Jim Harbaugh, who served a three-game suspension in exchange for the Big Ten dropping its investigation into the allegations after the two ended up in court. Moore also was accused of deleting text messages with sign-stealer Connor Stalions before they were recovered and provided to the NCAA. Moore has previously said he has and will continue to cooperate with the NCAA's investigation, but recently declined to say much about the issue looming over the college football program with the most victories. 'Today, not tomorrow, that's all I'm worried about,' he said on Monday. The NCAA investigation surfaced early in the 2023 season amid allegations that Michigan used a robust in-person scouting and sign-stealing operation conducted by Stalions, a former a low-level staffer. He was suspended by the school and later resigned. Stalions, who did not participate in the NCAA investigation, recently said he knew almost every signal opponents used in seven games over two seasons. Michigan has been prepared to suspend Moore for two games during the coming season as part of self-imposed sanctions. The NCAA will announce soon whether that punishment is enough to address allegations that Moore failed to cooperate in an investigation. Big Ten Commissioner Tony Petitti sent a letter to the NCAA Committee on Infractions last month, suggesting that Michigan's football program should not face more sanctions related to the sign-stealing saga. After winning the 2023 national championship, Harbaugh left to coach the Los Angeles Chargers. The Wolverines open the season on Aug. 30 at home against New Mexico State and then play at Oklahoma, where Moore was an offensive lineman, on Sept. 6. Harbaugh was suspended by the Big Ten, three weeks after an investigation by the NCAA into the allegations began. Hours later, Michigan asked a court for an injunction and temporary restraining order and the two sides narrowly avoided a court hearing. Harbaugh has repeatedly denied any involvement in Stalions' apparent scheme. The NCAA does not have rules against stealing signs, but does prohibit schools from sending scouts to the games of future opponents and using electronic equipment to record another team's signals. Multiple Big Ten schools had records showing ticket purchases under Stalions' name and video surveillance footage of people in those seats with cell phones pointed toward the field. Big Ten coaches and athletic directors previously pushed Petitti to punish Harbaugh before the NCAA concluded its investigation. When the Big Ten did suspend Harbaugh, Michigan claimed the commissioner overstepped his authority and acted outside the conference's bylaws. Athletic director Warde Manuel released a scathing statement just before Michigan kicked off at Penn State and won 24-15 without Harbaugh on the sideline. The NCAA previously put Michigan on three years of probation, fined the school and implemented recruiting limits after reaching a negotiated resolution in a recruiting case and banned Harbaugh from coaching college football for four years. ___ AP college football: and
Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
Breaking Down The Top 20 College Football Stars' 2025 NIL Tax Bills
The 2025 college football season is upon us, with the University of Texas as the pre-season top-ranked team according to the AP rankings. As documented by Opendorse, the money that college athletes earn from their Name, Image, and Likeness last year has eclipsed $1.6 billion with 'no signs of slowing down'. However, with big earnings comes big tax bills. This article highlights the 20 college football players with the most lucrative NIL valuations and breaks down what these athletes can expect to pay in taxes in 2025. The Taxation Of NIL Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in O'Bannon vs. NCAA, college athletes were permitted to earn money related to their NIL. This decision led to the NCAA implementing rules that went into effect, paving the way for athletes to do this without sacrificing their eligibility to play collegiate sports. Athletes are now deriving income from many sources. For instance, athletes are now permitted to serve as spokespeople for companies by appearing in commercials, much like quarterbacks Arch Manning and Garrett Nussmeier, who recently appeared in a commercial for the restaurant chain Raising Cane's, according to SI. Other income can be derived through the receipt of intangible benefits, such as a free car lease. In fact, CBSSports reported that the entire University of Utah's men's and women's basketball team and the gymnastics team all received complementary leased vehicles for the 2023-24 season. However, what most commonly generates NIL income is the simple name recognition of the athlete through signing autographs, making appearances, or selling personally licensed apparel. Like any other source of income, income derived from NIL is subject to taxation. As these deals are becoming increasingly lucrative, athletes earning NIL income are now facing significant tax bills. Top 20 College Football NIL Valuations In 2025 On3 provides an algorithm that estimates an athlete's NIL valuation. Of note, this is not an exact amount as NIL deals are typically not disclosed publicly. However, their valuations provide a baseline estimation for what some of the top college athletes can expect to earn over the next 12 months. Below is a table that outlines On3's top 20 highest college football NIL valuations for 2025. On3 provides the data on the name, team, position, and NIL valuation. Using this NIL valuation, one can calculate the federal income tax, state income tax, and total tax owed. Notably, in this table NIL valuations are treated as taxable income, meaning they do not factor in any possible deductions for business expenses or personal deductions (for example, the standard or itemized deduction). The calculations treat all athletes as single taxpayers with no dependents. Finally, the calculated taxes owed pertain only to income taxes, excluding property, sales, and jock taxes. Quarterbacks Lead The Way With High NIL Valuations And High Tax Bills It is no surprise that the player with the top NIL valuation in 2025 is none other than Arch Manning, quarterback for the pre-season top-ranked University of Texas Longhorns. Even if one is not familiar with this athlete, the name likely rings a bell, as Manning is the grandson of legendary quarterback Archie Manning and the nephew of Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks Peyton and Eli Manning. Manning's $6.8 million NIL valuation is over 50% higher than Carson Beck (quarterback for the University of Miami), and their valuation aligns with paying federal income taxes of $2,474,186 and $1,549186, respectively. What is somewhat unique about these two athletes is that they pay no state income tax. In total, nine U.S. states do not levy taxes: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming. Thus, high-NIL-earning athletes in these states will pay income taxes to the U.S. and not their own state. This same notion applies to Josh Hoover (TCU quarterback and number 14 on the list). As I previously reported in Forbes, the ability to not pay state income taxes on NIL earnings can result in significant tax savings, as many athletes on this top 20 list must pay six figures annually to their state. The First Year Of Arkansas Exempting NIL From State Income Tax Taylen Green (Arkansas quarterback and number 18 on the list) also does not pay taxes to his state in 2025. The reason for this is that, in 2025, Arkansas became the first state to levy a tax on income to pass a law that exempts tax on NIL earnings. As I reported in Forbes, many schools have felt that their state income tax laws put them at a disadvantage when recruiting talent compared to schools in states without an income tax, leading to pressure on the state legislature, and, ultimately, the passage of this novel tax law. While Arkansas is the first state to pass such a law, they were not alone in considering such a change. Other states, such as Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and North Carolina, also considered such legislation. For athletes like Garrett Nussmeier (LSU quarterback and number 4 of the list), Ryan Williams (Alabama wide receiver and number 13 on the list), CJ Bailey (NC State quarterback and number 16 on the list), and Jackson Arnold (Auburn quarterback and number 20 on the list), their state not passing a similar law to Arkansas this year impacts their estimated tax liability close to or above six figures. Nico Iamaleava's Curious NIL Tax Liability Increase UCLA quarterback Nico Iamaleava checks in at number 19 on the list of the top NIL valuation football players for the 2025 season. Despite being toward the bottom of the list, he has the highest state income taxes owed, with $237,394 expected to be levied against the state of California based on his $2 million NIL valuation. The reason for this is that California has the highest statutory state tax rate in the U.S., where the state taxes income over $1 million at a staggering rate of 13.3%. To put Iamaleava's tax liability into context, his NIL valuation suggests he will pay more in taxes with an expected $935,580 in 2025 than Hoover ($846,186) and Caleb Downs ($928,720, Ohio State safety and number 15 on the list), despite having a $400 thousand lower NIL valuation than either other the other two athletes. What makes Iamaleava's situation even more curious is that he transferred this past offseason from the University of Tennessee to UCLA. The state of Tennessee does not levy an income tax. Assuming his NIL valuation did not change, this means that the $237,394 in taxes he will now owe to the state of California are all incremental taxes.
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former NCAA runner demands records taken by trans athlete be restored
Former NCAA runner Caroline Hill joins 'America's Newsroom' to discuss her fight to have her records, broken by a transgender athlete, restored in her name.
