"Big, beautiful bill" gives ICE unprecedented funds to ramp up deportations
The money allocated by the law amounts to the largest infusion of funds Congress has given the federal government for immigration enforcement, at a time when the Trump administration has vowed to oversee a deportation campaign of unprecedented proportions.
Overall, the Republican-led Congress set aside roughly $170 billion for immigration enforcement and border security efforts through the legislation, including $75 billion in extra funding for ICE, making it by far the highest-funded law enforcement agency in the federal government.
"The bill will supercharge immigration enforcement," said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, an attorney at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C.
Here's a look at what the new funds will be used for:
$45 billion for ICE's detention system
The law gives ICE $45 billion to expand its already sprawling detention system over the next four years, letting officials use the money to hold both single adults and families with children facing deportation.
Based on cost estimates, the money could allow ICE to hold more than 100,000 detainees at any given time, roughly doubling the current capacity. On Wednesday morning, ICE was holding just over 58,000 individuals in its detention network, which was previously funded for 41,500 beds, according to internal agency data obtained by CBS News.
ICE's detention network mainly consists of facilities operated by for-profit prison companies and county jails. The Trump administration has also been exploring using military facilities in the U.S. to hold detainees before they are deported. The naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been housing some ICE detainees since February.
$30 billion for ICE's arrest and deportation efforts
ICE is also receiving nearly $30 million in additional money to fund every single stage of the deportation process.
Congress said ICE can use the money to hire additional deportation officers and other staff; retain current personnel through bonuses; increase transportation assets supporting deportation efforts; and expand and facilitate agreements that allow state and local officials to enforce federal immigration laws.
The funds can also be used to modernize ICE's fleet of deportation planes and hire more agency prosecutors whose job it is to persuade immigration judges that unauthorized immigrants should be deported.
The Department of Homeland Security has said the money could pave the way for ICE to hire 10,000 deportation officers. The agency currently has fewer than 6,000 officers in its deportation branch, though the Trump administration has tasked other federal law enforcement agencies, like the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration, to support immigration arrests throughout the country.
Tens of billions of dollars for other immigration and border efforts
The "big, beautiful bill" allocates tens of billions of dollars for other types of immigration-related enforcement, including along the U.S.-Mexico border.
More than $46 billion is allocated for Customs and Border Protection to build walls, barriers and related projects along the U.S.-Mexico border. The agency received an additional $12 billion to fund Border Patrol agent vehicles, facilities, training, hiring and bonuses.
While the money is allocated for CBP, the Trump administration has been using hundreds of Border Patrol agents in the interior of the country to help ICE arrest unauthorized immigrants in places like Los Angeles. That deployment has come amid historically low levels of illegal crossings at the U.S. southern border.
The law also gives the Department of Homeland Security a catch-all pool of $10 billion to support its "mission to safeguard the borders of the United States." Another $13.5 billion was set aside to reimburse states for their immigration enforcement and border security actions, including for efforts under the Biden administration.
That money for states could allow Texas to be paid back for Operation Lone Star, under which the state deployed National Guardsmen to fortify the southern border and bussed thousands of migrants to Democratic-led cities. It could also fund actions taken by states like Florida to aid the Trump administration's deportation campaign by deputizing state officials as immigration agents and offering facilities, like the so-called "Alligator Alcatraz," to hold detainees awaiting deportation.
ICE heads hails funds; but critics have concerns
In a statement, Todd Lyons, the acting director of ICE, hailed passage of the "big, beautiful bill."
"The unprecedented funding for ICE will enable my hard-working officers and agents to continue making America safe again by identifying, arresting and removing criminal aliens from our communities," Lyons said.
But critics of the administration have denounced Republican lawmakers for giving billions of dollars to an agency under fire in many parts of the country over concerns that its enforcement operations have been too aggressive and indiscriminate.
Andrea Flores, a former Biden administration immigration official, warned that money given to ICE would lead to dire humanitarian, legal and economic consequences, including "inhumane" conditions at detention facilities.
"The administration now has the resources it needs to carry out more deportations than we have ever seen in modern history," said Flores, who now serves as a vice president at FWD.US, a group that supports liberal immigration policies.
Sneak peek: Who Killed Aileen Seiden in Room 15?
Social media content creator shows his hustle
Everything we know so far about the deadly Texas floods
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors
Tesla investors have had a rough go in 2025, with a stock price that's down by more than one-fifth year-to-date and a major slump in global electric vehicle sales. I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: Learn More: Now, the Elon Musk-led company faces more grim news in the form of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' spending bill, which was signed into law on July 4th. Among other things, the bill will bring an end to federal tax credits on certain EVs. Here are three ways the bill could hit Tesla investors. Tax Credits Will End Federal tax incentives played a big role in boosting Tesla's EV sales in recent years, but those incentives will soon come to an end. Because of Trump's bill, buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on Tesla EVs before they're terminated, CBS News reported. Before the bill passed, new EVs came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, while used EVs came with credits of up to $4,000. The idea behind the credits was to make EVs more affordable. That's important, because the average purchase price of a new EV is about $9,000 higher in the U.S. than the average new gas-powered car, according to Kelley Blue Book data cited by CBS News. Used EVs cost roughly $2,000 more than comparable gas cars, on average. An end to the tax credit will hurt Tesla — and Tesla shareholders — because it narrows the number of potential EV buyers. I Sold My Tesla: Rival EV Companies Will Get a Boost As Business Insider reported, one key provision in the new bill is that cars made by companies that sold more than 200,000 'accepted' EVs between December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2025 do not qualify for the tax credit. This provision will mainly impact Tesla, which sells a lot more cars than that in a single quarter. In contrast, rivals Rivian and Lucid have not reached the 200,000 milestone, meaning their customers can still get tax credits. This could give them an edge against Tesla, at least over the short term. Sales Could Decline Further Tesla's EV sales have already slumped badly this year. The company recently posted second-quarter car sales of 384,122 — down 13.5% from the previous year, CNN reported. It was the biggest year-over-year decline in Tesla history, and followed a similarly dismal first quarter. Trump's spending bill will likely hurt sales even further because buyers will no longer have the same tax incentives. This means they'll have to dish out more money to buy a Tesla than in the past. 'It's on Tesla to make the case for consumers to even slightly pay up today versus some other EVs,' Seth Goldstein, an equity strategist at Morningstar, told Business Insider. More From GOBankingRates 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on 3 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors


New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump brags about ‘highest ever' approval ratings from MAGA base, claims numbers ‘soared' — despite Epstein backlash
President Trump crowed Sunday about his poll numbers within his GOP base, claiming that his approval has soared 'significantly' despite the ongoing firestorm over notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. 'My Poll Numbers within the Republican Party, and MAGA, have gone up, significantly, since the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax was exposed by the Radical Left Democrats and, just plain 'troublemakers,'' Trump boasted on Truth Social. 'They have hit 90%, 92%, 93%, and 95%, in various polls, and are all Republican Party records. The General Election numbers are my highest, EVER! People like Strong Borders, and all of the many other things I have done. GOD BLESS AMERICA. MAGA!' Advertisement 4 President Donald Trump departs after a signing ceremony for S.1582 GENIUS Act in the East Room at the White House in Washington on July 18, 2025. Gripas Yuri/ABACA/Shutterstock 4 New York Post front page detailing the Epstein-Trump theories. 4 Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump seen at Mar-a-Lago in 1997. Getty Images It is not immediately clear which polls Trump was citing. Advertisement Several recent surveys last week showed Trump with a robust approval rating among Republicans, such as a CNN poll that pegged it at 88% and a Quinnipiac poll that gauged it at 90%. Both of those polls marked an uptick for Trump's approval rating among his base, with a prior CNN poll pegging him at 86% and a prior Quinnipiac survey at 87%. 4 Minor aged Teala Davies flying in a helicopter over the US Virgin Islands with Jeffrey Epstein. Matthew McDermott Advertisement Trump's brag about his polling numbers comes after controversy within part of his MAGA base over Epstein and demands that the administration release more information on the deceased pedophile.


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
NASA's summer of discontent may be coming to an end
NASA has had a difficult early summer, between a proposed budget that would eviscerate the space agency's science programs and President Trump's sudden withdrawal of billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman from the nomination to be administrator of NASA. Even so, there are signs that NASA's fortunes may be looking up. The space agency has a new administrator — sort of. As Ars Technica reports, Trump has appointed Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy as interim NASA administrator, pending the nomination and confirmation of a permanent space agency head. Duffy is said to have a 'colorful background' since he was a cast member in a reality show called 'Real World Boston.' But his four terms as a member of Congress constitute more relevant experience. The careers of Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), another former House member, and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), a former senator, demonstrate that political experience can be an advantage when dealing with Congress, which funds and sets the direction of NASA. Duffy may be spread a little thin, having to run the Department of Transportation as well as NASA. It is also unclear what kind of power he will have to affect policy. Duffy could confine himself to trying to enact the White House's agenda, which involves draconian cuts to NASA's science programs and focuses on human space exploration of the moon and Mars under the Artemis program. On the other hand, someone who has ties to Congress and who can get Trump on the phone could make a good start in forming a space policy that is acceptable to both the White House and Congress. Duffy as a bridge between two branches of government could be useful because Congress is in open revolt against the executive branch's space agenda. Senate appropriators are rejecting the cuts to NASA's science programs and are developing a bill that more or less funds them. The bill also reflects ideas advanced in the Big, Beautiful Bill in that it funds the Space Launch System and the Orion spacecraft past Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway. The House appropriators are marking up a similar spending bill. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies that funds NASA, made the reason pretty clear as to why the appropriators are sticking to the original Artemis plan for now. 'For NASA, the bill reflects an ambitious approach to space exploration, prioritizing the agency's flagship program Artemis, and rejecting premature terminations of systems like SLS and Orion before commercial replacements are ready,' he said. When and how those commercial replacements would be ready is not clear. Much will depend on how private sector launch systems and spacecraft evolve. The SpaceX Starship is one of those launch systems that might become the center of a commercial Earth to moon transportation system. Unfortunately, recent tests of the Starship have resulted in spectacular failures. The Blue Origin Blue Moon is another vehicle that could become part of a commercial lunar transportation system. A smaller, cargo version of Blue Moon is slated to launch on a New Glenn rocket perhaps as early as 2025. The larger crewed version is likely years away from flying. Progress on the Starship, Blue Moon and possibly other spacecraft will doubtless inform Congress' attitude about going commercial to the moon in the future. One possible fly in the ointment is Duffy's somewhat fraught relationship with Elon Musk. While Musk's Department of Government Efficiency did initiate hardware and software enhancements to the air traffic control system, Duffy clashed with Musk over an alleged attempt to fire air traffic controllers in the midst of a series of aircraft disasters. The acrimony between the two men may be a feature rather than a bug so far as President Trump is concerned. Trump withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator partly over alleged personal ties with his fellow billionaire. Questions remain. Can Duffy help to turn NASA, reeling from proposed budget cuts and a leadership vacuum, around? Can he make peace with Musk and continue the NASA-SpaceX partnership that has so profited both organizations? Can Trump find a permanent NASA head in a timely fashion? Can the Senate confirm that nominee quickly? Can the White House and the Congress agree on a budget and a policy that makes sense for America's space ambitions? The answers to these questions should be forthcoming with all due speed. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.