Milwaukee homeowners can more easily build extra housing units under zoning change
The new ordinance created conflicts among council members − some arguing for more restrictions on developing the accessory dwelling units, or ADUs. It passed on an 8-7 vote and now awaits Mayor Cavalier Johnson's signature.
They could be built in backyards of existing houses or duplexes − considered external or detached ADUs. Those are sometimes called "granny flats" for their traditional use of housing an older family member.
The units also could be developed within an existing house − perhaps using a basement or attic − or with an addition. Those are internal and attached ADUs.
The council debate on July 15 centered on whether ADUs within single-family zoning districts should obtain special use permits from the Milwaukee Board of Zoning Appeals.
The idea behind ADUs is to create an affordable housing option for residents facing rising rents and housing prices.
Alderwoman JoCasta Zamarripa told her colleagues ADUs can provide affordable options for intergenerational living.
The special use provision requires families to pay architectural costs and zoning board application fees, Zamarippa said.
That would make it largely impossible for families to afford internal ADUs − which Zamarippa said are the least expensive option.
Alderman Scott Spiker sponsored the special use provision. He said it would give council members and neighborhood residents an opportunity at zoning board hearings to provide input on proposed ADUs.
Internal ADUs could turn single-family houses into duplexes, he said, with separate entrances, kitchens and bathrooms.
Spiker said he wants Milwaukee to maintain single-family housing as a choice. His constituents could move to nearby suburbs for that choice if they find it diminished in Milwaukee, Spiker said.
Spiker was supported by council members such as Andrea Pratt.
A person who can afford to develop a second housing unit "can probably afford a $600 special use permit," Pratt said. She also said the zoning board process would provide transparency for neighbors.
But other council members said allowing ADUs without zoning board approval is needed as Milwaukee faces a shortage of affordable housing.
"I want us to be the most welcoming city in the United States," said Marina Dimitrijevic.
The council also approved Mayor Johnson's Housing Element Plan.
Backers say it remains focused on expanding housing choices − even though it no longer recommends developing duplexes in neighborhoods zoned for single-family homes.
Housing Element is a good first step toward encouraging more housing development, including apartments, say its co-sponsors. A larger supply, including ADUs, helps counter rising rents, they say.
Housing Element doesn't change any zoning regulations or land sale policies, said Sam Leichtling, deputy city development commissioner, at the July 8 zoning committee meeting. Those require separate council votes.
But it does create "the vision for where we want to go as a community," Leichtling told committee members.
(This article was updated to add new information).
Tom Daykin can be emailed at tdaykin@jrn.com and followed on Instagram, Bluesky, X and Facebook.This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee homeowners can more easily build extra housing units
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law, arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country. Parents — and even some teens themselves — are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media use on young people. Supporters of the new laws have said they are needed to help curb the explosive use of social media among young people, and what researchers say is an associated increase in depression and anxiety. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch argued in a court filing defending the law that steps such as age verification for digital sites could mitigate harm caused by 'sex trafficking, sexual abuse, child pornography, targeted harassment, sextortion, incitement to suicide and self-harm, and other harmful and often illegal conduct against children.' Attorneys for NetChoice, which brought the lawsuit, have pledged to continue their court challenge, arguing the law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. The industry group, which has filed similar lawsuits in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio and Utah, represents some of the country's most high-profile technology companies, including Google, which owns YouTube; Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. In a written statement, Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said the group is 'very disappointed' in the decision to let Mississippi's law go into effect and is 'considering all available options.' 'NetChoice will continue to fight against this egregious infringement on access to fully protected speech online," Taske said. "Parents — not the government — should determine what is right for their families.' ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Kate Payne, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law , arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country.

Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law, arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country. Parents — and even some teens themselves — are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media use on young people. Supporters of the new laws have said they are needed to help curb the explosive use of social media among young people, and what researchers say is an associated increase in depression and anxiety. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch argued in a court filing defending the law that steps such as age verification for digital sites could mitigate harm caused by 'sex trafficking, sexual abuse, child pornography, targeted harassment, sextortion, incitement to suicide and self-harm, and other harmful and often illegal conduct against children.' Attorneys for NetChoice, which brought the lawsuit, have pledged to continue their court challenge, arguing the law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. The industry group, which has filed similar lawsuits in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio and Utah, represents some of the country's most high-profile technology companies, including Google, which owns YouTube; Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. In a written statement, Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said the group is 'very disappointed' in the decision to let Mississippi's law go into effect and is 'considering all available options.' 'NetChoice will continue to fight against this egregious infringement on access to fully protected speech online,' Taske said. 'Parents — not the government — should determine what is right for their families.' ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.