Suffered in silence for the past eight months: Omar Abdullah
'We suffered in silence for the past eight months but did not complain. It's for what happened yesterday that you (people) came to know about our reality. But don't misconstrue our decency for weakness. We don't talk loudly, threaten or resort to gundagardi (hooliganism) but that does not mean we are weak. My strength is my people. I will always safeguard my strength,' Mr. Abdullah, who was addressing a function at the Jhelum Valley Medical College in Srinagar, said.
Mr. Abdullah was referring to the L-G administration's security measures to stop the Chief Minister and the Ministers from visiting the graveyard where 22 civilians, killed during the 1931 uprising against the Dogra ruler, are buried. On July 14, there were dramatic images where Mr. Abdullah was seen climbing a wall to reach the graveyard and a police officer pushing him in a bid to stop him from paying tributes.
'They (administration) tried their best to raise barricades on July 14. No barricade will push us away from our goal. We will work towards realising the dignity and dreams of people of Kashmir. There will be no sell out with the dreams of our people. It's no favour we are ruling Jammu and Kashmir. It's because of Allah and our people we are here today,' Mr. Abdullah said.
It's for the first time since Mr. Abdullah won elections in October 2024 after a prolonged Central rule that he upped the ante to this high pitch against L-G Mr. Sinha, who retains the powers to transfer employees, both State and Central services, and spearhead the security forces in the union territory.
Sharp reactions
The dramatic images of Mr. Abdullah being heckled and disallowed to reach the graveyard in Srinagar evoked sharp reactions from national leaders, including Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav and Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav.
'At a time when there is a growing demand for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, the current events unfolding there are a grim reminder of how far things have deteriorated. If this can happen in Kashmir, it can happen anywhere, to any elected representative of the people. Every democratic voice must unequivocally condemn this,' Mr. Stalin said in a post on X.
Meanwhile, Jammu and Kashmir Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary on Tuesday (July 15, 2025) described the actions against the sitting Chief Minister as 'an insult to democracy'.
'This land saw countless sacrifices for freedom and the Constitution. Under the same Constitution, Mr. Abdullah's government was elected by the people. Any insult to Mr. Abdullah is an insult to democracy, an insult to India's democracy, and an insult to the people who gave us their mandate,' said Mr. Choudhary.
Mr. Choudhary said any insult or humiliation of our leader would not be tolerated. 'We will not stay silent. What happened yesterday whether people speak up about it or not is an insult to every Indian who cast their vote,' he added.
The Deputy Chief Minister said one day the L-G, like taking responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack, might even say that what happened with Omar Sahib was wrong. 'The police are under his control and acted unjustly. He (L-G) owes an apology for what happened yesterday,' he added.
Referring to Mr. Sinha's recent statement accepting responsibility for the security lapse in the Pahalgam terror attack, Mr. Abdullah said, 'Someone has to be held responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack and now that the security lapses have been accepted.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
P Chidambaram writes: ‘Mischief thou art afoot'
If a popular vote had been taken between 1991and 1996, the Election Commission of India (ECI) would have been certainly voted as the best and most effective institution of India — even higher than the Constitutional Courts. Thanks to T N Seshan, Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), the ECI's independence, integrity and impartiality (the three 'I's) were universally acclaimed. After Seshan, the CECs who stoutly defended the three 'I's were M S Gill, Mr J M Lyngdoh, Mr T S Krishnamurthy, Navin Chawla and Mr S Y Quraishi. Other CECs drifted in and drifted out, sometimes bending and sometimes appearing to be unbending. CECs appointed in the last 12 years were, viewed through the prism of the Constitution, disasters. ECI is an autonomous institution. In the early years, the conduct of elections was not considered a great challenge. People voted according to the wishes of local satraps, some sections were not allowed to vote but they were too poor and powerless to complain, and there was no political challenge to the Congress. Elections became challenging after 1967. The governments between 1965 and 2014 did not interfere with the functioning of the ECI, nor do I recall any accusation of interference. Some elections to the state assemblies were alleged to have been rigged but the allegation was not against the political party ruling at the Centre but against the incompetence of the ECI. The Lok Sabha election of 2014 was a free and fair election. Since then, most of the elections to the Lok Sabha or the State Assemblies have been subject to widespread criticism of incompetence, rigging, fraud and worse. Since 2014, ECI has faced numerous challenges and it has emerged with its reputation severely scathed. Apropos the election to the Maharashtra Assembly in November 2024, the electoral rolls became a subject of controversy. The allegations are that (i) an unusually large number of new —and perhaps ghost — names were added to the lists of voters and that (ii) an unusually large number of persons were allowed to vote long after polling hours had ended. ECI has attempted to defend itself against both charges but the jury is out. Another bitterly contested state election is in the offing — in Bihar — and, next year, more are due. Bihar is a test case. Barely four months before the state will go to the polls, ECI has started a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls. This is unusual and unprecedented. An electoral roll is usually updated on January 1 of the year and a summary revision is done on the eve of the polls. The summary revision will include names of new and unenrolled voters and exclude dead or permanently migrated voters from the current electoral rolls. The bulk of the current electoral rolls will be intact and untouched. Besides, the inclusion and exclusion will be done with the full knowledge and participation of the political parties. Each case for inclusion will be carefully scrutinised and each case for exclusion will be decided after a full contest and hearing. SIR is different. It effectively scraps the current electoral rolls. Despite the claim that SIR is based on the 2003 electoral rolls, it effectively starts from a zero base and constructs new electoral rolls for each constituency. Besides, the onus is shifted to the voter: despite his/her name being in the current electoral rolls and despite having had a right to vote (and in most cases having voted) in the Bihar Assembly elections of 2020 or the Lok Sabha elections of 2024, he/she must apply for inclusion with documents to prove his/her citizenship. And all this is expected to be done between June 25 and July 26. The fine print of the exercise is not to enable enrollment but to place insurmountable hurdles in the path to enroll and vote. The ECI has prescribed 11 documents as 'proof' of citizenship: four of them do not contain information on place of birth and two of them have not been issued to any person in Bihar. So, effectively, there are only five documents (including caste certificate issued by revenue officers) to prove one's citizenship. Passport, birth certificate or government employee ID are available to only 2.4 to 5 per cent of the population of Bihar. Conspicuous by their absence are (1) Aadhaar, (2) EPIC or voter-identity card issued by the ECI and (3) ration card. When the Supreme Court asked ECI why the three missing documents cannot be included for the purpose of SIR, the ECI had no ready answer. The irony is residency and caste certificates are issued by revenue officers based on Aadhaar; while the residency or caste certificate is valid for SIR, the Aadhaar is invalid! The only rational part of SIR is that dead persons and double-entry names must be removed. ECI has estimated that 17.5 lakh voters have migrated but that does not mean they are no longer domiciled in Bihar or will not return to vote. The CEO, Bihar uploaded a form for enrollment of out-of-state voters on July 15 and expects to complete the exercise by July 26! The inevitable conclusion is that SIR is not an exercise to enable eligible citizens to enroll and vote. It is a dark, sinister plot to disenfranchise millions of poor, marginalized or migrant citizens. Over to the Supreme Court on July 28.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Ex-NIA judge moves Delhi High Court seeking arms licence for personal security
New Delhi: A former special judge of National Investigation Agency (NIA) recently approached Delhi High Court seeking directions to central govt and Delhi Police to issue him an arms licence. In his plea, the judge cited personal security concerns. Hearing the plea, Justice Sachin Dutta recorded an assurance by the govt counsel that a decision on the judge's pending application would be taken within four weeks. "The above redresses the immediate grievance of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms. The pending application also stands disposed of," the court stated. Justice Dutta, however, noted that if the petitioner judge was not satisfied with the decision taken by the authorities, he could seek legal remedies. In the petition filed through advocate Sadiya Rohma Khan, the judge submitted that he served as a special NIA judge in Tripura and was currently on deputation in Delhi. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi He said he applied for an arms licence in Nov 2023, but no action was taken on his request, reflecting a "casual" attitude by Delhi Police's licensing authority. According to the petition, the judge was called by the police licensing authorities for a personal assessment last year, and he appeared for the same. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo However, there was no development after the assessment. "It is shocking that the petitioner and his family are living with no security in New Delhi, and this potentialises both direct and indirect threats to their personal safety and security," the plea argued. Since his family is permanently stationed in Delhi, he applied for an arms licence to ensure protection and safety so that he is free from any "external criminal threats and potential risks and non-interference in free movement and is able to defend himself if a threat arises", the counsel submitted. Invoking Article 21 of the Constitution, the petitioner argued that forcing his family to live without any security amounted to a violation of their right to life and personal liberty.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HC directs Madurai corpn to repair, relay damaged roads
Madurai: It is the Constitutional obligation of the state and its authorities to ensure that basic amenities and infrastructure facilities are provided to redress the grievances of the citizens, observed the Madras high court , while directing Madurai corporation to repair the damaged roads and relay new roads in a phased manner in Madurai city. The court was hearing a public interest litigation filed by an advocate, S Suresh Kumar Isaac Paul, seeking a direction to the corporation authorities to lay quality roads and ensure proper maintenance of the stormwater drains in the areas within Madurai city limits. A division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete observed that the petitioner's grievance is that roads within the limits of Madurai corporation are not maintained properly. Additionally, the stormwater drains have not been constructed, causing flooding during the rainy season. Due to the damaged roads, users are suffering. The petitioner pleads that his grievances are to be redressed by issuing suitable directions to the corporation authorities. The judges observed that the court issuing any such general directions may not practically work out. In the event of addressing any specific grievance, that alone may be redressed by issuing suitable directions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold 2021 Cars Now Almost Free - Prices May Surprise You Unsold Cars | Search Ads Learn More Undo The corporation is expected to provide basic amenities and infrastructure facilities to the citizens residing in Madurai city. Roads are to be laid properly to prevent accidents and for traffic movements. Areas which require immediate attention are to be identified, and the roads which are damaged are to be repaired immediately. New roads are to be laid in a phased manner according to budget allocations. While laying new roads, the existing roads are to be milled to avoid inconvenience to the residents and commercial establishments adjacent to the roads, in order to maintain the roads at the existing level, the judges observed. "Providing drinking water, pure air, and infrastructure facilities are the constitutional mandate for the state. The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution also extends to the provision of these basic amenities, and it must be protected by the state and its authorities. Taking note of all these factors, the authorities shall act in a swift manner to redress the grievances of the people residing in Madurai city," the judges observed and disposed of the petition.
