logo
Thai-Cambodia border clash threatens 181 billion baht economic loss as ceasefire holds

Thai-Cambodia border clash threatens 181 billion baht economic loss as ceasefire holds

The Star5 days ago
BANGKOK: A fragile ceasefire between Thai and Cambodian forces has brought temporary relief to border tensions, but economists warn that prolonged conflict could cost both nations up to 181.7 billion baht over three months whilst displacing hundreds of thousands of workers.
The five-day border skirmish from 24-28 July ended with a ceasefire agreement taking effect at midnight on 28 July, yet sporadic violations continue to undermine the truce.
Cambodian forces have reportedly continued firing into Thai territory at multiple points, prompting Bangkok to lodge formal protests with Asean, the United States, and China as ceasefire witnesses.
Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira revealed that the government is still assessing the economic fallout, with initial estimates suggesting the conflict has already cost Thailand approximately 10 billion baht during the brief escalation period.
Economic vulnerability exposed
The financial implications extend far beyond immediate military costs.
Associate Professor Dr Aat Pisanwanich, an international economics expert, has modelled three potential scenarios following the ceasefire, warning of an 80% probability that fighting could resume.
"The ceasefire agreement represents a Thai victory in initiating bilateral negotiations rather than relying solely on international court intervention," Dr Aat stated, though he cautioned that underlying territorial disputes remain unresolved.
Should tensions persist for one month, both economies would suffer combined losses of 60.6 billion baht.
A two-month conflict would double this figure to 121.1 billion baht, whilst a three-month standoff could reach 181.7 billion baht in total economic damage.
Cross-border trade under threat
The conflict's epicentre along key border crossings in Sa Kaeo and Trat provinces has paralysed vital trade arteries.
Sorathep Rojpotjanaruch, chairman of the Restaurant Business Association, warned that a three-month disruption could eliminate 40-50 billion baht in border exports immediately.
"If the crisis extends beyond six to ten months, export losses could reach hundreds of billions of baht," he cautioned. "Beyond one year, we risk permanently losing our export infrastructure as Cambodia seeks alternative suppliers from Laos, Vietnam, or China."
The uncertainty has already triggered concerns about supply chain diversification, with Cambodian buyers potentially sourcing goods from competitors who can deliver via maritime routes.
Tourism sector braces for impact
Thailand's crucial tourism industry faces substantial headwinds, with the Thai Travel Agents Association (ATTA) projecting significant visitor shortfalls depending on conflict duration.
Adith Chairattananon, ATTA's secretary-general, outlined three scenarios: if normalcy returns within one month, Thailand could still achieve its target of 34.5-35 million foreign visitors this year.
However, a three-month disruption would reduce arrivals to 33-34 million, whilst a six-month crisis could severely impact next year's peak season, affecting European and American markets during the crucial winter period.
Labour market disruptions
The conflict threatens to displace over 250,000 Cambodian workers currently employed in Thailand's manufacturing sector, particularly in frozen food processing, poultry, and seafood industries.
Whilst most workers have remained at their posts, prolonged tensions could trigger mass departures, exacerbating Thailand's existing labour shortages.
Nationalist sentiment clouds trade relations
Rungphech Chitanuvat from Informa Markets expressed concern that rising Cambodian nationalism could influence consumer purchasing decisions, potentially reducing demand for Thai consumer goods in Cambodia's retail market.
"Thailand exports significant consumer products to Cambodia," Rungphech noted. "While long-term investment impacts may be limited due to the border location of conflicts, we're monitoring how nationalist sentiment might affect trade relationships."
Path forward remains uncertain
Thai-Cambodia Business Council chairman Voratat Tantimongkolsuk emphasised the urgent need for transparent border demarcation negotiations.
The territorial dispute centres on conflicting map scales - Thailand uses 1:50,000 whilst Cambodia employs 1:200,000 - creating ambiguity over precise boundaries.
While Cambodia pushes for International Court of Justice arbitration, Thailand favours bilateral negotiations. The private sector continues monitoring developments closely, hoping for swift normalisation and renewed dialogue addressing underlying territorial issues.
The conflict underscores the economic interdependence between the neighbouring nations, with business leaders calling for comprehensive resolution mechanisms to prevent future disruptions to the substantial annual bilateral trade relationship. - The Nation/ANN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perikatan hails Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire
Perikatan hails Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire

The Star

time12 minutes ago

  • The Star

Perikatan hails Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire

KUALA LUMPUR: Perikatan Nasional on Monday (Aug 4) congratulated and commended Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for his key role in arranging a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. Perikatan deputy chairman and Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin said the coalition welcomed any Malaysian involvement in efforts to strengthen regional stability. "Whatever role played by the Honourable Tambun member (Anwar), even if described by some as simply that of a host, it remains a contribution that will be recorded in history. I offer my congratulations and appreciation. "What's important is that Malaysia continues to be respected as a sovereign nation and is regarded as a credible balancing power in the Southeast Asian region,' he said when debating the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday. On July 28, Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an unconditional and immediate ceasefire following a special meeting in Putrajaya chaired by Anwar. At the meeting, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai also agreed to convene a General Border Committee Meeting as part of the ceasefire agreement. In line with this, Hamzah called for Malaysia to remain consistent in championing global peace and to boldly express firm stances against all forms of cruelty and oppression, especially in light of Monday's fragile geopolitical environment. "The ongoing humanitarian crisis and genocide in Gaza, the war in Eastern Europe, prolonged conflicts in the Middle East, and the tensions between Thailand and Cambodia all have direct or indirect impacts on Malaysia. "To safeguard the country's diplomatic and strategic interests from all angles, the Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and the entire Cabinet bear a great responsibility to ensure their statements and actions remain composed and measured," he said. On the 19% tariff imposed by the United States on Malaysia, Hamzah said Perikatan holds a firm view that the country must trade with dignity, especially in defending its sovereignty and national interests. The US has imposed a 19% tariff on Malaysian goods effective Aug 1, a drop from the 25% it proposed earlier. - Bernama

PN praises Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire deal
PN praises Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire deal

The Sun

time12 minutes ago

  • The Sun

PN praises Anwar's role in Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire deal

KUALA LUMPUR: Perikatan Nasional (PN) has commended Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for his pivotal role in brokering a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. PN deputy chairman and Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin acknowledged the diplomatic effort as a historic contribution to regional peace. Hamzah stated, 'Whatever role played by the Honourable Tambun member (Anwar), even if described by some as simply that of a host, it remains a contribution that will be recorded in history. I offer my congratulations and appreciation.' He emphasised Malaysia's standing as a credible mediator in Southeast Asia. The ceasefire agreement was reached on July 28 during a special meeting in Putrajaya chaired by Anwar, with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai in attendance. Both nations also agreed to convene a General Border Committee Meeting to reinforce the truce. Hamzah urged Malaysia to maintain its proactive stance in global peacekeeping, particularly amid ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. He stressed the need for measured diplomacy, stating, 'The Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, and the entire Cabinet bear a great responsibility to ensure their statements and actions remain composed and measured.' On trade relations, Hamzah addressed the US's 19 per cent tariff on Malaysian goods, effective Aug 1, advocating for dignified trade policies that protect national sovereignty. - Bernama

Malaysia's decisive diplomacy puts the breaks on Thailand-Cambodia border conflict
Malaysia's decisive diplomacy puts the breaks on Thailand-Cambodia border conflict

Borneo Post

time42 minutes ago

  • Borneo Post

Malaysia's decisive diplomacy puts the breaks on Thailand-Cambodia border conflict

Anwar (centre) join hands with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet (left) and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai following the announcement of the ceasefire on July 28 at the Seri Perdana Complex in Putrajaya. – Bernama Photo KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 4): As tensions boiled along the Thailand-Cambodia border threatened to spiral into a bigger regional crisis, Malaysia emerged as an unexpected yet effective mediator. Amid growing instability, it was Malaysia under the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that succeeded in halting the violence and delivering a ceasefire agreement on July 28 through a strategy rooted in diplomacy, neutrality, and regional solidarity. 'Malaysia stepped in not only because of its position as ASEAN Chair, but because the situation demanded immediate and impartial mediation,' said Associate Professor Dr. Syahruddin Awang Ahmad, Deputy Dean (Research, Innovation and Commercialisation), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Universiti Malaysia Sabah. 'The humanitarian toll and the risk of regional contagion left no room for delay.' Syahruddin Awang Ahmad The conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, rooted in an unresolved 817-kilometre border dispute, escalated rapidly in the Samraong region. In just four days, the conflict had claimed over 30 lives and displaced close to 200,000 people, raising alarm across Southeast Asia and beyond. Malaysia's timely and decisive intervention not only averted further bloodshed but also demonstrated ASEAN's capacity to respond to internal disputes when led with vision and commitment. Recognising the potential for further destabilisation, Anwar initiated a series of quiet but high-stakes diplomatic engagements that culminated in face-to-face talks in Kuala Lumpur. Both Cambodian and Thai leaders agreed to the discussions which acts as a testament to the credibility and neutrality Malaysia brought to the table. While Malaysia's intervention was rooted in protocol, it was Anwar's personal leadership that proved decisive. Known for his diplomatic acuity and calm demeanour, Anwar approached the crisis with characteristic restraint, clarity, and moral authority. 'His capability, composure, and statesmanship stood out at a moment when most leaders might have retreated into silence or hesitated,' Dr. Syahruddin noted. 'This was a masterclass in how to de-escalate through diplomacy, not force.' The diplomatic breakthrough formalised through a ceasefire agreement has reinforced Malaysia's reputation as a credible interlocutor and placed ASEAN's collective voice back at the centre of regional peace efforts. It also affirmed Malaysia's long-standing belief that conflicts within Southeast Asia must be resolved through regional mechanisms, not external arbitration. While the United States had earlier issued a public call for restraint, Malaysia's actions were not a by-product of Western pressure. Instead, they aligned with ASEAN's foundational principles of non-interference and consensus-based diplomacy resembling values that many believed had become obsolete in the face of modern geopolitical realities. 'Anwar's mediation efforts were clearly grounded in ASEAN priorities,' said Dr. Syahruddin. 'Malaysia worked within the ASEAN framework, coordinating with the ASEAN Secretariat, other member states, and relevant institutions. This was ASEAN centrality in action.' Malaysia's neutrality, especially when compared to U.S.-aligned members such as the Philippines, enabled it to engage both Thailand and Cambodia with credibility. That neutrality also reinforced its role as an impartial convener, allowing both sides to enter discussions without political loss or international scrutiny. More importantly, Malaysia's intervention did not stop at securing a ceasefire. Anwar signalled his intention to send a reconnaissance team to the affected areas to ensure the continued observance of the agreement and to monitor humanitarian conditions on the ground. 'Such measures reflect a long-term commitment to peacebuilding, not just peacekeeping,' Dr. Syahruddin remarked. 'PM Anwar's foresight shows that sustainable peace requires follow-through including monitoring, confidence-building, and ongoing dialogue.' By proposing post-conflict monitoring, Malaysia is laying the groundwork for institutional responses to future tensions, potentially led by ASEAN entities such as the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (AIPR) or the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Malaysia's handling of the crisis could well serve as a blueprint for future ASEAN-led conflict mediation. In a region often criticised for its 'soft' diplomatic posture, Malaysia demonstrated that proactive engagement when anchored in neutrality and guided by leadership can yield real results. 'Malaysia's success presents a valuable mechanism for the region,' said Dr. Syahruddin. 'It shows that ASEAN's principle of non-interference does not equate to inaction. Instead, it can be recalibrated to foster quiet, effective diplomacy.' The episode also underscores the importance of leadership within ASEAN itself. While the 2025 ASEAN Chair, Laos, maintained a limited public role, Malaysia's willingness to step into the gap shows that middle-power states within ASEAN can and should take initiative when circumstances require. The broader lesson for ASEAN is clear that internal cohesion and proactive diplomacy must become the norm, not the exception. In an era where regional security challenges are increasingly complex, Malaysia's example reveals that ASEAN does not need to rely on external powers to manage internal conflicts. 'PMX's success in this mediation effort elevates ASEAN as a respected and unified voice on the global stage,' said Dr. Syahruddin. 'It reminds the world and ASEAN citizens that regional peace is possible when we take ownership of our challenges.' While the conflict along the Thailand-Cambodia border may continue to require careful monitoring, Malaysia's diplomatic intervention represents a pivotal moment in Southeast Asia's regional history. Anwar's calm leadership and principled diplomacy not only halted a dangerous escalation but also reaffirmed Malaysia's and ASEAN's role as a capable peace broker. Anwar Ibrahim asean cambodia Thailand

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store