Alleged Mpumalanga fraud and corruption accused released on bail
According to the Mpumalanga Hawks' spokesperson, Lieutenant Colonel Magonseni Nkosi, Ngomane's misrepresentation led to SARS suffering an actual loss of R1 424 872.42.
'Upon receiving a tax refund from SARS, Ngomane allegedly transferred a total amount of R200 000 to KC The Princess (Pty) Ltd, a company that is solely directed by Khensani Mnisi (59). Mnisi then transferred the money to five other recipients, Phindile Shabangu (30), Dorren Simelane (49), Thobile Ngomane (35), Khanyisile Dlamini-Phenyane (50), and Bafana Singwane (50),' Nkosi said.
The Hawks' Nelspruit-based Serious Commercial Crime Investigation Unit executed the warrant of arrest and all suspects appeared in the Nelspruit Commercial Crime Court on Tuesday, May 20.
ALSO READ: Schoemansdal murder: Family members granted bail
Ngomane was released on R2 000 bail whilst his co-accused were released on R500 bail each. The matter was postponed to July 8 for further investigation.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Rhino trafficking syndicate: John Hume (83) among 6 in court
The case against conservationist John Hume (83) and his five co-accused is set to continue in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on December 9. Hume, the former founder and owner of Platinum Rhino Conservation Enterprise, appeared in the same court today, alongside transport maintenance manager Clive John Mervan Melville (63), attorney Izak du Toit (50), NPO director Catharina van Niekerk (58), insurance broker and part-time farmer Mattheus Poggenpoel (37) and game reserve manager Abraham Hennop (52). According to a statement by National Prosecuting Authority Gauteng regional spokesperson Lumka Mahanjana, their court appearance stems from their alleged involvement in a rhino trafficking syndicate. They face 55 charges that include counts of racketeering, fraud, theft and money laundering, as well as the contravention of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004 and the Riotous Assemblies Act 17 of 1956. 'It is alleged that between 2017 and 2024, the accused operated an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate and defrauded the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. They allegedly obtained permits to trade rhino horn locally, while intending to channel the horns into illegal international markets in Southeast Asia. The fraudulent scheme is estimated to involve 964 rhino horns valued at R250m,' reads the statement by Mahanjana. The investigation by the Hawks' Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit is said to have led to the accused handing themselves over at the Pretoria Central Police Station earlier today. According to Mahanjana, Melville disclosed in his affidavit that he has a 2019 conviction for fraud and being in possession of and transporting rhino horns. He was sentenced to pay a fine. 'Accused no 5, Poggenpoel, disclosed to the court that he has [a] 2009 conviction [for the] possession of a rhino horn, where he paid an admission of guilt fee of R2 500,' Mahanjana added. She said his affidavit revealed he has a pending case in the Winburg Magistrate's Court on September 17. The case is reportedly due to an investigation team finding ammunition that was allegedly not locked away in a safe, as well as the alleged possession of scheduled medicine without a permit. Hume was granted bail of R100 000, Melville and Van Niekerk were each granted R10 000 bail, while Hermanus, Du Toit, Poggenpoel and Hennop were each granted R2 000 bail. State Advocate Patsy Jacobs read into the record an affidavit by investigating officer Edward du Plessis that stated the accused were not flight risks, their addresses had been verified, and they had co-operated with investigators. The state therefore did not oppose bail, but requested bail conditions, which were granted: All accused had to surrender their passports and may not apply for new travel documents while the matter is pending They must report to their nearest police station once a week They may not interfere with investigations, tamper with evidence or influence witnesses They must not commit any offences while on bail. According to the website of Buffalo Dream Ranch (BDR), Hume is a former holiday resort developer who turned his focus to rhino conservation in the early 1990s and went on to establish BDR in the North West in 2009. The facility grew into the world's largest private rhino breeding project, with over 1 600 rhinos under its care, more than 1 000 of which were bred on the ranch. The website explains that BDR was originally named to conceal its main purpose – breeding rhinos – from poachers. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Higher funding limits in Political Funding Act 'will promote secrecy'
The proclamation that doubled the disclosure threshold and annual donation limit in the Political Funding Act will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to influence our politics and for corruption to occur. This is the view of My Vote Counts (MVC) after a proclamation signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa was published in the Government Gazette on Monday. The new annual donation limit will be R30m, up from R15m, and the new disclosure threshold will be R200,000, up from R100,000. 'This is indeed a setback for our democracy. We cannot allow those in power to jeopardise our democracy and water down constitutionally protected rights for their narrow, self-serving interests,' said MVC's project lead on money in politics, Joel Bregman. He said politics required funding and the role parties played in a democratic system was vital. 'But there needs to be a balance between ensuring that parties are adequately funded, and that such funding is regulated and mitigates the risk of undue influence from donors.' Bregman said the immediate impact of a higher disclosure threshold and donation limit was that there would be more secrecy in political funding. 'The details of all donations under R200,000 will not be known to the public. This is an enormous sum for most South Africans and donations of such amounts should be made public knowledge to facilitate scrutiny of parties' relationships with donors and ensure that donors are not receiving anything in return.' He said the state has never provided a legitimate reason all donations should not be disclosed to the public. 'The past four years of disclosure data show that a handful of wealthy individuals dominate our private political funding landscape. Doubling the amount a donor can donate to a party in a year to R30m will give donors an even greater ability to have an outsize influence on our political system.' Bregman said the change would make parties more susceptible to undue influence. 'And because the law does not regulate donations from related parties through the different legal entities they control, wealthy donors can now have an even more significant impact.' Bregman said when the Political Funding Act was first developed in 2017, MVC was concerned that the original limits would dilute the act, but nevertheless celebrated the fact that, for the first time, the country had a law that provided 'a light into the darkness'. MVC said while recognising the act's importance, it was clear that the law had many defects that limited its ability to achieve its objectives. In 2023, the MVC initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the act and the case was heard before a full bench of the Western Cape High Court in February 2025. 'A key component of our challenge is that the original limits were not formulated with reference to empirical evidence and were therefore irrational and unlawful.' MVC asked the court to find the limits unconstitutional and refer them back to parliament for remedying. Judgment is pending. 'Should our case succeed, the amendments to the act will be set aside with full retrospective effect, including the determination of these new limits. While we await judgment, we are considering other legal options to address the president's action.' Bregman said MVC will be writing to Ramaphosa to request that he release the reasons and full record of factors that were considered as he applied his mind to the matter.
Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Perfecting the political funding arena still a work in progress
CAPE TOWN - The Electoral Commission said perfecting the political funding arena was still a work in progress. But it would not be drawn on whether the recently raised limits for declaring private donations were sufficient. Addressing the concerns of civil society and political parties in Cape Town on Wednesday, the commission said it was for Parliament to grapple with these matters. Newly proposed regulations from Parliament raising the private donation limit to R30 million a year and the declaration threshold to R200,000 are yet to be promulgated by the president. Responding to concerns that political parties are advising donors to donate in smaller amounts so as to avoid having to declare it to the IEC, the commission said there was nowhere to hide and all funding eventually had to be accounted for in the annual financial statements of parties. The commission's George Mahlangu said that government funding to represented political parties was also strictly monitored. "The law is clear: section seven of the act provides on how these funds can be utilised, that's why the books of the political parties have to be audited by independent auditors." He said that the Multi-Party Democracy Fund, from which all political parties can benefit, had, however, not been as successful as the commission had hoped. Only around R45 million had been raised over the past four years. "We were so optimistic that this would do well, but to our surprise and disappointment, it doesn't receive the contributions that we expect." Mahlangu said that represented political parties were being sanctioned for not complying with declaring their spending.
