Leaders explore BRICS pay systems even as don warns
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
BRICS countries will continue discussions on implementing a cross-border payments system, according to a readout of the Leaders Declaration at the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro.The leaders have designated their finance ministers and central bank governors to continue discussions on the matter, while exploring the potential for greater interoperability of the BRICS payment system."We task our ministers of finance and central bank governors, as appropriate, to continue the discussion on the BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative, and acknowledge the progress made by the BRICS Payment Task Force in identifying possible pathways to support the continuation of discussions on the potential for greater interoperability of BRICS payment systems," the declaration read."In this regard, we welcome the 'Technical Report: BRICS Cross-border Payments System', which reflects members' revealed preferences, and should play a pivotal role in our efforts to facilitate fast, low-cost, more accessible, efficient, transparent and safe cross-border payments among BRICS countries and other nations and which can support greater trade and investment flows."Later, briefing the media in Rio on the initiative, Dammu Ravi , India's BRICS Sherpa and secretary (economic relations) in the external affairs ministry, said, "Countries are looking for alternatives. Interoperability payment is a faster mechanism in terms of being able to do cross-border trading. And this is a low-cost solution."Ravi said India has successfully implemented an interoperability payment mechanism and is also entering into bilateral arrangements with many other countries. "So, within the BRICS track, there is a discussion on it. We are hopeful that in the days to come, there will be traction, and countries will accept it, as it is beneficial to most of them," he added.Referring to trade in national currencies among BRICS member states, he said, "Now you talked about the national currency settlement ... This is to be seen in the same breath. Significant progress has also happened in that context, and all the countries are quite supportive of these initiatives."BRICS leaders also welcomed steady capacity expansion by the New Development Bank (NDB) to mobilise resources, foster innovation, expand local currency financing, diversify funding sources and support impactful projects. The leaders also welcomed the BRICS Interbank Cooperation .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BRICS Media and Think Tank Forum calls for greater Global South role in shaping global AI governance
At the seventh plenary session of the BRICS Media and Think Tank Forum (earlier known as the 'BRICS Media Forum'), more than 250 representatives from media organisations, think tanks, government agencies and enterprises from 36 countries gathered in Rio de Janeiro to deliberate on ways to foster greater South-South co-operation, including on joint R&D and co-established standards, for a more equitable sharing of Artificial Intelligence (AI) benefits across nations. A major concern that emerged was the risks of AI capabilities being concentrated among a few actors located in a handful of countries, with several participants noting that it could create dangerous dependencies for Global South nations. The Forum, organised on July 15-17, highlighted the importance of open source development of AI as well as the need for Global South nations to work together for a greater say in the shaping of AI governance frameworks. Mr Thorsten Jelinek, Europe Director and Senior Fellow of Taihe Institute, pointed out that some amount of 'regulatory autonomy' is critical to maintain the balance between multilateralism and sovereignty. 'The history of modern technology, whether it is telecommunications or the internet, has been shaped not only by innovation but also by technological, economic and institutional hierarchies and dependencies,' he noted, adding that the right governance framework would encourage AI as 'a moral partner' to growth and development. The Forum's lead statement on AI also called on media organisations and think tanks in the Global South to develop a 'multilingual and multimodal corpus'. This would 'lay the foundation for training large-scale AI models that serve journalism and think tank research.' By 'leveraging AI to translate quality content into multiple languages,' it will become possible to increase 'the availability of 'Global South Stories', elevate the international voice and influence of the Global South' and showcase the diversity of Global South civilisations, it said. Mr Fu Hua, Executive Chairman of the Forum and president of Xinhua News Agency, observed that BRICS was becoming the 'main channel for fostering Global South unity and self-reliance'. Noting that the BRICS countries represent vast civilisational diversity and pluralism, he urged BRICS media organisations and think tanks to prioritise and amplify stories from different parts of the Global South as a necessary corrective to the prevailing hegemonies and biases in the international media landscape. Speaking in the context of the US threat to impose additional punitive tariffs on countries wanting to join BRICS, Mr Wu Hailong, President of the China Public Diplomacy Association, emphasised that the BRICS grouping was not in opposition to any country but a mechanism 'to seek equity and justice' in the international governance scenario. 'Given that the world seems to be going back to the jungle rule of tariff turbulence, BRICS nations must co-operate more to protect their interests and oppose unilateralism,' he said. 'The US is our biggest trade partner, we have a free trade agreement with them, nearly 40 million Mexicans live in the US, and despite all this, we are living with daily threats of tariffs, and millions of Mexicans in the US could lose their citizenship any day,' said Ms Yeidckol Polevnsky Gurwitz, Chair of the Asia-Pacific Foreign Relations Committee of the Mexican Senate, adding, 'The world cannot organise itself around unilateralism and inequity, it needs to be built around co-operation and multilateralism.' Organised by Xinhua News Agency in collaboration with partners from BRICS nations, the Forum officially launched the 'Global South Joint Communication Partnership Program', an initiative by Xinhua to promote dialogue and cooperation across various sectors within the Global South. So far, 700 institutions have joined the Partnership Program, which leverages two core platforms – the Global South Media and Think Tank Forum and the Global South Media News Network. The Forum also launched a new report by Xinhua, titled 'The Rise of the Global South', a compilation that showcases stories of political and economic resurgence in post-colonial societies across Asia, Africa and Latin America.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Crude truth: India draws a red line on strategic autonomy amid Nato pressure
Sovereignty cannot be traded for approval ratings in Brussels or Washington. Energy security, economic pragmatism, and strategic autonomy will continue to define India's foreign policy no matter who disapproves read more In a sharp and measured response to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte's recent threat of secondary sanctions, India made it unequivocally clear on Thursday that it will not compromise its national interest at the altar of Western political expediency. The Ministry of External Affairs cautioned against 'double standards' and defended its procurement of Russian crude oil as a decision rooted in market logic and sovereign responsibility. The West may be attempting to reassert control over the global order through pressure tactics, but India, along with other Brics nations, has outgrown the phase of bowing to moral lectures from the Atlantic alliance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rutte's comments, delivered from Washington, marked a significant escalation. In what can only be described as a veiled threat, he warned India, China, and Brazil that continued commercial ties with Russia could 'hit them very hard'. His statement followed US President Donald Trump's announcement of 'very severe tariffs' on Russia if peace with Ukraine is not achieved within 50 days. Taken together, these remarks are not just an extension of Western frustration at the failure to isolate Moscow; they represent a deliberate attempt to bully large, independent powers that have dared to chart their course on the Ukraine conflict. India's reaction was firm but diplomatic. 'We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments,' said Randhir Jaiswal, the External Affairs Ministry spokesperson. 'Securing the energy needs of our people is understandably an overriding priority for us,' he added. Most critically, he warned against 'any double standards on the matter', a phrase that cuts to the heart of the global hypocrisy that defines Western foreign policy today. Let's be clear: when Europe continued to import Russian gas in the initial months of the Ukraine war under the guise of 'energy dependency', it was considered a rational act. When India does the same with crude oil, it's branded as undermining the global order. Why should New Delhi entertain such selective outrage? Rutte's remarks betray an old colonial instinct that the West still struggles to shed: that major non-Western powers are expected to play second fiddle to transatlantic dictates. However, the world of 2025 is not the unipolar, West-centric world of the 1990s. India today is not just the fourth-largest economy in the world but a key pole in the emerging multipolar world order—one that does not automatically align with Nato's geopolitical chessboard. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's energy diplomacy with Russia is grounded in pragmatism. With discounts on Russian crude offering a cushion against global price shocks, it has had to manage inflation, keep its fiscal deficit in check, and ensure the supply of affordable fuel to its vast population. For a country where hundreds of millions still live close to the poverty line, the idea of sacrificing energy security to satisfy Western foreign policy objectives is both irresponsible and morally indefensible. Moreover, India's balanced and independent position on the Ukraine conflict has found resonance in the Global South. Far from isolating Russia, the West's sanctions regime has unintentionally strengthened the Brics and other alternative groupings. The Global South sees the Ukraine war not as a simple battle between good and evil, but as a proxy war between geopolitical blocs, with Europe dragging the world into an economic quagmire of its own making. Rutte's suggestion that India should call up Russian President Vladimir Putin and urge him to negotiate peace is, frankly, laughable. Since when has Nato or the US needed moral nudging from countries like India to pursue diplomacy? Nato's track record in Afghanistan, Libya, and Iraq hardly makes it a credible champion of peace. Instead of lectures, the West should reflect on the consequences of its zero-sum approach that leaves no space for neutral positions or alternative diplomatic pathways. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Equally concerning is Donald Trump's effort to portray India's ties with other Brics nations as 'anti-American'. This line of thinking is reductive and dangerous. India's membership in Brics does not make it anti-Western. Rather, it reflects its desire to be part of a diversified global architecture, one where financial systems, energy flows, and political narratives are not monopolised by a single bloc. India's strategic autonomy has been a consistent thread in its foreign policy from Jawaharlal Nehru to Narendra Modi. Whether it was refusing to join Western sanctions during the Cold War or rejecting Chinese-dominated narratives today, India has always maintained a careful balance. The West must recognise that its geopolitical anxieties do not automatically become India's priorities. Indeed, this episode exposes the growing tensions between the older order, represented by Nato, and the emerging realities of a multipolar world. The West, rather than expanding its coercive apparatus, should start investing in genuine partnerships that respect mutual interests and sovereignty. The language of threats and tariffs only hardens positions and alienates rising powers like India, which have long outgrown their role as passive rule-takers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India is not alone in this stance. Brazil and China, too, have deepened their economic engagement with Russia since the Ukraine war. Despite relentless pressure, they have refused to toe the Nato line. The result? An alternative ecosystem of trade, diplomacy, and energy cooperation is gradually but firmly taking shape, one that may soon rival the West's dominance of global systems. In sum, Rutte's remarks and Trump's tariff threats only underline the West's growing desperation to maintain relevance in a rapidly changing world. India's response, by contrast, reflects the maturity, balance, and confidence of a rising power that knows where its interests lie. Sovereignty cannot be traded for approval ratings in Brussels or Washington. Energy security, economic pragmatism, and strategic autonomy will continue to define India's foreign policy no matter who disapproves. Let the world take note: India is not a vassal state. It is a civilisational power that makes its own choices. And those choices will always put Indians first. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author. He pens national, geopolitical, and social issues. His social media handle is @prosenjitnth. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Trump repeats 10% tariff threat on BRICS, says bloc would collapse if it ever united
Trump also said he was committed to preserving the dollar's global status as a reserve currency and pledged to never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency in America. 'When I heard about this group from BRICS, six countries, basically, I hit them very, very hard. And if they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,' Trump said without naming the countries. 'We can never let anyone play games with us.' Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday repeated his threat to slap a 10% tariff on imports from members of the BRICS group of developing nations and said the group would end very quickly if they ever formed in a meaningful way. Trump announced the new tariff on July 6, saying it would apply to any countries aligning themselves with what he called the 'Anti-American policies' of the BRICS group. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of the U.S. president, the BRICS group is presenting itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy. Since issuing the threat, Trump has repeatedly claimed without evidence that the group was set up to hurt the United States and the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. BRICS leaders have rejected the claim that the group is anti-American. Brazil in February nixed plans to push for a common currency during its presidency this year, but the group is advancing work on a cross-border payment system known as BRICS Pay that would facilitate trade and financial transactions in local currencies. The BRICS group expanded last year beyond Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to include members such as Iran and Indonesia. Leaders at the group's summit in Brazil voiced indirect criticism of U.S. military and trade policies. Trump has also taken aim at Brazil specifically, announcing a 50% tariff rate on its imports, starting in August, and launching a separate investigation into what Washington called Brazil's 'unfair' trading practices. This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: India-Pakistan terms of engagement: H-word, M-word & the Trump hyphenation
