logo
Health secretary to meet resident doctors in last-ditch bid to avert strikes

Health secretary to meet resident doctors in last-ditch bid to avert strikes

ITV News2 days ago
Wes Streeting will attempt to prevent a five-day walkout by resident doctors, formerly called junior doctors, set to start next week
Crunch talks between Health Secretary Wes Streeting and resident doctors are due to take place on Thursday in a bid to prevent five consecutive days of strike action.
The Resident Doctors Committee (RDC) - part of the British Medical Association (BMA) - says its demands for a 29.2% salary increase is needed to reverse "pay erosion" since 2008.
It said this figure is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households.
If talks fail, resident doctors in England are due to go on strike for five days from 7 am on July 25.
The last bout of strikes ended last September when resident doctor members voted to accept a government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years.
Discussions this time around could be tense, after Streeting told MPs on Monday that he did not see a 'reasonable trade union partner' in the RDC 'at this time'.
He has insisted the government will not budge on pay, but said discussions could focus on improving the working lives of resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors.
In a joint statement issued at the weekend, RDC co-chairs Dr Ross Nieuwoudt and Dr Melissa Ryan said they were hoping to 'find a solution that our members will find acceptable and that can prevent any strike action having to take place'.
What happened the last time there were doctors' strikes?
A long-running wave of strikes began in March 2023 following demands by the BMA for a substantial pay rise for doctors.
It said at the time that newly-qualified medics earned just £14.09 an hour, meaning they could earn more if they worked at Pret-A-Manger.
The union argued that resident doctors' pay had fallen 26% since 2008-2009 in real terms and asked the government for pay restoration.
After the previous Conservative government refused to come to the negotiating table, talks with the Department of Health following Labour's election victory in July 2024 was hailed as a positive step forward.
In September last year, resident doctors accepted a government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years, bringing to an end more than a year of strike action.
At the time, the BMA said 66% of their members voted to accept the deal; they also said the government had agreed separately to swap the term 'junior doctor' for 'resident doctor' to better reflect their expertise.
The 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4% increase plus £750 'on a consolidated basis', working out as an average rise of 5.4%.
Government officials said these two increases meant resident doctors had seen an average increase in pay of 28.9% over the last three years.
In May this year, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said it expected the average full-time basic pay for resident doctors to reach approximately £54,300 in 2025 to 2026 following the agreed-upon increase.
However, the BMA has been pushing back, saying resident doctors need 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09.
In September last year, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said that NHS strikes in general had cost the taxpayer almost £1.7 billion since April 2023, adding that 1.5 million appointments had been cancelled.
However, the DHSC later confirmed that the figure came from financial directions to NHS England and referred to the cost of all NHS England strikes in 2023/24, according to FullFact.
This means the figure did not include resident doctors' strikes in June and July 2024, nor strikes in March 2023, when the dispute began.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales
Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales

South Wales Argus

time17 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales

Peter Fox, the Conservative chair of the Senedd's health committee, sought clarity on the Welsh Government's position and its powers to implement assisted dying in Wales Health secretary Jeremy Miles said the Welsh Government maintained a neutral position as he drew a distinction between enacting the UK end of life bill and its implementation. He explained enactment is reserved to Westminster but providing voluntary assisted dying services in Wales is a discretionary power in the hands of the Welsh Government. Giving evidence on July 16, Mr Miles suggested options for services outside of the NHS would be available in the private sector in Wales and England as in other parts of the world. Pressed on whether ministers could refuse to implement elements, Wales' health secretary said: 'In devolved competence, yes, and even if the [Welsh] Government wanted to and the Senedd didn't want to approve it – the Senedd would have that ability as well.' Mr Fox asked: 'On regulations – if they are not made by the Welsh Government and consequently approved by this Senedd, the NHS in Wales will not be able to provide assisted dying services – is that the case?' 'That is correct,' Mr Miles replied, later suggesting a decision on whether to provide services in the health service would be made after the next Senedd election in May 2026. The Welsh Parliament rejected the principle of assisted dying in a historic vote last year, with Senedd members voting 26-19 against with nine abstaining. The Senedd rejected a similar motion a decade earlier in December 2014. But, this side of the election, politicians will get a vote on a legislative consent motion (LCM), the means by which the Senedd signifies consent for proposed UK laws in devolved areas. While the Sewel convention states the UK Parliament would 'not normally' legislate on devolved matters without consent, it is not legally binding. But Mr Miles suggested the vote would influence Welsh ministers' decision-making.

Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales
Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales

South Wales Guardian

time17 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales

Peter Fox, the Conservative chair of the Senedd's health committee, sought clarity on the Welsh Government's position and its powers to implement assisted dying in Wales Health secretary Jeremy Miles said the Welsh Government maintained a neutral position as he drew a distinction between enacting the UK end of life bill and its implementation. He explained enactment is reserved to Westminster but providing voluntary assisted dying services in Wales is a discretionary power in the hands of the Welsh Government. Giving evidence on July 16, Mr Miles suggested options for services outside of the NHS would be available in the private sector in Wales and England as in other parts of the world. Pressed on whether ministers could refuse to implement elements, Wales' health secretary said: 'In devolved competence, yes, and even if the [Welsh] Government wanted to and the Senedd didn't want to approve it – the Senedd would have that ability as well.' Mr Fox asked: 'On regulations – if they are not made by the Welsh Government and consequently approved by this Senedd, the NHS in Wales will not be able to provide assisted dying services – is that the case?' 'That is correct,' Mr Miles replied, later suggesting a decision on whether to provide services in the health service would be made after the next Senedd election in May 2026. The Welsh Parliament rejected the principle of assisted dying in a historic vote last year, with Senedd members voting 26-19 against with nine abstaining. The Senedd rejected a similar motion a decade earlier in December 2014. But, this side of the election, politicians will get a vote on a legislative consent motion (LCM), the means by which the Senedd signifies consent for proposed UK laws in devolved areas. While the Sewel convention states the UK Parliament would 'not normally' legislate on devolved matters without consent, it is not legally binding. But Mr Miles suggested the vote would influence Welsh ministers' decision-making.

Angela Rayner's bill ‘will make it easier for doctors to strike'
Angela Rayner's bill ‘will make it easier for doctors to strike'

Times

timea day ago

  • Times

Angela Rayner's bill ‘will make it easier for doctors to strike'

Labour's workers' rights overhaul will make it harder for hospitals to find cover for walkouts because unions will no longer need to tell managers in which departments the strikers work. NHS bosses have raised safety fears about the measures, which could put Wes Streeting, the health secretary, on a collision course with Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, who is leading the reforms. The Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through the Lords, will make it easier for the British Medical Association (BMA) to call strikes, with some doctors saying jokingly: 'All hail Queen Angela'. Unions will no longer have to meet a legal threshold of a 50 per cent turnout in a ballot to hold a strike. The reforms will also increase the length of a strike ballot mandate from six months to 12. This is expected to only apply to new ballots once the legislation has passed but NHS bosses have said it raised the prospect of 'ongoing, lengthy periods of industrial action'. The BMA had only a 55 per cent turnout in its recent ballot of resident or junior doctors, and on current trends turnout would dip below 50 per cent if the union reballots doctors next year. However, Rayner's reforms mean the BMA would be able to strike anyway. Resident doctors have said the bill is a 'game changer' in their long fight to get 'full pay restoration' to 2008 levels — the equivalent of a 29 per cent pay rise. By law, individual employees do not need to tell employers if they intend to strike but unions must tell bosses how many workers in each category will walk out, as part of their notice of a strike. The Employment Rights Bill will remove that requirement and while unions will still need to list the category of workers, they will not need to provide the numbers of workers in each category. This week, Streeting said it was 'shockingly irresponsible' for unions to tell striking doctors not to inform their bosses. He said: 'What I cannot fathom is how any doctor in good conscience would make it harder for managers to make sure we have safe staffing levels, would make it harder for other staff who are going to be turning up to work that day, not least the staff who have not had a higher percentage pay rise, many of whom are paid less than resident doctors.' Richard Sloggett, of Future Health Research, said the Employment Rights Bill was 'very problematic for Streeting' and he was being 'boxed in by Angela Rayner'. Rory Deighton, acute network director at the NHS Confederation, said: 'Not knowing whether individual members of staff will go out on strike can create much uncertainty for NHS leaders who will be working to minimise the impact on the provision of care and services to patients, ensuring that services can continue to be delivered safely — including considerations on the welfare of all of their staff working normally and not taking strike action.' • Key Labour workers' rights reforms delayed after business backlash He said employers and unions needed to 'work constructively and professionally at all times' and added: 'Nobody in the NHS, least of all patients, want to see ongoing, lengthy periods of industrial action, however, these reforms do mean this is a risk we could face.' Chris Coombes, senior associate at the employment law firm Littler, said: 'Certainly, for employers who need to arrange cover during periods of industrial action, it will be more difficult to do so with less information about what sort of employees will be taking part in the strike.' The BMA's six-month mandate to call strike action will run out in January, when the union will have to reballot its members. Its leaders have made it clear they are prepared to keep balloting in the long haul and have said they will not back down until they are awarded a 29 per cent rise. • Doctors could have student loans written off to avert strikes Sloggett, an adviser to Matt Hancock when he was health secretary, said: 'This current strike mandate will run until January. If both sides are still dug in, then the BMA will just reballot. When Rayner's reforms kick in next year, there will be nothing to stop the BMA going on strike again — even if they don't get above 50 per cent turnout. 'If you are in Wes Streeting's shoes you need as many tools and levers as possible against the BMA. Angela Rayner is taking away one of his levers — that if turnout goes below 50 per cent they can't strike again. 'Streeting is being boxed in by Angela Rayner. Rayner's reforms will rebalance power towards the unions. We could have wave after wave of industrial action. The government has got itself into a really messy situation. 'It raises the prospect of indefinite NHS strikes rumbling on and on for years. Unions will no longer have to go through the process of reballoting every six months.' • Five deaths linked to disruption from last junior doctors' strikes He said the reforms would also give more power to other members of NHS staff threatening to strike, including nurses and hospital consultants. 'For Streeting the Employment Rights Bill is a real bind, as he can't be seen to be anti-union if he wants to secure a future labour leadership crown. But strikes will severely hamper any progress on NHS waiting lists.' A government spokesman said: 'The old strike laws clearly didn't work, with the UK losing more days to industrial action in 2022 and 2023 than in any year since the 1980s. 'Strikes have a serious cost for patients, which is why we are appealing to the BMA to call them off and work to improve working conditions and continue rebuilding the NHS. Under our plans unions will still need to provide categories of worker, workplaces affected and number of workers involved. 'We have also been clear that the intention to change the ballot turnout threshold will be aligned closely with the introduction of e-balloting to ensure that industrial action mandates have broad support.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store