Bihar Is Set For Its 18th Assembly Election: From Revised Electoral Roll To Majority Run
In recent elections, three major parties have maintained a strong presence in the state: the BJP, JD(U), and RJD. Currently, the BJP and JD(U) are part of the NDA alliance, while the opposition alliance, known as the Mahagathbandhan, includes RJD and Congress. There are also several smaller parties expected to play a significant role in the upcoming election, such as Jan Suraj and AIMIM.
In preparation, ECI launched a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls on June 24, 2025. Voters were required to submit updated documentation by July 25, and 86 per cent of enumeration forms were submitted by mid‑July. Section 21 of the Representation of the People (RP) Act empowers the Election Commission (EC) to conduct a special revision of the electoral roll at any time, provided it records the reasons for doing so. The ECI discovered fake voters on the rolls, which triggered political controversy. The opposition is opposing the implementation of SIR while the BJP supports it.
Additionally, urban and migrant voters are expected to play a pivotal role. The NDA has promised multiple benefits to win the election, including 35 per cent reservation for women in various sectors, aiming to garner support from key demographics.
The Bihar Legislative Assembly has changed since its inception. After India's independence, the assembly first convened in 1952 with 331 members. Today, it comprises 243 members, known as Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs).
From the above context answer the following question.
Q: How many assembly seats does Bihar have?
A: Bihar consists total of 243 seats.
Q: When was the first Bihar assembly formed after independence?
A: The assembly first convened in 1952 with 331 members.
Q: When is the 2025 Bihar Legislative Assembly election scheduled?
A: October-November 2025
Q: How many seats are required for a majority in the Bihar Assembly?
A: 122 seats.
Q: Which parties are part of the NDA alliance in Bihar?
A: BJP and JD(U).
Q: What is the name of the opposition alliance in Bihar?
A: Mahagathbandhan consists of RJD and Congress.
Q: When did the ECI launch the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls?
A: June 24, 2025.
Q: Why did ECI launch the SIR process?
A: To identify Fake voters on the rolls.
Q: What percentage of reservations for women has the NDA promised?
A: 35 per cent
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Nainar Nagenthran flays DMK government over poor cleanliness in cities
BJP Tamil Nadu president Nainar Nagenthran on Sunday said the DMK leaders should be ashamed of boasting about governance over the past four years, when the State government has failed to contain the growing problem of garbage accumulation in cities. In a statement, Mr. Nagenthran said it was deeply shocking that in the national-level cleanliness survey, Swachh Survekshan 2024-25, released by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Chennai ranked 38th and Madurai 40th among the 40 cities in the country having a population of more than 10 lakh. 'When not a single city from Tamil Nadu finds a place in the top ten, what happened to the Dravidian model government's claims of spending thousands of crores every year on sanitation work? Is the DMK government incapable of managing the garbage crisis in the State, just as it is unable to control rising crime?' Mr. Nagenthran asked. 'It is tragic that Tamil Nadu has been turning into a hotspot for diseases due to ineffective administration. Poor conditions in government hospitals, major cities becoming garbage dumps, and large-scale corruption under the guise of maintenance all pointed to the incompetence of the ruling DMK government,' he alleged.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
BJP MLAs claim new corporations of Bengaluruunscientific, Congress thinks otherwise
Bengaluru: The draft notification enabling the formation of five new civic bodies in Bengaluru in place of the existing BBMP is met with stiff opposition from BJP, which claims it is unscientific. Rajarajeshwari Nagar BJP MLA and former minister N Munirathna said he had "no words to describe how senseless the splitting exercise has been." His constituency is part of the proposed Bengaluru West, North, and South corporations. "How do they expect one MLA to attend three meetings on the same issue at the same time?" he said. He noted that he was not against having five corporations but opposed splitting the city without a clear concept for planning and allocation of funds. "The central part has less space for new development. Constituencies, including Malleswaram and Basavanagudi, could have been included entirely within the Central corporation," he said. He also said the Outer Ring Road and the upcoming Peripheral Ring Road could have been used as a reference for the boundaries. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru However, transport minister and BTM Layout MLA Ramalinga Reddy was hopeful about the next steps, including the formation of wards and holding local body elections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "Since an affidavit has been filed, polls cannot be delayed for long," he said. Malleswaram MLA Dr CN Ashwath Narayan opined that the corporations have nothing to show as their job description. "Most of the critical functions are handled by specialised bodies like Bescom and BWSSB. Waste management will be taken up by BSWMA. What is left for these corporations to do?" he said, adding that major infrastructure projects will continue to remain centralised under the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA). However, Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad, who was instrumental in advocating the division of BBMP, denied any political motive behind the new boundaries, noting that most of the core constituencies represented by BJP will remain intact within a single corporation. "Boundaries of some assembly constituencies were unscientifically drawn, with their areas extending from the city's north to south. Portions of these constituencies being included under the respective zone ensures administrative convenience," he said, adding even these areas would be mostly under one corporation. He claimed that the boundaries of assembly segments may even change in the future. Arshad said the new corporations will enjoy autonomy in collecting and spending tax revenue. "There will also be greater accountability compared to one large corporation," he added. — Quotes Most of the critical functions are handled by specialised bodies like Bescom and BWSSB. Waste management will be taken up by BSWMA. What is left for these (new) corporations to do? -Dr CN Ashwath Narayan, Malleswaram MLA —— (Once smaller corporations are formed), there will also be greater accountability compared to one large corporation -Rizwan Arshad, Shivajinagar MLA
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sanjay Raut slams Maharashtra's Public Safety Bill as tool to suppress dissent
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut on Sunday (July 20, 2025) launched a blistering attack on the Devendra Fadnavis government over the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, claiming it poses a direct threat to civil liberties and democratic expression in the State. Writing in his weekly Rokhthok column in the party mouthpiece Saamana, Mr. Raut described the legislation as a tool crafted not for public safety, but to serve political and corporate interests. 'This is not a Jan Suraksha Bill, it is a BJP Suraksha Bill,' he wrote, alleging the government rushed the bill through the legislature without adequate debate. According to Mr. Raut, the Bill—passed during the recently concluded monsoon session of the Assembly—grants sweeping powers to the police and government to arrest individuals for acts deemed to disturb 'public order,' a phrase he said is deliberately vague and prone to misuse. He warned that NGOs, civil society groups, tribal activists, and those opposing large corporate projects like Gautam Adani's mining operations spread from Chandrapur to Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand forests could now be easily targeted under the new law. The Maharashtra Assembly on July 10, 2025, passed the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, aimed at preventing 'unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations or similar groups'. The Bill will now be tabled in the Legislative Council. 'I assure the House that we will not allow the misuse of this law. I request the House to pass this Bill unanimously,' Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who tabled the Bill. Despite opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI) and objections by other parties, Speaker Rahul Narvekar declared that the Bill, put to vote through a voice vote, was approved by a majority. With the passage of the Bill in both Houses, Maharashtra will become the fifth State after Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha to enact a public security law. The law will impose punishments ranging from two to seven years in prison for members of unlawful organisations. Offences under the Act will be cognisable and non-bailable in nature, and grant the government the authority to seize and forfeit funds belonging to such groups. Mr. Raut further criticised the government's intent behind the bill, saying it is aimed at silencing protests in areas such as Dharavi, where residents have been resisting redevelopment and displacement. 'The Dharavi Rehabilitation Project is the world's biggest land scam. The original residents will be uprooted from their rightful place and the leaders who are fighting for their rights will be labelled as 'Urban Naxalites' and imprisoned under the act. If people cannot protest peacefully against injustice, what remains of democracy?' the column said. Highlighting the double standards of the ruling coalition, Raut questioned why the government was turning a blind eye to hate speeches and violent acts by right-wing elements, while seeking to criminalise dissent from marginalised communities and activists. He also accused the government of using the bill as a pretext to consolidate power before the upcoming civic elections, particularly in Mumbai. 'The law is being used to intimidate those who dare speak against the regime or its business allies,' he claimed. 'Such laws attack the soul of democracy. If this bill becomes law, it will be a dark day for Maharashtra,' he added.
