logo
Australia Launches Lung Cancer Screening Program for Smokers

Australia Launches Lung Cancer Screening Program for Smokers

Medscape09-07-2025
Australia has launched a government-funded lung cancer screening program that provides biennial low-dose CT scans to patients who are either current heavy smokers or who have quit in the past decade.
The screening program is a 'game-changer' for Australia, Lucy Morgan, MD, PhD, respiratory physician at Concord and Nepean Hospitals in Sydney, told Medscape Medical News. 'This [program] gives us the opportunity to offer cure to people who would otherwise develop Australia's most deadly cancer.' Morgan is also chair of the Lung Foundation Australia and a member of the screening program's expert advisory committee.
Early Diagnosis Crucial
Shalini Vinod, MD
Lung cancer is the fifth most diagnosed cancer in Australia and the most common cause of cancer death, claiming around 9000 lives per year. Survival rates for lung cancer (around one quarter of those diagnosed survive for 5 years) are far below those of more common cancers, including breast cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of above 90%, and colorectal cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of above 70%.
The reason for the low survival rate of lung cancer is that by the time it is symptomatic, it's often advanced, said Shalini Vinod, MD, radiation oncologist at the University of New South Wales Sydney. 'Approximately in half the cases that I pick up, the cancer has spread beyond the lungs and so is incurable,' said Vinod, who is on the expert advisory committee for the program.
Lung cancers that are detected early, before they have spread, have a much better prognosis and better treatment options, Vinod said. The most common approach for early lung cancer is surgery to remove the tumour or radiotherapy. 'If they're 2 centimetres or less, they're eligible for minimally invasive surgery…where rather than taking a whole lobe of the lung out, you can just take a part of the lobe with equivalent outcomes,' she told Medscape Medical News .
The program, which was launched on July 1, is recruiting smokers aged 50-70 years who currently smoke or have quit in the past 10 years and have a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years.
Henry Marshall, MD, PhD
Only a handful of countries worldwide, including the United States, the United Kingdom, South Korea, Taiwan, and Canada, have national or regional lung cancer screening programs, which all vary slightly in the choice of screening interval, age range, and smoking history. For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends yearly screening.
The choice of 2-yearly screening was an effort to balance cost and benefit, said Henry Marshall, MD, PhD, a thoracic physician at the Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre in Brisbane. 'It's as effective in terms of its health benefit, but of course a lot cheaper because you're immediately halving the number of scans that you need to do,' said Marshall, who is also a member of the screening program expert advisory committee.
Australia's Unique Challenges
Australia faces unique challenges in implementing a national screening program like this one. The first is that lung cancer is the most diagnosed cancer and the most common cause of cancer death among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, with incidence and mortality rates around twice those of non-Aboriginal Australians.
'Some of it is about living in rural and remote Australia, some of it is about smoking rates, some of it is probably about genetic predisposition; we don't understand that completely,' said Morgan. 'And much of it is about access to health care.'
To address this disparity, the program was developed in partnership with the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation sector and First Nations people to ensure that the design and implementation was community-led and culturally appropriate and that the information and education materials were tailored to the community.
The program includes a mobile CT screening service to reach Australians in rural and remote areas because 'there are millions of Australians living more than four hours away from a CT scanner,' said Morgan. Five mobile screening trucks will be deployed around the country beginning in November this year.
Participants must be initially referred for screening by their general practitioner (GP). If anything is detected on CT, they are then referred to another clinician according to a nodule management protocol that was developed specifically for the program.
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners has expressed concern about the potential increased workload for GPs, particularly those in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage, where greater numbers of patients are likely to have histories of heavy smoking and therefore be eligible for screening.
The program will also lead to increased pressure on radiology and cardiothoracic surgery services in Australia, Vinod said, but another concern is whether smokers will actually sign up for the program. Uptake for breast cancer screening in Australia is around 50%, and uptake for bowel cancer screening is around 40%. 'If you just benchmark it against those, this is going to be tough because this is a cancer where there is a lot of stigma,' Vinod said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UnitedHealth (UNH) Faced a Significant Downturn in Q2. Here's Why
UnitedHealth (UNH) Faced a Significant Downturn in Q2. Here's Why

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealth (UNH) Faced a Significant Downturn in Q2. Here's Why

Wedgewood Partners, an investment management company, released its second-quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In the second quarter, Wedgewood Composite's net return was 7.1% compared to the Standard & Poor's 10.9%, the Russell 1000 Growth Index's 17.8%, and the Russell 1000 Value Index's 3.8% return for the same period. In addition, you can check the fund's best 5 holdings to know its best picks in 2025. In its second quarter 2025 investor letter, Wedgewood Partners highlighted stocks such as UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH). UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is a diversified healthcare company that operates through UnitedHealthcare, Optum Health, Optum Insight, and Optum Rx segments. The one-month return of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) was -4.62%, and its shares lost 49.04% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On July 17, 2025, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) stock closed at $288.07 per share, with a market capitalization of $261.32 billion. Wedgewood Partners stated the following regarding UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) was a leading detractor from performance during the quarter. Medical costs in their key Medicare Advantage business are spiking as the Company uncharacteristically misjudged the morbidity of its newest members. Additionally, there was another rare miss for what we believed was the 'Tiffany' health care operator, which fumbled their execution at Optum Health. This oversight led to the Company pulling their 2025 earnings guidance along with the turnover of key management, including their CEO. We were surprised by the severity of this miss along with the execution missteps, and we decided to liquidate our holdings because the long-term, double-digit growth trajectory of the Company has been thrown into question." A senior healthcare professional giving advice to a patient in a clinic. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is in 18th position on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 139 hedge fund portfolios held UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) at the end of the first quarter, which was 150 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) and shared Vulcan Value Partners' views on the company. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Coroner warning over incompatible NHS systems
Coroner warning over incompatible NHS systems

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Coroner warning over incompatible NHS systems

A Hull coroner has warned NHS bosses that delays to the availability of mental health assessments between different teams due to outdated IT systems could lead to future deaths. Prof Paul Marks, senior coroner for Hull and East Riding, issued a prevention of future deaths report following an inquest into the death of John Kirkman, who took his own life. Prof Marks said healthcare teams could encounter problems accessing "vital" information about patients as a result of incompatible computer programmes and this could lead to delays in care. The report, sent to the chief executive of NHS England, said the organisation should take action, "possibly by reviewing the compatibility of IT systems". The report said Mr Kirkman, who was 36, had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia and took his own life on 27 December 2023. During the inquest, the coroner said the evidence revealed matters that caused him concern. Prof Marks said that if a mental health screening assessment was carried out in one part of the country, the results and conclusions may not be immediately available elsewhere when a further assessment is carried out, due to the use of different IT systems. "Absence of vital background information could result in an incorrect prioritisation for onward referral, as it did in this case," he said. The lack of availability of clinical information and data may "adversely influence subsequent assessments", he said. The coroner said NHS England had 56 days to respond with details of action taken or a proposed timetable of action. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices More on this story NHS computer issues linked to patient harm 'Outdated' IT leaves NHS staff juggling 15 logins Related internet links NHS England

'Get a job': Medicaid work requirements included in Trump's megabill sparks partisan debate on Capitol Hill
'Get a job': Medicaid work requirements included in Trump's megabill sparks partisan debate on Capitol Hill

Fox News

time6 hours ago

  • Fox News

'Get a job': Medicaid work requirements included in Trump's megabill sparks partisan debate on Capitol Hill

Democrats have railed against potential Medicaid cuts since President Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election. Now that his "big, beautiful bill" has passed through Congress, they are making Medicaid a top talking point ahead of competitive midterm elections expected in 2026. Republicans, meanwhile, are doubling down on Medicaid reform included in Trump's megabill, which also includes sweeping legislation on taxes, immigration and energy. "My policy is if you're an able-bodied worker, get a damn job," Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital. "If you want government benefits, go to work and get a job." A provision in the megabill requires able-bodied, childless adults between the ages of 18 and 64 to work at least 80 hours a month to be eligible to receive Medicaid benefits. Individuals can also meet the requirement by ​​participating in community service, going to school or engaging in a work program. Fox News Digital asked lawmakers on Capitol Hill if taxpayers should have to pay for Medicaid bills for able-bodied workers who are under 65 and unemployed. Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, said in both Arkansas and Georgia, where work requirements have already been imposed, it ended up costing taxpayers more money to administer the work requirements. "We're talking about a very small population, and in the two cases where they tried it, it ended up, number one, disqualifying people who met all the requirements but gave up on the paperwork. These aren't people that are used to filling out a lot of paperwork every month. And it also cost the state a lot to administer," King said. The New England Journal of Medicine found that Arkansas' Medicaid work requirement from 2018 to 2019 "found no evidence of increased employment … and a significant loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income adults." Similarly, the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute (GBPI) reported that 80% of the $58 million spent in the first year of Georgia's Pathways to Coverage program went toward administrative costs. But Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., emphasized that Republicans "want these programs to be around for the people who need them." She said Medicaid reform is about "strengthening and preserving these programs at the rate that they're growing." "These programs were intended to be safety nets, not hammocks that people stay in, and the success of these programs should be measured by how many people we get off of them," Britt said. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., agreed, telling Fox News Digital, "What you don't want is for somebody to become dependent. I'd tell people: safety nets should bounce you to your feet. They shouldn't be like flypaper in which you stick and can never get off." "We're not saying, 'Hey, we're not throwing you out.' All right, but you gotta go get a job. You either get a job, or actually you can even volunteer, all right? And that will satisfy the requirements for work," Rep. Carlos Gimenez, R-Fla., explained. But Democrats who spoke to Fox News Digital continued to push back against the work requirements included in the "big, beautiful bill." "I think people [who] are able to work, trust me, they'd rather work than to get the piddling dollars that they get from Medicaid. It's insulting to suggest that a person would rather sit at home rather than work and get this meager amount of money. All of this has just been totally expanded to fit a narrative that allows them to cut into those people who really deserve Medicaid," Rep. Troy Carter, D-La., said. And Rep. Lateefah Simon, D-Calif., said, "We need to be able to have an infrastructure in this country that supports the elderly and the sick and the widows and the child. This bill, it violates all those basic principles."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store