logo
In Germany, the LGBTQ+ flag is at the heart of a new culture war

In Germany, the LGBTQ+ flag is at the heart of a new culture war

LeMonde26-07-2025
The rainbow flag will not fly above the Bundestag on Saturday, July 26, during Berlin's Christopher Street Day (CSD), the annual parade in support of LGBTQ+ rights. This decision, which ends a practice that began in 2022, has sparked heated debate in Germany at a time when the far right is gaining ground and attacks against sexual minorities are increasing.
The turning point came in mid-May. Just days after the new government took office, Bundestag President Julia Klöckner, of the Christian Democrat (CDU) party, announced that she would ban the raising of the rainbow flag atop the Bundestag for CSD in the name of neutrality for public buildings and administration, considering it a "political demonstration." She explained that this symbol of diversity and the fight against discrimination would now only be displayed atop of the building one day a year: on May 17, the International Day Against Homophobia.
Klöckner also banned the "Parliament's Queer Network," a group of LGBTQ+ staff, from participating in the CSD parade as a political group. Its members may attend only in a private capacity. In doing so, the Bundestag president broke with the approach of her predecessor, Social Democrat Bärbel Bas, who had herself participated in CSD in 2023 and 2024 and had the flag flown atop the building.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German officials worry 'trusted flaggers' may curb free speech
German officials worry 'trusted flaggers' may curb free speech

Euronews

timea day ago

  • Euronews

German officials worry 'trusted flaggers' may curb free speech

More and more lawyers, politicians and journalists are criticising the German government's hotline policy of establishing reporting centres against "hate and agitation on the internet." These centres are often funded by the state or are even state-run. But there are worries that opinion is too often mistaken for hate. In some cases, 6 am police raids have reportedly occurred at the homes of ordinary citizens who posted memes critical of the government ("insulting politicians") during Germany's previous so-called traffic light coalition government. Two such reporting NGOs in Germany are now labelled as so-called "trusted flaggers". As part of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) regulation, they are tasked with removing illegal content from the internet. But some legal experts believe that the private reporting centres are too close to politics and fear that content could be reported when it may turn out to be authorised as opinion after all. "Trusted flaggers are controversial because they are semi-governmental organisations that are financed by the state with large sums of money and de facto decide what is legal and what is not," Lawyer Ralf Höcker told Euronews. "It's a form of state censorship, you could call it the Ministry of Truth." According to Höcker, there are now "numerous connections" between the appointed trusted flagger organisations and politics and political parties, adding that "this cannot end well." 'It's not right to continue down this path' Scepticism is also emerging within the ruling CDU party. "It is absolutely not okay to continue down this path," CDU lawmaker Saskia Ludwig told Euronews. "Commissioning private companies to sift through what is and isn't allowed on the internet, I'm not the only one who is sceptical about this, I know that many in the parliamentary group are too," she pointed out. SPD MP Parsa Marvi explains why his party disagrees. "In our view, the point is that platforms and social media are not a legal vacuum, where justiciable criminal offences take place, such as hate speech, defamation and threats like bullying. All of these things must be taken very seriously," he told Euronews. This is why the European Commission has established the trusted flagger instrument, says Marvi, "to make this illegal, criminal content reportable". "Nothing will be deleted," he emphasised. "The trusted flaggers report on the basis of the guidelines and legislation and the platform decides and checks." But as government-funded NGOs are often seen as "trusted whistleblowers", social media platforms usually react quickly when they flag content or risk penalties. In addition, the reporting centres verify that the online platform has deleted the post following the deletion request. In other words, the pressure on online platforms to press "delete" is very high. At the same time, freedom of expression is a valuable asset in Germany. The highest court therefore often makes the final decision as to whether an opinion is still admissible. The German government has also reintroduced the offence of lèse majesté during the second lockdown in the coronavirus pandemic. The offence means that in certain cases, criticism of the government that constitutes insult or defamation against political figures is subject to criminal prosecution in Germany. Specifically, Section 188 was amended by law, adding "insult" to the offence in addition to "defamation" and "slander". The offence was also extended to include local politicians. During the last federal government, hundreds of complaints were filed by politicians across the party spectrum under the amendment. So much so that initial statistics have already been compiled. Robert Habeck of the Greens, for example, filed 805 criminal complaints. The Greens' Annalena Baerbock filed 513, Marco Buschmann of the FDP 26, and Boris Pistorius of the SPD 10, among others. Politicians from other parties such as the CDU and AfD have also filed criminal complaints against insults from citizens. This includes AfD leader Alice Weidel, who has filed hundreds of complaints for insults online and has also made use of Section 188, even though her party is in favour of abolishing it. CDU leader Friedrich Merz, before he became chancellor, had also filed several criminal complaints for insulting behaviour, which in some cases led to house searches. Former Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) did not file a single complaint against a citizen for insulting behaviour during her time in office. Criticism of politicians that is considered offensive is also reported by trusted flaggers. One of these, Respect, passes reports directly to the Federal Criminal Police Office, although this is not required in the DSA. CDU politician Saskia Ludwig is alarmed. "I grew up in the GDR, I'm very sceptical about the fact that portals are being created so that anyone can report anyone. But the trusted flaggers are not controlled, that's not possible," Ludwig said. It suggests that conflict within the German government may be imminent. In the coalition agreement, it was agreed that "false factual claims are not covered by freedom of expression". Germany is further ahead than other countries with Trusted Flagger. 14 EU countries have still not appointed them. Reporting centre receives up to 95% government funding Documents made available to Euronews show that the Respect reporting centre appointed by Germany as a trusted flagger is 95% government-funded, using money from the "Demokratie Leben" programme of the Ministry of Family Affairs. German MEP Friedrich Pürner has requested the documents that prove this from the Network Agency. When asked, the Network Agency explained that "even public or semi-public organisations" can be "approved as trusted flaggers". What's more, government grants "do not prevent certification". Organisations like Respect would be receiving hundreds of thousands of euros in government funding each year. The Baden-Württemberg Youth Foundation will receive €424,562 in 2025, while HateAid will get €424,823 this year. 'Other opinions could be silenced' "It is highly interesting that the 'Respect' reporting centre is predominantly financed by state funds. Only around 5% comes from its own funds," Pürner, who was a member of BSW until this year, told Euronews: The network agency has examined independence from online platforms, but "there was no critical scrutiny of state independence," he added. "My fear is that only opinions or statements accepted by the state and the government will be accepted," Pürner explained. "Statements to the contrary, on the other hand, could be defamed, deleted and thus silenced." This reminds him strongly of his "own experiences during the coronavirus pandemic," Pürner said. Pürner, originally a doctor from Bavaria, headed a Bavarian health authority until the end of 2020, but was then transferred after criticising the coronavirus policy measures. He told the Berliner Zeitung newspaper: "When I criticised the coronavirus measures, I was seconded within a few days with the aim of a permanent transfer."

Bavarian premier calls to end Ukrainian refugees' citizen allowance
Bavarian premier calls to end Ukrainian refugees' citizen allowance

Euronews

time3 days ago

  • Euronews

Bavarian premier calls to end Ukrainian refugees' citizen allowance

Bavaria's Minister-President Markus Söder is shaking up the coalition agreement of Germany's so-called black-red federal government. In a ZDF summer interview on Sunday, Söder said he is in favour of reducing benefits for certain Ukrainian refugees, who currently receive a citizen's allowance. The German citizen's allowance is a state welfare benefit given to those with little or no income to ensure a minimum standard of living. Söder specified that only newly arrived refugees from Ukraine should receive reduced social benefits, adding that it must be ensured that there is "no more citizen's allowance for all those who have come from Ukraine." This must apply "not only for those who come in the future," "but for everyone," he added. Söder justified his stance by saying that no other country was granting Ukrainian refugees benefits comparable to the citizen's allowance. This is one reason why comparatively few Ukrainians have taken up employment in Germany despite having good qualifications. In their coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD had agreed that Ukrainian refugees who come to Germany from 1 April 2025 should in future - like other refugees - only receive benefits in accordance with the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act. Binding legal implementation yet to take place Ukrainian refugees who arrive in Germany after this date and prove that they are in need will in future only receive benefits in accordance with the Asylum Seekers' Benefits Act instead of citizens' benefits. People who arrived before this date will still be entitled to citizen's allowance. However, a binding legal implementation of this regulation has not yet taken place. Currently, Ukrainians who arrived after the cut-off date continue to receive citizen's allowance. Expenditure on citizens' benefits in Germany rose to a total of €46.9 billion in 2024 - an increase of around €4 billion. This is according to the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs' answer to a question from the AfD in the Bundestag. A total of €22.2 billion was paid to foreign recipients of citizens' benefits. Of this, €6.3 billion was paid to Ukrainian recipients of citizen's allowance.

Berlin LGBTQ+ café targeted in wave of escalating hate crimes
Berlin LGBTQ+ café targeted in wave of escalating hate crimes

Euronews

time6 days ago

  • Euronews

Berlin LGBTQ+ café targeted in wave of escalating hate crimes

Inside a cozy café in one of Berlin's trendiest neighbourhoods, a glowing neon sign reads 'Queer and Friends.' It was meant to be a warm welcome - an invitation to LGBTQ+ people seeking a safe space. Instead, it has become a target for hate. Das Hoven café owner Danjel Zarte says his business has faced a relentless campaign of homophobic abuse. In the past 18 months, there have been 45 criminal investigations into incidents ranging from verbal abuse and violent assaults to vandalism involving swastika graffiti, smashed windows, and even faeces. One person even stood outside the café with a gun, he recalled. 'When I opened the café and it became clear that it would be a queer establishment, the attacks began with faeces on the windows, with things being thrown at the windows or into the café,' Zarte said.'Verbal attacks, physical assaults, fire extinguishers thrown at the first floor of my office, windshield wipers broken off, windows smashed... an act of terror.' His story reflects a growing crisis across Germany. According to the Association of Counseling Centres for Victims of Right-Wing, Racist and Antisemitic Violence, anti-LGBTQ+ attacks rose by 40% last year in 12 of the country's 16 federal states. Much of the blame, advocates say, lies with the rise of the far-right, including Germany's Alternative for Germany party (Alternative für Deutschland - AfD), who made significant electoral gains this year. Yet despite this rise of hate, hundreds of thousands still turned out for Berlin's annual Christopher Street Day parade this year - a celebration rooted in the spirit of the 1969 Stonewall rebellion in New York. 'Suddenly, when you stand in such a crowd and simply see these differences, which then bring us together again, it is very moving to feel completely accepted once a year," said Zarte at the parade. Check out the video above for more about the hateful attacks on Das Hoven.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store