1992 Los Angeles Riots: The Last Time 'La La Land' Burned
Los Angeles is burning again.
The weekend ICE raids lit the first spark. Armed agents fanned across workplaces, detaining dozens in what activists say were overly aggressive immigration crackdowns. It didn't take long for the anger to spill onto the streets. Protesters hurled rocks, burned vehicles, and faced tear gas and rubber bullets as the city spiralled into chaos.
In a move that reminded many of past strongman politics, President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops, without the California Governor's consent. The streets of LA, already tense with chants and smoke, now stood under federal boots.
This isn't the first time 'La La Land' has been here. Rewind to 1992, the last time Los Angeles truly burned.
When The City Erupted
It was April 29, 1992. Four white Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers had just been found not guilty in the brutal beating of Rodney King, an unarmed Black motorist. The attack was captured on video. It showed Mr King on the ground, arms flailing, as batons crashed down over and over. The footage aired across the world.
Yet, when the not guilty verdict came, the rage exploded.
Six straight days of fire, looting, and violence engulfed Los Angeles. Entire neighbourhoods were torched. Stores burned. Helicopters circled above a city at war with itself. More than 60 people were killed, over 2,000 injured, and around 12,000 arrested. The damage was Over $1 billion, and 1,100 buildings destroyed. President George W Bush deployed thousands of federal troops to restore order.
At the time, the fire department was fighting flames and dodging bullets along with it.
The Aftermath
The Rodney King riots didn't emerge out of nowhere. For decades, communities of colour in LA lived under a system they believed brutalised them with impunity. Mr King's situation only confirmed what many already suspected. As the 1992 jury read its verdict, people began chanting: "No justice, no peace."
On that very day, a truck driver was pulled from his vehicle and beaten on live television. Police retreated. Fire spread. The mayor declared a state of emergency. President George Bush sent in troops. And Rodney King's famous televised plea, "Can we get along?" echoed across a broken city.
The aftermath was seismic. LA Police Chief Daryl Gates resigned. Mayor Tom Bradley chose not to run again. The city settled with Mr King for $3.8 million.
Fast forward to 2025. The players have changed. ICE raids instead of police brutality, immigration raids instead of beatings. But the flames are familiar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids
Los Angeles (United States): Governor Gavin Newsom has announced a lawsuit against President Donald Trump over what he calls an 'illegal and authoritarian' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. The decision has led to an escalation of the already strained relationship between California and the federal government. What began as a wave of protests against immigration raids has now snowballed into a full-blown constitutional showdown between Sacramento and Washington. Over the weekend, Los Angeles erupted as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested dozens of undocumented immigrants from city streets. The sweeping raids triggered mass protests. Demonstrators blocked freeways and clashed with the police – demanding an end to what they called a 'militarised war on migrants'. By Monday, nearly 2,000 National Guard troops had been dispatched to the city under direct orders from the White House – a move Governor Newsom says was made without his knowledge or consent. 'This is not only about California. This is about a president who believes he can federalise any state's National Guard, bypassing governors, the Constitution and the people. It is illegal. It is immoral. And we are going to court,' Newsom said in an appearance on MSNBC. The governor took to social media as well and warned that Trump's executive order could set a dangerous precedent. 'What he has done in L.A., he can now do in any state. We will not allow California to be his testing ground for tyranny,' he wrote on X (formerly Twitter). Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is a California native, too joined the chorus and accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis to inflame division and distract from his own failures'. The protests began last Friday after ICE conducted raids in several neighborhoods. The crackdown led to the arrest of at least 44 undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators quickly flooded the streets and accused federal authorities of targeting vulnerable communities and acting with little regard for due process. The police responded with tear gas, flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets. The unrest intensified over the weekend and prompted Trump to invoke what he called a 'necessary federal intervention'. 'These are not protesters, they are insurrectionists. Governor Gavin Newsom and 'Mayor' Bass have lost control of their city. They should apologise to the people of Los Angeles for this disaster,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. However, city officials flatly rejected Trump's narrative. While coordinating emergency response efforts, LA Mayor Karen Bass condemned the federal intervention as 'reckless and inflammatory'. Legal experts say Newsom's lawsuit could spark a constitutional battle over the limits of federal power. While the president does have authority to federalise the National Guard in rare situations, doing so without state consent – particularly for domestic law enforcement – is legally murky. 'Trump is testing the boundaries of presidential power in ways we have not seen in decades. If the courts side with Newsom, it could rein in executive overreach. If they don't, it could open the door to more unilateral deployments in the future,' said Dr. Emily Serrano, a constitutional law professor at UCLA. As tensions continue to rise in the streets and now in the courts, Los Angeles has become the latest flashpoint in the nation's deepening political divide. Whether this battle is resolved by judges or ballots remains to be seen. But for now, California is sending a message it will not back down.
New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘We're suing him': California Governor slams Trump's National Guard move as protests continue across LA
California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC that he plans to file suit Monday against the Trump administration to roll back the National Guard deployment, which he called 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' In a post on X, Newsom said, 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted. He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalise the National Guard. The order he signed doesn't just apply to CA. It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing. We're suing him.'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Explained: Trump's Troops in Los Angeles: What the National Guard Can — and Can't — Legally Do
explained-video LA Protest: President Donald Trump has deployed thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid escalating protests over immigration raids — bypassing California's governor and invoking federal law. Why is this move controversial? What exactly is the National Guard, and how much power does the president have to deploy it? In this deep explainer, we break down everything — from Title 10 powers to the political backlash, including protests, property damage, and the looming threat of more federal force.
