Two high-ranking NOAA employees connected to 'Sharpiegate' incident put on leave
Steve Volz, the assistant administrator for NOAA's Satellite and Information Service, and Jeff Dillen, a deputy general counsel at NOAA, were placed on leave Thursday morning, Volz told NBC News.
Volz and Dillen were figures in a controversy during the first Trump presidency that came to be known as ' Sharpiegate,' in which forecasters were rebuked for contradicting the president over a crude alteration to a hurricane map.
NOAA confirmed Friday that the two men had been placed on leave.
'Mr. Dillen was placed on administrative leave by the department's senior career attorney pending a review of performance issues over the past several weeks,' NOAA Communications director Kim Doster said in an emailed statement. 'Separately, Dr. Volz was placed on administrative leave on an unrelated matter.'
When reached by phone, Dillen declined to comment.
The high-profile move comes at a tenuous time for NOAA, which is down hundreds of employees after staffing cuts and voluntary buyouts implemented by the Trump administration. The staffing and performance of the National Weather Service, which is part of NOAA, have been under intense scrutiny after recent extreme weather events, including the central Texas flooding tragedy.
The agency is without a leader as President Donald Trump's nominee, Neil Jacobs, awaits confirmation by the Senate. NOAA's spending is also under close review. The Trump administration has proposed deep cuts to the agency's budget, though Congress has signaled it won't implement such severe budget restrictions.
The news that Volz and Dillen were placed on leave was first reported by CNN. It's not clear exactly why the two top NOAA leaders were placed on leave.
In an interview, Volz said he received the news on Thursday morning in a letter from Laura Grimm, the acting administrator of NOAA.
'The letter itself gave no information about the cause. It said, 'You are on administrative leave pending an investigation into your recent public conduct,'' Volz said on Friday, adding that he had 'no idea' what was being investigated.
He said part of his job is to speak at public events, and he recently took part in a press conference at a satellite launch in Japan, among other events. Volz, who has worked in public service for 36 years, said he had not changed his approach to media or public speaking since the new administration took over.
'I give public comments on a routine basis and I've done that my entire time at NOAA. I haven't adjusted that. I'm cautious about my personal opinions,' Volz said. 'I have not been reticent about communicating the work we do and the challenging circumstances we're under. That's probably more out front than many other people in similar positions at NOAA.'
Both Volz and Dillen played roles in the aftermath of the 'Sharpiegate' incident in 2019. At the time, President Trump incorrectly said Hurricane Dorian could strike Alabama. But, the local weather forecasting office in Birmingham, Alabama, denied the state was at risk. Trump then showed reporters an altered hurricane path marked with a black Sharpie. Later, top NOAA officials rebuked the local forecasters amid perceived political pressure.
After the event, NOAA hired the National Academy of Public Administration to perform an independent assessment into allegations of scientific misconduct during the incident. The investigation found that Jacobs violated NOAA's ethics policies.
Volz authored a final decision about the report for NOAA, which agreed with NAPA's findings. He said Dillen worked on that document also. Volz said he did not know whether notices that they'd both been put on leave on the same day and their connection to the 'Sharpiegate' report was a coincidence.
'Jeff was the legal counsel. I was the senior official reading through the NAPA report and writing up our own determination memo, which found fault with two officials inside NOAA, including Neil Jacobs,' Volz said. 'It's not lost on me Jeff and I were both given admin leave on the same day and Neil Jacobs is going through hearings now and getting ready to be voted on by the Senate.'
NOAA did not directly comment about whether the 'Sharpiegate' investigation played any role in its decisions.
Volz said he remains a NOAA employee, but has no access to federal facilities and his email is 'locked.'
He said he was not sure what his next steps would be.
'I love the work I do at NOAA,' Volz said. 'I'm not ready to walk quietly into the sunset, that's for sure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
Researchers Are Resurrecting Billion-Dollar Disaster Tool Trump Killed
A climate nonprofit is planning to revive a key federal database tracking billion-dollar weather disasters that the Trump administration formally stopped updating in May. The database — which was produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — is set to return this fall as a product of Climate Central. The organization has hired Adam Smith, the former NOAA climatologist who led the disaster tracker for more than a decade, to continue tallying the growing number of storms, droughts and wildfires that cause at least $1 billion in damage.
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Washington's Job Market is Hot — For People Who Represent Fired Feds
The work, though, isn't always just about litigating terminations. In serving people cast out of what many had assumed would be career-long vocations, lawyers also find themselves playing job-hunt advisor, financial strategist and psychologist. Living in a region built on a bedrock of stable federal jobs, D.C.-area feds are particularly ill-equipped for the turmoil that hits private-sector industries more often. As the lion's share of federal reductions in force have yet to happen, the sorts of reactions the employment lawyers are seeing also offers an early sense of what the capital may experience as the Trump job cuts go into full effect. Right now, a reported 154,000 departing feds are still being paid under the fork-in-the-road deferred resignation plan. But that will end next month. 'I kind of expected more anger and was surprised that it was more just a deep, deep sadness,' said Jessica Samuels, a former Justice Department litigator who now working with Bailey on class-action suits on behalf of employees ousted from the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 'There's a deep grief on behalf of these people who have poured their heart and soul into these careers that aren't going to be there anymore.' That's a feeling that will be familiar in parts of the country where once-robust manufacturing industries cratered in the late 20th century. Since cities like Washington prospered even as the rust belt struggled, there likely won't be a lot of sympathy for people going through the same thing. Another cohort wonders whether they should even push back. 'There's a very destructive thing where a lot of people are saying, 'Do I really want my job back?,' which is really what [administration leaders] want,' said Greenfield. She said she counsels against this because she thinks the chaotic terminations often mean people have pretty good cases if they want to be reinstated. All the same, Rapp-Tully, who's been in the field awhile, cautions against thinking of the administration as a gang who can't shoot straight. 'What I thought months ago is we would see a huge influx of RIFs, quickly done and with a lot of error,' she said. 'Instead, we saw two rounds of the [deferred resignation program]. We saw many emails that said 'RIFs are coming, resign now, get out. But if you're looking at the whole federal government, there are not a lot of actual RIFs, which tells me that the administration is aware that these are things that get litigated. … They keep telling us it's coming, but not every agency has had one yet. That tells me that many agencies are taking that into consideration and trying to work through that process.' Which isn't to say there won't be grounds to litigate when the biggest RIFs come. 'It's a very complicated process,' Rapp-Tully said. 'So even when you are trying to do it correctly, there still are many opportunities to make mistakes.'
E&E News
30-07-2025
- E&E News
NOAA, transportation nominees clear Senate panel
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee approved President Donald Trump's nominee for NOAA administrator Wednesday with bipartisan backing. The panel advanced Neil Jacobs by voice vote, but Democratic Sens. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Andy Kim of New Jersey, Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Brian Schatz of Hawaii, all of whom represent states facing acute risk from sea-level rise and intensifying coastal storms, asked to be recorded as opposing the pick. Ranking member Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), however, expressed support for Jacobs despite continued reservations about the nominee, who also served as NOAA administrator in the first Trump administration. Advertisement 'The NOAA position could never be more important, and while we may have some differences with Dr. Jacobs … I believe that he is in agreement on what NOAA's priorities should be,' Cantwell said.
