How to find an English speaking tax advisor in Germany
Those filing with the help of a professional have until next April to submit their declarations to the
Finanzamt
, or Tax Office.
Freelancers and self-employed individuals are required to file a tax declaration in Germany, whereas regularly employed individuals are not. But employees file their taxes anyway to get refunds.
READ ALSO:
The German tax deadlines to know in 2025
Navigating German bureaucracy can be a headache for anyone. That's especially true for foreign residents who have complicated finances or don't speak German. If that's the case for you, getting some outside help may be the way to go.
If you think you'd benefit from some extra help as you prepare your taxes this year, here are some resources for English speakers filing taxes in Germany.
You can find English-language tax professionals across Germany
Tax professionals are legally liable for the advice they provide, so if they make a mistake, they pay for it.
When seeking tax help, you'll want to look for an accredited
Steuerberater
, because they are specifically qualified to do tax returns.
Alternatively a
Buchhalter
, or bookkeeper, is not specifically qualified to do tax returns, and is not legally liable for their mistakes.
The U.S. Embassies in Germany each publish a list of English-speaking tax professionals that offer services in their respective regions.
The embassy in Berlin's
list
of tax professionals includes providers that offer services in Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Schleswig-Holstein and Thuringia.
The embassy in Munich
publishes a list
of English-speaking tax advisors in Bavaria, and the embassy in Frankfurt
publishes a list
for Hesse, Baden-Württemberg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland.
EXPLAINED:
How US consulates help American citizens living in Germany
The blog All About Berlin also has a
list
of English-speaking tax advisors in and around Berlin.
Advertisement
But even once you've found a firm that provides English-language tax help, actually hiring someone can still be challenging.
Many firms are fully-booked and not taking on new clients – especially in big cities with many English-speaking professionals looking for tax help.
A German tax declaration form with the box indicating income tax return ticked. Photo: picture alliance / Hans-Jürgen Wiedl/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa | Hans-Jürgen Wiedl
For people living in Berlin, for example, it can help to look for a tax advisor in other parts of Germany. Your tax advisor does not have to work in the city where you live.
Hiring a tax professional can also be quite expensive. Costs vary depending on whether you are employed or self-employed, but you can expect to pay at least a couple hundred euros for a single tax declaration.
Note that accredited tax advisors can offer various services, like bookkeeping or legal advice at various prices, but prices to submit a tax return are tightly regulated.
English-language tax software offers an alternative to tax professionals
Because hiring a tax professional can be difficult and expensive, some people prefer to use online tax software. There are several options that offer English-language assistance.
Some English-language options for preparing your taxes online include
WunderTax
,
TaxFix
and
SteuerGo
.
WunderTax boasts that you can file your taxes online in just 17 minutes using its services. These services and others like them charge fees, but the fees are typically much lower than the cost of hiring a tax professional.
The services mentioned above all advertise rates between €34 and €40 per tax return. Other services include SmartSteuer and MyExpatTaxes.
Advertisement
If your tax situation is simple enough that you'd like to try and manage filing on your own, you can create a profile with ELSTER, or the
Elektronische Steuer Erklärung, to do so online
.
ELSTER is a free online platform run by the German government that allows users to securely file their taxes completely online. ELSTER is primarily a German-language platform, but many of its resources are also translated into English.
READ ALSO:
Germany's official online tax portal is now available in English
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
21 hours ago
- DW
Trump fires labor data chief over disappointing jobs report – DW – 08/02/2025
The US president said the latest jobs report was "rigged" to "make him look bad," accusing BLS chief McEntarfer of manipulating the data. Trump did not provide evidence of such manipulation. President Donald Trump announced on Friday the dismissal of the US Commissioner of Labor Statistics, just hours after the entity had published its latest report on job growth and the economy. Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has been leading the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) since January 2024. The post, a four-year term, is the only one in the agency that is appointed by the president. McEntarfer was confirmed by the US Senate with an overwhelming majority of 86-8, with now Vice President JD Vance among those who voted The Bureau's jobs report on Friday showed that just 73,000 jobs were added in the US last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report also suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Trump's tenure. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump accused McEntarfer of tampering with the jobs numbers, but provided no evidence to back his claims of data manipulation by the BLS. "We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this [Joe] Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on the social media platform Truth Social. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified," he added. "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," Trump said. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer followed Trump's lead, writing on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would take over as the acting director. "I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said. Following the announcement, economists, labor unions and Democratic Party leaders criticized the move. "The civil servants at BLS are not political actors. They are professionals committed to producing accurate, independent data, regardless of who is in power," said American Federation of Government Employees national president Everett Kelley, adding that McEntarfer has worked in the federal government for more than two decades under multiple administrations. "What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger," Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said. "Politicizing economic statistics is a self-defeating act," said Michael Madowitz, principal economist at the Roosevelt Institute's Roosevelt Forward. "Credibility is far easier to lose than rebuild, and the credibility of America's economic data is the foundation on which we've built the strongest economy in the world," he added.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Will Germany raise retirement age beyond 67? – DW – 08/01/2025
Germany's old-age pension system faces collapse under the weight of an aging population. The country's new Economy Minister Katherina Reiche wants Germans to work longer to make up for it. For German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche, there's a simple way to fix Germany's pension system: "We need to work more and longer," she flatly told the newspaper in late July, instantly triggering a new debate along familiar lines. Reiche argued that the pledges her government had made in the coalition contract earlier this year were just not going to be enough. Germany's aging population has long been recognized as a problem. The population's median age — 46.7 — is the eighth-highest in the world and the third-highest among major economies, after Japan and Italy. By 2040, fully a quarter of the population is expected to be 67 or older. This year, birth rate fell to its lowest point in 20 years. This has had a marked effect: In the early 1960s, there were still six actively insured workers for every pensioner — that ratio is now 2 to 1 and sinking, and in 2025, two-thirds of the Labor Ministry's budget will go into the pension system: €121 billion ($140 billion). "It cannot be sustainable in the long term for us to work only two-thirds of our adult lives and spend one-third in retirement," said Reiche. "Unfortunately, too many people have been refusing to accept the demographic reality for too long." Reiche's statements triggered a quick backlash from her center-left Cabinet colleagues. Lars Klingbeil, finance minister and leader of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), which traditionally sees itself catering to a working-class electorate, described Reiche's statement as a "slap in the face" for many workers. "It's easy to say that when you're sitting in your comfortable chair in Berlin," Klingbeil told news outlet ntv. "But you should go out and talk to the people in the country who are working as roofers, who are working as nurses, who are working as teachers and are really wearing themselves out and who are already struggling to make it to 67." Trade unions, meanwhile, said Reiche's plan was simply a new way to cut pensions. Many workers will be unable to work to a higher age for health reasons, forcing them to retire early, and accept deductions that permanently reduce their pensions. The contract agreed by Germany's two governing parties — Reiche's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the SPD — promised that Germany's current retirement age would not be raised. Instead, the contract pledged, "We want more flexibility in the transition from job to pension." In practice, "flexibility" means offering incentives to people who work beyond the legal retirement age. This would include measures like the so-called "Aktivrente" ("active pension"), by which any income of up to €2,000 per month is tax-free for those above the legal retirement age. Jan Scharpenberg, pensions expert at the financial advice company Finanztip, is convinced that the German pension system urgently needs to be reformed, but that the debate around it has become tedious. "The length of a working life is just one of the levers that can be adjusted to reform the German pension system in order to deal with the demographic transformation," he told DW. "And if I'm being really honest, I think it's a bit exhausting how for years and decades the same pro- and con arguments are being made, but no actual reform is put in place." While he agrees that raising the legal retirement age may become necessary, that doesn't negate the argument that it would, in practical terms, mean pension cuts for some people. "Those two things can be true at the same time, but that shouldn't prevent a pension reform," he said. "A reform of the system will only work if you combine and pull several levers." The retirement age system in Germany is dauntingly complicated. At the moment, the legal retirement age in Germany is 65, though it is scheduled to rise to 67 by 2031. But the age is staggered depending on the individual's year of birth, and how long they have paid into the system. And there are exceptions: People who are disabled or have paid into the system for 45 years, for example, can retire earlier. A contribution of 18.6% of an employee's gross monthly salary goes into the state retirement fund, with the employee and the employer each paying half. The government expects this contribution rate to rise to 22.3% by 2035, where it is supposed to level out until 2045. Johannes Geyer, public economics researcher at the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), pointed out that the reason why the retirement age issue is so contentious is because it affects workers differently. "There are lot of people who can't imagine working beyond the age of 67," he said. "But those in perhaps better paid jobs can do that." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But many experts say the narrow focus on the retirement age is unhelpful, as there are many different ways of increasing contributions to the pension system. One measure, for example, would be to provide better child care facilities, so that more single parents are able to work full-time and therefore pay higher pension contributions. Another solution might be to make migrating to Germany to work easier and more attractive. There are also proposals to increase the number of people paying into the public system by including the self-employed and civil servants, a proposal made recently by Labor Minister Bärbel Bas from the SPD. Meanwhile, on the expense side of the ledger, some more painful measures might be put in place to balance the books. Apart from raising the retirement age, that might mean extending the "waiting time" (the number of years one must pay into the system before one can begin to draw a pension), or reducing the rate at which pensions increase every year. The pension increase is calculated based on the development of gross wages and salaries in Germany and is 3.74% for 2025. In the coalition agreement, the SPD was able to secure the pension level at 48% of the standard pension to the average income (before taxes) until 2031. Critics have labeled this as untenable. According to Scharpenberg, a mix of measures needs to be implemented. But instead, he said, the perennial political debate revolves around doing one measure or another, as if it were impossible to combine them. The German pension system is structured very differently to other European countries. In Denmark, for example, the retirement age is linked to the country's life expectancy, so that it rises automatically as people live longer. And in Sweden, an individual's contributions are invested in various financial markets and then the profits are paid out when that person reaches old age. "That helps to diversify the risk," said Geyer. "They're not so dependent on the aging of their own population." In the German system, on the other hand, contributions from workers are put into a single pot, which is used to finance current pensions. Geyer argues that, unlike other European countries, Germany has failed to develop private insurance options to complement state pensions so that they help the whole population, rather than just the rich. "Other countries have done that significantly better," he said. "The UK, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden — they all have systems of obligatory insurance with relatively low costs and good profits. That's missing here."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
DW
a day ago
- DW
How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025
Brazil will pay as much as 50% tariffs on goods exported to the United States. But experts say the tariffs, along with sanctions on a Brazilian judge, indicate this isn't about economics but about Trump's politics. The newly announced tariffs by the US government on Brazilian imports, as well as Washington's move to sanction Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes "for serious human rights abuse," has caused a strong reaction in Brazil. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has condemned American interference in the Brazilian legal system, calling it "unacceptable." The political motivation behind these measures undermines Brazil's sovereignty and threatens the relationship between the two countries, Lula said. From August 6, the US will impose tariffs of 50% on Brazilian imports into America. Somewhat surprisingly, around 700 Brazilian products were exempted. But experts have said this still puts the average tariff on Brazilian goods at around 30%. The European Union and Japan are only paying 15% tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The US government, under President Donald Trump, has justified its new global tariffs by blaming a bilateral trade imbalance. The Trump administration has also given the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro as an explanation for the punitive tariffs. Judge de Moraes is presiding over the trial of Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat. The personal sanctions on de Moraes come under the US' Magnitsky Act, which allows the American government to sanction foreign government officials worldwide for human rights offenses. Among other things, de Moraes could see any assets he has in the US frozen. The US government had already prevented de Moraes and other Brazilian Supreme Court judges from entering the country. "The Magnitsky Act was previously used against the US' enemies but it always used to have a basis in human rights," said Demetrio Magnoli, a sociologist and foreign affairs columnist in Brazil. "But by using it for the first time against a judge in a democracy, Trump is shattering the human rights foundations of this law." As for the high tariffs, Magnoli told DW it's not unusual for Trump to use tariffs as a weapon in his trade war and deal-making. "But in the case of Brazil, he is using both tariffs and the Magnitsky Act for political and ideological reasons," the commentator noted. "A unique case worldwide and a direct attack on a democratic country and a US ally." Judge de Moraes has been seen as a nuisance by American right wingers since he ordered social media platform, X (formerly Twitter) blocked for several weeks in late 2024. De Moraes demanded that user accounts that violated Brazilian law be removed, part of an attempt to crack down on anti-democratic, far-right voices. Billionaire Elon Musk, the owner of X, tried to get around the court-ordered block and called for de Moraes to be impeached. But de Moraes actually became a target for Trump earlier than that, because of Bolsonaro. In late 2022, the former president was accused of planning a coup against his successor, Lula, something that could carry a sentence of up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro and his co-defendants have disputed this charge, and Trump has described it as "a witch hunt." De Moraes has also investigated Bolsonaro for, among other things, manufacturing disinformation and has convicted Bolsonaro's supporters for storming the government district in Brasilia in January 2023. As a result, the judge has been celebrated as a defender of democracy in Brazil, particularly by those on the left. But perhaps because of the parallels to Trump's own past — his supporters also stormed government buildings in January 2021, and Trump previously insisted the 2020 election was "stolen" from him — de Moraes' actions have been like a red rag to Brazil's bullish right wingers, and now also to Trump supporters. However, Guilherme Casaroes, a professor at the Sao Paulo School of Business Administration at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, sees a bright side. The fact that, contrary to his initial announcement two weeks ago, Trump is allowing numerous tariff exemptions means that Brazil did well in negotiations with the US, he said. "But it also clearly shows that Trump's motivation is not so much commercial and more political," said Casaroes. "Especially because Brazil actually has a trade deficit with the US." The expert believes there are three key factors influencing Trump's attack on Brazil. Firstly, the country's closer ties with China, which makes Brazil a battleground in the geopolitical conflict between the US and China. Secondly, this fight is ideological: Trump wants to be seen supporting his allies around the world. That includes Bolsonaro. And thirdly, the economic interests of US tech giants: "They don't want social media regulation," said Casaroes. In Brazil, Trump's onslaught has triggered Brazilian nationalism, especially on social media. That's fair, said sociologist and political commentator Celso Rocha de Barros. He described what he calls the "American intervention against the Brazilian Supreme Court" as "unacceptable imperialist aggression" and insisted that in the future, Brazil must "negotiate economic agreements without giving an inch on democratic and political issues." Rocha de Barros believes de Moraes is actually looking stronger after this episode. Even Supreme Court justices who felt more favorably about Bolsonaro don't want to be giving anybody the impression that they support foreign intervention in their own court, he said. But Demetrio Magnoli believes the US' attacks on de Moraes could actually find favor with parts of the Brazilian population. Many locals are unhappy with their Supreme Court, he pointed out. This is partially because what some think are the judges' too-high salaries, but it's also because of the high penalties meted out to what Magnoli called "the useful idiots of the Bolsonaro camp," those who participated in the January 2023 rioting. Some Brazilians also believe de Moraes became too powerful during the trial against Bolsonaro. In other ways, Trump's attacks actually offers the Brazilian president an opportunity. Lula is polling badly, but if he manages to convince the Brazilian parliament to help an economy badly hit by Trump's tariffs, he might become more popular again. And that would be the opposite of what the US leader was hoping for, Magnoli said.
