Sarepta shares slump after report of patient death in early-stage study
The latest death marks the third treatment-related fatality this year. Two teenage boys have died after receiving Sarepta's Elevidys, a gene therapy approved to treat a rare muscular dystrophy.
Sarepta did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside of its business hours.
The patient was enrolled in a study testing Sarepta's gene therapy to treat another muscle-wasting disorder called limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, according to the Bloomberg report, which cited a company spokesperson.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pensions and investments millions have in these major funds are in for a bumpy ride. Now our experts reveal if it's time to ditch them - and what you need to do now
If you have a pension or investment portfolio there is one fund type that you almost certainly hold – and while it will have made you excellent returns over the past decade, experts now warn its future is far more precarious. Global passive funds that track an index of the world's largest companies form the bedrock of most investment portfolios. They give cheap and easy access to thousands of companies and have delivered stellar returns.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Terrifying dashcam footage shows what it's like trapped inside a self-driving Tesla that crashed and KILLED woman
Terrifying dash camera footage shows the moment a self-driving Tesla rammed into a couple killing a young woman and leaving her boyfriend with life changing injuries. Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, died after the Tesla Model S slammed in to her and boyfriend Dillon Angulo, then 27, in 2019. The couple had pulled over to look at the stars at the side of a road near Key Largo, Florida, when they were struck by the vehicle after driver George McGee took his eye off the road to reach for his phone. Footage from the Tesla's front camera showed McGee blow through a red light as he speeds down the road at nearly 70mph. The car passes a stop sign and crashes through several other road signs before striking the couple's vehicle, which was parked 40 feet off Card Sound Road by County Road 905. Benavides Leon was thrown 75 feet and died at the scene, while Angulo suffered serious injuries, according to a wrongful death lawsuit filed against Tesla by the woman's estate. The filings accuse Tesla of advertising its self-driving system Autopilot, 'in a way that greatly exaggerated its capabilities and hid its deficiencies '. 'The McGee Tesla Model S had an Autopilot system that was still in Beta, meaning it was not fully tested for safety, and, further, the system was not designed to be used on roadways with cross-traffic or intersections,' the lawsuit states. 'Nevertheless, Tesla programed the system so that it could be operated in such areas.' The documents call-out Tesla boss Elon Musk and allege he ignored previous reports about issues with the Autopilot feature, listing out 56 alleged incidents. 'Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk, made the intentional decision to continue encouraging Tesla drivers to over-rely on its Autopilot system,' the filing states. 'Tesla chose to continue profiting from the sales of their defective vehicles and software systems rather than heed warnings from government agencies, experts, and other car companies.' The lawsuit provides allegations about the fatal crash on April 25, 2019. 'While McGee was reaching for his phone, the vehicle detected a stop sign, a stop bar, the road's edge, a pedestrian, and a parked Chevrolet Tahoe, but the Vehicle did not provide McGee with any audio alert or other warning of the obstacles and never engaged its emergency brakes,' court documents said. McGee told cops he was driving in 'cruise' and he took his hand off the wheel to retrieve his dropped cell phone and then hit the truck, according to the complaint. 'McGee stated to officers, "[i]t was actually because I was driving. I looked down and I've been using cruise control, and I looked down, I didn't realize (INAUDIBLE) and then I sat up. The minute I sat up, I hit the brakes and saw his truck,' the legal filings state. The lawsuit also claims that McGee told a 911 operator he was not paying attention during the drive. 'Shortly after the crash, McGee called 911, telling the operator: 'Oh my God, I wasn't looking," "I don't know what happened. I ended up missing the turn. I was looking down," and "I dropped my phone. Oh my God,"' the document said. The complaint claims that McGee relied on Tesla's autopilot feature to drive him home. Tesla Traffic Aware Cruise Control claims to help drivers maintain safe distance from the car in front, automatically break and with lane control. The Elon Musk founded company has said its features are meant for 'fully attentive' drivers, opens new tab holding the steering wheel, and the features do not make its vehicles autonomous. Proceedings in the case are scheduled to being on July 14, marking the first time a wrongful death case against Tesla is heading to trial. Daily Mail has contacted Tesla for comment on this story. In June, Tesla failed to persuade a federal judge to end the lawsuit after the judge said the plaintiffs offered sufficient evidence that Autopilot defects were a 'substantial factor' in their injuries. While McGee, who is not a defendant, conceded he was not driving safely, but that didn't automatically make him solely responsible, 'particularly given McGee's testimony that he expected Autopilot to avoid the collision,' US District Judge Beth Bloom said. Bloom said the failure to warn claim survived in part because Autopilot's risks might be hard to extract from the owner's manual on Model S touchscreens. 'Tesla deliberately blurs the distinction between whether its automation system is merely a 'driver assist' system or a fully autonomous system that does not require the driver's constant attention,' the complaint states. They go on to quote Musk in September, 2016 when he asserted that: 'The exciting thing is that even if the vision system doesn't recognize what the object is because it could be a very strange looking vehicle, it could be a multi-car pileup, it could be a truck crossing the road, it really could be anything – an alien spaceship, a pile of junk metal that fell off the back of a truck, per the lawsuit. 'It actually doesn't matter what the object is, it just knows that there's something dense that it is going to hit – and it should not hit that.' But the lawsuit claims Tesla is liable because its promises about Autopilot are what motivated McGee to purchase the vehicle. 'At all material times, George McGee purchased the vehicle in large part because of the Autopilot and other safety features advertised by Tesla,' the document states. A summary judgement denial from Judge Bloom allowing the plaintiffs to pursue punitive damages states that: 'McGee testified that his beliefs about the capabilities of Autopilot came from "looking at information on the [V]ehicle" . . . [and] Plaintiffs contend that he likely watched videos online or on Tesla's website about the [V]ehicle's features and how they work . . . [including] [o]ne video show[ing] Tesla['s] drivers operating the vehicle without their hands.' Bloom also dismissed the estate's manufacturing defect and negligent misrepresentation claims. The lawsuit is seeking unspecified damages and the trial got underway this week.
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Former Ohio State QB's lawsuit over lost NIL opportunities dismissed
July 19 - A lawsuit seeking compensation from the NCAA for thousands of former Ohio State athletes was dismissed. The class action suit against the NCAA, Ohio State, the Big Ten and others brought by former Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor was not done in a timely manner, according to Chief U.S. District Judge Sarah Morrison. Pryor's suit, filed in October, alleged that by not allowing student athletes to profit from the commercial use of their names, images and likenesses, the NCAA and other defendants violated antitrust law. Pryor argued in the lawsuit that he "would have been one of the highest paid collegiate athletes in the country" if NIL had been legal while he was playing at Ohio State. He also claimed the NCAA and the other defendants continue to make revenue from his name, image and likeness. Under U.S. antitrust laws, plaintiffs generally have a four-year window to bring a claim. Pryor was the quarterback at Ohio State from 2008-10. "Mr. Pryor knew the material facts underlying his antitrust claims long before the four-year limitations period had run," Morrison said in her ruling. Additionally, Morrison ruled that as a public school and arm of the state, Ohio State was immune from the lawsuit. Similar lawsuits were filed by former Southern California running back Reggie Bush, several former Michigan football players, and basketball players from Kansas and North Carolina State. Since 2021, and under pressure from states and the courts, the NCAA has allowed student-athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness (NIL). Student-athletes can now be compensated for merely showing up to play and can earn a profit for spokesperson gigs, clothing and autograph sales and more. Additionally, a legal ruling on June 6 allowed colleges to directly pay players via revenue sharing for the first time. The settlement of House v. NCAA marked the end of the NCAA's previous model of amateurism, in which athletes were not allowed to earn money while in school. Schools can now share up to $20.5 million of their revenues with their athletes. --Field Level Media
