Kevin Spacey to get charity award in Cannes despite new scandal
The charity told AFP Monday that it invited Spacey to the French Rivera resort because he had been cleared by the courts.
The invitation to Cannes -- where Spacey has not been seen on the red carpet since 2016 -- comes as the main festival has been enforcing a new no-tolerance policy on sexual misconduct, under pressure from lawmakers and #MeToo anti-abuse activists.
A festival spokesperson declined to comment when contacted by AFP.
Spacey was acquitted of nine cases of alleged sex offences in Britain in 2023 and a New York court dismissed a $40 million civil sexual misconduct lawsuit against the "Usual Suspects" actor in 2022.
But last May new claims of inappropriate sexual behaviour emerged in a British television documentary, "Spacey Unmasked".
In it, 10 men not involved in the UK court case involving Spacey accused him of behaving inappropriately towards them.
But the 65-year-old, whose stellar career was derailed by the earlier claims, denied any wrongdoing.
In February, lawyers for former actor Ruari Cannon told AFP that he was taking a case to Britain's High Court against Spacey and London's Old Vic Theatre, where the actor was artistic director between 2003 and 2015.
In the documentary, Cannon accused Spacey of having touched him inappropriately in London when he was 21 years old and the American star was 53.
#MeToo policy
Cannes -- once the hunting ground of disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein whose arrest sparked the #MeToo movement -- has been dogged for years by claims that it was too soft on celebrity abusers.
This year's festival opened just as French screen legend Gerard Depardieu was handed an 18-month suspended sentence for sexually assaulting two women on a film set in 2021.
With jury president, French actor Juliette Binoche, speaking out about harassment she experienced on set, Cannes has been swift to implement its new rules.
French actor Theo Navarro-Mussy -- who denies rape allegations made by three women against him -- was barred last week from the premiere of "Dossier 137", one of the films in the running for the Palme d'Or top prize.
The festival justified its decision by saying an appeal was under way.
And on Thursday, a vice president of the avant garde parallel film section at Cannes, ACID, was suspended after being publicly accused of sexual violence during an event.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Isaac Asimov, Elon Musk and the replacement of humans by robots
Surprisingly, Elon Musk and French leftist politician Jean-Luc Mélenchon share common ground: Both are admirers of the work of American novelist Isaac Asimov (1920-1992). Considered one of the founding fathers of science fiction, this tireless writer published an astonishing 500 novels between 1939 and his death. Within this vast body of work, these two famous fans are especially fond of the Foundation cycle. This saga, widely regarded as the gold standard of science fiction, was initially launched as short stories in 1942, reworked into novels in the 1950s and then extended at the end of Asimov's life. As early as 1966, the series won the Hugo Award, a literary prize for science fiction, for "Best Series of All Time." It was a remarkable feat in a genre not lacking in masterpieces. Asimov had a scientific background, considered a prerequisite at the time for being recognized as a credible author in the genre. He was also a versatile, eclectic thinker. According to his autobiography I, Asimov (2000), his precocious brilliance set him apart from other children his age, leading him to retreat into reading. Gifted, by his own account, with a phenomenal memory, he retained everything he read. Musk's entourage said the same thing about him when talking about the American entrepreneur's childhood with his biographers, Ashlee Vance and Walter Isaacson. Aside from science, Asimov's great passion was history. Foundation tells the story of the fall and then the resurrection of a civilization. In the 13 th millennium, the empire Asimov imagined was at the height of its power, yet had already begun an irreversible decline. Asimov drew inspiration from a 1776 classic by Edward Gibbon (1737-1794): The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. According to the British historian, whom Asimov read countless times, Rome's fall was due to two causes: one external, the pressure of migration; the other internal, the rise of Christianity. Asimov's futuristic empire collapses under centrifugal forces, which is logical since it encompasses the entire galaxy. There are no external threats or borders. However, the loss of entrepreneurial spirit and love of innovation proves fatal. The empire suffocates under the weight of its own bureaucracy. Only someone like Musk could appreciate this kind of dramatic tension, despite Asimov's progressive views. Both Mélenchon and Musk were influenced by the character Hari Seldon, the inventor of a predictive science called psychohistory, who manages to influence humanity's future by wielding the law of large numbers. Asimov, who trained as a biochemist, was inspired by the kinetic theory of gases, as astrophysicist Roland Lehoucq of the French Atomic Energy Commission – a major science fiction enthusiast – wrote in the journal Bifrost in 2012. Universal reach As Asimov explained in the preface to his major opus, it's impossible to predict the motion of a single isolated molecule, but you can say with precision what quintillions of molecules will do. So he applied this principle to human beings. Foundation actually translates philosophical debates on historical determinism into science fiction narratives, making them accessible to everyone. Thanks to its universal scope, the series has remained in the science fiction bestsellers' top 10 and continues, generation after generation, to serve as an entry point into the genre. Due to its internal contradictions and the forces at play, the galactic empire in Foundation is destined to fail. Just as no one can escape climate change on Earth in the 21 st century. However, Seldon uses psychohistory to influence history, though not to reverse fate. With his plan for a foundation that preserves knowledge, he reduces the transition period between the empire's fall and its successor from 30,000 years to 1,000. In the story, this is viewed as a decisive push forward. In Marxist terms, Seldon would be considered a positive hero. Indeed, it was precisely because he found Marxism "a bit dry," in his own words, that Mélenchon became fascinated by psychohistory. Anticipating the crises that punctuate Foundation 's plot, Seldon recorded messages for his distant successors to view as holograms – effectively, oracles. The stage device used by Mélenchon in his 2017 presidential campaign was a nod to this gimmick from the saga. Although Musk has never used holograms for communication, many of his public statements refer to the idea of positively influencing sweeping changes around us. In 2017, he quoted Asimov almost verbatim at a TED conference in front of a captivated audience: "I look at the future from the standpoint of probabilities. It's like a branching stream of probabilities, and there are actions that we can take that affect those probabilities or that accelerate one thing or slow down another thing." "Philosophy underlying my actions. It's pretty simple and mostly influenced by Douglas Adams [another science fiction author] and Isaac Asimov," he wrote in 2018 on X. If Adams taught Elon Musk the art of questioning with his answer 42 in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, then Asimov taught him that every major turning point in humanity is always driven by a technical innovation. For those who claim to follow in Seldon's footsteps, there is only one way to influence history: through science. Although Asimov considered himself an optimist, his work reexamined the dichotomy between good and bad science established by British author Mary Shelley in Frankenstein (1821). When confronted with scientific progress, as with social and political organization, humanity is invariably torn between individual freedom and collective security. While Foundation remains his seminal work on determinism, his other major science fiction series, I, Robot, delves deeper into this contradiction. Replacement by robots In 1942, a particularly productive year for Asimov, he formulated his "Three Laws of Robotics." Intended to protect humans from a robot uprising, also known as the infamous "Frankenstein syndrome," in which a creation turns against its creator. These laws raise the question: Who counts as "human"? The individual, or humanity as a whole? To resolve this dilemma, Asimov's robots invent a fourth law, as Anne Besson explained on the French podcast C'est plus que de la SF ("It's more than SF"). This law prioritizes the species. One of the final stories in the series describes a revolt by humans that is suppressed "for their own good" by robots. As a rationalist atheist and staunch believer in evolution, Asimov did not believe that Homo sapiens was the ultimate stage of life. Whether it be astrophysics or the laws of evolution, recent scientific advances all indicate that the days of the human species on Earth are numbered. This bleak finitude pales in comparison to the space epics of Star Trek and Star Wars, with their hyperspace and distant galaxies. As always, Asimov was provocative when he predicted that robots would replace humanity. Far from being a cause for anxiety, he considered it a hopeful prospect, as he stated in an interview with Le Nouvel Observateur in 1985. He argued that robots would be the next step for humanity, more rational and unburdened by emotion. Musk, raised on dystopian visions like Terminator (1985) and The Matrix (1999), where robots and computers enslave humans in apocalyptic futures, has distanced himself – at least in his public statements – from his science fiction idol on this point. In 2017, essayist Ariel Kyrou recalled Musk clashing with Mark Zuckerberg, the co-founder of Facebook. Musk accused Zuckerberg of being reckless about the risks artificial intelligence poses to humanity. Musk had already directed similar criticisms at Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the co-founders of Google, and he would later target his new nemesis, Sam Altman, his rival at OpenAI. By Musk's logic, his competitors are followers of transhumanist ideals, which claim that technology will allow humans to transcend their limitations, such as mortality and terrestrial life. Musk sees them as distant descendants of Dr. Frankenstein, ready to sacrifice humanity's interests. However, his critics argue that Musk's fratricidal attacks are motivated more by economic self-interest than genuine ethical concern. He often sounds the alarm when others are making advances without him. As Kyrou pointed out, with Neuralink, Musk has taken a position far closer to transhumanism than he admits. His company's neural implants are designed to eventually serve as an interface between human neurons and computers. They are named after Iain M. Banks (1954-2013), the Scottish author and creator of the celebrated series The Culture. In that saga, every humanoid is equipped with a "neural lace" that serves as a means of communication and ensures their safety. This lace connects them to intelligent machines that handle production and the distribution of resources. The machines perform the labor while the humanoids enjoy the pleasures of hedonism. "In a way, it is anarchism assisted by artificial intelligence," said Yannick Rumpala, a political science researcher who analyzes the relationship between politics and science fiction. Backed by these vast computational powers, Banks's utopia resembles a successfully executed "Gosplan" (a Soviet-style planning committee), with AI serving as a vast thinking infrastructure and omnipresent planning authority. As Rumpala points out, this vision would have appealed to Asimov, who, in Foundation, imagined another form of collective consciousness – more organic – with the planet Gaia. In 2018, Elon Musk described himself on X as a "utopian anarchist of the kind best described by Iain Banks," an avowed socialist who is no longer here to defend himself. As usual, Musk interpreted Banks's work through his own lens. He said, "The Iain Banks Culture
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Rare first edition of 'The Hobbit' sells for record price at auction
More than 50 years after his death, J. R. R. Tolkien's fantasy masterpieces never cease to enchant audiences around the world. Now, a rare first edition of Tolkien's 'The Hobbit' has been sold for £43,000 (€49, 500) at an online auction on Wednesday. The first edition was expected to fetch between £10,000-£12,000 at auction, ultimately selling for four times that amount. The book is one of 1,500 original copies of Tolkien's beloved novel, which was published in September 1937. Only 'a few hundred' from the initial print run remain and are considered 'some of the most sought-after books in modern literature,' according to the British auction house Auctioneum. Attracting bidders from across the world, the book was purchased by a UK private collector in what is believed to be a record price for a first edition. The edition was discovered hidden on a bookcase during a house clearance in Bristol. After spotting its faded green cover, Auctioneum's book specialist Caitlin Riley went on to meticulously inspect the well-preserved treasure. 'Nobody knew it was there,' said Riley. 'It was clearly an early Hobbit at first glance, so I just pulled it out and began to flick through it, never expecting it to be a true first edition.' The 'rare find' is bound in light green cloth and features black and white illustrations by the author, making it even more unique as later editions colourised them. 'When I realised what it was, my heart began pounding,' shared Riley. Tolkien developed the mythical world of "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" during his time as a teacher at the University of Oxford. Une publication partagée par Auctioneum - Bath & East Bristol (@auctioneum) The auctioned book was passed down in the family library of Hubert Priestley, a famous botanist with 'strong connections' to the university. Tolkien and Priestley most likely knew each other, according to Auctioneum, who said both men shared mutual correspondence with author C.S. Lewis. "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" are two of the best-selling books of all time, with more than 250 million copies sold worldwide. The 2000s hit film franchise based on the books cemented their classics status for generations to come.
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Bring out your stamps: UK's Royal Mail celebrates Monty Python
Britain's Royal Mail has issued stamps celebrating the absurdist comedy of Monty Python... and from all of us here at Euronews Culture, who frequently cut down the mightiest trees in the forest with a herring: it's a 'Ni!' of approval. The 10-stamp series announced today celebrates some of the legendary troupe's most iconic characters and catchphrases, from 'Nudge, nudge' to 'The Lumberjack Song.' Six stamps depict scenes from the sketch-comedy TV series Monty Python's Flying Circus, including The Spanish Inquisition, The Ministry of Silly Walks, Dead Parrot and The Nude Organist. Another four mark the 50th anniversary of the cult classic 1975 film Monty Python and the Holy Grail, including one showing the limb-losing Black Knight insisting ''Tis but a scratch.' Made up of Michael Palin, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones and Graham Chapman, Monty Python brought a unique blend of satire, surrealism and unfiltered silliness to British TV screens in their series that ran from 1969 to 1974. The gang also made several feature films, including Monty Python's Life of Brian (1979) and Monty Python's The Meaning of Life (1983). David Gold, Royal Mail's director of external affairs, said: 'Monty Python has left an indelible mark on global comedy, all while remaining unmistakably British at its core. From their groundbreaking television debut to a string of iconic films, this stamp collection honours a body of work that has shaped the comedic landscape for nearly six decades.' As for Palin, he said he was 'very glad to share a stamp with the nude organist!' The group disbanded in the 1980s, and Chapman died of cancer in 1989 aged 48. The five surviving Pythons reunited in 2014 for a string of live stage shows. Jones sadly died in 2020 from a rare form of dementia, aged 77. Euronews Culture caught up with Terry Gilliam two years ago at the Festival Lumière in Lyon, where he told us that Monty Python may not be able to do their brand of comedy in modern times. "People are losing their sense of humour, and that, to me, is probably the most important sense," he said. "Sense of touch is very important, sense of taste also – but sense of humour is more important. You get to the point where people are frightened to laugh. 'Oh, no, you're making fun of somebody!' No, I'm making fun of humanity, and we are an absurd species of creatures." He added: "We are funny because we got such pretentions, and we fall on our face so constantly. Make jokes about it! It keeps life interesting." Check out our full interview with Terry Gilliam here. The Monty Python stamps are available to pre-order from today and go on general sale from 14 August.
