Hoekstra warns Trump policy is a 'major blow' to climate efforts
The EU recently outlined its path to attaining 90% net reduction in greenhouse gasses by 2040.
Europe is the fastest warming continent with dramatic weather events – from floods to drought -already unfolding across several member states.
Hoekstra says the US pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord is a "major blow" to international efforts to tackle climate change.
US President Donald Trump fundamentally changed America's climate change policy when, for the second time, he withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord.
In addition, the Trump administration reversed an Obama-era clean power plan aimed at reducing carbon emissions from power plants and rolled back emissions standards for vehicles.
Although the EU says it is pressing ahead with its plans to deal with global warming, the overall ability for the world to tackle the issue is limited due to the about turn by the US, Hoekstra told Euronews.
As the world's second largest emitter of CO2 gas, its "clearly deeply unfortunate and a major blow to international effort", Hoekstra said.
"Climate change doesn't discriminate. It doesn't matter for the heating up of the planet where CO2 is being pumped into the air. And if then the second largest emitter, the most formidable power across the globe in geopolitical terms, and the largest economy basically says, well, thanks but no thanks, we no longer play ball. That is, of course, something that has very significant consequences," he said.
But Hoekstra says all might not be lost if US investors see the dividends from technologies in the green tech sector. He says the private sector will be useful in paving the way for innovation and delivery of better, greener technologies which will help the environment.
"My read is that you will see in the US that whenever an investment in, for example, cleantech pays off, and as a side effect is also something that is good for climate, businesses are not gonna stop it," he said.
Hoekstra also points out that Europe needs to grasp this opportunity to win back or attract innovation to the continent in the growing, green technology sector though major European investment and a functioning capital markets system across the EU.
"We need to reshape the landscape in such a way that innovation can flourish across Europe and that will take huge steps in terms of the capital markets union," he said.
It will take "way more investments from businesses and governments alike in tech and in AI," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Age verification becomes mandatory on porn sites in the UK, and gradually in France
The internet appears to be entering the "age verification era." This was the prediction made in June by France's media and digital communications regulator (Arcom) in its contribution to European guidelines on the protection of minors. It is clear that new fronts have opened up worldwide for the pornographic industry, which has been on the frontlines for several years. The United Kingdom made headlines last month by announcing that, starting July 25, several major porn sites would deploy age verification tools in the UK, retiring the familiar and purely declarative button, "I am over 18." Among these are several websites – Pornhub, RedTube, YouPorn, Tube8 and MyDirtyHobby – run by Aylo, a leading Canadian and Cypriot group in the industry. The list also includes "camshow" platforms, such as ICF Group (Streamate, LiveHDCams), Cam4 and Cypriot giant Stripchat. Adult video sites are not the only ones complying with the measures set out in the Online Safety Act, passed in 2023. In recent weeks, a range of publishers have announced plans to deploy age verification tools in the UK, starting with Reddit, the American social media platform, which will hide its pornographic content behind a filter designed to keep minors out. The same goes for the gay dating app Grindr and even the social network Bluesky.
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Anti-immigrantion demonstrations in more than 80 cities across Poland
Anti-immigration protests organised by the far-right Confederation Libery and Independence party took place in more than 80 cities across Poland, including in Warsaw, Krakow, Poznan, Wroclaw, and Bialystok. Demonstrators demanded the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia. "Enough of the years-long policy of 'let everyone in, and who they are will be determined later'," Krzysztof Bosak, one of Confederation party's leaders, wrote on X. "Polish women and men have the right to be concerned about the level of security in their own homeland," he added. In a speech at the start of the march, Bosak demanded the resignation of Donald Tusk's government, the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia to curb illegal immigration, and the permission for soldiers to shoot at people who cross the border illegally. "Without closing Poland to illegal immigration, without launching a deportation operation, without renouncing political correctness, without equipping the Border Guard and the forces responsible for controlling the legality of residence, and without controlling the labour market, security will gradually deteriorate," he said, calling for a change in policy. The protests come shortly after Poland introduced border controls with Germany and Lithuania, which came into effect on 7 July. On the Polish-German border, controls are in place at 52 places and on the Polish-Lithuanian border at 13. The issue of migration has been widely up for debate, and a contentious topic in Polish politics, particularly as the country has experienced a rise in immigration in recent years. In the first round of the presidential elections held in May, candidates of the far-right performed well, with Slawomir Mentzen of the Confederation Libery and Independence party and Grzegorz Braun of Confederation of the Polish Crown party coming in third and fourth, respectively. Many believe that both candidates' successes were due to their hardline stance on migration. Interior ministers agree on asylum rules On Friday, Poland and five other EU countries, agreed a set of targets for tightening asylum rules. During the meeting hosted by Germany's interior minister, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz admitted that he was "pleased that Poland is carrying out border controls." Last year, Poland saw an increase in asylum applications due to the recurring crisis on its eastern border with Belarus, which has been ongoing since 2021. As a result, the Polish parliament passed a law temporarily suspending the right to apply for asylum for those who crossed the Belarusian border. Both Polish and European leaders have long accused Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko of orchestrating the influx of migrants to destabilise the EU. On Saturday morning, the Ministry of Interior and Administration published statistics on the number of approvals issued for special protection for foreigners on X. "In 2024, we issued 40 per cent fewer approvals for special protection for foreigners than in 2021. This is the result of a better managed system, our operations at the border and more efficient procedures," the post read. "The government is pursuing a responsible and well-considered migration policy, taking care of the stability and security of citizens," it added. Counter demonstrations in many cities Counter-manifestations against the Confederation marches were also held in Warsaw, Katowice, Olsztyn and other cities on Saturday. Demonstrators carried banners with the slogans: "Accept the refugees, delete the fascists," "Action Democracy" and "We defend the right to asylum." "Everyone, regardless of their skin colour and origin, should feel comfortable not only in Poland, but also in Europe," Maria Książak of the International Humanitarian Initiative Foundation said during the demonstration.
LeMonde
17 hours ago
- LeMonde
The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US
"Trump always chickens out." The phrase, coined by a columnist at the Financial Times, has been circulating widely in recent weeks. The idea that the US president speaks loudly but does not always follow through on his threats has fueled complacency among stock markets regarding the risks his trade war poses to the global economy. However, accusations of cowardice may not apply to Donald Trump alone. The European Union's hesitance in the face of Trump's maneuvering has also raised questions about whether the 27 member states can truly engage in the kind of power struggle that is now essential. While Brussels believed it was on track to minimize the tariffs on European exports to the United States, Trump dashed the EU's hopes by announcing on July 12 that he would unilaterally impose a 30% tax starting August 1. Is this a final bluff to extract further concessions, or a definitive move that could deal a severe blow to European growth? In any case, as the American president ramps up the pressure, the EU continues to waver, trying to salvage what it still can. European leaders have responded with lackluster retaliatory measures that have done little to deter Trump, who seems indifferent to the economic consequences of his actions. This game of high-stakes bluffing is likely to benefit the party setting the rules, to the detriment of those who are forced to adapt, always a step behind and uncertain of the game's true objective. Setting ambitious goals The confrontation appears to be based on a misunderstanding. The EU seeks to negotiate in good faith, aiming for fair trade based on the principle of comparative advantage between countries. But the US president has little interest in this quest for a mutually beneficial, purely commercial agreement. His ambitions go further. He aims to undermine Europe by any means, because he despises everything it stands for: supranationalism, multilateralism, progressivism and the primacy of law. Yet the EU has no reason to apologize for what it represents, nor to make concessions on its tax policy or the regulatory framework it has established for digital services. In this final stretch of negotiations, Europe must give the talks a political dimension, moving beyond the technical aspects that have dominated the debate so far. The EU should clearly set out its red lines and aim high. Settling for a compromise as unfavorable as the one the United Kingdom accepted in May would be unacceptable. If the 27 member states, as the US's top trading partner, fail to demonstrate that they carry more weight than a single country, it would send a disastrous message about the purpose of the European project. The EU's strategy of absorbing American provocations without actually implementing the retaliatory measures at its disposal has shown its limitations. The "proportionate, robust, and well-calibrated" reprisals promoted by the 27 member states do not measure up to what is a clear act of aggression, one whose aim goes beyond simply rebalancing the US trade deficit – its goal is to subordinate Europe. If Europe were to "chicken out," the consequences would not be purely economic.
