10 Grok 4 Key Insights : Future of AI or Just Another Overhyped Tech?
In this breakdown, AI Explained explore 10 key insights about Grok 4 that every AI enthusiast, professional, or curious observer should know. From its standout features like advanced natural language processing to its limitations in real-world applications, this guide will help you navigate the model's potential—and its pitfalls. You'll also discover how Grok 4 stacks up against competitors like Gemini Pro and GPT-4, and why its steep price tag might not be for everyone. Whether you're here to evaluate its utility for your workflow or simply intrigued by its societal impact, this exploration will leave you with a deeper understanding of where AI is headed—and what it means for all of us. Grok 4 Overview Setting a New Benchmark in Performance
Grok 4 has redefined performance standards by excelling in academic benchmarks, surpassing competitors such as OpenAI and Google in areas like high school-level math, science, and coding tasks. Its notable achievement in the ARK AGI2 test—a rigorous evaluation of abstract problem-solving—demonstrates its ability to tackle complex intellectual challenges. Additionally, Grok 4's proficiency in text-based processing makes it an invaluable tool for tasks such as document analysis, content generation, and natural language understanding.
Despite these advancements, Grok 4 is not without its limitations. The model struggles with visual benchmarks and spatial reasoning, which restrict its application in fields like robotics, design, and other areas requiring advanced visual comprehension. These shortcomings highlight the uneven nature of its capabilities, making it essential to assess its suitability for specific use cases before adoption. Capabilities and Real-World Limitations
While Grok 4 demonstrates impressive academic and computational abilities, its performance in real-world scenarios reveals several challenges. The model is prone to hallucinations, occasionally generating inaccurate or nonsensical outputs, which can undermine its reliability in critical applications. Additionally, its slower response times and limited spatial reasoning capabilities further hinder its practical usability in dynamic environments.
These limitations underscore the gap between theoretical performance and real-world functionality. For users, this means carefully evaluating the model's strengths and weaknesses to determine its effectiveness in addressing specific needs. Grok 4's potential is significant, but its limitations must be factored into any decision to integrate it into workflows or projects. Grok 4 : 10 New Things to Know
Watch this video on YouTube.
Advance your skills in Grok by reading more of our detailed content. Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems: A Unique Feature
One of Grok 4's most innovative features is its use of collaborative multi-agent systems, a design that enables multiple AI agents to work together to solve complex problems. This approach enhances the model's performance in tasks requiring coordination and advanced problem-solving. For instance, Grok 4 Heavy, a specialized version of the model, uses this system to tackle intricate challenges more effectively.
However, the benefits of this feature are highly task-dependent. While collaborative multi-agent systems can significantly improve performance in certain scenarios, they may not always provide a clear advantage in simpler or more straightforward tasks. As a user, understanding the specific contexts in which this feature excels is crucial to maximizing its utility. Cost vs. Value: Pricing and Alternatives
Grok 4's advanced capabilities come at a premium price, with a subscription cost of $300 per month or $3,000 annually. This positions it as a high-cost option compared to alternatives like Gemini Pro, which offers comparable functionalities for just $20 per month. For users, this stark price difference raises important questions about cost-effectiveness and value.
When considering Grok 4, it is essential to weigh its unique features and performance advantages against its cost. While its capabilities may justify the expense for certain high-demand applications, more budget-conscious users may find alternatives like Gemini Pro to be a more practical choice. The decision ultimately depends on your specific needs, priorities, and budget constraints. Ethical and Environmental Considerations
The ethical implications of Grok 4's outputs are a critical area of concern. The model's responses can sometimes reflect political biases or generate content that may be inappropriate in sensitive contexts. This raises questions about its reliability and the potential consequences of its deployment in areas requiring impartiality and accuracy.
Additionally, Grok 4's high operational costs, driven by its reliance on GPU-intensive computations, contribute to a significant environmental footprint. The energy demands associated with running such advanced AI models highlight the broader challenges of balancing technological innovation with environmental sustainability. For users, these considerations are an important part of evaluating the model's overall impact and suitability. Future Developments and Competitive Landscape
The AI industry is advancing rapidly, with Grok 5 and other next-generation models already in development. Competitors like Gemini 3 and GPT-5 are also on the horizon, promising enhanced features and improved performance. This dynamic landscape offers users an expanding range of options, making it essential to stay informed about emerging technologies and their implications.
For users, the arrival of new models underscores the importance of adaptability and continuous learning. As the competitive landscape evolves, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each model will be key to making informed decisions about which tools best meet your needs. Applications and Societal Impact
Grok 4 has the potential to transform workflows and enhance productivity across a variety of fields. Its strengths in data analysis, content creation, and natural language processing make it a valuable tool for professionals in industries ranging from education to business. However, its limitations, such as hallucinations and slower response times, mean it is unlikely to drive new scientific discoveries or transform industries on its own.
The model's integration with X (formerly Twitter) also raises important questions about data reliance and the challenges of managing spam and bot-generated content. These issues highlight the broader societal implications of AI adoption and the need for responsible management of its capabilities. AI Safety: A Critical Concern
The potential misuse of Grok 4 underscores the importance of robust AI safety measures. Elon Musk's remarks on the uncertain impact of AI on humanity emphasize the need for ethical development and responsible use of these technologies. For users, staying informed about AI safety concerns is essential to navigating the risks and benefits of adoption effectively.
As AI continues to evolve, fostering a culture of responsibility and accountability will be critical to making sure that its benefits are maximized while minimizing potential harm. Grok 4 serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing innovation with ethical considerations in the pursuit of technological progress.
Media Credit: AI Explained Filed Under: AI, Guides
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘You can make really good stuff – fast': new AI tools a gamechanger for film-makers
A US stealth bomber flies across a darkening sky towards Iran. Meanwhile, in Tehran a solitary woman feeds stray cats amid rubble from recent Israeli airstrikes. To the uninitiated viewer, this could be a cinematic retelling of a geopolitical crisis that unfolded barely weeks ago – hastily shot on location, somewhere in the Middle East. However, despite its polished production look, it wasn't shot anywhere, there is no location, and the woman feeding stray cats is no actor – she doesn't exist. The engrossing footage is the 'rough cut' of a 12-minute short film about last month's US attack on Iranian nuclear sites, made by the directors Samir Mallal and Bouha Kazmi. It is also made entirely by artificial intelligence. The clip is based on a detail the film-makers read in news coverage of the US bombings – a woman who walked the empty streets of Tehran feeding stray cats. Armed with the information, they have been able to make a sequence that looks as if it could have been created by a Hollywood director. The impressive speed and, for some, worrying ease with which films of this kind can be made has not been lost on broadcasting experts. Last week Richard Osman, the TV producer and bestselling author, said that an era of entertainment industry history had ended and a new one had begun – all because Google has released a new AI video making tool used by Mallal and others. 'So I saw this thing and I thought, 'well, OK that's the end of one part of entertainment history and the beginning of another',' he said on The Rest is Entertainment podcast. Osman added: 'TikTok, ads, trailers – anything like that – I will say will be majority AI-assisted by 2027.' For Mallal, an award-winning London-based documentary maker who has made adverts for Samsung and Coca-Cola, AI has provided him with a new format – 'cinematic news'. The Tehran film, called Midnight Drop, is a follow-up to Spiders in the Sky, a recreation of a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian bombers in June. Within two weeks, Mallal, who directed Spiders in the Sky on his own, was able to make a film about the Ukraine attack that would have cost millions – and would have taken at least two years including development – to make pre-AI. 'Using AI, it should be possible to make things that we've never seen before,' he said. 'We've never seen a cinematic news piece before turned around in two weeks. We've never seen a thriller based on the news made in two weeks.' Spiders in the Sky was largely made with Veo3, an AI video generation model developed by Google, and other AI tools. The voiceover, script and music were not created by AI, although ChatGPT helped Mallal edit a lengthy interview with a drone operator that formed the film's narrative spine. Google's film-making tool, Flow, is powered by Veo3. It also creates speech, sound effects and background noise. Since its release in May, the impact of the tool on YouTube – also owned by Google – and social media in general has been marked. As Marina Hyde, Osman's podcast partner, said last week: 'The proliferation is extraordinary.' Quite a lot of it is 'slop' – the term for AI-generated nonsense – although the Olympic diving dogs have a compelling quality. Mallal and Kazmi aim to complete the film, which will intercut the Iranian's story with the stealth bomber mission and will be six times the length of Spider's two minutes, in August. It is being made by a mix of models including Veo3, OpenAI's Sora and Midjourney. 'I'm trying to prove a point,' says Mallal. 'Which is that you can make really good stuff at a high level – but fast, at the speed of culture. Hollywood, especially, moves incredibly slowly.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion He adds: 'The creative process is all about making bad stuff to get to the good stuff. We have the best bad ideas faster. But the process is accelerated with AI.' Mallal and Kazmi also recently made Atlas, Interrupted, a short film about the 3I/Atlas comet, another recent news event, that has appeared on the BBC. David Jones, the chief executive of Brandtech Group, an advertising startup using generative AI – the term for tools such as chatbots and video generators – to create marketing campaigns, says the advertising world is about to undergo a revolution due to models such as Veo3. 'Today, less than 1% of all brand content is created using gen AI. It will be 100% that is fully or partly created using gen AI,' he says. Netflix also revealed last week that it used AI in one of its TV shows for the first time. However, in the background of this latest surge in AI-spurred creativity lies the issue of copyright. In the UK, the creative industries are furious about government proposals to let models be trained on copyright-protected work without seeking the owner's permission – unless the owner opts out of the process. Mallal says he wants to see a 'broadly accessible and easy-to-use programme where artists are compensated for their work'. Beeban Kidron, a cross-bench peer and leading campaigner against the government proposals, says AI film-making tools are 'fantastic' but 'at what point are they going to realise that these tools are literally built on the work of creators?' She adds: 'Creators need equity in the new system or we lose something precious.' YouTube says its terms and conditions allow Google to use creators' work for making AI models – and denies that all of YouTube's inventory has been used to train its models. Mallal calls his use of AI to make films 'prompt craft', a phrase that uses the term for giving instructions to AI systems. When making the Ukraine film, he says he was amazed at how quickly a camera angle or lighting tone could be adjusted with a few taps on a keyboard. 'I'm deep into AI. I've learned how to prompt engineer. I've learned how to translate my skills as a director into prompting. But I've never produced anything creative from that. Then Veo3 comes out, and I said, 'OK, finally, we're here.''
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iOS 26 Beta 4 is Coming: What To Expect!
Apple is preparing to launch iOS 26 Beta 4, bringing a host of new features, performance upgrades, and design refinements to its ecosystem. This update is designed to provide a more stable and polished experience, making it ideal for developers and early adopters eager to explore the latest advancements. Among the key improvements are smarter eSIM functionality, enhanced AirPods integration, streamlined app interfaces, and notable enhancements in battery performance. These updates reflect Apple's commitment to delivering a seamless and efficient user experience. The video below from iReviews gives us more details on what to expect from iOS 26 beta 4. Watch this video on YouTube. eSIM Enhancements: Smarter and More Adaptive iOS 26 Beta 4 introduces advanced eSIM capabilities that simplify connectivity for users. The system now automatically switches between your primary SIM and travel eSIMs based on your geographic location, eliminating the need for manual adjustments. This feature is particularly beneficial for frequent travelers, making sure uninterrupted connectivity without the hassle of toggling settings. Additionally, Siri plays a proactive role by offering suggestions such as allowing roaming or purchasing travel eSIMs when it detects upcoming travel plans in your calendar or email. These updates make staying connected while traveling more intuitive and hassle-free. AirPods Updates: Greater Convenience and Control AirPods users will benefit from several practical updates in iOS 26 Beta 4. Pop-up notifications now remind you to charge your AirPods and alert you when media playback pauses during sleep, enhancing convenience. A standout feature introduced at WWDC 2025 allows users to control their iPhone camera hands-free using AirPods, making it easier to capture photos or videos without touching the device. These updates not only improve the functionality of AirPods but also strengthen their integration with other Apple devices, creating a more cohesive and seamless user experience. App Interface Changes: Cleaner Navigation The app interface in iOS 26 Beta 4 has been refined to improve usability and efficiency. Swipe actions now feature clearer button labels, making navigation more intuitive and user-friendly. For Apple Watch users, new cellular data icons have been introduced to indicate apps that rely solely on cellular connectivity, providing greater clarity when managing app usage. These subtle yet impactful changes are designed to streamline your interactions with apps, making sure a smoother and more efficient experience in everyday tasks. Battery Performance: Longer Life, Cooler Devices Battery performance receives a significant boost in iOS 26 Beta 4, addressing one of the most common concerns among users. Devices running this beta demonstrate noticeably longer battery life compared to earlier versions, allowing for extended usage without frequent recharging. Additionally, Apple has focused on reducing device heating during prolonged use, making sure a more comfortable experience even during intensive tasks. These improvements highlight Apple's dedication to energy efficiency and thermal management, paving the way for a more reliable and user-friendly experience. Liquid Glass Design: Polished Aesthetics Apple's signature liquid glass design has been subtly refined in iOS 26 Beta 4, enhancing the overall visual appeal of the interface. These updates, while understated, contribute to a more polished and cohesive aesthetic that aligns with Apple's design philosophy. By blending functionality with aesthetics, Apple ensures that the interface remains both practical and visually engaging, offering users a premium experience. Release Timeline: When to Expect It The release of iOS 26 Beta 4 is scheduled for July 21, 2025, with the first public beta expected to follow shortly after, on July 22 or 23. Both versions will include the same features and improvements, providing a consistent level of stability and functionality. For users who prefer to remain on earlier versions, Apple is also preparing to release iOS 18.6 RC, with a public rollout anticipated in the coming weeks. This dual release strategy ensures that users across different devices and preferences can benefit from Apple's latest advancements. What This Means for You The arrival of iOS 26 Beta 4 represents a significant milestone in Apple's software development cycle. With enhancements in connectivity, device integration, interface design, and performance, this update lays the foundation for a more seamless and efficient user experience. By exploring these new features, you gain early access to the future of Apple's ecosystem, showcasing its commitment to innovation and user-centric design. Whether you're a developer testing compatibility or an early adopter eager to experience the latest advancements, iOS 26 Beta 4 offers a glimpse into the evolving capabilities of Apple's technology. Find more information on iOS 26 Beta by browsing our extensive range of articles, guides and tutorials. Source & Image Credit: iReviews Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘A disaster for all of us': US scientists describe impact of Trump cuts
'Our ability to respond to climate change, the biggest existential threat facing humanity, is totally adrift,' said Sally Johnson, an Earth scientist who has spent the past two decades helping collect, store and distribute data at Nasa (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and Noaa (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). Donald Trump's assault on science – but particularly climate science – has led to unprecedented funding cuts and staff layoffs across federally funded agencies and programs, threatening to derail research tackling the most pressing issues facing Americans and humanity more broadly. A generation of scientific talent is also on the brink of being lost, with unprecedented political interference at what were previously evidence-driven agencies jeopardizing the future of US industries and economic growth. Johnson was among scores of scientists conducting vital research across a range of fields from infectious diseases, robotics, education, computer science and the climate crisis, who responded to a Guardian online callout to share their experiences about the impact of the Trump administration's cuts to science funding. Many said they had already had funding slashed or programs terminated, while others fear that cuts are inevitable and are beginning to search for alternative work – either overseas or outside science. So far, the cuts have led to a 60% reduction in Johnson's team, and fear is mounting over the future of 30 years of climate data and expertise as communities across the country are battered by increasingly destructive extreme weather events. 'We won't be able to afford to continue providing the free and quality tools and services to make our data stores searchable, viewable, usable, and accessible. We might not even be able to afford to keep all the data … this will mean worse forecasts and less effective search and rescue responses leading to unnecessary and avoidable loss of life,' said Johnson (not her real name). Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Obbba) calls for a 56% cut to the current $9bn National Science Foundation (NSF) budget, as well as a 73% reduction in staff and fellowships – with graduate students among the hardest hit. The NSF is the premier federal investor in basic science and engineering, and more than 1,650 grants have also been terminated, according to Grant Watch, a non-profit tracking federally funded research grants under the Trump administration. At the behest of Trump, the hardest hit are studies aimed at addressing the unequal impact of the climate crisis and other environmental hazards, as well as any projects perceived to have a connection to diversity, equity or inclusion (DEI). An anthropologist who researches the impact of floods and cyclones on public health and food supplies in Madagascar, which is among the most vulnerable nations in the world to the climate crisis but contributed virtually nothing to the catastrophe, is leaving Johns Hopkins for Oxford University after funding for the remainder of her fellowship was threatened. 'I am devastated to leave family, friends and the grad students I am mentoring in the US, but this seemed like the only way to continue work I've been pursuing for 10+ years. I am working on improving climate mitigation and adaptation in an African country. After Trump was elected, the writing was on the wall. There is no way I can write grant applications that will be acceptable to this government.' A veteran infectious diseases researcher at Ohio State University was forced to abandon a clinical trial for a new medication to treat hypoxemic respiratory failure in Covid patients after the National Institute of Health (NIH) terminated funding midway through the study. The decision will save $500,000, but $1.5m had already been spent on the trial which researchers hoped would lead to new treatment options for the million or so people hospitalized with respiratory failure each year as a result of flu, Covid and other infections. The trial would have to be repeated from the start, in order to seek approval from the FDA. 'This is a disaster for all of us. We're all depressed and living on a knife-edge, because we know we could lose the rest of our grants any day. These people really hate us yet all we've done is work hard to make people's health better. A flu pandemic is coming for us, what's happening in cattle is truly scary and all we have is oxygen and hope for people,' said the Ohio scientist. Between 90 and 95% of their lab work is funded through the NIH. So far, more than 3,500 grants have been terminated or frozen by the NIH. Trump's budget proposes slashing NIH funding by more than 40%. The majority of scientists who got in touch described feeling anxious and despondent – about their own work if the cuts continue, but also about what seems an inevitable loss of talent and knowledge which could upend the US position as a global leader in scientific endeavors and ricochet for years to come. The brain drain is real. The Australian Academy of Science is leading the country's efforts to proactively recruit top US-based scientists, creating a new global talent program that includes research funding, access to Australian research infrastructure, fast-track visas and a relocation package. At least 75 scientists applied in the first three months of the program, the AAS told the Guardian. The Trump administration has accused universities, without evidence, of promoting leftwing radical thinking and research, but federal funds train scientists who go on to work for the oil and gas, mining, chemical, big tech and other industries. Several respondents said the private sector was also starting to feel the knock-on effect of Trump's cuts and tariffs. Wessel van den Bergh, a materials scientist with a PhD, was working on battery storage technology for a Chinese-owned renewable energy company in Massachusetts. He was laid off in early June amid Trump's tariff chaos and attacks on science and renewables, and is struggling to find work. 'When I started my PhD program, America was at the leading edge of batteries/energy storage but this is no longer true due to tariffs, funding cuts, and aggression towards green alternatives. Rather, the US has ceded its hard-earned expertise to other countries such as Korea, Japan and China,' Van den Bergh said. Trump supports the expansion of fossil fuels and has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the oil, gas and coal industry, while his budget legislation terminated incentives for solar and wind energy. 'It's crushing, I don't see a clear path ahead any more. I no longer feel this country values science. It's genuinely heartbreaking to build your vocation to something that could genuinely benefit the world for it to be quashed for imagined political victories … especially at a time where these kinds of technologies are the only way out of the climate crisis,' said Van den Bergh. Separately, the Nuclear Physics Laboratory (NPL) at the University of Illinois got in touch after the Guardian's recent investigation into the chaos at the NSF. For almost 100 years the NPL has been at the forefront of cutting-edge science in drug discovery, cancer treatments, PET scans and other medical diagnoses, and semiconductor testing, with researchers playing a key role in world-renowned institutions like Cern and Los Alamos. It's a major hub for nurturing and training future talent, and at least 50 students have graduated with PhDs in the past 20 years. It was here that Rosalind Yalow got her PhD in nuclear physics in 1945, and then went on to invent radioimmunoassay – a technique to detect minute amounts of hormones, viruses and drugs in the blood which revolutionized medical testing for conditions such as diabetes. Yalow was awarded the Nobel prize in 1977, only the second woman to win it. The lab was recently informed that the NSF will reduce funding that supports graduates students from $15m for four years to $1m for one year. 'Our group in nuclear physics at Illinois actually predates the founding of the NSF in 1950, and we have a long history of both producing scientists and accelerator technologies that have had an impact on huge numbers of people,' said Anne M Sickles, professor of nuclear physics. 'If you cut the funding to the people who are doing the work right now, you don't know what they would have innovated in 10 years or 15 years or 32 years like Rosalind Yalow. We don't know what we're losing.' The NFS declined to comment, while the office of management and budget and NIH did not respond.
