logo
3 myths about metabolism could be holding you back

3 myths about metabolism could be holding you back

CNNa day ago
EDITOR'S NOTE: The podcast Chasing Life With Dr. Sanjay Gupta explores the medical science behind some of life's mysteries big and small. You can listen to episodes here.
(CNN)— Think speeding up your metabolism is key to losing weight? Metabolism has grown into one of the biggest buzzwords in the wellness industry — a tricky code that, if deciphered, is believed to unlock the secrets of weight loss and overall health.
Despite the term's ubiquity, one scientist says many people don't understand much of how this basic bodily process works.
'They think it has something to do with how much food we can eat without gaining weight or something like that,' Dr. Kevin Hall told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life.
Hall wants to elevate metabolism for different reasons. 'Metabolism is just this incredible biochemical process that basically turns the food that we eat and the oxygen that we breathe into essentially … everything we are and everything we do,' he said.
A leading nutrition and metabolism scientist, Hall is well-known for his research on contestants from the reality show 'The Biggest Loser' that helped explain what set participants who kept the weight off apart from those who gained it back.
He spent more than two decades at the National Institutes of Health. His later work on ultraprocessed foods investigated its link to obesity, including one study that demonstrated it actively caused participants to overeat.
Hall announced his early retirement and exit from NIH in April, citing censorship of how his research findings were communicated. He's now coauthor of the new book 'Food Intelligence: The Science of How Food Both Nourishes and Harms Us' alongside journalist Julia Belluz.
Metabolism and weight loss enter conversations arm in arm, but this, according to Hall, can be reductive.
'I just find it incredibly frustrating sometimes that this idea of metabolism, this really beautiful physiological process that is so fundamental to life, is kind of talked about as, 'Oh well, if you take this supplement, you can boost your metabolism and lose weight,'' he explained to Gupta.
You can listen to the full episode here.
Is a faster or higher metabolism really the highway to weight loss? Hall is here to set the record straight, highlighting three misconceptions about metabolism that show there is more to it than meets the eye.
One common belief is that a slower metabolism results in a higher body weight. But mostly, Hall said, the opposite is true.
'Generally, larger people have faster metabolisms than smaller people,' he told Gupta.
Hall attributed the pervasiveness of this myth to the way researchers designed early metabolism studies. Scientists initially tried to match up participants' caloric intake to their weight, but they didn't account for the fact that these calorie counts were self-reported.
It turned out that those with obesity often underreported the number of calories they ate to a larger degree than their leaner counterparts. This, Hall said, 'led people to a conclusion that, well, if they're eating less calories and they're maintaining their weight, then they must be burning less calories. And maybe the reason why they have obesity is because they have slow metabolisms.'
Modern technology now allows researchers to rely on data, not participants' own reports. 'When we actually directly measure people's metabolisms, people with obesity have higher metabolic rates on average than people who are lean,' Hall noted.
But the myth that we should be boosting metabolism to treat obesity has stubbornly persisted — and has at times led to deadly consequences. When Stanford University researchers discovered that the chemical compound 2,4-dinitrophenol, or DNP, increased metabolism levels in the 1930s, they enthusiastically promoted it as a safe and effective tool for treating obesity.
While DNP did boost metabolism, it also led to side effects that included blindness and death, causing federal drug regulators to quickly withdraw it from the market.
'Maybe,' Hall suggested, 'it shouldn't be too much of a surprise later to realize that with something so fundamentally important to life as metabolism, you can't just turn it up and turn it down with a pharmaceutical drug and not expect some pretty severe side effects, including death.'
Like weight, age might not affect metabolism as much as you may assume.
'It turns out that until you get to very advanced ages, we're talking 70s and 80s, it looks like our metabolic rate is roughly constant,' Hall said.
There are, of course, changes in the aging body that can impact metabolic rates.
People 'past the age of 30 or so,' Hall said, are 'tending to lose muscle mass or tending to lose lean mass, and they're tending to gain fat mass. And that alone is anticipated to result in a lower metabolism.' That's because lean muscle burns more calories than fat.
But it's these age-related changes — that are not inevitable — and not age itself, that influence one's metabolism.
'Once you get rid of that effect … it doesn't seem like there's a fundamental aging effect to slow metabolism as, as we get older,' Hall concluded.
A couple ways to combat the loss of lean muscle mass as you age is by engaging in twice-a-week strength training and getting enough protein in your diet (but no need to go overboard).
Another pillar of metabolism mythology is the idea that a slow metabolism is the enemy of continued weight loss. Interventions such as dieting are believed to slow metabolism to the point that you can't lose any additional weight.
But keeping your metabolism from slowing down isn't the key to sustained weight loss, Hall said. In fact, it's just the opposite.
'The people who are most successful at losing weight and keeping it off are the ones who sport the slowest metabolisms or the greatest reductions in metabolism,' he said. 'It's kind of like stretching a spring, right?'
The more intensely someone diets or exercises, the more weight they'll lose and the more their metabolism will slow down, he explained in his book.
Hall's research showed that a slower metabolism 'didn't seem to determine anyone's ability to lose weight or keep it off in the short or long run.'
By uncoupling metabolism from the weight loss conversation, Hall said he hopes everyone can appreciate the phenomenon for what it really is.
Misinformation about metabolism 'has really distracted people, I think, from the real beauty of what this is,' he told Gupta.
'It's harnessing the continuous flow of matter and energy in our food and in our breath and powering every cell in our body, as well as the bodies and cells of practically every organism that we have ever encountered,' Hall said. 'It's a fundamental component of life, and it's just incredibly fascinating.'
We hope these three insights help you understand your metabolism better. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of Chasing Life.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Endocrine Disruptors and Kids: What They Are and How to Lower Exposure
Endocrine Disruptors and Kids: What They Are and How to Lower Exposure

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Endocrine Disruptors and Kids: What They Are and How to Lower Exposure

Pediatrician-mom tips for understanding endocrine disruptors and making simple swaps You've probably heard the buzz about plastics and their potential risks, especially for children. But what exactly are these risks, and why are certain chemicals, known as endocrine disruptors, gaining attention? As a parent, it's natural to want to make the best choices for your family, but it can feel overwhelming to navigate the sea of information out there. Here's what to know, where they're commonly found, and how to take small, practical steps that feel doable for your family. What are endocrine disruptors? Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that can interfere with the body's hormone systems. Hormones are like messengers that regulate everything from growth and metabolism to reproduction and mood. Endocrine disruptors can mimic or block these hormones when they enter the body. These disruptors can come from natural sources, like plants, or be synthetic and found in many everyday products. Endocrine disruptors can be found in many of the products we use daily, making it difficult to avoid them completely. Over 1,000 endocrine disruptors have been identified, but here are some of the most common ones: BPA (Bisphenol A): Often used in hard plastics like food containers, water bottles, and some older baby bottles and toys. Phthalates and parabens: Found in plastic packaging, shampoos, lotions, and cosmetics. Oxybenzone: Common in certain sunscreens. Lavender and tea tree oils: Often found in skin care products. Lead: Still present in older homes, vintage toys, and contaminated soil. Soy-based products: Contain phytoestrogens, which are chemicals produced by plants that can mimic estrogen in the body. Why it matters for babies and young kids Endocrine disruptors interfere with the body's hormone systems by mimicking hormones like estrogen, blocking normal hormone activity, or altering hormone levels. Endocrine disruptors can affect how hormones are made, broken down, or stored, leading to imbalances. Additionally, they can change how sensitive the endocrine system is to various hormones, increasing or decreasing their effects. This is particularly concerning for pregnant women, infants, and young children who are more vulnerable to these hormonal disruptions during important stages of growth and development. It's important to note that the research is ongoing; however, there is evidence that high exposure to endocrine disruptors can increase the risk of certain health issues. There is less evidence on what the actual safe levels are for people. As more research is available, the risks will become clearer. During pregnancy, research suggests that endocrine disruptors can cross the placenta, leading to low birth weight, thyroid dysfunction, and neurological disorders. Repeated exposure to chemicals like BPA has been linked to early puberty, reproductive malformations, and infertility risks, as well as reproductive cancers. Endocrine disruptors are also associated with metabolic disorders, such as obesity and insulin resistance, and conditions like gynecomastia. While these risks can seem alarming, it's important to acknowledge that most recommendations are aimed at reducing cumulative exposure rather than attempting to eliminate every source of endocrine disruptors. Simple ways to reduce exposure You don't need to eliminate every single source of endocrine disruptors. That's nearly impossible, and not the point. Instead, the goal is to reduce repeat exposure where it's easy and practical to do heating in plastic: Swap out plastic containers for glass or stainless steel, especially when heating food. If using plastic, make sure it's labeled 'BPA-free.' Use BPA-free baby products: Choose infant bottles and toys labeled 'BPA-free,' or consider using glass bottles to reduce exposure. Wash produce thoroughly: Pesticides can carry endocrine disruptors. Rinse fruits and vegetables well, or use a baking soda and water solution to minimize mineral sunscreens: Chemical sunscreens can contain oxybenzone, so consider mineral-based sunscreen made with zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. Check labels for 'Phthalate-Free' or 'Paraben-Free': Opt for personal care products that do not contain these chemicals. Be cautious with essential oils: Avoid the sue of topical formulations of tea tree and lavender oils in children. These can contain chemicals with estrogenic/androgenic properties, and repeated use of these oils has been linked to breast growth in prepubertal girls and plastic toys: especially older or hand-me-down plastic toys, as they may contain higher levels of harmful chemicals. Reduce lead exposure: If you live in an older home, test for lead paint and make sure that any peeling paint is addressed. Choose flame-retardant-free items: if possible, avoid products treated with flame retardants, which can also act as endocrine disruptors. Keeping a balanced perspective Focus on reducing repeated exposure in key areas. Remember, the 'dose makes the poison.' Overexposure is when problems are likely to occur, not from occasional contact with things like receipts or plastic water bottles. It's easy to get swept up in fear, especially with the constant stream of new research on potential health risks. But balance is key. Make mindful choices that fit your family's lifestyle and needs, and don't feel pressured to overhaul everything all at once. Want a calm, clear explanation of endocrine disruptors and which swaps actually matter most? Watch this PedsDocTalk YouTube video for more practical, pediatrician-backed tips.

'Grey's Anatomy' star diagnosed with Hashimoto's: What to know about the disease
'Grey's Anatomy' star diagnosed with Hashimoto's: What to know about the disease

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Grey's Anatomy' star diagnosed with Hashimoto's: What to know about the disease

"Grey's Anatomy" star Camilla Luddington recently revealed she has been diagnosed with Hashimoto's disease, an autoimmune disorder. The British actress, known for her role as Dr. Jo Wilson, shared the news on the "Call It What It Is" podcast in an episode aired on Wednesday, which she co-hosts with fellow "Grey's Anatomy" star Jessica Capshaw. 'Grey's Anatomy' star opens up about battle with postpartum anxiety, severe PMS disorder Luddington explained that, for some time, she had felt unusually tired and sluggish, often joking about being "slothy." However, she didn't consider that there might be a medical reason behind it. After finally completing routine blood work, Luddington received the surprising diagnosis. "My doctor was like, everything looks great except this one little thing," she recalled. The news hit her hard. "I remember hearing the words 'autoimmune disease' and thinking, 'What the f---?'" Luddington said, though she later learned that hypothyroidism caused by Hashimoto's disease is quite common. Capshaw asked how Luddington processed the news, and Luddington admitted that she had suspected something was wrong with her health. "You know what? I knew something was up," Luddington shared. "Because even when I was having my blood drawn, the doctor said to me, 'Is there any, you know, particular thing you're concerned about?' And I said, 'Look, I'm really f---ing tired all the time.'" Initially, Luddington thought her symptoms might be due to perimenopause, a phase before menopause. But after learning about her autoimmune diagnosis, she said, "When they said it's really common, I was like, 'well, that sucks, but okay.'" Luddington has been part of the "Grey's Anatomy" cast since 2012. In addition to her role on the ABC drama, she has starred as Kate in "William & Kate: The Movie" and appeared on shows like "Californication" and "True Blood." What to know about Hashimoto's disease Hashimoto's disease is an autoimmune disorder that can cause hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid) or, in rare cases, hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid), according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The thyroid, a small, butterfly-shaped gland in the neck, becomes damaged in people with Hashimoto's, NIDDK states on its website. The immune system produces antibodies that attack the thyroid, leading to the accumulation of white blood cells which destroy thyroid's cells that produce hormones. 'Grey's Anatomy' renewed for 22nd season at ABC This condition is also known as Hashimoto's thyroiditis, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, or autoimmune thyroiditis, according to NIDDK. While the exact number of people affected in the U.S. is unknown, Hashimoto's is the leading cause of hypothyroidism, which impacts about 5% of Americans. NIDDK notes that early on, Hashimoto's may not show symptoms, but as it progresses, it can cause fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, joint pain, constipation, dry skin, irregular periods and a slowed heart rate. It often leads to hypothyroidism, but in its early stages, it can cause symptoms of hyperthyroidism. The thyroid may also enlarge, creating a swollen neck or goiter, which can shrink over time. According to NIDDK, the exact cause of Hashimoto's is unknown, but it is often linked to a family history of thyroid disease. Several factors, including genes, viruses like hepatitis C, certain medications, and exposure to toxins such as nuclear radiation, can contribute to its development. Solve the daily Crossword

Profits over people and microplastics in every meal?
Profits over people and microplastics in every meal?

Fast Company

time17 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Profits over people and microplastics in every meal?

For decades, the plastic crisis has always felt far away, whether through time or across distance. But unfortunately, we're no longer talking about environmental pollution 'out there' in the ocean. Microplastics, tiny fragments that come from the breakdown of everyday plastic items, are now inside all of us, turning this from a theoretical risk into a shocking—and deeply personal (physically) —reality. Despite this fact, most Americans remain unaware of just how prevalent microplastics are in our lives. New national research that we conducted with our partners at The 5 Gyres Institute paints a troubling picture: while 77% of Americans say they've heard the term 'microplastics,' only 49% actually understand what it means. Even about half of people—51%—know it's often a result of larger plastic breaking down. The knowledge gap That knowledge gap is more than an academic concern. It's a public health crisis, especially when you consider that, after the term is defined for survey respondents, 90% of Americans state that they're worried about microplastics in the human body—and they're right to be. Science confirms that these particles have been found in breast milk, placental tissue, lungs, brains, blood, and more. And studies are increasingly linking microplastics to serious health impacts, including cancer, heart disease, hormone disruption, and infertility. But even when you close that knowledge gap, people who care often feel stuck. Our research shows that 70% of Americans don't know how to reduce their exposure to microplastics and 67% can't name a single company actively working on the problem (we're hoping to change that!). That sense of powerlessness is as dangerous as the plastic itself, because people want better. They just don't know where to turn. At Grove, we've seen firsthand that Americans are searching for answers and they're looking to us: to companies, brands, and private-sector leaders. They want healthier homes, safer products, and more sustainable choices. They want corporations to lead—not with vague promises, but with bold, measurable action. This is our collective moment. A solution Consumers didn't create the plastic crisis. We, the private sector, did. For decades, our industries have driven plastic adoption in product design, packaging, and sourcing. And we were lied to and manipulated by the petrochemical and plastics industry that shaped this system. Now, we, the private sector in 2025, must dismantle it. That means going beyond plastic. It means rejecting outdated systems that rely on single-use packaging, microbeads, and petrochemical-based materials. It means investing in compostable and refillable formats, shifting supply chains, being transparent about ingredients and sourcing, and leaning into the circular economy. It means learning and being aware of the impact plastics are having in our bodies and environments. It means supporting legislation, like the newly introduced bipartisan Microplastics Safety Act, which calls on the FDA and HHS to investigate and report on the health impacts of microplastics. Most importantly, it means refusing to offload responsibility onto consumers and admitting that recycling, long touted as a solution, simply isn't enough. Only 5% of plastic is recycled and the rest ends up in landfills, incinerators, or breaks down into microplastic particles that pollute our air, food, water, and (if not abundantly clear by now) our bodies. At Grove, we remain unwavering in our commitment to eliminate plastic from the products we make and sell—and to empower others to do the same. But we can't do it alone. The cost of inaction Consumers are demanding accountability. Our research shows that 79% of Americans believe microplastics represent a human and environmental emergency; 82% believe companies should be doing more. But only half (54%) believe that businesses are actually stepping up. That gap is where trust and long-term relevance will be won or lost. The cost of inaction is rising. Not just in terms of public health, but in trust, consumer confidence, and regulatory risk. There will come a time soon when inaction on microplastics will be seen for what it is: negligent at best, and reckless at worst. Companies that continue to delay action on plastic pollution aren't just making a business decision. They're making a decision that directly impacts human health. Brands that cling to plastic-heavy models are effectively choosing profits over people, and they'll have to live with the consequences. But brands that choose to lead? They'll be rewarded with consumer loyalty, resilience, and relevance in a world that's rapidly waking up to this crisis. The science is clear. The public is paying attention. The future will not be plastic. And the time for action is now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store