Son of Mexican drug kingpin ‘El Chapo' Guzman admits trafficking charges
A son of notorious Mexican drug kingpin 'El Chapo' has pleaded guilty Friday to US drug trafficking charges.
Prosecutors allege Ovidio Guzman Lopez and his brother, Joaquin Guzman Lopez, ran a faction of the Sinaloa cartel.
They became known locally as the 'Chapitos', or little Chapos, and federal authorities in 2023 described the operation as a massive effort to send 'staggering' quantities of fentanyl into the US.
Ovidio Guzman Lopez pleaded guilty to drug trafficking, money laundering and firearms charges tied to his leadership role in the cartel.
Ovidio Guzman Lopez has pleaded guilty (CEPROPIE via AP)
News in 90 Seconds - Saturday July 12
As part of a plea agreement, Guzman Lopez admitted to helping oversee the production and smuggling of large quantities of cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, marijuana and fentanyl into the United States, fuelling a crisis that has contributed to tens of thousands of overdose deaths annually.
Terms of the deal, including sentencing recommendations or cooperation agreements, were not immediately disclosed.
Speculation about a deal had percolated for months, as behind-the-scenes negotiations quietly progressed.
The hearing was initially scheduled for Wednesday but was moved to Friday by US District Judge Sharon Coleman without explanation. Hearings have often been delayed or rescheduled.
Ovidio Guzman Lopez's father, Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman, is serving a life sentence after being convicted in 2019 for his role as the former leader of the Sinaloa cartel, having smuggled mountains of cocaine and other drugs into the United States over 25 years.
The brothers allegedly assumed their father's former role as leaders of the Sinaloa cartel.
Ovidio Guzman Lopez was arrested in Mexico in 2023 and extradited to the United States. He initially pleaded not guilty but signalled in recent months his intent to change his plea.
Joaquin Guzman Lopez and another long-time Sinaloa leader, Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada, were arrested in July 2024 in Texas after they landed in the US on a private plane.
Both men have pleaded not guilty to multiple charges. Their dramatic capture prompted a surge in violence in Mexico's northern state of Sinaloa as two factions of the Sinaloa cartel clashed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
21 minutes ago
- Sunday World
Cops hunting driver after car crashes into roundabout in Belfast
Locals said the vehicle collided with a roundabout and overturned late last night. An overturned car on the McKinstry Road in Dunmurry last night. Photo: Kevin Scott Police are searching for a driver who fled after a crash in west Belfast. Locals said the vehicle collided with a roundabout and overturned late last night. The incident happened shortly before midnight. An overturned car on the McKinstry Road in Dunmurry last night. Photo: Kevin Scott News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 A PSNI dog unit was deployed to look for the driver, according to residents. The PSNI said: 'Police received a report of a single vehicle road traffic collision on the McKinstry Road in west Belfast at approximately 11:30pm on Friday. 'Efforts are currently ongoing to locate the outstanding driver who had made off from the scene prior to the arrival of emergency services.'
Sunday World
21 minutes ago
- Sunday World
Indian media reports on embassy warning to nationals following recent attacks in Ireland
The advisory issued by the Indian Embassy warns that there has been an 'increase in the instances of physical attacks reported against Indian citizens in Ireland recently' Dr Santosh Yadav documented his injuries following an attack by six teens near his Dublin apartment People taking part in an anti-racism march last month following the attack in Tallaght A warning issued to Indian nationals to 'avoid deserted areas' following a spate of recent attacks in Ireland has been picked up by media in India. The advisory issued by the Indian Embassy on Friday warns that there has been an 'increase in the instances of physical attacks reported against Indian citizens in Ireland recently'. "The Embassy is in touch with the authorities concerned of Ireland in this regard,' the advisory reads. 'At the same time, all Indian citizens in Ireland are advised to take reasonable precautions for their personal security and avoid deserted areas, especially in odd hours." The Embassy also shared its emergency contact number for citizens. The Times of India reported how Dr Santosh Yadav, an Indian AI scientist in Ireland, suffered a brutal attack by six teenagers near his Dublin apartment 'in yet another racist attack on Indians in Ireland'. People taking part in an anti-racism march last month following the attack in Tallaght News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 The unprovoked assault left him with a fractured cheekbone and other injuries. 'Dr Yadav highlighted a surge in racist attacks against Indians and minorities in Dublin,' the report states, while 'criticising the government's inaction'. In a post on LinkedIn, Dr Yadav showed how his glasses were broken and he was left bleeding from his nose after the unprovoked attack 'that has become common in the country'. "After having dinner, I was walking near my apartment when a group of six teenagers attacked me from behind,' Dr Yadav recalled. 'They snatched my glasses, breaking them, and then beat me relentlessly across my head, face, neck, chest, hands, and legs—leaving me bleeding on the pavement. Dr Santosh Yadav documented his injuries following an attack by six teens near his Dublin apartment 'I managed to call the Gardaí, and an ambulance took me to Blanchardstown Hospital. The medical team confirmed my cheekbone is fractured, and I have now been referred for specialist care," he said. Dr Yadav added that this was 'not an isolated incident' as 'racist attacks on Indian men and other minorities are surging across Dublin—on buses, in housing estates, and on public streets. Yet, the government is silent. There is no action being taken against these perpetrators". Two weeks ago hundreds gathered outside the Dáil following a brutal, unprovoked attack on an other Indian national in Tallaght Organised by members of Ireland's migrant community, the protest called attention to a growing sense of fear and vulnerability among immigrants, and demanded urgent action from the government. The victim, an Indian man in his 40s, had arrived in Ireland weeks before the incident, and was attacked at Parkhill Lawns in the Kilnamanagh area around 6pm on Saturday, July 19. Gardaí later confirmed they were investigating the assault. A vigil that was also held in Tallaght drew significant support from the Indian community. Ajay Shaji, attending the protest as a member of Migrant Nurses Ireland, described the incident as "shocking" and deeply traumatic for the wider migrant community. 'The migrant community was under stress and really shocked at the news,' he said. 'I don't know how traumatic it must be for him. He was here for [just weeks] and had to go through something like that. There are no words to explain it.' Kavi Raj, an Indian national living in Tallaght, called the incident 'horrifying' and explained that attacks like this need to be addressed at government level. 'We live in Tallaght - we are afraid to walk outside,' he said. "Immigrants and Irish people can live side by side, hand in hand,' Kavi said. Shinith Ak, who has lived in Kilkenny since 2009, said the attack left him 'ashamed.' 'One of my family members was attacked, and when I told my hometown back in India, they said, 'Come back – you're not safe there.'' Rofayda Mohamed, a mother who also attended the protest, expressed her growing fear for her children. 'The hate is rising. I was horrified, shocked, actually - that this can happen on our streets' she said. 'I'm afraid for my children, to go out, to play. This is not acceptable.' Speaking at the protest, Dublin West TD Ruth Coppinger called the attack 'repulsive'. 'These attacks are not isolated. They're under-reported and under-investigated,' she said. 'We keep hearing stories from the migrant community, from people of colour in Ireland, about attacks like this.'
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
‘What a f***ing b***h' – Call centre worker who thought she was on hold loses unfair dismissal claim
'The problem is that the customer heard it and took it to be a direct reference to her,' a WRC adjudicator wrote. A telephonist who was 'marched out' of a call centre after being sacked for using 'abusive and foul language' over an open phone line in the mistaken belief she had put the customer on hold has lost a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Bosses at Infosys BPM Ltd concluded the worker, Colleen Lonergan, jeopardised a 'valuable' client contract and committed gross misconduct when she was heard to remark 'what a f***ing b***h' by the customer last year, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) heard. In a decision just published, the employment tribunal has rejected a series of statutory complaints against the firm by Ms Lonergan, including claims under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Employment Equality Act 1998. Ms Lonergan told the WRC the phrase was intended to 'describe the situation rather than the customer', the tribunal noted. Stock image. News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 'The problem is that the customer heard it and took it to be a direct reference to her,' a WRC adjudicator wrote. It happened during a 'particularly difficult' call on June 27, 2024, when Ms Lonergan said she had been 'on the phone for an hour and 45 minutes without help', the tribunal noted. Ms Lonergan's evidence was that she 'thought the call was on hold'. Adjudication officer Penelope McGrath wrote in her decision document that by the time the case came before her, the tape of the call that had been reviewed in a company investigation had been wiped. 'There does not seem to be any doubt that the complainant used the word 'b***h' while on the call,' the adjudicator wrote. She noted the sworn evidence of the company investigator, a junior operations manager, that the phrase used was: 'What a f***ing b***h.' 'I understand that the tape was played in the course of the investigation and disciplinary process and that there was, at that time, no dispute that the language which was used was unacceptable,' Ms McGrath wrote. The adjudicator wrote that it was to Ms Lonergan's credit that she 'owned her mistake immediately' and raised it with the team leader. Ms Lonergan was allowed to keep working for a number of days while a disciplinary process took its course in early July 2024, but was 'marched out of the building' upon her dismissal in what the adjudicator considered to be 'regrettable' circumstances. Ms Lonergan, had also advanced a complaint of workplace discrimination against her former employer, referenced absences from work owing to health trouble on one occasion, and 'a breakdown crying at work over home issues and bad calls from customers' on another. 'I was continually harassed about taking too long coming back from toilet and breaks even though I was struggling with my various health issues,' Ms Lonergan wrote in a letter to the WRC. 'It's my belief that when I made the mistake on the call…the company took full opportunity to terminate my employment because of my ongoing health issues,' she added. The company's position was that there was 'no substance whatsoever to these allegations', the WRC noted. Addressing the disability discrimination element of the claim, the adjudicator wrote that she did not form the impression that the Ms Lonergan's team leader had to 'chivvy' her along from bathroom and smoke breaks any 'more or less' than other staff. 'I note there were never any disciplinary issues around time keeping and must assume that the team leader was simply doing her job,' Ms McGrath wrote. 'The respondent's position is that the claimant's behaviour in calling a customer a 'f***ing b***h' on a recorded call was completely unacceptable in the workplace, constitutes gross misconduct and warranted dismissal,' its representative Muireann McEnery submitted. Referencing this in her decision on the unfair dismissal claim, Ms McGrath wrote: 'I approve the respondent position as set out in the submission received.' She dismissed both the unfair dismissal and the disability discrimination complaints, along with further claims by Ms Lonergan under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994, and the Payment of Wages Act 1991 and the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973.
