Occupied Territories Bill: US Congress group asks that Ireland be added to list of countries boycotting Israel
US House of Representatives
has written to treasury secretary
Scott Bessent
requesting he consider adding Ireland to a list of countries boycotting
Israel
, if the proposed
Occupied Territories Bill
is passed.
The move will increase pressure on the Irish Government from the US over its plans for the bill, which would prohibit trade in goods with the occupied Palestinian territories.
The Government has said it is committed to passing the bill, and is
considering whether to include trade in services
under its ambit. However, some business groups have warned the bill's passing may have
significant implications for US companies here
.
The letter to Mr Bessent, sent Thursday and signed by 16 Congressmen and women, led by New York Republican Congresswoman Claudia Tenney, is likely to be favourably received by the Treasury Department.
READ MORE
It suggests the Occupied Territories Bill would fall foul of 1986 legislation which requires the Treasury Department to maintain a list of countries which implement what the letter calls 'an unsanctioned international boycott'.
Inclusion on this list imposes specific tax reporting requirements and potential penalties for US individuals and businesses engaged in certain activities in those countries, it says.
'Last month, Irish Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister
Simon Harris
introduced legislation to prohibit the import of goods and services originating from territories under Israeli administration that they characterize as 'occupied,' including Judea and Samaria, Gaza, parts of Jerusalem and the Golan Heights,' the letter from the Congressmen and women states.
'This measure is part of a broader effort aligned with the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to economically isolate Israel. Such policies not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for US companies operating in Ireland.
[
Binyamin Netanyahu signals Israel's intent for military to seize all of Gaza
Opens in new window
]
'The United States must send a clear signal that efforts to economically isolate Israel will carry consequences, and that US law designed to combat such discrimination will be enforced.'
It is signed by Ms Tenney, and by Representatives Nick LaLota, David Schweikert, Elise Stefanik, Andy Ogles, Joe Wilson, Pete Stauber, Chuck Edwards, Keith Self, Barry Moore, Mark Messmer, Harriet Hegeman, Andrew Garbarino, Earl 'Buddy' Carter, Ben Cline and Michael Turner. All are Republicans.
[
Ireland will be remembered as a beacon in dark times if we pass the Occupied Territories Bill
Opens in new window
]
In a statement, Ms Tenney said, 'Ireland's proposed boycott is a blatant attempt to isolate and delegitimize Israel on the world stage. This proposed boycott is discriminatory, dangerous, and would violate US law. The Treasury Department has the duty to enforce the law, protect American businesses, and hold countries accountable when they promote foreign boycotts against our allies. The United States will not stay silent while our allies are targeted by hostile political agendas.'
The letter makes no mention of
rulings by the International Court of Justice on the illegality of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories
which is relied upon by the Irish Government as a justification for the bill.
Dublin has stressed it does not want to boycott Israeli goods, only those produced in the occupied territories. It is not clear, however, that the distinction matters hugely to the US system.
'There have been suggestions made that Ireland's position has been misrepresented in the United States. That is absolutely not the case – Ireland's position is very well understood – people just strongly disagree with it,' said one person in the US who is opposed to the Irish legislation.
'There is a growing sentiment in Congress and political circles in the US that there will be severe political and economic consequences for Ireland if it presses forward with this legislation. Not only is this a Federal issue but it would also expand to a State issue across 36 states as enforcement of State anti-boycott legislation commences against companies doing business in Ireland that comply with such a law,' the source said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, August 8th: On questions on Gaza, prescribing opioids, and big cars
Sir, – The world will eventually get into Gaza, and establish that the 61,000 reported killed so far by Gaza's health ministry is only a fraction of the dead. Many more lie under the rubble, or were not able to be brought to hospital to be counted. The following questions will then demand answers. Why did the United Nations (UN) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) allow a full famine to develop after four months of Israel blocking food, medicine and fuel to Gaza, when they could have forced the aid through under Article 7 of the UN charter? Why did the world not stop Israel's war crimes when the first hospital was shelled, instead allowing all 36 hospitals to be repeatedly bombed? Why did the world's media accept a ban on their journalists reporting inside Gaza, and why did RTÉ continually refer to the Hamas-controlled health ministry, long after CNN and Channel 4 dropped this nomenclature? READ MORE Why did Western governments, including Ireland, drag their feet on sanctioning Israel, despite consistent mass protests throughout the world? Why were many decent people silenced in the face of clear Israeli barbarity against children and families in Gaza, by the fear that criticising Israel might make them appear anti-Semitic? (A charge refuted by the many Jewish critics of Israel). Why were US warplanes refuelled at Shannon airport despite vocal criticism by Ireland of the 'war' they were enabling and supporting? Why did the Irish Central Bank take on the facilitation of Israeli war bonds in the EU, thus providing at least ¤418 million funding of Israel's war economy? Why did the world stand by for 21 months, wringing its hands and looking pained, while the war crimes of bombing civilians, starving civilians, and forced population transfers took place before our eyes? A genocide in plain sight. – Yours, etc, BETTY PURCELL, Former commissioner, Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, Dublin 6W. Sir, – I object , as a taxpayer, that the staff of the Central Bank, whose salaries are paid for by the Irish exchequer, are being indirectly deployed to finance the Israeli government's genocidal war against the Palestinian people through the sale of Israeli war bonds (' Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend ,' August 6th). According to Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf, Ireland has no power to unilaterally remove itself from this role and that any decision to change this situation would be made by Israel. Who is in charge in the Central Bank, Mr Makhlouf representing the Irish taxpayer, or Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu? – Yours, etc, BRENDAN BUTLER, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Prescribing opioids Sir, –Your article on increased opioid prescribing in Ireland highlights a genuine concern (' Doctors increasingly prescribing highly addictive opioids, ' August 7th). However, the study it references adjusted only for age and sex; it did not control for clinical indication, comorbidities, or access to non-drug treatments such as physiotherapy or timely surgery. The findings are based solely on the General Medical Services population, which is older and more socioeconomically disadvantaged. An increase in prescriptions within this group may reflect unmet need rather than inappropriate use. We must be cautious not to conflate prescribing volume with prescribing harm. Simplistic interpretations risk stigmatising both patients with complex pain and the doctors doing their best in a constrained system. The real challenge is improving access to safe, evidence-based alternatives – not simply tightening prescribing. – Yours, etc, Dr JOSEPH BROWNE, Consultant Physician, and Geriatrician, Castleknock, Dublin 15. Benefits of breastfeeding Sir, – I refer to ' Parents of children with Down syndrome: it teaches you to be a better person ' (August 5th). Congratulations and fair play to the mother referred to in the report who persisted in her efforts to breastfeed her baby who has Down syndrome despite being told 'that Down syndrome babies probably don't breastfeed'. It is very disappointing that this outdated attitude still persists, especially if it is coming from the medical profession. Of course babies with Down syndrome breastfeed. I can verify this from my own and many other mothers' experiences. What makes the difference for many is the right support and information at the right time. The health and other benefits of breastfeeding for any baby – but particularly for a baby with additional needs – cannot be emphasised enough. Therefore, all mothers who wish to breastfeed their babies who have Down syndrome should be given all the encouragement and support to do so, particularly while they are in hospital. – Yours, etc, MARGARET CARROLL. Portobello, Dublin 8. Too much information Sir, – To the letter writer (Letters, August 6th) whose Tesco spinach was recalled due to possible Listeria, and is now 'overthinking every bowel movement', I'm sorry but one expects a certain decorum on the Letters page and that is simply, to use the modern parlance, TMI. –Yours, etc, BRIAN AHERN, Clonsilla, Dublin 15. Women and men Sir, – Pamela McDonald (Letters, August 6th) says that she is 'struck by the absence of a male outcry against abhorrent male violence'. I am proud to be part of a male swimming group, The Gollymocky Whalers, who, in February 2024, raised €48,500 for Women's Aid in our annual Freezbrury swim challenge. We chose Women's Aid as our charity precisely because we are males. An outcry can come in many forms. – Yours, etc, JONATHAN WHITE, Killiney, Co Dublin. Sir, – Pamela McDonald (Letters, August 6th) is struck by the lack of a male outcry against abhorrent male violence. In her next breath, she quotes Germaine Greer saying that 'women have very little idea of how much men hate them'. She then finishes by challenging men to prove her wrong. To be honest, having given this some thought, all I can think is that this is offensive nonsense. –Yours, etc, BRIAN CULLEN, Rathfarnham, Dublin. Taxing rental income Sir, – In his letter (August 6th), Emmet McCrann expresses surprise at Lorcan Sirr's surprise that small landlords earn so much from their rental. He goes on to say: 'As an actuary who has worked with statistics for decades, it always surprises me to see experts quote statistics and then imply tangential conclusions.' Indeed. His own conclusion is: 'With income tax of 40 per cent, USC of 8 per cent and PRSI of 4 per cent all applying, the small landlord is left with 48per cent of the rent . . . etc'. He then itemises further deductions, such as management fees and repairs, that reduce income even more. Could these be 'tangential conclusions?' He may be further surprised to learn that taxes are not levied on the gross rental income, but on net income after such legitimate costs are deducted. – Yours, etc, JIM HOLOHAN, Stranorlar, Co Donegal. Population and the environment Sir, – In the course of a meandering Opinion piece on world population and future demographics, it is unclear what point former Green Party leader Eamon Ryan is making (' It's about to get much harder to blame population growth for the climate crisis ,' August 6th). Surely it is obvious that the current world population of over eight billion is putting massive strain on the natural world and an increase to a peak of 10 billion will hardly help matters? The Industrial Revolution and rapid population growth from 1900 onwards has contributed to climate change and a tipping point into the age of mass extinction in the natural world, all at the hands of mankind. At this point I do not see technology and a falling birthrate pulling us back from the brink in an increasingly authoritarian multi-polar world. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL FLYNN, Dublin 13. Build the MetroLink Sir, – I would like to express my frustration over a series of myopic and parochial articles regarding the proposed MetroLink rail service. It's as if nobody in Ireland has ever been outside the country. It makes Irish people look stupid and maybe they are too infantile to understand the value of good public infrastructure. Anyone who has used the Elizabeth Line to Heathrow, gone from central Tokyo to Narita, or has been to Hong Kong will tell you that you simply can't beat the rail service to the airport. Self-driving cars will get stuck in self-driving traffic jams trains regardless of weather. Please stop this insane and ridiculous hand-wringing and moaning about building a piece of infrastructure that would barely get any notice in most countries. The Chinese would have built this in 18 months and ditto for any major European or Asian country. Just tender the contract to any large European or Asian infrastructure provider, CPO the necessary property and set up a special purpose vehicle to facilitate all legal eventualities and start the work. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL COFFEY, New Jersey, US. Sir, – Instead of encouraging cars or private transport of any kind, or discouraging future MetroLink plans, we should be trying to increase frequency, improve and extend public transport. The Dart and Luas are both very successful, Dart's daily ridership has grown to around 90,000 passengers, Luas, approximately 140,000. And that's probably not counting free travellers! We now need to extend both and proceed to build the metro in both Dublin and Cork. A fixed charge could be paid to use public transport up to a given number of journeys, the charge pro-rated upwards, depending on the number of journeys made. This would simplify the collection of fares and reduce the cost. In the interests of the economy, the environment, our health, and the future of the planet, public transport must be encouraged by all. –Yours, etc, SHEILA DEEGAN, Dublin 3. A suggestion on big cars Sir, – I refer to Ultan Ó Broin's letter (August 7th) regarding the seemingly insatiable lust of Irish drivers for tank-like cars which occupy far too much space on roads and in car parks never designed for these monstrous vehicles. I would propose an educational approach accompanied, as in Paris, by extra charges for these jumbos to compensate for their unnecessary weight and size and environmental impact. These vehicles are not safer, certainly not if they hit a human. Posters showing a child standing in front of one of these behemoths should be displayed everywhere, it is genuinely blood chilling to see. – Yours, etc. JOANNA MULVEY, Greystones, Co Wicklow. The Lions share Sir, – I have enjoyed reading Barry Sheehan's articles and this last one today, his final take on Sydney and the team's 'effort, commitment and bravery', really struck a chord with me, as a parent of young men, how important trust and camaraderie among a group of friends can make all the difference in one's life. We always want the best for our children, no matter what road they are on. Well done to Barry, and to the Lions squad. You have done us all proud. – Yours, etc, VICTORIA MADIGAN, Terenure, Dublin 6. Figuring out Trump Sir, – The current president of the United States has sacked the head of that country's bureau of employment statistics, Erika McEntarfer. Cause? It was alleged she was massaging those very statistics to make the president's record in this area look bad. Wait a minute. Six or so months ago did not the same president employ a close associate to head up a new government efficiency department? That head of Doge(Elon Musk), now unemployed from government himself, did 'real good' according to the template. Hundreds of thousands of civil servants lost their jobs. So, was the statistics head not merely reporting great success in the job filleting endeavour? Am I missing something? – Yours, etc, MARY FINN, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14. Illegal dumping Sir, – Is it any wonder illegal dumping is so prevalent in this country? If caught the individual faces a €150 fine. This is cheaper than using a refuse company or a legal dump (if used throughout the year). Illegal dumpers will not be put off by a few CCTV cameras, they will just dump their rubbish somewhere else. The fine is too small and enforcement rates too low and this is why illegal dumping is an option many will continue to take. – Yours, etc, SIOBHÁN McDERMOTT, Killester, Dublin 5. Seeing red Sir, – As one who, as a child, remembers notices outside Garda stations offering the public £5 for a dead fox and also hearing despairing tales of overnight slaughter in back yard chicken coops, I too think that foxes are beautiful creatures (Letters, August 7th). At dusk on recent nights I have watched three delightful red cubs frolic and play together at dusk at the fence behind my house, as they gobble up the dog food I leave out for them. Who needs television with such alternative entertainment? – Yours, etc, MARION WALSH, Donnybrook, Dublin 4.
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Group of US politicians express concern over proposed Irish trade ban with Israeli settlements
A GROUP OF US politicians have urged the US treasury secretary Scott Bessent to examine if the Irish Government's proposed ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine would breach American anti-boycott laws. Sixteen US congress members have signed a letter calling for the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025, which seeks to ban the trade of goods between Ireland and Israeli settlements, to be investigated. Republican Congresswoman Claudia Tenney, for New York, is leading the group of politicians. The letter references the US anti-boycott laws, which seek to oppose boycotts against America and its allies. Should the US find the Irish ban constitutes a 'foreign boycott', America may take action to counteract the ban and include Ireland on a purported 'boycott list', potentially suspending future US business deals in Dublin and elsewhere. The Irish government has been aware for a number of years that the anti-boycott movement in the US, made up of a number of American politicians, would take issue with the Occupied Territories Bill. The group's letter reads: 'This measure is part of a broader effort aligned with the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to economically isolate Israel. 'Such policies not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for U.S. companies operating in Ireland.' It added that the Irish ban on trade between illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine would 'not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for US companies operating in Ireland'. Advertisement It added: 'We encourage the Treasury Department to assess whether Ireland's proposal indicate that they require or may require participation in or encouragement of an international boycott within the meaning of [US anti-boycott mechanisms].' Speaking to The Journal prior to the general election in November, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the US embassy have previously expressed concern over the ban, but that Ireland was clear in its position on the matter. He said: 'I had already made the decision, prior to that communication. I was aware of that it's not a new concern [from the US]. That's been there a long time. 'It's not a surprise that the US Embassy would communicate that, they communicated that five or six years ago, and that's been a standard position. 'Our position is that it relates to the Occupied Territories, not to Israel. And that might be a point of difference in the US, because, in the US, people might look at it differently – but we have a very clear view of it here.' Politicians on the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee last month recommended that trade of services should be included in the law. Chairperson of the committee, Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, said while the Bill has been described as largely symbolic, it remains 'important'. He added that Ireland's reputation has been tarnished by some , stating that there have been smears and lies said about the country due to the position it has taken on this piece of legislation. With reporting by Christina Finn Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says he would meet Putin even if Russian leader won't meet Zelensky
Donald Trump has said he would meet Vladimir Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Mr Trump was asked by a reporter if the Russian leader would need to meet Mr Zelensky to secure a meeting with the US, and replied: 'No, he doesn't. No.' His comments followed Mr Putin's remarks earlier on Thursday that he hoped to meet the US president next week, possibly in the United Arab Emirates, but the White House was still working through the details of any potential meetings, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed Mr Putin's announcement came on the eve of a White House deadline for Moscow to show progress towards ending the three-year war in Ukraine or suffer additional economic sanctions. Asked on Thursday if his deadline for Friday would hold, Mr Trump said of Mr Putin: 'It's going to be up to him. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed.' He also touched on killings that have continued on both sides and added, 'I don't like long waits. I think it's a shame.' A White House official told the Associated Press on Thursday morning that a US-Russian summit would not happen if Mr Putin did not agree to meet Mr Zelensky, but the official later said it only made it less likely. Speaking of possible direct talks with Mr Zelensky, the Russian president said he has mentioned several times that he was not against it, adding: 'It's a possibility, but certain conditions need to be created.' The Kremlin has previously said Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky should meet only when an agreement negotiated by their delegations is close. Ukraine fears being sidelined by direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow, and Mr Zelensky said he had phone conversations with several European leaders on Thursday amid a flurry of diplomatic activity. European countries have pledged to back Ukraine for as long as it takes to defeat Russia's invasion. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, earlier brushed aside the possibility of Mr Zelensky joining the summit, something the White House said Mr Trump was ready to consider. Mr Putin has spurned Mr Zelensky's previous offers of a meeting to clinch a breakthrough. Asked who initiated the possible talks with the US president, Mr Putin said that did not matter and 'both sides expressed an interest'. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky (Gregorio Borgia/AP) A meeting would be the first US-Russia summit since 2021, when Joe Biden met Mr Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone towards Mr Trump's effort to end the war, although there is no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Months of US-led efforts have yielded no progress on stopping Russia's invasion of its neighbour. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides and more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Western officials have repeatedly accused Mr Putin of stalling in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. He has previously offered no concessions and said he will accept a settlement only on his terms. Mr Zelensky said European countries must also be involved in finding a solution to the war on their own continent. 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war,' he added. A ceasefire and long-term security guarantees are priorities in potential negotiation with Russia, he said on social media. He noted that Russian strikes on civilians have not eased despite Mr Trump publicly urging Mr Putin to relent. A Russian attack on Wednesday in the central Dnipro region killed four people and wounded eight others, he said. A new Gallup poll published on Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a peace settlement. In the survey, conducted in early July, about seven in 10 Ukrainians said their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible.
