Boos and applause for Trump at FIFA Club World Cup final
The US president was applauded as he arrived for the match between Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea at the MetLife stadium in New Jersey, just outside New York City.
But when a jumbotron screen briefly showed Trump saluting to the US national anthem, there was some booing in the giant stadium, before the camera quickly cut away.
Trump, 79, had earlier taken his seat in a suite alongside First Lady Melania Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino.
The Republican's appearance at the game also came on the first anniversary of the assassination attempt that he survived at an election rally in Pennsylvania.
Trump has made no secret of his desire to use this year's club championship and next year's 2026 World Cup as symbols of the "Golden Age of America" during his second term in the White House.
Next year's World Cup, the final of which will be held at the same stadium, will coincide with the 250th anniversary of America's independence.
Trump has even set up a White House task force to ensure next year's championship -- hosted jointly with Canada and Mexico -- goes smoothly.
- 'He loves it' -
Another factor in his appearance at the match is that Trump has fostered a close relationship with Infantino, who has been a frequent visitor to the White House.
Trump has kept the Club World Cup trophy next to his desk in the Oval Office since the FIFA president dropped by in March.
Infantino, who is no stranger to dealing with hard-nosed world leaders including Russia's Vladimir Putin ahead of the 2018 World Cup, thanked Trump for his support on Saturday.
He said Trump had "embraced immediately the importance of the FIFA Club World Cup, and of course of the World Cup next year."
Infantino also joked that Trump "certainly loves as well the trophy" -- whose gold-plated curves match the gilded makeover that the president has given the Oval Office.
But Trump's fondness of football, or soccer as he would say, is also personal.
The president's 19-year-old son Barron is a fan, as Infantino pointed out in a press conference at FIFA's new office in Trump Tower in New York on Saturday.
Asked if Trump liked the game, Infantino replied: "Well I think he does. In his first term as president of the United States, there was a soccer goal in the garden of the White House.
"He then explained to me that his son loved football, and that he loved the game. And of course when you are a parent, you love what your children love, so I think that he loves it."
As a boarding school student at the New York Military Academy, Trump himself also reportedly played the game for a season.
- 'Go home' -
But in typical form, Trump has also mixed political controversy with his football fandom.
Hosting Italian side Juventus in the Oval Office in June, he delivered a diatribe on transgender people in sports before asking the players: "Could a woman make your team, fellas?"
Most of the players looked bemused before Juventus general manager Damien Comolli replied: "We have a very good women's team."
"He's being very diplomatic," said Trump.
Trump's hardline immigration crackdown -- part of his "America First" policy -- has meanwhile sparked fears that football fans will be discouraged from coming to the United States for the 2026 World Cup.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Nation edgy as decision day looms
The new US tariffs are set to have global repercussions and impact various countries unless negotiations for more favourable rates can be achieved prior to Aug 1. The US intends to impose a 36% reciprocal tariff on Thai goods, which could hinder the competitiveness of Thai products in the US market, especially when compared with rival nations such as Vietnam. Aat Pisanwanich, an analyst in international economics and advisor on Asean affairs at Intelligence Research Consultant, recently explored the implications of the policy, its potential impact, and outlined actions that Thailand ought to pursue moving forward. What are the main objectives of the US tariff measures? The primary goal of the American tariffs is to lower deficits with its trading partners. Last year, the US recorded a global trade deficit of US$1.2 trillion. Additionally, the government aims to boost its revenue from the elevated tariffs to make up for declines in corporate and personal income tax receipts. The revenue generated from these tariffs is expected to be dedicated to military spending and managing immigration under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (2025). For the 2025 fiscal year, US tariff revenue is projected to reach $100 billion, based on the implementation of universal tariffs at 10%. Should reciprocal tariffs be introduced on Aug 1, the US will gain even more in tariff revenue and could potentially lure investment back to the nation. What are the principles behind the US tariffs? The US has imposed new tariffs, commonly referred to as the "Trump Tariffs" on nearly all countries due to its significant and prolonged trade deficits. These tariffs fall into two main categories: Universal tariffs: Trump announced a baseline 10% universal tariff on all imports to the US, regardless of whether the US has a trade surplus or deficit with them. These tariffs came into effect on April 5. Reciprocal tariffs: Effective as of Aug 1. The tariffs are calculated based on trade data in 2024, using the following formula: Import Tariff Rate (%) = (US trade deficit with a country ÷ US imports from that country) × 100 ÷ 2 For example, the US trade deficit with Thailand in 2024 was $45 billion, while total US imports from Thailand were valued at $63 billion. By applying the formula (45 ÷ 63) × 100 = 71.4% ÷ 2 = 35.7%, the resulting tariff rate is approximately 36%. The US has also enacted product-specific tariffs as part of its trade policy. Under Section 232, which addresses national security, the Department of Commerce is empowered to impose tariffs aimed at protecting the nation's economic security. These include a 25% tariff on imports of steel, aluminium and auto parts. It plans to impose a 50% tariff on copper and a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Under the Tariff Act 1930, the US has set some extraordinarily high tariffs, such as a tariff of over 3,000% on solar panels from Cambodia and a tariff above 300% on those from Thailand. The US administration has utilised Section 301 to impose tariffs on a wide range of Chinese goods. What are the reciprocal tariff rates the US plans to impose on imports? Starting Aug 1, along with a 10% universal tariff applied to all imports, the US will impose reciprocal tariffs on imported products from various countries, with the rate varying by nation. If no agreements are reached before the deadline, the tariff rates will come into effect (see accompanying graphic). Mr Aat outlined the implications of these reciprocal tariffs on exported goods. For instance, consider Product A from Thailand. Previously priced at $100, the cost in the US will rise to $136 after Aug 1. In contrast, Product A from Vietnam, also previously exported to the US at $100, will see an increase resulting in a final price of $120, or $16 less than the Thai product. Are any Thai industries expected to benefit from the US tariff policy? The imposition of a 36% reciprocal tariff is not expected to favour any Thai industries, and the impact will differ from sector to sector. Last year, the value of Thailand's total exports to the US reached about $63 billion, with 85% industrial goods and 15% agricultural products. About 30% of industrial exports are conducted by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), while larger exporters, both domestic and foreign, account for the remainder. Mr Aat said the most heavily impacted group would be Thai SMEs, due to the higher tariffs, heightened challenges in terms of competitiveness, and limited working capital. At the same time, they are also facing competition from an influx of Chinese products into the Thai market. Which industries will be negatively impacted? Mr Aat's assessment, based on Thailand's trade surplus value with the US last year, suggests several key industrial products are likely to be adversely affected by the new tariffs. These include communication and telecommunication equipment; computers and data processing systems; machinery parts; car tyres; electronic equipment and semiconductors; electric transformers and power supply equipment; motors and engines; rubber products; and electrical appliances. Additionally, agricultural products expected to be affected include rice and rice products; fresh and dried fruits; fruit and vegetable juices; and fresh and processed vegetables. How will Thai consumers be affected by the US tariff measures? According to Mr Aat, Thai consumers could experience a drop in income caused by a decline in exports, which would significantly slow down the economy. Although expenses may remain stable, the rising cost of living could become increasingly burdensome. There is also a high risk of job losses, business closures, and an increase in household debt. What actions should the government take to support affected industries? Mr Aat said the government must raise and allocate funds to stimulate the economy, as Thailand's economic growth could fall below 1% without such a stimulus, or might even face a contraction. Moreover, the government must provide support to farmers and affected SMEs, which could include tax exemptions, establishing compensation funds, exploring alternative markets, subsidising production costs, and offering low-interest loans. How are other countries assisting affected businesses and individuals? Mr Aat said Thailand should consider China's comprehensive measures, which include broad economic stimulus strategies, consumer support initiatives, the modernisation of manufacturing facilities through advanced technology, and fostering innovation via research funding. China is projected to allocate around $1 trillion to these efforts. Meanwhile, Indonesia has announced plans to distribute cash to low-income groups, along with a 30% discount on train fares, targeting about 18 million low-income individuals at a cost of around $1.3 billion.
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump administration to release some Epstein material
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump attempted Friday to control the storm triggered by a bombshell report on his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, ordering the Justice Department to seek the release of testimony from the prosecution of the late, alleged sex-trafficker-to-the-famous. Trump also vowed to sue 'the ass off' The Wall Street Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch after the newspaper said that in 2003 the future president wrote a raunchy letter to Epstein, referring to their shared 'secret.' 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department would ask a court to unseal grand jury testimony from the case against Epstein, apparently in hopes of dampening fury among many of Trump's most loyal supporters over what they see as a White House cover-up. Epstein, a financier, was found hanging dead in his cell in New York in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that sexually exploited dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida. The case sparked conspiracy theories, especially among Trump's far-right voters, about an alleged international cabal of wealthy paedophiles. Epstein's death — declared a suicide — before he could face trial super-charged the narrative. When Trump returned to power for a second term this January, his supporters clamored for revelations about Epstein's supposed list of clients. But Bondi issued an official memo in July declaring that there was no such list. The discontent in Trump's MAGA, or Make America Great Again, base poses a rare challenge to the 79-year-old Republican's control of the political narrative in America. It remained unclear whether a court would authorise the unsealing of what is usually highly secret grand jury testimony. Even if such material were made public, it was also unclear whether it would shed much, if any, light on the main questions raised in the conspiracy theories — particularly the existence and possible contents of an Epstein client list. Naked woman and signature Trump was friends with Epstein and the two were photographed and videoed together at parties over the years, although there has never been evidence shown of wrongdoing. The Wall Street Journal article published late Thursday was damaging because it indicated a shared interest in sex. The Journal reported that Trump had wished Epstein a happy 50th birthday in 2003 with a letter featuring a hand-drawn naked woman and referring to their 'secrets.' The letter was reportedly among a slew of well-wishes from other rich and well-known figures for a birthday album. A furious Trump said on Truth Social that the purported letter was a 'Scam' and 'Fake.' Trump also said that the Journal's chief editor, Emma Tucker, had been told the letter was fake and that she shouldn't publish it. According to the Journal, the Trump letter contained the outline of a naked woman, apparently drawn with a marker pen, and had the future president's signature 'Donald' mimicking pubic hair. It ends, according to the newspaper, with 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump reacted in a series of furious social media posts, saying 'it's not my language. It's not my words.'
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
EU readies retaliatory list targeting US services
BRUSSELS — The European Union (EU) executive is preparing a list of proposed restrictions on US services companies -- including tech giants -- should Brussels fail to strike a trade deal with Washington, European diplomats said on Thursday. United States President Donald Trump blindsided the EU earlier this month by threatening to slap 3% tariffs on the bloc's goods, despite months of talks to get an agreement. If they don't clinch a deal by Aug 1, Brussels has warned it will have no choice but to retaliate against Trump's steep levies because of their economic impact, and has drawn up two lists of US goods to target. The European Commission, steering trade policy for the 27-country bloc, is also working on a list of American services -- including financial services -- it could hit with restrictions, for example on public procurement, EU diplomats said. It could also mean excluding certain suppliers, one diplomat said, adding that the commission had not yet put forward any list to EU member states. Any action on services would be in addition to two sets of retaliatory tariffs on goods: one put forward this week that targets €72 billion (US$83 billion) of US products, and another worth €21 billion, drawn up in response to steel and aluminium tariffs. One EU diplomat said the bloc could retaliate step-by-step, hitting the United States with first the smaller, then the larger counter tariffs on goods -- before potentially escalating to services. The official also stressed the EU had yet to even approve the measures by vote and that they could still change, but another diplomat said Brussels would have no choice but to respond "forcefully". Most EU member states want to keep options on the table but have backed the commission's attempts to try once again to get an agreement before firing off retaliatory measures. The EU's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, jetted to Washington on Wednesday for talks with his US counterparts but the commission did not provide details on meetings. There are questions over Europe's appetite for a damaging fight with Trump if he slaps on the 30% levies as promised. But France has been pushing for Brussels to take a harder line and consider deploying its most powerful trade tool, known as the anti-coercion instrument, if negotiations with the United States end in disappointment. Even if Brussels were to activate this so-called trade "bazooka", it could take months before any measures were taken, according to the rules. First, the commission would have four months to investigate the third country it accuses of detrimental trade policies -- then member states would have eight to 10 weeks to back any proposal for action.
