
Who Was General Albert Pike? Confederate Statue To Be Reinstalled in DC
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The National Park Service has said it will reinstall a bronze statue of Confederate General Albert Pike that Black Lives Matter protesters pulled down in June 2020.
According to the agency, the restoration of the statue in Washington, D.C., is in line with two executive orders that President Donald Trump signed on March 27: Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful and Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.
Newsweek contacted the National Park Service for comment outside regular business hours.
People film the only statue of a Confederate general, Albert Pike, in Washington, D.C., after it was toppled by protesters and set on fire on June 20, 2020.
People film the only statue of a Confederate general, Albert Pike, in Washington, D.C., after it was toppled by protesters and set on fire on June 20, 2020.
Maya Alleruzzo/AP
Why It Matters
Confederate monuments have long been lightning rods for those campaigning against racial injustice and police brutality. In 2020, Black Lives Matter protests sparked by the death of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who died in police custody in Minneapolis, swept the country and helped to bring the issue of Confederate monuments into even sharper focus. The plan to reinstall Pike's statue may revive the debate about monuments honoring the Confederacy.
What To Know
Pike was a lawyer, poet and writer who played a major role in developing the judiciary in Arkansas before the Civil War. He was also a prominent Freemason. During the Civil War, he commanded the Confederacy's Indian Territory, raising troops there and exercising field command in one battle, according to the Encyclopedia of Arkansas.
Pike was commissioned in the Confederate army as a brigadier general, but his wartime career lasted less than two years. His men were accused of scalping Union troops, and he was eventually forced to resign. He received a reprieve from President Andrew Johnson and moved to Washington, D.C., where he died in 1891.
Pike was the only Confederate official to be honored with an outdoor statue in the capital.
The 27-foot bronze and marble monument, which Congress authorized in 1898 and dedicated in 1901, was located near Judiciary Square. It honors Pike's leadership in Freemasonry, "including his 32 years as Sovereign Grand Commander of the Ancient Rite of Scottish Freemasonry," the National Park Service said.
The statue has been in storage since it was pulled down on June 19, 2020, in the midst of the Black Lives Matter protests, when monuments honoring figures from the Confederate side in the Civil War were targeted.
Trump, then in his first term as president, scolded police in a social media post for not protecting the statue.
The statue is undergoing restoration by the National Park Service's Historic Preservation Training Center.
"Site preparation to repair the statue's damaged masonry plinth will begin shortly, with crews repairing broken stone, mortar joints, and mounting elements," the service said, adding that it is working to reinstall the fully restored statue by October.
Since returning to office, Trump has moved to restore the names of Confederate generals at military bases, reversing an effort to change U.S. military base names honoring Confederate figures.
Questions about the Pike statue in the nation's capital were raised years before it was pulled down.
Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat from the District of Columbia, said in response to the National Park Service's announcement that she would reintroduce a bill to have the statue permanently removed.
"I've long believed Confederate statues should be placed in museums as historical artifacts, not remain in parks and locations that imply honor," Norton said. "The decision to honor Albert Pike by reinstalling the Pike statue is as odd and indefensible as it is morally objectionable."
She added, "A statue honoring a racist and a traitor has no place on the streets of D.C."
What People Are Saying
Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton said in a news release on Monday: "Pike served dishonorably. He took up arms against the United States, misappropriated funds, and was ultimately captured and imprisoned by his own troops. He resigned in disgrace after committing a war crime and dishonoring even his own Confederate military service."
The National Park Service said in a news release on Monday: "The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues."
What Happens Next
Those opposed to the statue can be expected to raise their voices in the coming weeks before it is due to be reinstalled in October.
This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Thurmond joins Georgia governor's race, citing experience and record
Michael Thurmond won over voters three times across Georgia to become — and remain — the state's labor commissioner. He hopes to repeat history in his run for governor. Why it matters: Thurmond, who most recently served as DeKalb County CEO, is the fifth Democrat to jump into the race to succeed Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, who is term-limited. The latest: Thurmond announced his candidacy early Wednesday, with a campaign video noting he's ready to put "boots on Georgia ground." What they're saying: Thurmond told Axios on Wednesday that he entered the race after traveling around the state — "particularly [the] Georgia that exists outside of 285," he said — and hearing residents' ideas on how to move Georgia forward. Those voters, he said, want leaders to move beyond partisanship and "get back to the basics and address issues they are concerned about." Those issues include the rising cost of groceries, lack of access to affordable health care and job creation. State of play: Thurmond joins state Sen. Jason Esteves of Atlanta, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, state Rep. Derrick Jackson and businessman Olu Brown on the Democratic primary ballot. On the Republican side, Attorney General Chris Carr and Lt. Gov. Burt Jones are running. Reality check: Thurmond is running for governor in a solid Republican state. Georgia swung for former Democratic President Biden in the 2020 election, but President Trump put the state back in the GOP column last year. Yes, but: The former DeKalb County CEO told Axios he is confident voters will consider him a viable candidate because of his "strong record of accomplishments and willingness to build bridges." Flashback: Thurmond's tenure in politics stretches back decades. He was elected to the state House of Representatives in 1986 and was the first Black person elected to represent Clarke County since Reconstruction. He was elected labor commissioner in 1998 and served three terms. In 2013, he was selected to become superintendent of the DeKalb County School District at a time when the system was facing a major deficit and its accreditation was at risk. He was elected DeKalb County's CEO in 2016 and served two terms before opting not to seek reelection. Fun fact: The Athens, Georgia, native has published three books about Georgia history. He was a finalist for 2025's Georgia Author of the Year for "James Oglethorpe, Father of Georgia." What we're watching: Whether Stacey Abrams, the two-time Democratic gubernatorial candidate, will make a third run.


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio, Swiss president discuss trade ahead of tariff deadline
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter met to discuss trade on Wednesday, one day before President Trump's steep tariffs were slated to take effect. Keller-Sutter, who also serves as finance minister, and Vice President Guy Parmelin, who is also the economic minister, traveled to Washington this week in a last-ditch effort to strike a deal with the United States after Trump announced last week a 39 percent tariff rate on exports from Switzerland. When Trump initially unveiled his sweeping tariffs in April, it was lower, at 31 percent. In a readout of the meeting of the three officials, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce did not offer any details about a prospective deal but said Rubio met with the Swiss leaders 'to discuss the importance of a fair and balanced trade relationship that benefits the American people.' She said they also 'reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening bilateral defense cooperation.' Swiss companies are slated to face some of the steepest U.S. tariffs, with only Laos, Myanmar and Syria paying higher rates, at 40 percent to 41 percent. Ahead of the meeting, the nation's cabinet, the Federal Council, said in a statement, ='Switzerland enters this new phase ready to present a more attractive offer, taking U.S. concerns into account and seeking to ease the current tariff situation,' according to Reuters.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Some questions about that global AI race
Just how far is the U.S. ahead of China in the AI race? The conventional wisdom is that the U.S. has an edge on China in artificial intelligence — and President Donald Trump's ambitious new AI policy is built around keeping it. 'America is the country that started the AI race,' Trump said during a speech in July. 'And as president, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.' But some big questions are swirling around that whole argument — like, how far ahead the U.S. really is, and what it means to have a lead at all. 'When people make claims like that, they're making political statements,' said Chris Miller, a Tufts University economic historian who wrote the book 'Chip War.' What it means to have an 'edge' is ill-defined: it could be technological, economic or geopolitical. 'I don't know how to answer that,' said Suresh Venkatasubramanian, who served in the Biden White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, when DFD asked if the U.S. is ahead. 'There's so many dimensions.' 'American [AI] models are about 3 [to] 6 months ahead of Chinese models,' White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks told DFD in a statement — though he added that when it comes to semiconductors, the U.S.' lead 'grows to years.' There's also the proposition that China is ahead in some ways — in part because the U.S.' chip export controls arguably led DeepSeek, a Hangzhou-based startup, to make breakthroughs in developing more efficient AI algorithms. Depending on which dimension you care about, the race could steer policy in very different directions. In general, it's hard to argue that America isn't currently leading the AI race. The San Francisco Bay Area is unquestionably the global AI talent and business capital. The largest AI companies are American, and so are their biggest customers. OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude are the most popular generative AI systems among users worldwide. Under the hood, American AI chips are the most advanced in the world (though they're largely manufactured in Taiwan). China is hungry for America's semiconductors, undertaking extensive smuggling operations to get around U.S. restrictions. Even chips purposefully designed to be less advanced than their cutting-edge models are a hot commodity — the president lifted bans on their sales to China in trade negotiations. America also has better computing infrastructure, with around ten times more data centers than China. However, China has proved in recent months that it's within striking distance of the U.S.' AI models. While Silicon Valley's chatbots still top performance charts, China's are running ahead on some metrics. DeepSeek set off shockwaves in January when it unveiled its V3 model that uses a tenth of the computing power required for those in America. In July, the Beijing-based company Moonshot AI released its Kimi K2 model, which could outperform ChatGPT and Claude in coding at a fraction of the cost. Alibaba, also based in Hangzhou, debuted a model just a couple of weeks ago that bested American LLMs in logical and mathematical problem solving. China is making strides in computing power as well. Huawei came out with a showstopping processing system known as CloudMatrix 384 in late July, which trumps Nvidia's competing product in memory capacity and bandwidth. (AJ Kourabi of the research firm SemiAnalysis offered a caution on its importance in the AI race, telling DFD it's 'still extremely difficult to train on.') Pinpointing exactly where the U.S.-China race is getting close isn't just a high-tech debate exercise. It's driving policy. Some of the concerns are clearly baked into Trump's AI Action Plan. China's easy access to electricity is what enables systems like CloudMatrix 384 to run — it's packed with a ton of less efficient chips, but you can brute force performance with more energy. You can draw a straight line from that concern to the plan's warning that China has 'rapidly built out their grid,' and its recommendations to further loosen environmental regulations so that the U.S. can keep up. The plan also suggests taking the brakes off the AI industry by overriding state laws (a controversial idea that showed up in the Big Beautiful Bill this summer). And during a speech on the plan, Trump blamed copyright laws for slowing down training of AI models. Though the plan itself doesn't address copyright, AI companies have long complained the rules stifle their competitiveness. The debate over chip exports is also a point of tension — one where national security hawks are in direct conflict with the go-go business types, though both have an argument that they're helping the American cause. Tighter restrictions on high-end chips mean that China lacks access to the best technology, and is hamstrung at the most advanced end of AI development — but pro-business officials and influential CEOs argue that disseminating chips more broadly gets the world hooked on the U.S.' AI tech stack. In some ways, however, this 'AI race' framework isn't all that helpful for setting priorities, and could ultimately be self-defeating. We don't really know what we're sprinting towards. 'This is an infinite race,' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in April. Also, beating China could be a pyrrhic victory. Trump's AI plan writ large looks a lot like a centrally planned industrial policy: companies buy closeness to Trump, and get rewarded for it. The AI plan fuses state and industry in a way that leaves out a lot of the AI debate that Americans arguably would prefer to have. Data centers are causing utility bills to rise and drying up well water for the people living around them, and AI has been increasing unemployment rates. Many critics of the AI rush think the U.S. may be boosting the industry by shutting off dialogue about those things — winning the race, but becoming less American in the process. A senator questions Intel on ties to China Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) is inquiring into reports about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's involvement with China-backed semiconductor firms and a criminal case regarding one of his former companies, POLITICO's Anthony Adragna reports. Cotton sent a letter on Tuesday to the chair of Intel's board of directors, Frank Yeary, about the 'security and integrity of Intel's operations.' Cotton asked whether the company knew about subpoenas issued to Tan's previous company, Cadence Design Systems, before it hired him. The company pleaded guilty last week on charges that it illegally exported chip design tools to a university linked to the Chinese military, and agreed to pay more than $140 million in penalties. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson said in a statement. Intel was awarded up to $7.86 billion in federal grants under the 2022 CHIPS Act, in addition to another $3 billion for the secure enclave program. California strikes down an election deepfakes ban A federal judge in California struck down one of the country's strictest laws on AI-generated deepfakes in a win for Elon Musk's X, POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. Judge John Mendez on Tuesday overruled a law prohibiting online platforms from hosting deceptive election-related deepfakes during the runup to a vote. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law last year after chiding Musk for sharing a manipulated video of then-Vice President Kamala Harris on X. The creator of the video, Christopher Kohls, brought the legal challenge on First Amendment grounds. X later joined the case. Mendez did not rule on the First Amendment arguments raised in the case, but rather made the decision based on Section 230 of the Communications Act, which shields platforms from liability for content posted by third parties. Mendez also signaled that he intends to overturn another law requiring labels on digitally altered campaign materials. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@