White House press secretary Leavitt plays down Musk ‘fistfight' reports: ‘It was definitely a disagreement'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has shut down rumors of a physical altercation that allegedly took place between Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
Trump's former political adviser Steve Bannon claims that Musk body checked Bessent 'like a rugby player' during an incident in the White House in mid-April. According to Bannon, Bessent hit the tech billionaire back and the pair had to be broken up by multiple people before Musk was taken out of the West Wing.
Fox News presenter Maria Bartiromo quizzed Leavitt about the reported clash on Sunday. 'Did Musk actually get physical? Was there a fistfight that he body checked the treasury secretary?' she asked.
'I certainly wouldn't describe it as a fistfight, Maria,' the press secretary replied. 'It was definitely a disagreement [...] we've moved on from it,' said Leavitt, after sharing that there were several occasions where the cabinet and Musk would 'get frustrated with one another.'
Both men had been inside the Oval Office making their cases for who should be selected as Internal Revenue Service commissioner, The Washington Post reports.
However, things took a nasty turn when Trump opted for Bessent's choice, and the pair began firing off a round of insults as they departed the Oval Office.
According to The Post, Bessent teased Musk over his claims that he would uncover over $1 trillion in wasteful government spending – a goal which Musk had not managed.
'Scott said, 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,'' Bannon said in an interview.
Musk, who has been facing allegations of ketamine use during his time in Washington, then slammed his shoulder into Bessent's rib cage before the trade secretary retaliated, Bannon told The Post.
'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,'' Bannon claimed.
News of the scuffle broke Sunday following the firestorm between the Tesla billionaire and Trump, who said he had 'no intention' of speaking to Musk following their X spat over the 'Big Beautiful Bill' up for debate in Congress.
'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump told NBC News on Saturday. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.'
'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the president,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump reveals the advice he gave Barron about drugs and tattoos
President Donald Trump revealed his 'formula for good parenting' as 19-year-old Barron wraps up his first year in college. 'I always said the same thing. I said: no drugs, no alcohol, no cigarettes. I also would say don't get tattoos, but I don't say it too strongly, because a lot of people have gotten tattoos, and that's what they choose to do,' Trump told The New York Post in a podcast interview released Wednesday. Many of the president's supporters at rallies sport tattoos and even some members of Trump's Cabinet, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The 78-year-old president has made a point of not drinking, as his older brother, Fred Trump Jr., suffered from alcoholism and died young, at age 42. He boasted that his five children - Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany and Barron - were 'born smart.' 'Barron is great. He is very tall and good,' the president said of his youngest, his only child with first lady Melania Trump. The president also revealed the sad reason why Barron was drawn to studying at New York University - he thought his late grandmother would live nearby. 'He just wanted to be there,' Trump said. 'He wanted to be there because his grandmother was gonna stay and wait for him in an apartment near the school. And she passed away.' Barron Trump is spotted leaving class at New York University last month. President Donald Trump said his 'formula for good parenting' was to tell his broad to avoid alcohol, cigarettes, drugs and even tattoos Melania's mother Amalija Knavs died in January 2024 at the age of 78. 'She was fantastic. Melania's mother was a fantastic woman. And Melania is a fantastic mother, by the way. She loves Baron,' Trump said. 'He's very tall and he's a good-looking guy.' Barron started at NYU as a freshman later in the year. Trump said he warned his son 'a little bit' about 'all the lefty professors' at the school. During the 2024 cycle, Barron, at that point 18, popped his head up more on the campaign trail. He attended his first Trump rally at his father's Doral golf club in Miami in July - the rally the Republican nominee attended before the Butler, Pennsylvania event where he was nearly assassinated. Barron also pushed his father to appear on particular podcasts, which likely helped the president increase his strength among the young male vote - a bloc Democrats usually overwhelmingly win. Trump lauded his other children in the interview too. 'Eric has done a fantastic job,' the president said. 'Ivanka, you know Ivanka? Yes. Very well. She's so great,' he continued. 'And Tiffany has done really well,' he said. She went to a great law school and did very well. Always a good student.' Eric Trump, and brother Donald Trump Jr., have been inking deals as the heads of the Trump Organization, while Ivanka has stepped back from the political limelight, after working in the first Trump administration. She did travel with her father over the weekend. Tiffany Trump had her first child, a son, in May. But it's Donald Trump Jr. who's most often referenced when there's talk of a Trump dynasty. Trump wasn't sure if Don Jr. would ever run for president. 'I don't know. I mean, I don't know. I think all of them probably have a future in politics, frankly. And Don is very good. A good guy. He's an outdoorsman,' the president said.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major blow for Australia just days before Anthony Albanese meets Donald Trump
The Trump administration has launched a review into the AUKUS security deal with Australia and the UK. The review, which was announced overnight on Thursday, will be led by vocal sceptic Elbridge Colby, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy who has called the pact 'crazy'. A defence official told The Daily Telegraph the Pentagon was looking at the deal to ensure 'this initiative of the previous Administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda'. 'As (Defence) Secretary (Pete) Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs. It comes almost two weeks after it was revealed Hegseth urged Australian counterpart Richard Marles to increase military spending. Australia's total defence spend in 2024-25 was about $53.94billion, or 2 per cent of GDP. This is set to increase to 2.33 per cent by 2033-34 - but the US wants the number to be at least 3 per cent. Head of the US Seapower Subcommittee, Congressman Joe Courtney has spoken up to encourage his government not to abandon the pact. 'The new administration certainly has the right to review the trilateral AUKUS mission,' he said. 'But as the recent UK government's defence review determined, this is a defence alliance that is overwhelmingly in the best interest of all three AUKUS nations, as well as the Indo-Pacific region as a whole. 'To abandon AUKUS – which is already well underway – would cause lasting harm to our nation's standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing.' Under the pact, Australia will spend up to $368billion eight nuclear-powered submarines and purchasing more from the United States. It marks the biggest defence investment in Australian history with the annual cost amounting to 0.15 per cent of GDP until the mid-2050s. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will be attending the G7 Summit next week in Canada, during which he is expected to meet with Donald Trump.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump gets the OK to end protections for national monuments, from the Statue of Liberty to the Grand Canyon
President Donald Trump has the authority to abolish national monuments protected by his predecessors, the Justice Department recently said. In a legal document dated to May 27, the department overturned a nearly 90-year-old opinion that said presidents did not have that ability, saying that its conclusions were 'wrong' and 'can no longer be relied upon.' ' The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a president to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the 'landmarks,' 'structures,' or 'objects' identified in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the act's protections; and such an alteration can have the effect of eliminating entirely the reservation of the parcel of land previously associated with a national monument,' the Office of Legal Counsel's Deputy Assistant Attorney General Lanora Pettit wrote. ' The contrary conclusion of the Attorney General in Proposed Abolishment of Castle Pinckney National Monument, 39 Op. Att'y Gen. 185 (1938), was incorrect.' The document specifically refers to former President Joe Biden establishing California's Chuckwalla and Sáttítla Highlands National Monuments. The monuments, that have particular significance to Native American tribes and extend over some 848,000 acres of land, barred oil and natural gas drilling and mining there. The Trump administration told The Washington Post in March that it has plans to eliminate them. In April, the paper reported that Interior Department Officials were studying whether to scale back at least six national monuments, and a person briefed on the matter said the aim was to free up land for drilling and mining. Biden established 10 new monuments during his tenure. 'America's energy infrastructure was on life-support when President Trump got into office; and in nearly six months, the administration has shocked this critical industry back into life, making good on another promise to the American people,' the White House's Harrison Fields, principal deputy press secretary, told The Independent in an emailed statement responding to question about the Justice Department's opinion. 'It's imperative that the Senate passes OBBB to completely end Biden's war on American energy, and will liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal, and mineral leasing.' The Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Independent's request for comment on the matter. While this opinion does not overturn any national monument, it hints at future action. Trump has taken steps to shrink monuments in the past. During his first administration, he moved to slash Utah's Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments: the first such move of its kind in more than 50 years. Biden reversed Trump's decision before the courts could make a final ruling on the matter. Earlier this year, Trump opened the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine national monument to commercial fishing while leaving the monument in place. The Interior Department is weighing changes to monuments across the country as part of the push to 'restore American energy dominance.' The National Park Service alone manages more than 100 national monuments established under the authority of the Antiquities Act. Some are also co-managed by the U.S. and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Army, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Some of those include the Statue of Liberty, the Stonewall Inn, the Grand Canyon, Sequoia National Forest, and the Lincoln Memorial. While Congress must approve the designation of national parks, a national monument is designated by a president via the Antiquities Act. Around half of the nation's national parks were first designated monuments, and all except three presidents have used the act to protect areas both offshore and on land. Presidents, including Dwight Eisenhower, have also diminished monuments. Responding to the document, environmental advocate groups have asserted there might not be much legal standing and that moves to eliminate or shrink monuments would be less than popular. "There's no reason to think the OLC opinion should make much difference to the White House. National monuments have broad public and political support, and shrinking or revoking them will only damage the Trump Administration's popularity,' Aaron Paul, the staff attorney for the Grand Canyon Trust, told The Independent in an emailed statement. 'Besides, if the president tries to shrink or eliminate monuments, it would send the question to the courts, which is the real test of whether the OLC's views have any validity or not." 'The Trump administration can come to whatever conclusion it likes, but the courts have upheld monuments established under the Antiquities Act for over a century. This opinion is just that, an opinion. It does not mean presidents can legally shrink or eliminate monuments at will,' Jennifer Rokala, executive director of The Center for Western Priorities, said in a written statement. 'Once again the Trump administration finds itself on the wrong side of history and at odds with Western voters,' she said.
