This dark corporate satire will distract you from your own work woes
Stinkbug
Sinead Stubbins
Affirm Press, $34.99
Can wellness culture mix with the workplace? Don't the two produce a weird water and oil liquid that can't quite combine, no matter how cutting-edge the innovations? In her debut novel, Stinkbug, Sinéad Stubbins wittily highlights the many pitfalls of current trends, and in the process holds up a cracked mirror of horror as we recognise how corporate culture is invading individual privacy.
Edith is our anti-heroine. Swedish overlords are acquiring the marketing company where Edith – the worst kind of control freak who lives in habitual fear of the outstretched hands of her subordinates, her equals, and her superiors – has worked at for decades. All employees with jobs on the line are sent to a three-day luxury 'work retreat' in the Australian bush where a sip of a mind-altering elixir will replace toxic negativity with toxic positivity. So much oil, so much water.
The approach of the team leaders escalates from a familiar wellness doctrine to group exercises in consensual slapping that get way out of hand and are madly funny.
Edith's life is a shamble in every other respect, so she can't cope with her job being on the line as well. Then there's the fact that the retreat threatens to lay bare the very worst aspects of Edith. The crowning jewel of her self-destruction comes with the looming exposure of the secret that she had her (popular) former partner fired from the company.
Poor Edith is something of a monster of bad faith but her paranoia and sneakiness are intimately familiar; they're cartoon exaggerations of us all. All that deception, all those tangled webs. Stinkbug tickles the reader but then it starts to pinch; to squeeze and to claw at your fears.
What begins as workplace farce mutates into a corporate horror show as everyone's salaries are revealed and suddenly, chillingly, 'Edith's colleagues [move] towards her … speaking in low voices, coming closer, gnashing their teeth and snarling things that she couldn't catch.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Do your research': Tattoo removal myths busted as stars go under the laser, plus which Aussie state tops the ink charts
With shirts off and sleeves rolled up for summer, many Australians have been forced to confront their ink head-on, and for a growing number, winter is prime time to start the removal process. As celebrities like Dune star Josh Brolin, Victoria Beckham and comedian Pete Davidson begin erasing their body art, experts say everyday Aussies are following suit, triggering a surge in laser tattoo removal across the country. According to 2023 data from McCrindle, around 30 per cent of Australians have at least one tattoo, up from 20 per cent in 2018. Tattoos have found particular popularity among Australian women, with one in three (33 per cent) inked, compared to just 26 per cent of men. "This gendered preference showcases the growing acceptance of tattoos as a means of self-expression and personal adornment among women," McCrindle said. Queensland tops the list when it comes to the most tattooed state, with 36 per cent of residents sporting ink, followed by South Australia (33 per cent), and Western Australia (30 per cent). Victoria and the Northern Territory come in next at 29 per cent each, while NSW sits at 26 per cent. The ACT and Tasmania round out the list at 22 and 21 per cent, respectively. While most Aussies get their first tattoo between the ages of 18 and 24, but as time goes on, the ink doesn't always hold the same appeal. A quarter of Australians (23 per cent) now say they regret at least one of their tattoos, up from one in five (20 per cent) in 2018. That might explain why Australian-based tattoo removal company Removery Australia has seen a 30 per cent jump in removal treatments over the past year alone. Jason Erwin, Director of Operations at Removery Australia, said a growing number of clients are referencing celebrity tattoo removal journeys as inspiration. "Celebrities are just like anyone else- they have lifestyle changes, shifts in their careers, and ultimately can rethink their body art," Erwin told "When a high-profile celebrity documents or discusses their tattoo removal journey, it increases awareness of the service and tends to support a normalisation and acceptance for the wider public." Brolin, for example, recently revealed on Instagram that he was having his back tattoo removed "because he didn't need it anymore", joking that his natural edge was "intimidating enough". Meanwhile, Victoria Beckham opened up about having the initials of husband David Beckham removed from her wrist. "I had these tattoos a long, long time ago, and, they just weren't particularly delicate," she told US morning program TODAY. "My husband has so many gorgeous tattoos, and the children do, and they're very fine… But mine were just a little bit thick, and they were bleeding a little bit and just not looking as pretty." According to Erwin, the most common reason Australians seek removal is simply that their tattoo no longer suits their current life. "Tattoos relating to old partners account for roughly 13 per cent of removals," he said. "These clients are now at a different stage of their lives and their tattoos no longer suit their lifestyle or reflect who they are." Other top reasons include poorly designed artwork (18 per cent), changing taste in tattoo style (12 per cent), and placement in a highly visible area that can't be easily hidden (nine per cent). And winter, Erwin said, is one of the best times of year to start the removal process. "Less sun exposure to a tattoo that is being removed means simpler aftercare, quicker healing time, and less time for your body to process out the ink," he explained. Thankfully, Irwin said, modern laser technology has made the process far more precise and far less painful than many expect. While full removal typically takes between eight and twelve sessions spaced at least six weeks apart, it's also possible to fade a tattoo enough to allow for new ink in the same spot. "Because the technology we use is non-invasive, the surrounding skin is unharmed and able to be tattooed as it would have been beforehand," Erwin said. "We recommend clients wait at least six weeks after their laser treatment before getting tattooed in that area, but ideally waiting three months or longer will provide the best results." Although tattoo removal is becoming increasingly common, Erwin said the most important step is doing your research. "When choosing a service provider, key things to note are what technology is being used, their tattoo removal experience, and whether they have a solid library of results and client reviews," he said. "Whether you're regretting your tattoo 24 hours after getting it, or 10 years later, the most important thing is knowing your options."
Sky News AU
11 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Tomorrowland music festival goes ahead after fire engulfs main stage
Revellers in Belgium have kicked off this year's Tomorrowland music festival after a fire destroyed the main stage days earlier. Organisers had revealed it was a 'race against time' to build a replacement stage after the main stage burnt down on Wednesday. Australian DJ duo Nervo were able to get the party started on Friday after a slight delay with some charred remains of the structure still visible behind them. An estimated 400,000 people are expected to file through the gates across the festival's two weekends.
Perth Now
11 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Exploitative': Viral TikTok trend under fire from experts
A woman stumbles out of a dingy public toilet at a park in Perth's northern suburbs. Visibly shaken, she admits she was in the bathroom with a couple of 'junkies' and had just copped a 'couple of punches'. Then, a stranger with a microphone pounces. He is followed by two cameramen who film her as she staggers around in bare feet with torn clothing, messy hair and missing teeth. The four-minute video — titled 'Traphouse' — attracted almost 1 million views after it was posted to social media platform TikTok last month. It exposes a helpless young woman at her weakest and most vulnerable. The shocking video is just one of dozens of controversial interview-style clips posted by Perth comedian and content creator, Jasky Singh, better known as 'Mr Sikkant'. Perth comedian and content creator Jasky Singh - username @MrSikKant - has gone viral for his controversial TikTok videos Unknown Credit: Unknown / TikTok And he's not alone. Instagram and TikTok feeds are flooded with thousands of crass videos where content creators ambush the public with Punk'd-style questions for the sake of clicks and clout. Perth content creator Cynthia Lin — username ' — has amassed over 1.4 million likes for her street interviews, interrogating locals with questions like, 'what is your favourite Australian beer?' and 'where is the best place to hang out in Perth?' In one video, Lin speaks with an Indigenous woman — who appears to be under the influence of drugs — with missing teeth and distressed, ragged clothing. The woman is filmed speaking erratically, while grinding her jaw and clumsily attempting to put on her shoe. And in another video, Lin is filmed attempting to interview a man who appears to be homeless. Local content creator Cynthia Lin - username @ - has gone viral for her vox pop-style videos. Unknown Credit: Unknown / TikTok Aussie DJ duo 'Bread Gang' have also gone viral for their shocking vox pop-style videos, speaking with people at nightclubs and music festivals who are clearly under the influence of drugs and alcohol. The pair — who are on the hunt for the world's 'loosest' city — almost exclusively film people who are heavily intoxicated, asking party-goers, 'Tell me something your mum doesn't know'. In one clip one woman says, 'my mum doesn't know that I do drugs and I'm completely wired out of my head'. Another confesses to sleeping with her mother's step-cousin, while one man admits to 'eating pingers (ecstasy) all day.' Both Lin and Bread Gang have been contacted for comment. Aussie DJ duo "Bread Gang" have gone viral for their shocking vox pop-style videos, talking to people at nightclubs and music festivals across the globe who are under the influence of drugs and alcohol. breadgangtv_ Credit: breadgangtv_ / TikTok ESafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said she was aware of 'growing concerns' regarding street interview content that 'appeared to exploit or humiliate' other people. 'Just because something may be technically legal does not mean it is ethical,' she told The West. 'In other words, just because you can, doesn't mean you should. 'Technology and social media are evolving rapidly, making it easier to film and post without consent, often at the expense of those least able to protect themselves. 'Whether as creators or consumers, we all have a responsibility to not dehumanise people or treat moments of distress as entertainment.' While most of Singh's videos are free, 'extended' and 'uncut' versions are available to fans who pay a monthly subscription fee. Singh has recently come under fire for his provocative street interviews, which predominantly involve him speaking to people from marginalised communities. Many of his subjects appear to be under the influence of drugs and or alcohol, homeless or living with a mental health condition. In another video, titled 'Koondoola King', Singh films Robert, a young First Nations man who admits he hasn't slept in nine days because he's 'been on drugs for days'. 'I had like seven shots last night, that's why I need to f... off home to my woman and smoke two more cones,' he says. And in a 35 minute-long YouTube video, titled 'Mandurah: The methiest place in Australia', Singh interviews dozens of locals, asking where and how he can buy meth. Comedian and TikToker Jasky Singh is famous for his vox pop-style interviews with people in the WA community Andrew Ritchie Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian Singh's videos have sparked fierce debate, with some accusing the 39-year-old creator of exploiting society's most vulnerable. 'You enjoy exploiting the unfortunate for views? Cringe,' a comment on one of the video says. Others said, 'This one feels weirdly exploitative' and, 'Are you serious? Leave them tf alone.' But Mr Singh has hit back at suggestions he is reinforcing negative stereotypes, insisting he is casting a spotlight on underprivileged communities. People, he argues, are rarely given a platform in mainstream media. 'It's unfair to say, 'You shouldn't talk to someone who's a battler' . . . (because) sometimes these are people that never get anyone speaking to them,' he told The West Australian. 'These are people that are typically ignored, so we go, 'Hey, this person has an interesting story'. 'Are we not interested to know how they got into that situation? Are we not interested in potentially helping them? 'Not sharing their stories is probably worse, because (you would be) ignoring that side of society. 'People can jump on and say, 'You're exploiting them', but how often do these people even talk to these people? I guarantee you, never.' Singh added he did not film if he knew the subject was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. 'I'm not actively (filming) when I know someone's under the influence or someone is on some sort of drug,' he said. 'Sometimes there is a moment where I go, 'Look, this person may not be in their right senses'. 'But then I ask them, 'What has put you in this situation? What are you doing?'' He also said he received 'everyone's consent'. 'We make sure that they're happy and know where (the video) is going,' he said. While it is unclear how much Singh makes from his videos, Word of Mouth Agency director Adam Perich said influencers and content creators generally could earn anywhere between $500 and $20,000 per paid partnership post. 'If you're looking at large-scale (influencers and content creators) in America, they can earn up to $300,000 per post,' he said. 'That's obviously a large scale compared to Perth or Australia, where they might be getting $500 up to $20,000.' Mr Perich said content creators were focused on producing 'valuable, entertaining and educational content'. 'Their main goal is creating quality material that's resonating with audiences ... the content is essentially going to be relatable to people that are in a certain area or location,' he said. 'The biggest thing is probably their personal branding, so if they ever do another venture like own another business ... it will drive brand awareness, because (the audience) has trust in that individual. 'Content creators get paid partnerships, but it's more in exchange (so the brand) can use that content to re-purpose it to sell.' In Australia, it is legal to film other people in a public place. Comedian and TikToker Jasky Singh is famous for his vox pop-style interviews with people in the WA community Andrew Ritchie Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian Singh agreed there was a 'fine line' between comedy and making a mockery out of someone and admitted there had been times where he had overstepped. 'There are times where I've probably put out something where it was at the expense of the person and I felt not OK about it,' he said. 'I said, 'Hey, let's learn from this because (the video) is already out . . . let's try and get better'. 'Unfortunately, comedy is a fine line where sometimes the joke is at the expense of a person, but you can't see that until the video is posted because you were having a laugh at them.' But Singh denied he was exploiting vulnerable people for the sake of content, saying everyone was 'entitled to their own opinion'. 'Everyone has an opinion, I'm not going to be changing their opinion,' he said. 'Whatever anyone's opinion is, that's entirely their opinion, I guess they're entitled to their own opinion.' Curtin University internet studies professor Tama Leaver said videos which promoted people under the influence in low socioeconomic communities, 'played into the worst stereotypes'. Professor Tama Leaver at Curtin University. Credit: ABC News: Gian De Poloni / ABC News: Gian De Poloni 'It's hard to see what a video like this achieves other than playing into the worst stereotypes,' he said. 'A lot of people don't seem to be in a sober state of mind, and so the ethics around getting anyone to comment when they're not able to make a rational judgement about what they're saying and what they're committing to by being filmed is iffy. 'I don't think this was an opportunity for people to tell their story . . . it sounds like exploiting people and doubling down on stereotypes.' Last month, another YouTuber came under fire for 'reinforcing harmful stereotypes' after he uploaded a 27-minute video featuring a homeless Indigenous man in Kalgoorlie titled, 'Drunk in Australia's Roughest Outback Town'. In the video, British creator Wendall — better known as 'WendallExplores' — speaks to Jeff, who admits he has been an alcoholic since he was 18-years-old. British YouTuber @WendallExplores has been slammed for "reinforcing harmful stereotypes" for his 27-minute-long video on Kalgoorlie. Unknown Credit: Unknown / TikTok 'Sometimes I have a quiet day, sometimes (I'm) too much on the drink,' Jeff says. 'There's nothing much to do around here, the only think is just that (drink). 'I've been sleeping on the streets for two years.' But City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Mayor Glenn Wilson condemned the video and said it risked 'reinforcing harmful stereotypes'. 'While we appreciate that Wendall chose to visit Kalgoorlie-Boulder, we do not condone the way footage of our First Nations community was captured and presented,' he told The West. 'Stories involving First Nations people must be approached with cultural sensitivity, respect and in consultation with the community. 'Without this, content like Wendall's risks reinforcing harmful stereotypes and overlooking the complex realities and efforts underway to support vulnerable community community members. 'The issues shown are not unique to Kalgoorlie-Boulder and do not define our First Nations people.' Academic and First Nations advocate Emma Garlett said it was 'disheartening' to see First Nations people being used to 'generate content for the entertainment of others at their expense'. '(These types of videos) perpetuates deficit discourse by targeting people who may be vulnerable, not want to be filmed, or who are under the influence of substances,' she told The West. 'Once this content is online is is available to the public. '(Creators) need to work with Aboriginal people in the ideation and production of content or consult Aboriginal organisations to learn about how to work effectively and meaningfully with Aboriginal people.' Curtin University media ethicist Dr Glynn Greensmith said there was 'absolutely no way' people under the influence could give informed consent to be recorded. 'By trying to generate shock or extra colour at the expense of vulnerable people, there is a price to be paid for that,' he said. 'There is a reason society frowns upon this type of behaviour. 'We do not exist for your algorithm, for your likes and subscribers. 'It looks like he is using vulnerable people for entertainment. It looks like he is laughing at people, not helping them.' Professor Leaver pointed out that content creators — unlike journalists — were not bound by a code of ethics. 'If a journalist did this they would have crossed a line . . . and there would be grounds to complain, but content creators are not bound by a code of ethics,' he said. 'If it's getting the views, then people are watching it ... which means there is an audience to be found. 'Even if people consume this and write a comment that says, 'Oh this is terrible', they've still made an effort to watch it and comment. 'It's not as straightforward as saying this is somehow morally reprehensible ... it's a really difficult thing around social media and ethics.'
