Sweden: a socialist paradise overflowing with billionaires
EVERY year I run an analysis of the Forbes rich lists, to spot countries where billionaire wealth is surging as a share of gross domestic product, concentrating in family empires or pooling in 'bad' industries better known for corruption than productivity. My working assumption is that the most extreme outliers face the highest risk of anti-capitalist revolt.
This year, the warning signs point above all to Sweden. Though still seen by many progressives as a socialist paradise, Sweden saw billionaire wealth rise by four points to 31 per cent of GDP – the biggest increase, and to the highest level, of the 20 major economies in my analysis.
Sweden has 45 billionaires, about 1.5 times more per capita than the US, which is often said to be enjoying a new gilded age. The richest American ever was John D Rockefeller in around 1910, when his fortune surpassed 1.5 per cent of GDP. No American is close to that mark today. The land of latter-day Rockefellers is Sweden, with seven magnates whose wealth as a share of their nation's GDP exceeds that of Rockefeller at his peak.
A functioning economy will generate a balanced billionaire class, with more 'good' wealth from industries like tech or manufacturing than bad wealth from sectors such as real estate or commodities. Not that real estate or commodities are inherently bad. But they contribute less to productivity and are less likely to be held in high popular esteem than, say, cars or software.
In Sweden, the good billionaires are outnumbered two to one by the bad ones. Despite the country's emergence as an incubator of tech entrepreneurs, only three of them make the Forbes list. At just 12 per cent, the good share of billionaire wealth is third-lowest among my top 10 developed countries.
Sweden began to encourage wealth creation after the failure of its post-World War II experiment in unrestrained welfare statism. Heavy taxes were driving celebrities and industrialists out of the country, costing Sweden far more in lost wealth than it raised in revenue. The ensuing financial crises of the early 1990s forced Sweden to rethink its commitment to socialism.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Sweden did not end free education and healthcare, paid for with high income taxes. But it did downsize the welfare state, while abolishing or lowering taxes on wealth, inheritance, corporations and real estate.
By the mid-2000s, the super-rich were no longer fleeing. Now, they dominate. Nearly 70 per cent of Sweden's billionaire wealth comes from inheritance, third-highest on my list after France and Germany.
Sweden is not the only big welfare state to see a billionaire boom in recent years – France has, too – but each has special imbalances. Sweden's include distorted taxes and easy money. The country taxes capital much less heavily than salaries, and sometimes taxes capital regressively. A yearly homeowner fee is capped under US$1,000 – a big boon for the rich. Sweden has also held interest rates well below the European average, and low rates tend to inflate asset prices, while making it easy for the rich to borrow money to make more of it.
In recent elections, political anger has been focused on immigrants and crime, not inequality. Many leading business families are better known for giving away than flaunting their wealth, which helps explain why they have avoided political attacks. But Sweden's composite ranking on my three billionaire metrics is now the worst of the 20 countries I track, and that does not bode well.
I started running these analyses in 2010, when the booming fortunes of bad billionaires in India led to a backlash against wealth creation that was enough to hold back business activity in general. Over the next decade, dismal results on the billionaire metrics would presage revolts around the world, including in Chile before mass riots against social inequality erupted in 2019, and in France before the outbreak of 'tax the rich' rallies in 2023. The Paris protests have targeted top billionaires by name.
These class revolts can ignite like bush fires, shifting with the political winds. As Swedish economist Johan Norberg has described his home country, this is a nation of 'extremes', prone to ignoring festering problems 'until they become too big to deny and everybody changes their minds at the same time'.
Every healthy economy needs to encourage wealth creation, particularly in the most productive sectors, but balance is essential. Too much wealth at the top, concentrated in the hands of too many billionaires of the wrong type, puts a country at risk of political backlashes or policy reversals. Sweden is fertile ground for this kind of unrest now. FINANCIAL TIMES
The writer is chair of Rockefeller International. His latest book is What Went Wrong With Capitalism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
China didn't just survive decoupling, it turned it into strategy
WHEN the first Trump administration pushed for decoupling from China, it was framed as a geopolitical warning shot. Decoupling was meant to be a chokehold – a way to cut China off from capital, consumers, and core technologies. However, Beijing did not panic, it treated the move as a strategic signal. Rather than resist, China began quietly reconfiguring its global economic footprint. Washington thought it was cornering China. US President Donald Trump thought he held the cards, controlled the chips and set the rules. But he missed one inconvenient truth: Most of those cards were printed, packed, and shipped from factories in China. No grand speeches. No drama. Just deliberate moves: Diversifying supply chains, investing abroad, and pushing local tech to close the gap. While American legislators staged hearings, Chinese firms inked deals. While one side debated restrictions, the other redrew its map. The result? A calibrated diversification of supply chains, not as an act of retreat, but of repositioning. Supply chains with Chinese characteristics Over the past five years, Chinese firms have accelerated investments across South-east Asia, particularly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia. These moves weren't just about evading tariffs; they reflected something deeper – the private sector's instinct to escape the involution of domestic competition. Rather than grind through China's crowded and laser-thin margin markets where capital quickly pile into the same trends, many entrepreneurs sought arbitrage abroad. Lower labour costs, less stiff competition and higher margins. In other words: less involution, more unfair advantage (over the local players in the overseas markets) . BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But this wasn't a solo act. Beijing provided the scaffolding – through bilateral free trade agreements, infrastructure lending and sometimes diplomatic cover. It's market-driven, but state-supported. A relay race between private initiative and public policy. The numbers are telling. China's foreign direct investment into Asean nearly tripled, from around US$9 billion in 2016 to over US$25 billion in 2023. Bilateral trade with Asean grew from US$486 billion to nearly US$700 billion over the same period. And critically, much of this new value chain – from intellectual property (IP) to logistics to upstream components – remains under Chinese control. What's emerging is not just offshoring, it is a China-centric supply chain, just not physically in China. Washington turns inward, Beijing looks outward While China was expanding outward, the US focused inward. Rather than competing through innovation or strengthening ties, Washington's toolkit leaned heavily on bans and restrictions – cue TikTok, Huawei, WeChat, DJI. Legislative energy went into hearings and symbolic gestures. Meanwhile, Chinese companies opened factories, expanded exports, and deepened market ties. Firms like Midea acquired global assets such as Germany's robotics maker KUKA and Spanish appliance manufacturer Teka Group. BYD set up electric vehicle (EV) plants in Hungary and Brazil, while Wuling manufactured their mini EVs in Indonesia. Consumer names such as Mixue, Luckin Coffee and Chagee have also become household names across South-east Asia in recent years. Industrial giants such as the likes of CATL, Trina Solar, and Sungrow now dominate global energy supply chains. Technological independence under pressure Despite export bans and semiconductor restrictions, China has made visible progress in core technologies. Domestic players have achieved 7nanometre (nm) chip production and are pushing into DUV (deep ultraviolet) and potentially EUV (extreme ultraviolet) lithography. AI chips are now a top priority for firms like Huawei and SMIC. In aviation, Comac's C919 took flight, further reducing dependency on Airbus and Boeing. In rare earths, China has not only consolidated upstream and midstream operations but also introduced tighter controls and oversight. This has significantly strengthened Beijing's ability to enforce export restrictions and wield rare earths as a strategic bargaining chip in ongoing trade negotiations. Early signs of strategic payoff Recent trade data shows that China's preparations since Trump's first term are bearing fruit. In May 2025, despite a sharp 35 per cent drop in exports to the US, overall exports rose 4.8 per cent year on year. This plunge in exports to the US was somewhat cushioned by strong performance in Asean (15 per cent), the European Union (12 per cent), and Africa (33 per cent). Germany and Vietnam both saw a 22 per cent jump in imports from China. Over the past month, the US now accounts for just 10 per cent of China's total exports. From being China's largest trading partner, it is gradually becoming just one of many customers and, arguably, not a very reliable one. The decoupling irony The more ironical part of all this is that by seeking to isolate China, the US may have isolated itself. Supply chains rerouted. Markets matured. Chinese firms globalised. The geopolitical chessboard shifted, without much fanfare, but with deliberate execution. For foreign investors and policymakers, the lesson is clear. While one side drew lines, the other built bridges. One end of the world conducted a bi-partisan witch-hunt while the other silently reinvent themselves. And in doing so, China has turned decoupling from a defensive stance into a strategic advantage. The ship hasn't just sailed – it's already halfway to its next destination. The writer, a seasoned economist, adviser and entrepreneur, is an affiliate lecturer at Singapore Management University
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US: Stocks fall as investors pare risk on Middle East clash
[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks finished sharply lower Friday (Jun 13) as Iran launched counterstrikes in response to an Israeli siege, leaving most non-petroleum equities lower. While oil producers and service companies rallied with oil prices, major indices spent the entire session in the red as investors shunned risk ahead of the weekend. 'After having a pretty solid run in May and the first part of June, markets found an excuse to take some profits,' said Art Hogan, chief market strategist of B Riley Wealth. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 1.8 per cent at 42,197.79. The broad-based S&P 500 shed 1.1 per cent to 5,976.97, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 1.3 per cent to 19,406.83. Analysts described Friday's selling as orderly. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Investors 'are paring back some risk, but this is hardly a panicky sell-off,' said Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers. The market is partially in 'a wait and see approach to what happens over the weekend because it's obviously a very fluid volatile situation,' Sosnick added. Credit card and payment companies were under pressure following a Wall Street Journal report that Walmart and Amazon are exploring the issuance of stablecoins, potentially threatening conventional payment methods. Visa and PayPal both dropped around 5 per cent, while American Express lost 3.4 per cent. Adobe sank 5.3 per cent despite reporting higher than expected profits as analysts pointed to disappointment that the company's artificial intelligence investments have not resulted in more revenue growth so far. But a more than seven percent rise in crude prices in the wake of the Iran-Israel conflict lifted Halliburton by 5.5 per cent and ConocoPhillips 2.4 per cent. AFP
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Europe: Shares tumble as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
EUROPEAN shares closed lower on Friday (Jun 13) as Israel's wide-scale strike against Iran triggered a broad market selloff, with investors rushing to safe-haven assets amid an already uncertain trade environment. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index fell 0.9 per cent, briefly hitting its lowest level in three-weeks. The index also marked its fifth consecutive declining session and longest losing streak since September 2024. Israel launched a barrage of strikes across Iran, saying it had attacked nuclear facilities and missile factories. The news sent global risk assets lower and investors moved into traditional safe havens like the dollar and gold. Though Washington said it had no part in the attack, US President Donald Trump, Israel's main ally, suggested that Iran had brought the attack on itself by resisting a US ultimatum in talks to restrict its nuclear programme. Most regional stock bourses finished in the red, with Germany's DAX ending 1.1 per cent lower after data showed German inflation eased to 2.1 per cent in May, confirming preliminary data. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'If this is over quickly, we'll see a fairly quick recovery and the markets basically are discounting the possibility that this drags out,' said Patrick Armstrong, chief investment officer at Plurimi Wealth. 'Our view is that it probably will be very short lived because Iran isn't in a position to respond meaningfully, given the power dynamics between the two countries', he added. Most Stoxx sub-sectors clocked losses, with auto stocks leading declines, down 2.2 per cent. Travel and leisure also dropped 2 per cent – with airline operators ICAG, Lufthansa and Ryanair among the biggest laggards as many airlines cleared out of the airspace over Israel, Iran, Iraq and Jordan and crude oil prices surged. Energy stocks advanced 0.6 per cent as crude oil prices jumped close to 6 per cent on worries about a disruption in Middle East oil supplies. Shipping groups Maersk advanced 4.2 per cent and Hapag-Lloyd gained almost 1 per cent, respectively, as analysts flagged upside risks to freight rates amid the supply disruptions. Defence companies also jumped, with Germany's Rheinmetall up 2.7 per cent and UK's BAE Systems adding 2.9 per cent. A measure of European volatility also shot up to its highest level since May 26. The benchmark index Stoxx 600 posted a weekly decline, as investors were unimpressed by the outcome of US-China talks earlier this week, and had doubts over an EU trade deal with the US before Trump's Jul 8 tariff deadline. REUTERS
