Tampa Theatre to host screening of Oscar-nominated "Nickel Boys," Q&A
The Tampa Theatre will host a special screening of "Nickel Boys" on March 22, followed by a discussion with filmmaker RaMell Ross, forensic anthropologist Erin Kimmerle and journalist Ben Montgomery.
Why it matters: The film adapts Colson Whitehead's award-winning novel, a fictional portrayal of the Dozier School for Boys in Marianna, Florida, where students suffered horrific abuse for over a century.
"Nickel Boys" had a limited theatrical run last year and was nominated this month for Academy Awards for Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay.
Zoom in: The film tells the story of Elwood Curtis, a Black teenager from Jim Crow-era Tallahassee, and his friend Turner as they navigate Nickel, an abusive reform school in Florida.
Flashback: The Tampa Bay Times series, " For Their Own Good," written by Montgomery and former Times reporter Waveney Ann Moore, inspired Whitehead's novel.
For 109 years, Florida sent wayward boys from across the state to Dozier — and the series chronicled the men who survived the school and demanded acknowledgment, resolution and reparation.
Dozier closed in 2011, and soon after, researchers from USF found the remains of children in unmarked graves at the school.
The big picture: Attendees will have the chance to hear from the filmmaker, along with the reporter and researcher who helped uncover the real story.
The Florida Institute for Forensic Anthropology and Applied Science (IFAAS) at USF partnered with Orion Pictures and Amazon MGM Studios for the special screening.
The event is free, and seats are available on a first-come, first-served basis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cosmopolitan
37 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
More Black women are going blonde than ever – Is it a comment on western beauty standards or is it not that deep?
As I got blonde crochet braids installed for the first time a couple of years back, I remember my hair anxiety was through the roof – would I even suit having blonde hair? After all, nobody wants to spend hours in a salon chair and then not like what they see when their stylist is finished. Thankfully, this wasn't the case – I loved it. So much so that I had the same style of crochet braids reinstalled time after time since then. Back in 2023, this felt like a big change for me, a real statement, but now, I am one of many Black women who are experimenting with blonde hair. Beyond the celebrities we are used to seeing, now TikTok is full of videos from Black women who are tapping into the trend. The appeal? The fact that there is a blonde shade for everyone. The perception around being a Black woman with blonde hair has changed through the years and this, met with advances in the hairdressing space which offers bespoke options for Black women who want to go blonde, means the space is flourishing. The rise in Black women opting to have blonde hair serves as a source of inspiration for other Black women who are thinking about making the change but aren't sure how to go about it. Beyonce, Ciara, Zendaya, Rihanna, Kelly Rowland and Serena Williams are just some of the celebrities who have gone blonde, but seeing blonde hair on Black skin in real life is encouraging. Blonde hair has the ability to elevate any look with a fresh and vibrant touch and speaking from experience, mine made me feel more confident than I have ever been. Hair theory could have a part to play in someone's decision to go blonde. Blonde hair has been linked to youthfulness, approachability and being fun-loving but some people think it's just another way in which Black women are adhering to western beauty standards. I don't think this is the case. In my opinion, Black women are able to put their own influence on any trend and the emergence of this trend isn't just about going blonde, but it's about finding a shade of blonde that compliments your undertone and overall aesthetic. For Black women, hair is part of our identity and we should have the freedom to express ourselves however we choose to. Blonde hair beautifully contrasts on Black skin so if you've found the shade that enhances your complexion, what have you got to lose? Entrepreneur Lindsey Tramel chose to dye her hair blonde because she wanted to reclaim her identity away from motherhood and being a wife but she did receive some mixed reactions for her new look. 'I'm on active duty in the US Army and there have been a few double takes, side eyes and whispers. It's safe to say that my blonde hair does draw attention but I refuse to dim my light because having blonde hair makes me feel alive,' she says. Hair stylist Michelle Sultan dyed her hair blonde when she was at school because she wanted to be like Mary J Blige. 'She was the OG blonde queen as far as I was concerned,' she adds. While Sultan dyed her hair blonde to emulate an artist she admired, children's expert Chioma Fanawopa wanted to pay tribute to her late mother, who had blonde hair. 'I wanted to keep her memory close and honour the connection we shared. I've received so many lovely compliments from people - they tell me it really suits me,' she said. Sultan and Fanawopa haven't received any backlash over their decision to go blonde. Surprising in some ways because there's still a bit of stigma attached to experimenting with colour (and texture) with Afro-textured hair. Sultan believes that people should be allowed to do whatever makes them happy with their own hair and although Fanawopa was hesitant about her decision at first (mainly that her hair colour would be too bright), she has found that her choice of blonde hue brings out more maturity in her look. According to hairstylist Lorraine Dublin, the trend of Black women dying their hair blonde is here to stay, but maintenance is key for anyone who wants to achieve the look and keep their hair happy and healthy. 'When dying textured hair, it's important to get touch-ups done professionally every 6-8 weeks for short hair and every 3 months for longer hair. I highly recommend protein treatments as well as they help to restore strength to hair that's been compromised by bleach,' she explains. In addition to regular touch-ups, protein treatments and regular deep conditioning, moisturising treatments and minimising heat usage are also essential for bleached hair. And be prepared to wait for the perfect hue as this may not be achieved in one sitting. 'If someone has a darker hair colour, then it will take some time for them to get the shade of blonde that they want. Mine took years to get to where it is now,' Sultan says. For wig wearers who want to experiment with blonde hair, the cost will depend on the length and density of the hair. 'A high-quality human hair blonde wig starts at around £500 and if you're wearing it daily, you'll need to wash it every two weeks with a sulphate-free shampoo or conditioner,' says Dublin. If you don't fancy buying a ready-to-wear human hair wig, you can always buy a darker human hair wig and get it dyed in a blonde hue of your choice - just a note that the hair will need to be raw as raw hair can be dyed to any colour, including blonde. Whether you wear your hair natural or you prefer to wear wigs, you can find something that works for you. And if you want to experiment with a bold and vibrant blonde hue, then so be it. Yes, keeping your hair happy and healthy is the most important thing of all, but the rise in more Black women experimenting with colour is a reminder of just how versatile our hair can be. To quote Sultan, 'They say blondes have more fun and who am I to argue with that? YOLO!'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
L.A. County to pay $2.7 million to teen assaulted in 'gladiator fight'
Los Angeles County is poised to pay nearly $2.7 million to a teenager whose violent beating at a juvenile hall launched a sprawling criminal investigation into so-called 'gladiator fights' inside the troubled facility. Video of the December 2023 beating, captured on CCTV, showed Jose Rivas Barillas, then 16, being pummeled by six juveniles at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall as probation officers stood idly by. Each youth attacked Rivas Barillas for a few seconds before returning to breakfast. Two officers, later identified as longtime probation officials Taneha Brooks and Shawn Smyles, laughed and shook hands, encouraging the brawl. "What made this unique is the video,' said Rivas Barillas' attorney, Jamal Tooson, who said his client suffered a broken nose and traumatic brain injury. 'The entire world got to witness the brutality that's taking place with our children at the hands of the Los Angeles County Probation Department.' The video, first reported by The Times, prompted a criminal investigation by the state attorney general's office, which later charged 30 probation officers — including Brooks and Smyles — with allowing and encouraging fights among teens inside county juvenile halls. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta referred to the coordinated brawls as 'gladiator fights' and said his office's CCTV review had turned up 69 such fights during the chaotic first six months after the hall opened in July 2023. On Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors will vote on whether to approve the $2.67-million settlement to Rivas Barillas and his mother, Heidi Barillas Lemus. According to a public summary of the 'corrective action plan' that the Probation Department must produce before a large settlement, officials failed to review CCTV video of the fight and waited too long to transport the teen to a hospital and notify his family. CCTV monitors are now 'staffed routinely,' and officials are working on conducting random audits of the recordings, according to the plan. A spokesperson for the Probation Department did not respond to a request for comment. Immediately after Rivas Barillas arrived at the Downey juvenile hall, Brooks demanded to know his gang affiliation, according to the claim filed with the county. Brooks said she had heard that Rivas Barillas, who is Latino, was from the "Canoga" gang and that she "hoped he could fight' before directing the other juveniles, all of whom were Black, to attack him in the day room, the claim stated. After the video made headlines, accounts of teens forced by probation officers to fight have trickled out of Los Padrinos. A teen told The Times in March that officers at Los Padrinos rewarded him with a fast-food 'bounty' — In-N-Out, Jack in the Box, McDonald's — if he beat up kids who misbehaved. The teenager, who had previously been housed in the same unit as Rivas Barillas, said staffers would also organize fights when someone arrived who was thought to be affiliated with a gang that didn't get along with the youths inside. 'We get a new kid, he's from the hood. We have other hoods in here. We're going to get all the fights out of the way,' he said at the time. 'They were just setting it up to control the situation.' Another teenager, identified in court filings as John (Lohjk) Doe, alleged in a lawsuit filed in February that soon after arriving at Los Padrinos in 2024, he was escorted by an officer to the day room. The officer, identified only by the surname Santos, told a youth inside the day room that 'you have eleven (11) seconds' and watched as the youth attacked Doe, according to the lawsuit. On another occasion, the same officer threatened to pepper-spray Doe if he didn't fight another youth for 20 seconds. The teens who fought were rewarded with extra television and more time out of their cells, the suit alleged. After the teen told a female officer about the two coordinated brawls, he was transferred to solitary confinement, the suit alleged. Times staff writer James Queally contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Justice Department investigation of racial hiring at City Hall also highlights President Donald Trump's own hiring record
WASHINGTON — Facing a federal probe into alleged hiring preferences for Black job candidates, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson attempted to deftly highlight that it was the president's hiring practices that were the problem, not his. 'My administration reflects the country, the city,' Johnson said as he called on the Department of Justice to turn its sights essentially on itself and investigate President Donald Trump's hiring. 'His administration reflects the country club.' While Johnson's gambit to get the DOJ to investigate Trump's hiring has no chance of succeeding, the first-term mayor's comments underscore how the president's picks for top leadership positions have skewed more heavily toward men and white people than any president in recent memory. Trump's assault on diversity initiatives has also led to major changes within the agencies charged with fighting discrimination. His administration has dismantled many traditional approaches for combating racial and gender bias, while using headline-grabbing announcements to put pressure on political opponents such as big-name law firms, Harvard University and the Chicago mayor's office. At the 100-day mark of his second administration, Trump's Cabinet was 84% white and 84% male, according to research from The Brookings Institution, a left-of-center think tank in Washington. That's a bigger share for both groups than any other president since at least 2001, when George W. Bush assumed office. In fact, Trump's current Cabinet is less diverse than his first-term Cabinet, which, after 100 days, was 74% male and 74% white. Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, the researcher who compiled the data and the director of Brookings' Katzmann Initiative on Improving Interbranch Relations and Government, said many factors could have made Trump's second-term Cabinet less diverse than his first. Trump in 2024 campaigned heavily on opposing diversity efforts, she noted, and outside groups such as the Heritage Foundation and its Project 2025 initiative compiled lists of potential officials aligned with their ideology. That could have shrunken the pool of candidates, she said. Experienced Republican job candidates, especially women, who served in the Bush administration might also have been turned off by what they saw during Trump's first term. 'When they saw all the turnover, when they saw a lot of chaos, when they saw Jan. 6, all of that decreased the pool of people,' said Tenpas, referring to the riot at the Capitol that sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election. 'There is something to having had experience in the prior administration and then working your way up. I think (the Trump administration) doesn't have as deep a pool as the typical Republican president would, given that the Republican Party has really shifted and become the party of Trump.' All presidents since 2001 — Bush, Barack Obama, Trump and Joe Biden — have fallen short of mirroring the racial composition of the country in their Cabinets when compared to census figures. Biden came closest, with a third of his appointees being non-white. About 58% of Americans reported being white in the 2020 census, the most recent nationwide count. Nearly 19% were Hispanic, 12% were Black and nearly 6% were Asian American. There are slightly more women than men in the country, the census found. Tenpas said measuring Cabinet positions is a 'good microcosm' of a president's hiring practices. 'These are the most senior, the most elite positions. Having to get confirmed by the Senate is a big deal, and that gives you a lot of cachet in that particular job,' she said. By comparison, the makeup of Johnson's entire mayor's office staff is 34% Black, 24% Hispanic, 30% white and 7% Asian, according to the latest numbers provided by the mayor's office. Johnson's Cabinet was much Blacker, however, hovering at about 44% as of last year, according to the Triibe news website. The population of Chicago is about 30% Latino, 29% Black, 31% white and 7% Asian. But Trump's pattern of promoting predominantly white and male people for powerful positions extends beyond his Cabinet. During Trump's first term, for example, 76% of the federal judges he had confirmed were men; 84% were white. Under Biden, only 34% of federal judges confirmed were men, while 40% were white. Toward the end of Trump's first term, only seven of the 93 U.S. attorneys — the top federal prosecutors for their area — were women. Only two were Black. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for diversity initiatives, which regained popularity in government and corporations after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Among the flurry of executive orders he issued in his first days of office at the start of his second term, Trump terminated all federal offices, positions and programs dealing with 'diversity, equity and inclusion.' He and his administration have attacked universities, public schools, outside companies, nonprofit groups and even cities relying on federal transportation grants for using DEI initiatives. Trump has also removed many prominent federal leaders who are women or people of color. In February, the president fired the second Black general to serve as chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, former Air Force fighter pilot C.Q. Brown Jr. Pete Hegseth, Trump's secretary of defense, questioned whether Brown deserved the Pentagon's top post or whether he got it 'because of his skin color,' although it was Trump who picked Brown to become the top Air Force officer. While dismissing Brown, Trump also fired Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to become the Navy's top officer and the first woman to become a permanent member of the Joint Chiefs. He also fired the first woman to lead the Coast Guard and the first female president of the Naval War College. After Franchetti's firing, the military no longer has any women in four-star general or admiral positions. U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat and former Army National Guard helicopter pilot, decried Trump's string of firings. 'Trump would rather appear 'anti-woke' than keep our military strong,' Duckworth said on social media after Trump ousted the Coast Guard chief. Duckworth noted that Lt. Gen. Dan Caine, the person Trump picked to succeed Brown as chair of the Joint Chiefs, did not meet the legal requirements for that position (although the president can waive those prerequisites). 'President Trump has fired at least 10 expert senior military officers, most of whom were women or people of color, and several of whom — unlike Caine — met the legal qualifications to be chairman,' she wrote in an April op-ed. 'We have liberated our troops from divisive and demeaning political trainings,' Trump told graduates at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York. late last month. 'There will be no more critical race theory or transgender for everybody forced onto the brave men and women in uniform, or on anybody else for that matter, in this country. We will not have men playing in women's sports.' Outside the military, Trump fired Carla Hayden, the first woman and first Black person to be the Librarian of Congress. Obama appointed Hayden, who grew up in Chicago, to the position. She was the head of the Baltimore public library system and a former president of the American Library Association. Trump also came under fire for dismissing board members — all women — of independent agencies focused on protecting workers' rights before their terms expired and ousted two female members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which oversees workplace discrimination cases. The dismissals have left both the National Labor Relations Board and the EEOC without quorums. Tenpas, the Brookings researcher, said a diversity of advisers can help ensure that presidents hear from a variety of perspectives and give leaders a broad range of options. It can also have an impact on the public, she noted. Biden, for example, picked Deb Haaland as his secretary of the interior. The former House member was the first Native American to serve as a Cabinet secretary, and the agency she led had a major impact on tribal relations with the federal government. 'It is symbolically important,' Tenpas said. 'If you were a young Native American and you saw that this woman was now the secretary of the interior, you might think to yourself, 'Maybe I can do that.'' Trump's legal team, though, has argued that Johnson crossed the line when touting the number of Black officials in the mayor's administration. 'It's not the 1960s. It's not the fresh days of the Civil Rights Movement,' said Harmeet Dhillon, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, in an interview with Newsmax, a conservative cable network. Dhillon sent a letter to Johnson announcing the hiring investigation. 'In 2025, the mayor of Chicago is proudly proclaiming name after name or job description after job description of African Americans whom he has hired,' Dhillon said, adding that Johnson claimed Black people 'do a better job' and that he has tried to help Black people build their businesses. '(He's) basically rent-seeking for a particular race because he's from that background, or because that's what's politically demanded in his city,' Dhillon said. 'That's illegal.' 'You might call it ordinary pandering of a retail politician, but the city of Chicago actually has a long and lurid history of rent-seeking and favoritism and nepotism and all other manner of discrimination and specifically racial discrimination,' she said, without noting that discrimination and violence against Black residents of Chicago, including segregation, redlining, the 1919 race riots and racial discrimination among police, far outweighed any advantages they received. Dhillon told Newsmax it was an 'open and shut case' that Johnson was discriminating based on race, but the investigation would determine how wide-ranging the behavior was and how far back it went. Juan Perea, a professor at the Loyola University Chicago School of Law who specializes in racial inequality and civil rights, said it was unusual for the Justice Department to launch an investigation into Johnson's administration on its own. Typically, employment discrimination matters are handled by the EEOC. In Johnson's case, there are no allegations that an applicant was improperly denied a job because of racial discrimination. So the Justice Department is investigating whether Johnson's hiring practices had a 'disparate impact' on the makeup of his workforce. If the Justice Department can show that type of pattern, the Johnson administration would have to prove its hiring practices are neutral or related to a business necessity, he explained. But Trump himself issued an executive order in April to 'eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, federal civil rights laws and basic American ideals.' 'Disparate-impact liability is wholly inconsistent with the Constitution and threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream. Under my administration, citizens will be treated equally before the law and as individuals, not consigned to a certain fate based on their immutable characteristics,' Trump's order said. Perea said the order wouldn't prevent the Justice Department from using the same tool against the city of Chicago, because presidential policies often affect how federal agencies enforce workplace discrimination laws. 'Trump wants to eliminate disparate-impact liability for people he likes. He basically wants to make it harder for Black people and minorities to bring disparate-impact actions with respect to majority white workforces,' Perea said. 'But that doesn't prevent him from using a disparate-impact action against a predominantly Black workforce. You can do both.' The Trump administration has promoted the idea that white workers regularly face discrimination because of DEI initiatives. The EEOC, under acting Chair Andrea Lucas, publicly questioned 20 large law firms in March about their diversity initiatives. Lucas also accused Harvard University of 'engaging in a pattern or practice of disparate treatment against white, Asian, male, or straight employees, applicants, and training program participants.' But Perea said employment discrimination against white people was a 'cultivated fiction' that 'essentially doesn't exist' as white employees and applicants rarely file racial discrimination cases with the EEOC. One study by the Center for Employment Equity at the University of Massachusetts Amherst found that, over a five-year period, white people filed only one racial discrimination complaint for every 100,000 employees, compared with 195 cases for every 100,000 Black employees. As Trump changes the face of federal leadership, his administration is also completely overhauling many of the federal institutions charged with fighting discrimination. The Justice Department is at the forefront of those changes. Trump has fired or pushed out top leaders in the agency, which traditionally has distanced itself from the White House, and installed leaders loyal to him in top posts. Dhillon, head of the civil rights division that's investigating Johnson, was a prominent conservative activist in California who represented the 2020 Trump campaign and disputed the fact that Biden won that race. U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, opposed her appointment to lead the civil rights division, which he called the 'crown jewel' of the Justice Department. 'I cannot and will not support a nominee whose record suggests she is more likely to attack civil rights than defend them,' Durbin said in an April statement. Three weeks later, Durbin and other Democrats on the panel pushed for more information about changes Dhillon made during her initial weeks on the job, which they said 'may well be inconsistent with Congress' intent' in enacting the Civil Rights Act that the division enforces. They noted many career lawyers from the civil rights division left their jobs in the first few months of the Trump administration. According to Justice Connection, a network of former Justice Department lawyers, about 70% of the civil enforcement attorneys have been forced out of the civil rights division. In January, the division had 365 attorneys, but now there are only 110 left. Just five of the 35 lawyers enforcing employment discrimination laws are still on the job. At the same time, Dhillon has reframed the goals of each team in her division. When it comes to employment, a new mission statement makes clear lawyers will pursue claims of discrimination against whites and non-whites and that the division 'will not tolerate a two-tiered application of Title VII (the employment section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act) that protects only certain Americans from discrimination.' Stacey Young, executive director and founder of Justice Connection who once worked in the civil rights division, said the new direction under Trump undermines civil rights laws. 'Targeting employers for DEIA (diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility) initiatives isn't something that's contemplated by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act or the precedent that has evolved interpreting that statute. It's a political stunt, and they've weaponized the civil rights division to advance it,' she said. Young also questioned the Trump administration's handling of the investigation into Johnson's office, pointing out that Dhillon sent a letter the day after Johnson made the comments touting the Black members of his administration. 'It is at the very least extremely unusual — and possibly unprecedented — that an investigation like this by the employment litigation section of the civil rights division would have been opened based only on comments like those,' she said. 'What the mayor said was, 'We have hired a lot more Black people.' He didn't seem to suggest, 'We made it clear that we were only hiring Black people. We are denying non-Black people jobs,'' she said. 'Simply celebrating that greater diversity exists is not the same as discrimination.'
