Trump says Coca-Cola will use real sugar in its U.S. flagship drink. The company isn't confirming that
WASHINGTON — Make American Coke Great Again?
U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola has agreed to use real cane sugar in its flagship soft drink in the U.S. at his suggestion — though the company didn't confirm such a move.
Any switch from high-fructose corn syrup in Coke sold in the United States would put Coca-Cola more in line with its practice in other countries, including Mexico and Australia. But it wouldn't affect Trump's drink of choice, Diet Coke, which uses aspartame as a calorie-free beverage.
'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote on his social media site. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'
A spokesperson for Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co. said in a statement that the company appreciated Trump's enthusiasm and promised that more details on new offerings within its products would be shared soon.
Coca-Cola didn't elaborate. But the company has long indulged U.S. fans of cane sugar by importing glass bottles of Mexican Coke to the U.S. since 2005.
Returning to sugar in U.S. production, meanwhile, might affect the nation's corn farmers, whose yields are used in artificial sweeteners.
'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode said in a statement. 'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit. Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.'
Trump himself is such a fan of Diet Coke that that he had a red button installed on the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office that he can press to have a White House butler bring one in for him.
Despite his fondness for Diet Coke, his relationship with the company hasn't always been sweet.
In a series of posts in 2012, Trump suggested diet soda might be connected to weight gain before eventually writing, 'The Coca Cola company is not happy with me — that's okay, I'll still keep drinking that garbage.'
A bottle of Diet Coke could be seen sitting next to his chair years later, at a G20 summit in 2017. And The New York Times reported in 2018 that he was drinking a dozen Diet Cokes daily.
__
Associated Press writer Dee-Ann Durbin in Detroit and Josh Funk in Omaha, Nebraska, contributed to this story.
Will Weissert, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
What to expect from Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal
U.S. President Donald Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal and its owners, including Rupert Murdoch, after the newspaper reported his name was on a 2003 birthday greeting for Jeffrey Epstein that included a sexually suggestive drawing and a reference to secrets they shared.
Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Can Investing $25,000 in the S&P 500 Today and Holding On for 25 Years Make You Wealthy?
Key Points A buy-and-hold strategy can be a great way to grow your portfolio while also avoiding the temptation to chase trends and risky stocks. The S&P 500 is at record highs, and while it has historically averaged double-digit returns, investors may want to brace for the possibility of lower returns in the future. If you don't think you're on track to meet your investing goals, you may want to consider investing more money or focusing on growth stocks. 10 stocks we like better than SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust › For not only years, but decades, tracking the S&P 500 has been a reliable way to generate significant stock gains. Since the index tracks the best stocks on the U.S. markets, it offers a great low-risk way to ensure you're positioned for long-term growth. But what if you invested a lump sum of $25,000 into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the S&P 500, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: SPY), and simply held on for 25 years? Could that be enough to make you wealthy and allow you to retire comfortably? Let's take a look. How much could your portfolio be worth after 25 years? A buy-and-hold strategy can be a good way to ensure your portfolio rises in value. Sometimes, just leaving your portfolio alone can be the best thing you can do for your future. The temptation to chase the latest trends or hot stocks can end up doing more harm than good and derail your investment goals and objectives. If you have a diverse portfolio or if you are invested in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF, a set-it-and-forget-it approach can be a great one to consider deploying. Over time, your investment should rise in value, though there's no guarantee stocks will rise or be up when you need the money. The variable that can have the most significant effect on your overall returns is unfortunately the one that is also nearly impossible to predict: your average annual return. And with the S&P 500 around all-time highs right now, it may be wise to assume that its average returns from here on out may trend a bit lower than its historical average of around 10%. Here's how a $25,000 investment in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF might look like after a period of 25 years, if the average annual return is between 7% and 9%. Year 7% Growth 8% Growth 9% Growth 5 $35,064 $36,733 $38,466 10 $49,179 $53,973 $59,184 15 $68,976 $79,304 $91,062 20 $96,742 $116,524 $140,110 25 $135,686 $171,212 $215,577 Calculations and table by author. A $25,000 investment would grow significantly over the years under this scenario, but with potentially below-average returns, you're not likely to end up with a boatload of money to consider yourself rich, or enough to retire with after 25 years. Your investment might end up growing to more than a couple of hundred thousand dollars and strengthen your overall financial position, but if your goal is to end up wealthy, i.e., having a portfolio worth over $1 million, then this strategy may not be sufficient to get you there. What you can do if you don't think you're on track to hit your goals If you're worried you may not reach your investing goals, there are things you can do to try to achieve better results. Investing more money, even if it's on a monthly basis, can be a way to slowly pad your portfolio's balance over time, and allow more money to be compounded over the years. And the more you invest, the quicker that your gains will accumulate. If that's not an option, what you may also want to consider is focusing more on growth stocks, rather than simply mirroring the market. By investing in tech stocks or companies with promising growth prospects, you may have better chances of outperforming the market and achieving better-than-average returns. This can involve more research and be more time-consuming, but it's an example of where picking individual stocks or simply focusing on ETFs that track growth stocks can be a better option than mirroring the S&P 500. It adds more risk into the equation, but the payoff can be worthwhile in the end. Regardless of what approach you decide to take, it's a good idea to revisit your portfolio on a regular basis to see how you're doing and if you need to recalibrate and adjust your holdings. Should you invest $1,000 in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust right now? Before you buy stock in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump's latest demand: Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back
CLEVELAND — U.S. President Donald Trump wants Washington's football franchise and Cleveland's baseball team to revert to their former names. Trump said on Truth Social on Sunday morning that 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' Josh Harris, whose group bought the Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the name was here to say. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change. 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said. Both teams have had their new names since the 2022 seasons. Washington dropped Redskins after the 2019 season and was known as the Washington Football Team for two years before moving to Commanders. Cleveland announced in December 2020 they would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out 'Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of national discussions about institutions and teams to drop logos and names considered racist. The Guardians are the fifth name for Cleveland's baseball franchise. It joined the American League in 1901 as one of the eight charter franchises as the Blues. It switched to Bronchos a year later and used the Naps from 1903 through 1914 before moving to Indians in 1915. Washington started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians. Joe Reedy, The Associated Press
