Air Chathams considers cutting services
Photo:
Sharon Brettkelly
Regional airline Air Chathams is considering cutting back services because of mounting cost pressures hitting the aviation sector.
The state-owned traffic controller Airways announced on Wednesday that it would charge commercial airlines 17.7 per cent more over the next three years.
Air Chathams chief executive Duane Emeny told
Nine to Noon
regional airlines were struggling.
"We fly from Auckland to Kāpiti and with the Airways provision service there with the new pricing in year one we're going to be paying $862 to Airways per sector, that's at least five passenger seats just for that one charge," he said.
"In our case the most important thing is we've got to maintain connectivity to the Chathams, they don't have a road over there, so lets just focus on that and then look at everything else we're doing and say what makes sense, what doesn't and what are we going to be doing in the long term. Sadly, the net result of that could mean further regional cutbacks."
In a statement, Airways said it consulted with customers and stakeholders on service prices every three years.
It acknowledged the ongoing challenges facing the New Zealand aviation industry post Covid-19.
In setting prices, Airways said it had balanced cost management with its obligations to provide safe, efficient and reliable air traffic control services.
Emeny said regional airlines were crucial for rural and regional links to bigger centres so people could rely on them for healthcare.
Cutbacks would be a huge shame and ultimately it would be the customers suffering, he said.
"Now you're just expected to get in your car and drive to a larger regional airport to fly a larger turboprop aircraft or jet aircraft to connect to these places," he said.
"More of the damage is actually done when the visibility of these regions - the Westports, the Whakatānes, the Kaitaias, the Mastertons- they just fall off the map because from a global perspective if you're looking to travel to New Zealand and do business and visit these places they don't exist, they don't exist on the Air New Zealand website so they do lose out as a result of that."
Emeny said his company was considering leasing planes to other operators.
"We have an aircraft right now in the Kingdom of Tonga serving that country and those people, and we're doing that because we actually spent five years operating an airline in Tonga and now we've been asked to come and help and support and someone is prepared to pay for it," he said.
"We may do more of that which means we're doing less of it in New Zealand and ultimately the losers are the regional communities that rely on our services."
Emeny said the user pays model was crushing smaller players in the industry.
"It's really serious. It would just be amazing if government and local government could come together on this and say enough is enough these things are important it's really important connected that these regional airports can be viable and maintained in some way because if you don't have airlines flying into them they will ultimately close," he said.
Sounds Air this month [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/567539/sounds-air-cut-flying-routes-as-costs-surge announced it was cutting its Blenheim to Christchurch and Christchurch to Wānaka services, having earlier stopped its services to Taupō and Westport.
Board of Airline Representatives chief executive Cath O'Brien told
Nine to Noon
the impact of rising costs were being felt through the entire aviation sector.
"It is more difficult for those regional airlines and I would that their suggest operating costs across their business will be a real challenge, but I do think this systematic problem we have of cost to deliver the aviation system as paid for by airlines is being felt by the larger players too. Airlines have not returned to New Zealand as they had done pre-Covid," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Harricado - a new varietal of avocado, grown in Nelson
business food 31 minutes ago Depending on where you shop, avocados are generally cheaper than tomatoes but pricier than apples so it makes sense to grow your own if you can. Imagine then being lucky enough to not only buy a property with an established tree but to discover that it was a little bit ... well ... special. Harry Pearson has since lent his name to the fruit borne from this tree - the Harricado - and has worked with the New Zealand Tree Crops Association to make it more widely available.
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
Rocky road predicted due to Trump's tariff expansions, not least for US
The global rollercoaster ride of US trade tariffs has entered a new phase with sobering ramifications for many countries including the US. Auckland-based Economics professor Niven Winchester explains. The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump Administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. ADVERTISEMENT For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. Economic impacts The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. ADVERTISEMENT GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) An economic own goal The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. ADVERTISEMENT The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the West Auckland builder sentenced over massive meth haul, fire on a commuter train, and how Bluey could teach kids about resilience. (Source: 1News) Global impacts For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. ADVERTISEMENT Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is a Professor of Economics, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons Licence.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Businesses urged to bypass free MBIE employment mediation service due to wait-list
There is currently a seven-week waiting list to access the Ministry of Innovation, Business and Employment's mediation service. Photo: 123RF An employment lawyer is advising businesses to bypass the government's free employment mediation service. There was currently a seven-week waiting list to access the Ministry of Innovation, Business and Employment's mediation service, which was supposed to be a way to avoid drawn-out disputes between employers and their employees. "Don't wait," Rotorua employment lawyer Michelle Urquhart said, adding the cost of accessing private services was well worth it given the risks associated with leaving a dispute to fester. MBIE advised availability was limited due to high demand and apologised for the inconvenience, though wait time was an improvement from the peak 11-week wait in February. "There has been a sustained demand for employment mediation services, with a 12 percent increase in mediations delivered in 2024/25 compared to the previous year," MBIE director Pele Walker said, adding full-day mediations rose by 25 percent over the past three years, which reduced overall mediator availability. "Mediators report that the complexity of issues being brought to mediation has increased, contributing to longer sessions and more time needed to reach resolution." Urquhart said it was more than an inconvenience for businesses, as the longer it took to resolve an issue the more complicated and costly it became. "Having to wait more than two months for mediation - which is meant to be an early intervention service - is far from ideal in the current economic environment," Urquhart said. She said the delay means an increasing number of businesses were turning to independent specialists - or not dealing with the issue at all. "The second option is a lose-lose for both parties," she said, given current labour market conditions. "No one wants to be looking for a new job. For an employer, it can cost up to 1.5 times a person's salary to replace them, including recruitment, onboarding and lost productivity." She said the parties involved in a dispute should seek help quickly, even if they have to pay to use private services. "A dispute will initially impact the people directly involved, but it doesn't take long for it to start impacting wider teams, productivity, morale and ultimately, the bottom line. "Getting on top of the concern early, having calm conversations, and developing a resolution plan that works for everyone is critical to moving forward before too much damage is done." Urquhart said businesses could find a private employment mediator online through the Arbitrators and Mediators Institute or the Resolution Institute. MBIE also offered an early resolution service with most cases resolved within 15 working days, though urgent cases, such as those involving strikes or collective bargaining, continued to be prioritised.
