Israel says it unleashed dozens of warplanes in a bold move to shatter Iran's nuclear program
Israel says it unleashed dozens of warplanes in a bold move to shatter Iran's nuclear program
Israel just launched a major preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear program.
The Israeli military said dozens of aircraft hit military and nuclear targets.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signaled the operation could go on for days.
Israeli warplanes have struck Iran, delivering what officials say is a major assault against Tehran's nuclear and missile programs.
The Israeli military launched a large-scale preemptive strike against Iran early Friday in an attempt to crush the country's ability to build a nuclear weapon, officials said. The operation marked a major escalation and is likely to draw a response from Tehran.
The Israel Defense Forces said dozens of aircraft recently completed the first wave of strikes, attacking dozens of military targets, including "nuclear targets" in different areas across Iran.
ADVERTISEMENT
The IDF said the strikes were based on "high-quality intelligence" and intended to damage Iran's nuclear program.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a video statement that the operation, nicknamed "Rising Lion," will continue for "as many days as it takes" to remove what he characterized as an existential threat to his country.
Smoke rises after an explosion in Tehran early on Friday.
AP Photo/Vahid Salemi
Netanyahu said Iran has made enough highly enriched uranium for nine atom bombs and has taken unprecedented steps in recent months to weaponize the material and produce a weapon in a short time. He did not provide evidence to support his claim.
The Israeli leader said that his forces targeted Iran's nuclear enrichment program, its nuclear weaponization programs, its main enrichment facility of Natanz, its top nuclear scientists, and its ballistic missile program. The extent of the damage is unclear; some of Iran's critical nuclear facilities are buried deep underground, making them particularly challenging targets.
ADVERTISEMENT
The semi-official Tasnim news agency, which is associated with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, shared footage and photos of damage purportedly caused by the Israeli strikes, including partially damaged buildings and plumes of smoke rising from neighborhoods. Business Insider could not independently verify the imagery.
Tasnim also reported that Major General Hossein Salami, IRGC commander-in-chief, was killed in an Israeli strike on his headquarters.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US was not involved in the Israeli strikes against Iran. In a statement, he said the Trump administration has taken steps to protect its forces in the Middle East and warned Iran not to retaliate against American assets in the region.
A view of a damaged building after Israeli aircraft bombed Iran.
ajid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
The strikes are likely to derail ongoing talks between the US and Iran to reach a new nuclear deal and could draw a significant military response from Tehran, which has already launched two major missile attacks on Israel since October 7, 2023, the day a Hamas massacre against Israel sent the region spiraling into war and violence.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Trump administration and Netanyahu have very different views on how to handle Iran, with the Israeli leader long pressing for military action. The White House, however, has favored the diplomatic route.
Israeli officials have long said that they will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. Tehran, meanwhile, asserts that its nuclear program is for civilian, not military, purposes.
Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, the IDF spokesperson, said that the country had "no choice" but to attack Iran. Without presenting specific evidence, he said that Tehran's nuclear program is an "imminent and existential threat" that could pose a global threat.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump's Clear Message to Tehran
Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content. Here's what's happening… President Donald Trump promised that Israel's next round of attacks on Iran would be "even more brutal" in a Truth Social post pressuring Iran to cut a deal on its nuclear activity. "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Trump said. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE."…READ MORE. 'WILDLY INAPPROPRIATE': Padilla cuffed, McIver indicted: Can Congress come back from the brink? CASHING IN: Democrats cash in after Padilla forcibly removed from Trump admin press conference STORY OVER: Appeals court deals Trump blow in challenge to E. Jean Carroll verdict NO 'SPECIFIC POWERS': Second federal judge sides against Trump's election executive order PARTY IN CHAOS: Democrats forge strange bedfellows as party flounders in Trump's second term ATOMIC DEFIANCE: Iran claims right to nuclear prowess following Israel strikes, but remains silent on negotiations with US ON THE BRINK: How close was Iran to a nuclear weapon before Israel's strike on Tehran? WALZ OF CHINA: Tim Walz floats China as 'neutral actor' with 'moral authority' to negotiate Middle East peace SHIELDS UP: NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites across NYC after Israeli strikes on Iran ALL IN: Fetterman calls for US to supply anything Israel needs for Iran attack: 'Military, intelligence, weaponry' SHADOW WARFARE: Inside Israel's secret war in Iran: Mossad commandos, hidden drones, and the strike that stunned Tehran 'DEEPLY CONCERNING': IAEA chief calls Israeli president, reportedly says nuclear facility was severely damaged RISING AGAINST TEHRAN: Israel releases video of strike on Iranian ballistic missiles aimed at Jewish state IRAN'S REVENGE PLOT: Could the US be targeted as Iran retaliates against Israel? TAKING HEAT: 'War criminal Netanyahu': Squad members erupt over Israel's 'reckless' strike on Iran BLAME GAME: SCOOP: Comer probing Newsom, Bass response to Los Angeles riots CALI CHAOS: California candidate for governor blasts Newsom while walking through LA riot aftermath HIRED GUNS: Anti-ICE riot funding investigated as 'numerous high budget requests' for paid agitators reported CHAOS IN THE STREETS: Protesters hauled away as anti-ICE protests continue in Los Angeles despite mayor's curfew order FUNDS UNDER FIRE: Marjorie Taylor Greene launches probe into Planned Parenthood's use of taxpayer funds SENATE SHAKEN: Senate shaken: Bipartisan worry erupts after incident involving California Democrat 'NOT A FAN': Ron Johnson is 'trying to force reality' on DC, and believes COVID-19 jabs should have 'black box warnings' MANHUNT UNDERWAY: 4 migrants escape from Newark ICE detention facility, DHS official confirms MASSIVE SWING: Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in dramatic polling shift Get the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on
Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
How should the U.S. respond to Israel's attack on Iran?
Israel's decision to launch a wide-scale military operation against Iran may have come as a shock to many, but it's something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been itching to do for more than decade. The question now is whether President Trump will end up sustaining an Israeli bombing campaign that could last for days, if not weeks. The fact that Israel conducted the operation several days before Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, was scheduled to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi for a sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman wasn't lost on most observers. Netanyahu hasn't been particularly supportive of the Trump administration's diplomatic outreach to the Iranians and reportedly pressed the White House to green-light joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Tehran's nuclear facilities last month. Trump demurred, choosing diplomacy instead, but Netanyahu seems never to have believed the talks would result in anything substantial. Israel's negotiating position has long been entirely maximalist: Every nuclear complex on Iranian soil must be destroyed, and under no circumstances could Iran be left with even a rudimentary uranium enrichment capability. Trump's position isn't as definitive as Netanyahu's. At times, U.S. officials have talked about striking a deal that would allow the Iranians to continue enriching at a low level with strict, comprehensive international oversight. At other times, Trump has declared that Washington wouldn't sign any deal that allowed Iran to enrich at all. Various proposals have been floated in the months since those negotiations began, including a regional nuclear consortium involving Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other powers, which could prevent an indigenous Iranian enrichment program but still supply the region with peaceful nuclear energy, and also stem the possibility of an arms race in the Middle East. The Iranians, however, didn't buy into the idea that no enrichment would be permitted on Iranian soil. Israel's military attack upends the diplomatic chessboard, such as it is, turning the last few months of U.S.-Iran discussions into empty theater. Trump claims he knew what Israel was up to all along and congratulated Netanyahu on the attack. That alone makes it difficult to imagine Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei authorizing his subordinates to continue discussions with the Americans. Doing so would be a very public act of weakness on Tehran's part. Even so, the White House still expects Iranian officials to show up for the next round of talks. As Trump argued after the initial Israeli salvo, Iran is in no position to refuse anymore. 'I couldn't get them to a deal in 60 days,' Trump said, referring to the Iranians. 'They were close, they should have done it. Maybe now it will happen.' In reality, what we are likely to see instead is a collapse of the current diplomatic process and a situation that will be far messier to handle. Israeli political and military officials have made it abundantly clear that military operations will persist well into next week and perhaps go on even longer than that. The Iranians, in turn, will feel pressure to continue to retaliate with each passing day, whether it's in the form of drones and missiles aimed at Israel's air defenses, terrorist attacks on Western targets or sabotaging cargo vessels in the Persian Gulf. In any case, the Middle East is as close to a full-scale war as it has ever been. This is a critical moment for the Trump administration, and how it chooses to act in the hours and days ahead will be the determining factor in whether the United States gets dragged into another regional conflagration or not. Israel will do what it believes it needs to do to maintain its security. Even assuming Trump would try to pressure Netanyahu into stopping the bombings — the evidence for that scenario is slim — it's hardly guaranteed the Israeli premier would listen. For better or worse, Israel's strategic calculus has changed after the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks. Netanyahu is now far less risk-adverse than during his previous stints in office. The United States can only control what it can control. As much as Trump might like to see the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism hammered, he also doesn't want to aid a conflict that could expose tens of thousands of U.S. troops based in the Middle East to imminent risk. Besides, any U.S. involvement in offensive Israeli military operations would be a betrayal of Trump's core supporters and his campaign promises to avoid the fruitless, unending wars. In addition, U.S. offensive involvement would kill any grand diplomatic ambitions Trump may have in the Middle East and nip in the bud the administration's pivot to the Indo-Pacific as China tries to consolidate its power in Asia. Sometimes, the best response to a dangerous situation is to do nothing. It won't satisfy the more hawkish elements in Washington, but let's hope Trump holds his fire. Daniel R. DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities.
Fox News
38 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democratic lawmakers criticize Israel's defensive strikes against Iran's nuclear sites
Democratic lawmakers are sounding off on the Israel-Iran conflict, criticizing Israel's initial airstrikes Thursday night in the capital of Tehran. Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion," targeting Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure, and Iran responded with strikes in Tel Aviv, injuring at least five people. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) released a statement Friday calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu an "extremist." "The world is more dangerous and unstable as a result of the extremist Netanyahu's government ongoing defiance of international law," Sanders wrote. "First, he uses the starvation of children in Gaza as a tool of war, a barbaric violation of the Geneva Conventions. Now, his illegal unilateral attack on Iran risks a full-blown regional war." Sanders added the strikes "directly contravened" U.S. interests in resolving long-standing tensions over Iran's nuclear program. "Talks were planned for Sunday, but Netanyahu chose instead to launch an attack," Sanders wrote. "The U.S. must make it clear that we will not be dragged into another Netanyahu war. Along with the international community we should do everything possible to prevent an escalation of this conflict and bring the warring parties to the negotiating table." Senate Foreign Relations member Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn., chimed in on social media Friday morning. "Netanyahu wasn't trying to help diplomacy; he was trying to destroy diplomacy," Murphy wrote. "How do we know? They reportedly targeted and killed Iran's chief negotiator with Trump." Tim Kaine, D-Va., who also serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, added he could not understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike when a meeting was scheduled between the U.S. and Iran this weekend. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said military aggression is "never the answer." "Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," Reed wrote. "These strikes threaten not only the lives of innocent civilians but the stability of the entire Middle East and the safety of American citizens and forces. While tensions between Israel and Iran are real and complex, military aggression of this scale is never the answer." By Friday afternoon, some Democrats seemingly changed their tune in response to the counter-attack. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., slammed Iran's response, calling it "cowardice." "#Israel's strike on #Iran was targeted precisely at senior Iranian military commanders and military sites that posed an existential threat to Israel," Sherman wrote. "The Islamic Republic's response? To target civilian centers in #TelAviv. Unsurprising cowardice from a regime that has spent decades brutalizing its own people." Others evaded the conversation all together. "This is a rapidly evolving situation, and it's critical that the United States works with our allies and avoid steps that will cause further escalation across the region," Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., wrote in a statement. "For years, Iran has threatened the safety of Israel and the region, and Israel has an undeniable right to defend itself and its citizens."
