logo
Workers could see wages shrink by £320 due to Labour's stealth tax rises – check how your pay could be affected

Workers could see wages shrink by £320 due to Labour's stealth tax rises – check how your pay could be affected

The Sun3 days ago
EMPLOYEES could see their wages shrink by £320 due to Labour's stealth tax rises.
The government recently said it will not commit to lifting the freeze on income tax thresholds or national insurance (NI) in the next Budget - a move that would force millions of Brits into paying a higher rate of tax.
1
Workers would be pushed into higher tax brackets as their wages rise with inflation - a concept known as fiscal drag.
The tax thresholds were frozen under the Tories, and are set to be lifted in April 2028.
It has now emerged that people could see their wages fall by £320 under if the freeze is extended by Labour.
According to wealth manager Quilter, if the freeze is extended by two years, a worker earning £30,000 could end up paying an extra £106 in income tax and national insurance in 2028-29 and an extra £214 in 2029-30.
Someone earning £60,000 would pay an extra £317 in 2028-29 and an extra £643 the following tax year.
Meanwhile, someone on £150,000 would pay an extra £354 in 2028-29 and an extra £718 the following tax year.
The freeze to income tax brackets means almost 2.9 million more people will pay the basic rate of income tax - which is 20% on earnings between £12,571 to £50,270 - in 2025-26 compared to 2021-22.
Over 2.6 million more will pay the higher rate - which is 40% on income from £50,271 to £125,140.
If Rachel Reeves does decide to extend the freeze on income tax brackets in her autumn Budget, it will mark yet another Labour U-turn.
The Chancellor previously ruled this out in last year's Budget, saying extending the policy would "hurt working people".
Millions of workers to get pay rise as Rachel Reeves reveals income tax changes
But economists believe Ms Reeves will be forced to renege on her promise, as she struggles to fill a £5billion black hole in the public finances.
The Chancellor also needs to find an extra £1.5billion to pay for winter fuel following another U-turn by her party.
TaxPayers' Alliance head John O'Connell told the Telegraph: 'This is the sad but inevitable result of successive governments' assortment of anti-affluence tax policies, which penalise aspiration and success.
'The UK is now trapped in a doom loop with the Chancellor desperately scrabbling around for more cash to fill the fiscal black hole and increasingly finding her only option is to come after the middle classes.
'Rachel Reeves needs to now show some humility and reverse the policies that have done so much to drive away high earners.'
The prime minister last month refused to commit to lifting the income tax freeze in 2028.
He only pledged not to increase National Insurance, income tax, or VAT.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch criticised the stealth tax, saying it would hit "struggling pensioners" who would be dragged into paying income tax for the first time ever.
A Tory Party spokesman said at the time: 'The PM wouldn't repeat the promise his Chancellor made in the autumn to lift the freeze on income tax thresholds.
"He also refused to rule out a retirement tax and wealth taxes.
"The only reasonable conclusion is that a toxic cocktail of Labour tax rises are coming in the autumn budget.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grant Forrest congratulated by Donald Trump after winning Nexo Championship
Grant Forrest congratulated by Donald Trump after winning Nexo Championship

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Grant Forrest congratulated by Donald Trump after winning Nexo Championship

Grant Forrest eased to victory on home soil for the second time in his career with a four-shot success at the Nexo Championship – and then received a video call from United States president Donald Trump. Forrest's victory was at Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeen and, shortly after collecting his trophy, he was being congratulated by the owner and 47th president of the USA over FaceTime. 'I watched it… he's some player. I look forward to playing with him – in fact I will play with him tomorrow if he could get on a plane,' Trump said in the call, shared on X by the DP World Tour. 'What a round of golf. What three rounds of brilliant golf. It's a great honour you won, thank you very much.' Forrest, who lifted his maiden DP World Tour title at St Andrews four years and two days ago, took control of windy conditions over the weekend but saw his three-shot overnight advantage trimmed to two after Todd Clements' birdie on the opening hole. However, when Forrest birdied the fourth and Clements carded a triple-bogey eight at the same hole, the Scot led by five and never looked back. The world number 294, who double-bogeyed the last, added two more birdies and a dropped shot in a closing 72 to finish with an eight-under-par total. 'It's amazing, just speechless,' Forrest said. 'I think it is the same week as I won four years ago on the calendar so just amazing, that must say something about this week and being at home. 'I just can't believe it. It's been such a tough year on the golf course. It's just a crazy game that you can go and come out and do this, with what feels out of nowhere. 'It's just that old chestnut that one week can turn things around and it has.' Joe Dean nervelessly parred the last to claim solo second at four under, with John Parry one shot further behind alongside Norway's Kristoffer Reitan and Denmark's Jacob Skov Olesen. Jordan Smith finished sixth at two under, while Clements, Andy Sullivan and Finland's Oliver Lindell were a further shot adrift – the only nine players to finish the tournament under par.

Hermer to decide on Palestine Action terror charges
Hermer to decide on Palestine Action terror charges

Telegraph

time5 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Hermer to decide on Palestine Action terror charges

Lord Hermer will be given the final say over whether to prosecute hundreds of protesters arrested for supporting Palestine Action. The Attorney General has the power to approve or block further action against the demonstrators under the Terrorism Act after they were caught carrying placards in support of a proscribed group. The Metropolitan Police said 532 people had been arrested at a demonstration in Westminster on Saturday that was designed to overwhelm the criminal justice system. All but one of the arrests took place on Parliament Square, where hundreds of protesters gathered carrying placards that read: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The Met said the average age of those arrested was 54 and that more than 100 people hauled away by police were over 70. Officers arrested 263 men, 261 women and eight people who either defined themselves as non-binary or did not disclose their gender. The detained protesters included Moazzam Begg, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee who was once accused of being a member of al-Qaeda. He was released from US custody in 2005 following pressure from the UK Government and later received a settlement after suing the British authorities for alleged complicity in his detention. Anyone found guilty of supporting or gathering support for a proscribed organisation faces a maximum of six months imprisonment and a possible £5,000 fine. Just being arrested is enough to stop someone travelling to the US or working in education. Charges brought under the Terrorism Act must first be approved by the Attorney General, acting in his capacity as the Government's most senior lawyer rather than in a political capacity. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, told The Telegraph: 'If lawbreakers supporting a prescribed terrorist group aren't prosecuted, it will be the clearest example yet of two-tier justice under Two-Tier Keir. 'Lord Hermer needs to enforce the law, not pander to activists he's sympathetic to.' All those arrested on Saturday were taken to a processing centre in the Westminster area before being bailed. The Met said the sheer number of people detained made it impossible to track whether anyone released on bail returned to Parliament Square to continue protesting. It is understood that the CPS has established a special unit to process files on Palestine Action protesters because of the number of arrests. Last week, the first three charges were brought in relation to supporting the group, which was proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the Home Office in June after spray-painting an RAF transport aircraft at an air base in Oxfordshire. Protests in support of Palestine Action have been organised by Defend Our Juries, a campaign group that is trying to overturn the proscription with mass civil disobedience. A spokesman for Defend Our Juries said on Sunday that the number of arrests was an 'embarrassment for the Home Secretary, who must now justify this absurd waste of police resources' by bringing terror charges against people 'for holding a sign'. 'It's clear that ordinary people are refusing to be silenced by this authoritarian crackdown on our fundamental freedoms,' said the spokesman. 'The growing mass defiance shows this ban cannot be meaningfully enforced, and it will ultimately have to be scrapped.'

The logistical challenge of Palestine Action
The logistical challenge of Palestine Action

Telegraph

time5 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The logistical challenge of Palestine Action

The arrest of over 500 protesters in London at the weekend for supporting the proscribed group Palestine Action poses a major logistical challenge for the courts. Thousands of cases are already stuck in a backlog that has built up since the pandemic, with trials often set for years ahead. In addition, the prisons are full to bursting, so much so that criminals are being let out even earlier than normal to free up places. If these demonstrations, ostensibly in favour of free speech, continue in the weeks ahead how will the system cope? There is an argument that Palestine Action should not have been designated a terror group in the first place. It does not conform to the usual description of an organisation intent on killing innocent people and forcing policy change through fear. There are many, mostly on the Left but not exclusively so, who consider the ban to have been excessive. But this issue was thrashed out in Parliament, where MPs and peers agreed with the Government's assertion that it met the criteria for proscription. This followed an attack that inflicted damage on two RAF aircraft. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has said that PA is not 'non-violent' and that more information about its malign intentions would be revealed in future court cases. The fact remains that those who consider themselves martyrs for free speech are breaking the law and should suffer the consequences of doing so. Courts managed to act swiftly against rioters last summer following the Southport murders and can do so again. If they have to sit over August and round the clock, so be it; the logjams in the system must not be an excuse for law-breaking to go unpunished. Moreover, if the Government is serious (which we doubt) about removing foreign criminals the moment they are convicted that will free up spaces in our jails. To do that however, ministers will need to resile from Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights which allows criminals to stay even when the courts have ordered their deportation on the grounds that they have family in this country. Furthermore, will the offender's home country take them back and, if so, impose the punishment they faced in the UK or let them get away with criminal behaviour? The Government managed to extract some supportive headlines for its plan; but will it really see it through, or is this just the hot air of high summer?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store