logo
Carney's ethics filing shows more than 100 entities under conflict-of-interest screen

Carney's ethics filing shows more than 100 entities under conflict-of-interest screen

Prime Minister Mark Carney must recuse himself from discussions, debates, decisions or votes specifically pertaining to more than 100 corporate entities, newly released ethics documents show.
That includes Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., where he held a management role prior to entering politics, but also dozens of companies with ties to Brookfield, even if Mr. Carney personally has no role or direct financial interest.
'In all of his work for Canadians, the Prime Minister will continue to serve with the highest standards for integrity at all times,' spokesperson Audrey Champoux said in a statement.
The filings were released Friday in compliance with a deadline under the Conflict of Interest Act requiring public disclosure within 120 days of Mr. Carney becoming Prime Minister in March.
He had been pressed to make the information public ever since he launched his bid for leadership of the Liberal Party earlier this year.
Carney promises conflict-of-interest screen to prevent him from making decisions for companies he served
Mr. Carney came to federal politics after a high-profile career in the private sector, including a stint as board chair for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., a US$1-trillion asset manager whose investments touch on numerous sectors.
Mr. Carney's critics had argued that his connections to the company potentially placed him in a conflict of interest − as Prime Minister, his decisions might not just benefit Brookfield, but also Mr. Carney personally through his own financial relationship with the company.
Mr. Carney resigned from his board positions at the start of his leadership campaign, saying if he won he'd begin the process of compliance with ethics law. During the subsequent federal election, he said he had set up ethics screens and put his assets in a trust.
But, he resisted calls to publicly disclose the scope of those screens or his holdings ahead of the legally required deadline.
As a public office holder, he must report assets, liabilities, income and activities to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, and then a statement of those holdings must be made public within 120 days.
Conflict-of-interest screens can in turn be proposed by the Ethics Commissioner as a preventive measure.
The screen means he can't be aware of or participate in any matters specifically involving the companies' interests, but may participate in discussions or decisions that are general in nature or could affect the companies' interests more broadly.
Mr. Carney was also required to divest of any assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by government decisions or policy. He opted to place them in a blind trust.
That means he no longer has control over how the holdings are managed.
Though the financial value of his holdings is disclosed to the Ethics Commissioner, that number is not made public.
In addition to his roles with Brookfield, he was a director of the board of payments processor Stripe Inc. and an advisory board for investment giant PIMCO, among other private-sector jobs.
The disclosures list hundreds of individual stocks held through an investment account.
They include many stocks found in a typical mutual fund or index fund sold to ordinary investors, such as Walmart, Starbucks, video conferencing company Zoom, and tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon.com.
That investment account does not include many of the largest Canadian companies, including those in highly regulated industries, such as major Canadian banks, telecommunications companies or energy producers.
Mr. Carney also continues to own an interest in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. He owns stock options and deferred share units in Brookfield and its parent company, Brookfield Corp., worth millions of dollars at current share prices, though their value fluctuates as Brookfield's stock rises or falls.
The disclosures reveal that he owns shares of Partners Value Investments LP, a fund through which Brookfield's most senior executives own a large block of Brookfield shares.
Those shares are typically only awarded to an exclusive group of Brookfield insiders, demonstrating the prominent position he held at the company.
The Prime Minister is eligible to take part in the 'notional long-term inventive plan' for the Brookfield Global Transition Fund, a US$15-billion pool of capital that Mr. Carney spearheaded that makes large investments in technologies such as carbon capture and storage, solar power and batteries, and nuclear services.
Mr. Carney could earn bonuses if it performs well. It is not clear if those incentives would be paid in cash, stock, or in carried interest − a cut of the fund's profits after it meets a certain threshold for investment gains.
Mr. Carney divided his conflict screen into three sections. One is companies where he had a management position or an oversight role. The second lists Brookfield portfolio companies in the Registry of Lobbyists.
The third section is described in the records as 'entities being screened out of an abundance of caution,' identified by the Ethics Commissioner as being Brookfield-related, 'even though I had no role in managing them, and no direct financial interest in them.'
The screen is administered by his chief of staff and by the Clerk of the Privy Council.
Even before the records were public, Mr. Carney was obligated to recuse himself from decisions that could place him in a conflict of interest. Those recusals must be made public within 60 days.
None are listed on the Ethics Commissioner's website.
A spokesperson for the opposition Conservatives said Friday that they were not officially commenting until they had a chance to fully review the records.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump could crush Canada's softwood exports. Here's how a new crisis could play out
Trump could crush Canada's softwood exports. Here's how a new crisis could play out

National Post

timea minute ago

  • National Post

Trump could crush Canada's softwood exports. Here's how a new crisis could play out

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Canada-U.S. softwood lumber trade relationship has dealt with ups and downs, disputes and resolutions, for decades. Anxiety for Canadian exporters is reaching a fever pitch again as the U.S. threatens to more than double softwood lumber duties and add even steeper tariffs under a national security investigation. Article content Canadian foresters, mills, and governments that enjoy taxes, economic spinoffs and stumpage fees from Crown land will feel the pain if they lose too much access to the massive U.S. market. But larger producers have been preparing for just this kind of contingency and have cleverly hedged their bets, building capacity in the U.S., where they can sell as much as they want to Americans, tariff-free. Article content Article content Canadian firms will soon receive word from the U.S. Commerce Department's Sixth Administrative Review (AR6) of U.S. countervailing and anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber exports, with the rate expected to jump from around 14 per cent to roughly 34 per cent. For Canfor, the Vancouver-based lumber giant selected as a mandatory respondent in the AR6 review, it will be even worse. Its duties are calculated based on its own shipments and prices, not an industry average, like it is for other companies. Article content Article content Then there's the threat of tariffs from President Donald Trump's ongoing national security investigation of Canadian lumber imports under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which he ordered in March and is due late this year. Currently, lumber shipments are exempted from Trump's baseline tariffs, because they're covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal (USMCA), but that could soon change based on the findings of the 232 probe. Article content Article content National Post breaks down the position of the two countries, what the impacts could be, and how Canadian producers are trying to mitigate the potential damage of punitive trade barriers. Article content Article content The U.S. Lumber Coalition is playing for keeps. It backs higher anti-dumping duties and tariffs for what it sees as a subsidized domestic industry. It claims Canadian producers don't pay market rates for stumpage because their forests are publicly owned and provincial governments set the stumpage rates, while U.S. producers face higher market rates. But it doesn't stop there: the U.S. coalition also wants to see Canada's U.S. market share significantly chopped. Article content Miller isn't shy about the goals: 'A countrywide quota with no exemptions and no carveouts, and a single-digit market share' for Canadian lumber. Article content Today, Canada has a 25 per cent market share, with exports of 12 billion feet of softwood lumber to the U.S. each year, according to the coalition. Softwood lumber accounts for about 7.5 per cent of Canadian exports; in 2023, the U.S. was the destination for 68 per cent of those forestry products. The whole industry is worth about $33.4 billion in sales annually and employs more than 200,000 workers across Canada, according to a report this year from RBC.

WIENS: Defending Canadian dairy farms is worth taking a stand
WIENS: Defending Canadian dairy farms is worth taking a stand

Toronto Sun

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Sun

WIENS: Defending Canadian dairy farms is worth taking a stand

Dairy cows on a farm in B.C. on December 19, 2024. Photo by Postmedia Files With the increasing volatility in global supply chains, there's never been a better time to defend Canada's food security and sovereignty. Unfortunately, in his editorial opinion column, Postmedia's Lorne Gunter feeds into a misleading narrative about the dairy trade with the United States and disregards the strength and stability supply management delivers for Canadians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Under several trade agreements — chief among them, the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) negotiated with the first Trump administration — a large quantity of dairy products enter Canada tariff-free until they reach the tariff rate quota. Under CUSMA, the U.S. can send 49 million litres of milk to Canada every year, before a single drop would have a tariff imposed. And that tariff-free amount is set to continue to grow gradually over the next 13 years. Canada presently has a $520-million dairy trade deficit with the U.S. and American dairy exports to Canada have increased by 67% since 2021, to $877 million in 2024. Canada is America's second-largest dairy customer and is also its largest customer per capita. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Supply management has delivered food security and sovereignty to Canada for more than six decades by producing dairy here for Canadians. It aligns production with demand to deliver high-quality, diverse products at stable prices for consumers and a fair return for farmers. It also strengthens our economy, with 339,000 Canadian jobs fuelled by the supply-managed dairy, poultry and egg sectors and $30.1 billion contributed to Canada's gross domestic product. If anything, the recent trade dynamics show us we need to be able to take care of ourselves. Supply management means we have a steady supply of key food items, like dairy, made here when we need it. It protects consumers from shortages driven by supply chain disruptions, diseases or natural disasters. For example, egg prices in the U.S. skyrocketed this year because of avian flu. Canadians were not impacted thanks to the strength of supply management. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Moreover, the price of supply-managed products is generally in line with or below inflationary trends in Canada. In December 2024, the 12-month average dairy consumer price index increased 2%, compared to a 2.7% increase in food generally. In 2024, Canadian milk averaged $1.64 per litre, close to the U.S. price of $1.44. Over the same period, yogurt, cheese and butter prices were similar or lower in Canada compared to the U.S. It should also be noted that countries such as the United States heavily subsidize their dairy industry for production, forcing taxpayers to pay twice for their milk (once at the store and again through their taxes). In contrast, Canadian dairy farmers do not receive similar production subsidies. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. With over 9,000 dairy farms spread across every province, the benefits of supply management extend far beyond any single province or region. Gunter overlooks the importance of supply management to the vibrancy of rural communities from coast to coast. As a Western farmer from a small community in Manitoba, I know family-owned dairy farms bring stability to local economies by creating jobs in not just agriculture, but transportation, veterinary care, nutrition, etc. Canadians can also find local dairy products on store shelves in all provinces. As dairy farmers, we are proud to take a Team Canada approach, focused on doing what we do best — producing quality Canadian milk for Canadians. And dairy farmers have been heartened by the tremendous support consumers have expressed by choosing Canadian products. In this time of increasing global volatility, the facts demonstrate that supply management continues to prove its value, delivering stability, security and high-quality local food on our tables in every part of this country. Canadians have every reason to stand behind it. David Wiens is a dairy farmer and president of the Dairy Farmers of Canada Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays World

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store