Hong Kong cancels passports, bans financial support for wanted overseas activists
Hong Kong authorities on Monday strengthened a crackdown on 16 overseas-based activists who were previously targeted by bounties on suspicion of endangering national security, implementing measures that include banning financial support to them and cancelling passports for most of them.
The activists were among 19 people who were targeted with arrest warrants in July for alleged roles in Hong Kong Parliament, a pro-democracy group the police called a subversive organization abroad. The organization is not the region's official legislature and its influence is limited.
Three of the original 19 activists were already targeted by similar measures last year.
Secretary for Security Chris Tang banned providing funds or economic resources to the 16 activists, including Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai, Australian academic Chongyi Feng and U.S. citizen Gong Sasha, the Hong Kong government said in a statement.
Travel documents were cancelled for 12 of the 16 who hold Hong Kong passports.
Hong Kong police issue fresh wave of arrest warrants for 19 overseas activists
7 days ago
Police in Hong Kong have issued a fresh wave of arrest warrants for 19 activists overseas, including some in British Columbia. Ottawa is condemning the move, calling it a threat to Canadian safety and sovereignty. CBC's Michelle Ghoussoub reports.
The government also prohibited properties from being leased to the people on the list or forming joint ventures with them. Anyone violating the orders risks a penalty of up to seven years in prison.
The 16 activists are hiding in the U.K., the United States, Canada, Germany, Australia, Thailand and Taiwan, among other regions, the government said, accusing them of continuing to engage in activities endangering national security.
The notice also accused them of intending to incite hatred against Beijing and Hong Kong through smear and slander.
"We therefore have taken such measures to make a significant impact," the statement said.
WATCH | 'We all live in fear,' democracy advocate says following Hong Kong arrest warrants:
'We all live in fear,' democracy advocate says following Hong Kong arrest warrants | Canada Tonight
7 months ago
Hong Kong police on Tuesday announced arrest warrants for six overseas activists, including two Canadian citizens, and offered bounties of $185,000 for information leading to their arrests. Cheuk Kwan with the Toronto Association for Democracy in China discusses how his community is being impacted and how Canada should respond.
Beijing imposed a national security law on the territory in 2020 that has effectively wiped out most public dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019. Many activists were arrested, silenced or forced into self-exile.
The measures announced on Monday were issued under the powers granted by Hong Kong's homegrown national security law enacted last year.
The arrest warrants issued in July have drawn criticism from foreign governments, including the U.S., the U.K. and the European Union. Police offered rewards ranging from 200,000 Hong Kong dollars ($35,114 Cdn) to one million Hong Kong dollars ($175,574 Cdn) for information leading to their arrests.
WATCH | Hong Kong law cracking down on dissent comes into effect:
Hong Kong law cracking down on dissent comes into effect
1 year ago
Article 23, a controversial national security law in Hong Kong, has come into effect. Many fear the crackdown on dissent will further erode civil liberties.
In a July statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the moves.
"The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression," he said. "We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil."
The Hong Kong office of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry responded by opposing criticism from foreign politicians, insisting the actions were legitimate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Tariffs in crucial sectors could last beyond Trump era, says JPMorgan's geopolitics arm
The effective tariff rate on U.S. imports will settle near 22 per cent and duties on sensitive sectors critical to national security are unlikely to be lifted, JPMorgan Chase's Center for Geopolitics wrote in a report on Wednesday. Tariffs are being viewed across party lines as vital to enhancing the U.S. industrial base in strategic sectors such as semiconductors and defense, making a rollback unlikely even after U.S. President Donald Trump's term, the report said. While much of the market optimism has stemmed from the belief that tariffs are primarily a political bargaining tool, the report hints at a more nuanced trade landscape. Recent trade deals have fueled hopes that the White House may eventually soften its stance, but the report said expectations of a return to pre-Trump policies may be misplaced. 'It would be a mistake to assume that the United States returns to an era of low tariffs and the pursuit of comprehensive free trade agreements,' the report said. 'Even if the next U.S. president supports a pre-2017 approach to trade policy, they would face a number of challenges to unwinding the Trump administration's tariff structure.' As more times passes, companies might also recalibrate their investments accordingly, reducing the chances of going back to the previous trade regime. JPMorgan launched the Center for Geopolitics in May to help businesses navigate disruptions from global instability and other economic challenges. It is led by Derek Chollet, who has served in the Pentagon, the State Department, the White House and Congress. A report last month by the JPMorganChase Institute estimated that the implementation of full universal tariffs announced on April 2 could add up to $187.7 billion in direct import costs for midsize companies, more than six times the cost of earlier tariffs in place at the start of 2025. (Reporting by Niket Nishant in Bengaluru and Nupur Anand in New York; Editing by Arun Koyyur)
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Pfizer CEO says has spoken with Trump, in ‘productive' talks with government
On the company's Q2 earning call, Pfizer (PFE) noted that the company's guidance 'absorbs the impact of the currently imposed tariffs from China, Canada and Mexico as well as potential price changes this year based on the letter received on July 31 from President Trump.' Later in the call, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company is 'in very active discussions' at 'the highest levels of this government.' Bourla added: 'I discussed myself with the president after he sent the letter to me and all the others. We discussed a lot with the Secretary Kennedy, we discussed a lot with Doctor Post who is responsible for implementing a lot of these things. And I would say only that these discussions are extremely productive. I think we understand where the president comes from, and we are engaging in a productive way to find a solution. But because we are in active discussions, it's inappropriate for me to start providing more details because I don't want to say things while discussing with them. So I understand that many others may have questions about that, and I'm not sure I can give more information than what I just told you. That we had a letter that says a base of what the president wants. The letter asks a lot from us. But we are engaged in productive discussions with them.' Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Globe and Mail
7 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The Chinese family is in crisis
Nancy Qian is a professor of economics at Northwestern University. News stories about China nowadays largely focus on geopolitical developments, particularly the Sino-American rivalry. But China's 1.4 billion people, while aware of these issues, are more preoccupied with a problem that hits much closer to home: their shrinking families. The Chinese family is in crisis, owing to plummeting fertility rates, which declined from 7.51 children per woman in 1963 (its modern peak) to just one per woman in 2023. This demographic collapse is putting China's economy, society and polity at risk. The roots of China's fertility struggles are deep. China's population more than doubled between 1900 and 1979, from 400 million to 969 million. Food shortages were so common during this period that China became known as the 'land of famine.' Between 1959 and 1961, China endured the worst famine in recorded history, with 20-45 million people dying as a result of both high population density and deeply flawed government policies. So, beginning in the 1970s, China's government introduced strict family-planning laws that, for decades, restricted most Chinese households to one child. But family-planning laws are only part of the story. Though China's now infamous one-child policy was loosened in 2016 to two children, and then in 2021 to three, fertility rates have not increased. And unlike other countries grappling with low fertility rates, such as Japan and South Korea, China is still a poor country. According to the most recent data (from 2022) China's median per capita disposable income is US$6,224 (US$17 a day) for the 944 million people living in urban areas, and just US$2,777 (US$7.60 a day) for the 465 million in rural areas. In the United States, that figure is US$63,589. Even accounting for America's higher prices, the difference is huge. Add to that limited economic opportunities for young people – including those with university degrees – and Chinese households simply cannot afford more children. Why are so many young Chinese people depressed? Young people in China face an increasingly grim economic future The newest generation of Chinese parents face an additional psychological hurdle, rooted in their lack of firsthand experience of big families. The vast majority of them grew up as only children in households with two only children as parents, as well as four grandparents. They did not have cousins or siblings to play with, but they did have a large number of adult caregivers. As a result, many do not value large families and find the notion overwhelming. But all those caregivers imply heavy dependencies as generations age. A small and shrinking cohort of working-age Chinese, operating in a job market characterized by sparse opportunities and low wages, is now supporting a larger and growing population of retired individuals, who have limited access to pensions and health care. And their responsibilities extend beyond finances to include physical and emotional support. As if that were not enough, each young person is also the only source of pride for their parents and grandparents, who have collectively dedicated their lives – their time, energy, and money – to setting the child up for success. Young adults now have to earn all the sacrifices their caregivers made for them, effectively compensating their parents and grandparents for the children and grandchildren who were never born. This burden of responsibility is felt starting in childhood. Playgrounds are largely empty, and parks are populated mostly by retirees, even after school and on weekends. Children are more likely to be at home studying than outside playing. All this pressure may well be fuelling rising rates of depression and suicide among youths and young adults. The situation is set to worsen. Slower economic growth – which has already driven youth unemployment to historic highs – will continue to constrain the job market, intensifying already-fierce competition for limited opportunities, and will impede the government's ability to increase pensions. China's government has a strong interest in addressing the crisis of the country's families. Economic and social problems tend to evolve in unpredictable ways, and they can easily spiral into political instability. Although the government has implemented a broad range of policies aimed at encouraging families to have children, including monetary incentives, fertility remains low. How will a civilization built around family units and networks fare as a nation of individuals without siblings and cousins? What will the lives of the elderly be like when there are few young adults to care for them? Can ordinary Chinese, to whom family represents both a virtue and a way of life, feel content without children? As the spectre of social and economic upheaval looms, these questions must be answered. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025.
