Morocco Outlines Strategy Against Cyber Violence at Arab Women's Conference in Cairo
With a focus on legal reforms, awareness efforts, and digital support tools, Ben Yahya noted Morocco's commitment to safeguarding women and girls in a digital age that continues to present new threats.
The conference brought together policymakers, civil society leaders, and digital rights experts from across the Arab region.
Morocco's delegation took an active role in the discussions, which explored challenges and practical solutions to online gender-based violence.
In her remarks, Ben Yahya described Morocco's multi-layered approach, which includes strategic legislation, most notably, the 2018 law to combat violence against women. Although the law does not explicitly refer to cyber violence, it addresses the emotional and psychological harm caused by digital abuse.
The minister also pointed to Morocco's data protection law as a crucial part of the legal framework. It safeguards citizens' personal information and helps curb misuse on digital platforms. But even with these protections in place, she acknowledged that the issue remains difficult to tackle.
Another major obstacle, according to Ben Yahya, is a lack of legal knowledge among women. Many do not know how or where to report cyber violence. Others hesitate due to societal pressure or fear of stigma. In many cases, victims are made to feel responsible for what happened to them, which reflects a larger problem at hand. One rooted in persistent stereotypes and a culture that still tolerates certain forms of abuse.
In partnership with civil society and government bodies, the Ministry of Solidarity launched national campaigns such as 'together for a responsible and safe digital space for women and girls.' Morocco has also developed online platforms that guide and support women who face all types of violence, including cyber abuse. These platforms connect users to legal and psychological assistance, offer educational material, and create space for anonymous reporting.
Over the two-day conference, 26 experts from various Arab countries presented research and case studies, examined how AI affects women's digital safety , and discussed how legislation can better adapt to emerging forms of online harm and harassment.
The Arab Women Organization also announced the 2025 edition of its Arab Girl and Technology Award and launched a new guide on how to prepare national reports for the regional CEDAW committee.
The conference will close with a symbolic transition of leadership as the presidency of the Arab Women Organization passes from Egypt to Morocco, signaling the country's growing role in shaping the region's digital and gender justice agenda.
And yet, despite the summits, the panels, the growing body of laws and strategies, many women cannot shake a sense of helplessness in the face of their treacherous everyday realities.
In a world still shaped by male dominance, online and offline, words often feel weightless. Is this enough? Will the time for real, irreversible change ever arrive? As conversations grow louder, the need for tangible, material solutions becomes more urgent. Until then, many remain unconvinced that the promises made in conference halls will reach the corners where women continue to suffer in silence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
6 days ago
- Morocco World
The Second Nakba Nobody Wants to Own
Prime Minister Netanyahu's Security Cabinet controversially approved this week a plan for the Israeli military to occupy Gaza City to dismantle Hamas, provide humanitarian aid outside of combat zones, and ultimately hand over control to unidentified 'Arab forces,' the New York Times reported on Thursday. The goal of this endeavor is to externalize the Palestinian crisis, but at what cost? Shifting the Burden Netanyahu appears to be sending a clear signal with this gamble, urging 'Arab neighbors to get onboard with the widely denounced Israeli plan. 'This is not Israel's problem alone, I expect Arab neighbors to assume responsibility,' he pledged. Yet, for Arab states, especially those maintaining peace (Egypt, Jordan) or normalized ties (UAE, Morocco, Bahrain), this proposition is untenable. Avoiding a Second Nakba At the heart of the Arab states' reluctance lies their keen sense of the catastrophic historical implications of the devastating Israeli campaign's criminal expansion in Gaza. Pressuring Palestinians in Gaza to leave, by starvation or bombing, would compound the trauma of displacement and erase their future homeland. It risks replicating the catastrophe of 1948. Preserving National Stability No Arab ruler would invite instability by hosting Gaza's population, including possible Hamas militants, poses serious security risks. Historically, Arab governments have taken similar measures: In 1970, Jordan's King Hussein expelled Yasser Arafat and the PLO following violent insurrections known as Black September, when the PLO became a 'state within a state,' disregarding Jordanian sovereignty. This conflict resulted in thousands of casualties and the PLO's exile to Lebanon. Starvation as Coercion The strategy appears well-thought-out: the need to escape increases as circumstances deteriorate and civilian survival becomes more precarious. The pressure for 'voluntary repatriation,' even under duress, increases with the number of Palestinians still living in Gaza. Amnesty International has described this as 'a broader effort to inflict genocide,' with severe consequences for children who suffer from malnutrition and avoidable death. Regional Implications Netanyahu is effectively shifting the moral and political burden onto Arab neighbors through a cruel calculus, starvation, displacement, and coercion, not sovereignty. In essence, no Arab regime is willing to risk national stability by hosting a displaced, potentially volatile population. Gaza's fate cannot be externalized under duress. Israel's framing of the Palestinian crisis as a regional burden is a political maneuver lacking both moral and strategic legitimacy.
Morocco World
05-08-2025
- Morocco World
Morocco's Interior Ministry Suspends Caid Over Alleged Corruption
Rabat – Morocco's Ministry of Interior has announced the suspension of a Caid, a local administrative authority, in Marrakech due to his alleged involvement in a corruption offense. In a statement, the ministry said that its decision is part of its commitment to upholding 'public service ethics.' The measure is also part of the ministry's daily monitoring of the work of authority agents, the ministry added. It said that the decision followed the opening of a judicial investigation into the Caid's suspected involvement in a corruption case. 'Appropriate administrative measures will be taken against him in accordance with the laws and regulations in force, based on the results of the investigation and judicial proceedings,' the statement concluded. A recent ranking by Transparency International's 2024 Corruption Perception Index ranked Morocco 99th out of 180 countries. In February, the Index gave Morocco a score of 37/100, indicating continued challenges due to corruption. Compared to the 2023 ranking, Morocco lost one point. The index uses a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates high corruption levels and 100 represents complete integrity. Morocco maintains eighth position in the Arab world, ahead of Algeria (107th), Egypt (130th), Mauritania (130th), and Iraq (140th). The United Arab Emirates leads the regional rankings at 23rd globally with 68 points, followed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia sharing 38th position with 59 points each, and Oman ranking 50th with 55 points. Tags: anti-corruptionAnti-Corruption in Morocco
Morocco World
04-08-2025
- Morocco World
Secret French Intelligence Documents Reveal Morocco's Crucial Support for Algerian Independence
Marrakech – French intelligence documents classified as 'highly confidential' have exposed the full scope of Morocco's pivotal support for Algeria's independence struggle. Recently published by Algerian political analyst Oualid Kebir, these classified documents from July 27, 1959, were sent directly to General Challe's office in Algeria and reveal one of history's most remarkable chapters of cross-border solidarity. The intelligence reports, never intended for public disclosure, meticulously document how Morocco transformed itself into a strategic rear base for the Algerian revolution under King Mohammed V's leadership. Far from merely offering diplomatic rhetoric, Morocco provided comprehensive military, logistical, and humanitarian assistance that fundamentally altered the course of Algeria's battle against French colonization. King Mohammed V approached this support with sophisticated strategic vision, balancing solidarity with sovereignty requirements. According to the French documents, the King's position was guided by three advanced objectives that were formulated according to regional and international circumstances. First, he aimed to establish Moroccan leadership of a 'Maghreb Union' independent from Nasser's Cairo bloc, seeking to cement Morocco's role as a leading power in North Africa. Second, he wanted to maintain the Moroccan monarchy's prestige in the Arab world by providing 'remarkable assistance' to Algerian brothers. Third, he carefully balanced relations with France by maintaining minimum financial and technical cooperation to avoid an open confrontation that might threaten Morocco's recently gained independence. The only way to reconcile these three imperatives, according to the document, was King Mohammed V's vision of positioning himself as a 'mediator' or 'arbitrator' in the Algerian conflict. This allowed him to gain the trust of the Arab world while maintaining ties with the West, creating a complex but politically astute equation. The effectiveness of this approach is vividly confirmed by historical testimony from the late Algerian President Ahmed Ben Bella, who recounted an important meeting with King Mohammed V in Madrid. 'I felt embarrassed to take out my list of requests,' Ben Bella later revealed in an Al Jazeera interview, 'because he had already offered us twice what we were going to ask for.' Support was national: From cabinet rooms to campus protests This royal commitment cascaded throughout the Moroccan government. As cited by the French documents, Abdallah Ibrahim's government provided tangible and effective support to Algerian revolutionaries at all levels. This support wasn't limited to slogans of unity among North African countries but was translated into field decisions. Morocco allowed the establishment of military bases for the National Liberation Army (ALN) on its territory, received Algerian refugees and provided political and humanitarian protection, issued Moroccan passports to members of the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN), and even used diplomatic pouches to transport sensitive communications and documents. Judicial authorities overlooked certain revolutionary activities within the country, at times secretly releasing detained FLN members to support the cause. Moreover, Nador was converted into a radio communications center serving revolutionary propaganda, while logistical networks facilitated weapons transport, the construction of military bases, training camps, and ammunition depots across the region. All this, as the document indicates, was not subject to internal dispute or government hesitation, but received clear approval from the Moroccan cabinet. This confirms that Morocco officially chose to support the Algerian revolution, even at the risk of straining ties with France. The documents speak of a crucial role played by Moroccan leader Abderrahim Bouabid, who did not hesitate to announce Morocco's full commitment to supporting the FLN during a meeting with Ferhat Abbas. Bouabid clearly expressed Morocco's vision of providing 'comprehensive and complete support,' in a political declaration reflecting the Moroccan state's engagement in the Algerian struggle not as circumstantial solidarity but as a strategic position consistent with the spirit and necessities of the era. The documents also show that Moroccan support wasn't limited to the government but extended to political parties, unions, students, and broad segments of the population. The support extended deep into Moroccan society. Despite its official ban since 1952, the Moroccan Communist Party continued promoting the revolution through propaganda channels. Meanwhile, the Moroccan Workers' Union provided significant material and moral support to its Algerian counterpart (UGTA). The National Union of Moroccan Students played a central role in providing forged cards, postal boxes, and strong propaganda support within Moroccan universities. Southeastern Morocco became a backbone of Algeria's military operations Perhaps most remarkably, the documents reveal the existence of an FLN intelligence network operating within Morocco since October 1958. This mission, which managed documentation centers, surveillance, espionage, and coordination offices, operated with the tacit approval of Moroccan authorities and worked in parallel with Moroccan security agencies, notably cooperating with them on several sensitive files. Led by Lagha Zaoui, this network maintained direct contact with Moroccan intelligence services, collaborating on interrogating Algerian detainees, handling French army deserters, and pursuing agents involved in counter-revolutionary activities. The military dimension of Morocco's support was equally substantial. The country hosted key command structures of the National Liberation Army, including the Western Staff Headquarters in Nador, Region 5 Authority in Oujda, and Zone 8 Command in Figuig. Dozens of logistical bases strategically positioned throughout southeastern Morocco provided critical infrastructure for the revolution. The Boubker-Touissit base served as a major supply hub, while the Figuig-Bouanane base facilitated cross-border operations. These facilities weren't merely staging grounds but comprehensive military installations with dedicated centers for manufacturing mines, storing ammunition, and conducting specialized training for Algerian fighters. Additionally, Morocco established a network of field hospitals, rest centers for exhausted fighters, and even camps for prisoners of war captured during operations against French forces. The documents estimate the number of Algerian fighters in Morocco between 3,000 and 4,000 men, some of whom were preparing to cross the border into Algeria on the eve of Mohammed V's negotiations with President de Gaulle, as an indirect political pressure message. Despite Morocco's exceptional support for the Algerian revolution, the relationship was not without friction. The documents reveal several points of contention, including tensions over the ambitions of certain FLN elements in Moroccan border regions and repeated clashes between French forces and Algerian revolutionaries that originated from Moroccan territory. Moroccan authorities also expressed reservations about the conduct of FLN intelligence operatives operating within the country, alongside suspicions regarding the Front's ambiguous stance during the Rif unrest in Morocco. Furthermore, the failure of FLN representative Kheireddin to fully earn the trust of Moroccan officials further strained relations between the two sides. Morocco bore the political and diplomatic consequences of that deep moral alignment The foundation of solidarity, however, remained unshaken. As Libyan historian Ali Mohammed Al-Sallabi documented, King Mohammed V publicly championed Algeria's cause during a September 1956 speech in Oujda, directly challenging French colonial narratives. When France retaliated by hijacking a plane carrying Algerian revolutionary leaders who were the King's guests, Mohammed V declared to France Tireur newspaper that this act was 'a more dangerous blow to his honor than his dethronement,' considering the leaders were abducted while under his protection. The King's commitment extended to rejecting lucrative French offers. In 1957, he declined a potentially beneficial oil deal in Algeria, considering it an affront to the dignity of the Algerian people who desperately needed support from their neighbors. His practical assistance included placing approximately five hundred Moroccan volunteers from Marrakech at the disposal of the National Liberation Army (ALN) and establishing safe medical facilities for injured Algerian revolutionaries along the border. By 1960, the King's support had only intensified. After receiving complaints from an Algerian governmental delegation during a visit to Marrakech about harassment by French consuls in the border regions, Mohammed V immediately ordered the closure of the consulates in Oujda and Bouarfa. When Ferhat Abbas, head of the Algerian provisional government, subsequently visited Rabat, he declared: 'Algeria is Morocco, and our solidarity is eternal. The Sahara is an issue that concerns Algeria and Morocco alone, and in no way concerns French colonialism – neither directly nor indirectly.' What these French documents unintentionally reveal is that Morocco wasn't merely a host geography for revolutionaries but an actual partner in Algeria's liberation battle. Morocco didn't simply offer sanctuary; it integrated Algeria's liberation struggle into its own national security framework, accepting serious diplomatic risk in the process. From royal palace to government ministries, from student unions to border villages, Morocco transformed itself into an essential component of Algeria's independence movement. These once-classified pages, written in secrecy by French intelligence, reveal a forgotten alliance that reshaped North Africa's decolonization. They offer a sweeping account of a gripping history of pan-Maghrebi solidarity, which the Algerian military regime would soon bury beneath propaganda, having turned its back on Morocco at the first opportunity to support separatism and hostility. Read also: The Last Believers: Memory, Mirage, and the Failed Promises of the Algerian Revolution
