logo
Letters: Why adding ‘abstinence' to S.F. drug recovery policy can do more harm than good

Letters: Why adding ‘abstinence' to S.F. drug recovery policy can do more harm than good

Regarding 'S.F. drug crisis: Battle brews over adding one sentence to city's recovery policy' (Bay Area, SFChronicle.com, April 19): San Francisco Supervisor Matt Dorsey says that recovery from addiction entails 'abstinence from illicit drugs.'
While this definition is one way to view recovery, it is not the only one. Recovery from addiction is not as simple as Dorsey makes it seem. In fact, framing it in this way can be harmful to people whose journeys of recovery are more complex than total abstinence from illicit drugs.
As a public health student, one of the most important takeaways of my education is a deeper understanding of the circumstances that lead people to unhealthy situations and lifestyles. Dorsey's definition puts the road to recovery in a box by failing to consider the individual circumstances that might affect a person experiencing a drug addiction.
I oppose Dorsey's proposal to amend San Francisco's recovery policy. I urge the Board of Supervisors' Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee, which will hear this proposal on Thursday, to also oppose it.
Alyanna Asuncion, Berkeley
Reform could fund schools
Regarding 'Beloved East Bay performing arts school to close, leaving students without a stage' (Arts & Entertainment, SFChronicle.com, April 21): The impending closure of the Contra Costa School of Performing Arts is yet another tragic reminder that charter schools are not an effective solution to the issues found in traditional public schools.
Schools must be places where students feel a sense of stability. This is essentially impossible at most charter schools because more than 25% of them close before the five-year mark. Contra Costa School of Performing Arts will close after just nine years.
Instead of taking this neoliberal approach to education, we should invest in truly public schools that support students' passions.
Many traditional public schools in California have vibrant theater and arts programs. The key is funding the school well, which is challenging given the financial strangulation placed on our public education by Proposition 13.
If we reform Prop. 13 and make corporations pay their fair share in property taxes, we could restore billions annually to our public schools and communities.
All students deserve the chance to attend supportive and well-resourced schools, and the best way to do that is by taxing corporations.
Olivia McHaney, San Francisco
Ban glue traps
Regarding 'San Francisco could ban popular type of mousetrap' (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, April 21): San Francisco should follow in the footsteps of West Hollywood and Ojai (Ventura County) and ban cruel glue traps.
These torturous devices entrap animals in powerful adhesives and tear them apart as they struggle to escape. Victims often suffer for days before succumbing to starvation, dehydration or blood loss.
The traps are also indiscriminate and endanger birds, butterflies, lizards, squirrels and many other wildlife species, along with companion animals and small children.
Glue traps have no place in a civilized society, particularly when far more humane methods are readily available.
Hailey Hanson, San Francisco
Running on empty
You people who think everyone should get out of their cars and walk 50 or 60 miles to work everyday, who think there is no need for fuel to bring supplies to the Bay Area, who think it is fine if Sacramento politicians mandate fuels that no one else on Earth makes and forces it on the public no matter the cost.
Well, your time has come. When this refinery shuts down, and no one else is stupid enough to bring it back to life, you will have to explain to the voters why gasoline in California costs $9 per gallon.
Maybe then (but probably not) the people of California will wake up and get rid of the feckless politicians ruining what was once a great state. No wonder everyone who can leave is doing so.
John Madden, Tiburon
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Superman star Dean Cain says he joined ICE ‘to help save America'
Superman star Dean Cain says he joined ICE ‘to help save America'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Superman star Dean Cain says he joined ICE ‘to help save America'

Dean Cain, who starred as the Man of Steel in the ABC TV series Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman (1993-97), has announced that he has joined ICE to support President Donald Trump's illegal immigration crackdown. Cain, 59, took to social media on Tuesday to announce the news to his followers in a video post that played like a one-man recruitment drive. The actor opened by telling his followers: 'For those who don't know, I am a sworn law enforcement officer, as well as being a filmmaker, and I felt it was important to join with our first responders to help secure the safety of all Americans, not just talk about it. So I joined up.' He continued: 'Here's your opportunity to join ICE. You can earn lots of great benefits and pay. Since President Trump took office, ICE has arrested hundreds of thousands of criminals including terrorists, rapists, murderers, pedophiles, MS-13 gang members, drug traffickers, you name it – very dangerous people who are no longer on the streets.' Cain then reeled off a list of perks recruits could enjoy: 'You can defend your homeland and get great benefits like a $50,000 signing bonus, think about that, student loan repayment (legally), enhanced retirement benefits and special for those in field operations and law enforcement roles. 'You also don't need an undergraduate degree, you can get to work right away. So iIf you want to help save America, ICE is arresting the worst of the worst and removing them from America's streets. I like that. I voted for that. 'They need your help, we need your help, to protect our homeland for families. Join today if it's something that tickles your fancy because we can use you.' Cain's video comes a week after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a press release telling Americans: 'Your country is calling you to serve at ICE. Your country needs dedicated men and women of ICE to get the worst of the worst criminals out of our country. 'This is a defining moment in our nation's history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland.' The actor's enthusiastic endorsement of that message attracted some responses on X, including several pointing out that the maximum age for signing up is 37, more than two decades younger than Cain himself. However, that restriction appears to have since been lifted. One user told the actor, 'Superman himself would be disappointed in you, Dean.' Cain replied simply: 'Not a chance.' The actor remains closely associated with the iconic superhero and recently applauded the White House for putting out a meme of President Trump wearing the signature red cape and tights, a post that also attracted plenty of derision from responders, pointing out that Superman himself is an immigrant to Earth. A staunch MAGA conservative in other respects, Cain holds surprisingly progressive views regarding the man from Krypton, recently nominating Michael B Jordan to be the first Black incarnation of the character and praising James Gunn's new blockbuster despite Fox News commentators slamming it as 'superwoke' for carrying pro-migrant themes. Cain is a regular guest on Fox and is so devoted to Trump's cause that, in 2019, he appeared opposite original Buffy the Vampire Slayer star Kristy Swanson in the spoof play FBI Lovebirds: Undercovers, offering dramatic readings of the infamous text messages exchanged between agents Peter Strozk and Lisa Page, which Politico described as 'Hamilton for the Make America Great Again crowd.' Solve the daily Crossword

Letters: Prop 13 isn't what's keeping older homeowners from downsizing. Here's the real reason
Letters: Prop 13 isn't what's keeping older homeowners from downsizing. Here's the real reason

San Francisco Chronicle​

time8 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Letters: Prop 13 isn't what's keeping older homeowners from downsizing. Here's the real reason

I keep hearing how Proposition 13's tax incentives encourage older people to stay in their homes rather than downsizing. As a 78-year-old who has been tempted to downsize from the four-bedroom home we have lived in since 1997, I can say that Prop 13 is the least of the obstacles. The big one is the capital gains tax. The value of our home has increased substantially. But so has every other home in the area. If we sell, the combined federal and state capital gains tax of over 32% takes a huge dent out of any profit, making it impossible to purchase a smaller home of equal quality. There was a time when any gain put into the purchase of a new home was exempt, but that was replaced in 1997 by $500,000 limit for couples. That sum has never been adjusted for inflation and is a drop in the bucket in expensive areas, especially California, which has one of the highest capital gains taxes in the country. So we will stay put for the duration, over-housed and aging in place. And some young family that could benefit from a home like ours will end up moving elsewhere. Blame Hamas The Oct. 7 attack was a long-term plan, and Hamas amassed hundreds of millions and spent it to build terror tunnels instead of improving living and economic conditions in Gaza, the U.S. Treasury Department said in 2022. 'Hamas maintains a violent agenda that harms both Israelis and Palestinians,' the department said. Moreover, Hamas' goal was and still appears to be the destruction of Israel, as it refuses to disarm, and said weapons 'cannot be relinquished until our full national rights are restored, foremost among them the establishment of a fully sovereign, independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital,' according to an Al-Jazeera report this week. Israel does what it must to avoid being destroyed, despite letter writer Harry Chomsky's disapproval. Julia Lutch, Davis Outlaw gerrymandering Regarding 'How the Supreme Court enabled the Texas-California redistricting fight' (Politics, Aug. 1): Republican-led states gerrymander their legislative districts far more than Democrat-led states, which slants Congress in favor of the GOP and misrepresents the will of the people. Now, Texas is threatening more gerrymandering with new redistricting ahead of schedule. California and other blue states should definitely play the gerrymander game in response. At the same time that blue states announce their unapologetic gerrymandering, Democrats should also introduce a bill in Congress that would outlaw all gerrymandering for state legislative and congressional districts. Democrats should unanimously support banning gerrymanders while also matching Republican efforts to do it. If Republicans are offended by blue-state gerrymandering, then they should support the abolition of all gerrymandering. We can't have some states playing fair with nonpartisan districting rules while other states continually cheat. All states need to play by the same redistricting rules. Dennis Dowling, San Francisco Legalize sex work Why not emulate policies in Amsterdam and other places that provide a safe and clean environment for the oldest profession in the world? Give sex workers access to health care, security and freedom from pimps. Nigel Phillips, San Francisco No RV parks in S.F. Regarding 'Make room for RVs' (Letters to the Editor, Aug. 3): The letter writer suggests creating a $60 a night recreational vehicle park for tourists at Crissy Field and Sunset Dunes in San Francisco. 'There are many RVers who pay more than $60 in less spectacular places all over the U.S.,' he states. They should feel at home, then, because putting RVs at Crissy Field would be a sure-fire way to unspectacularize the world-class vista at East Beach.

Letters: Being called ‘Jew' offends me. Should it be banned? Who gets to decide?
Letters: Being called ‘Jew' offends me. Should it be banned? Who gets to decide?

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea day ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Letters: Being called ‘Jew' offends me. Should it be banned? Who gets to decide?

Regarding 'Trump wants to 'Make Indians Great Again' — by bringing back slurs to a school gymnasium near you' (Open Forum, July 28): Who determines what's offensive? A Washington Post op-ed says 'Jew' is fine, and the Chronicle uses it commonly. I'm Jewish, and I find that offensive. I was called 'that Jew boy' growing up. Is it OK for people of color to use the N-word all the time? Roosevelt Drive may be offensive to Japanese Americans because they had family members who were imprisoned under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's order during World War II. There are so many names offensive to one person and not another. Where does it stop? Maybe just give everything a digital address. James Sandler, Pleasanton Defend higher education By structuring success for immigrants, low-income youth and other underrepresented young people, universities help to build an educated populace. What do all of us have to gain from investment in forward thinking like this? Hopeful, engaged and skillful people in our communities. The institutions and programs now under attack are those that build the capacity of students while spreading affirmative energy into all our lives. When young people in our community achieve and thrive, we are all uplifted and enriched. Shirl Buss, San Rafael Stop the blame game Unfortunately, many of them declare Hamas responsible for Israel's war tactics. Could Hamas really end Israel's siege by releasing the hostages or by surrendering power? Maybe. Maybe Ukraine could end Russia's invasion by severing its alliances with the West. Maybe if Israel had ceased its decades of occupation and violence against Palestinians before 2023, Hamas would not have initiated the Oct. 7 attack. True or not, this kind of victim-blaming is unseemly. We should hold perpetrators of violence — including U.S. and Israeli leaders — responsible for their own actions. Jewish groups blaming Hamas for Israel's campaign of mass murder only succeed in making Jews look grotesque. Harry Chomsky, Albany Tariffs don't add up Let's do the math. U.S. imports of goods in 2024 were $3.3 trillion. A 15% overall tariff would bring in $495 billion. U.S. consumers will pay this tab, not corporations. There were 340 million people in the U.S. in 2024. That's $1,455 per person. The tariffs are a tax on consumers. Low-wage earners spend all their income on goods and services. The investor class spends a small portion of their income on goods and services. Who then benefits the most? Think about it. Barry Shiller, San Francisco Rethink MAGA support Regarding 'Why S.F.'s Democratic sheriff endorsed a MAGA supporter for California governor' (Joe Garofoli, Aug. 1): Perhaps San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto should take a good look in the mirror. He and I are subject to being detained and relocated under the Trump administration, just as his Japanese American ancestors were during World War II. Vickie Downey, Corning Group won't capitulate The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced Aug. 1 that it would no longer accept any federal dollars to support its programs because of the Trump administration's policies, particularly those regarding diversity, equity and inclusiveness. According to the group, DEI is integral to its mission. I am so proud that my professional organization has taken this stand. I hope that other professional organizations will be brave enough to follow its lead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store