Trump praises ‘very impressive' Pakistan army chief, reiterates trade stopped Indo-Pak war
ISLAMABAD: US President Donald Trump praised Pakistan's army chief on Wednesday, describing him as 'very impressive' while reiterating his earlier claim of preventing a nuclear war between Islamabad and New Delhi with trade deals last month.
Trump hosted Field Marshal General Asim Munir for lunch last Wednesday in an unprecedented White House meeting. The American president had told reporters he was 'honored' to meet the Pakistani general and that the two discussed the Iran-Israel conflict.
Nuclear-armed India and Pakistan engaged in a days-long military conflict before Trump announced a ceasefire between the two on May 10. Trump has repeatedly said he offered to help both nations with trade if they agreed to de-escalate.
At the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump was asked by a reporter why he had failed to stop the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The American president responded by saying he had stopped wars between Iran and Israel as well as India and Pakistan, saying the conflict 'was getting very bad' between the nuclear-armed rivals.
'And in fact I had the general, who was very impressive, the general from Pakistan was in my office last week,' Trump said.
He described Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a 'great man, a great gentleman,' saying Washington helped both countries reason with each other at the height of the conflict.
'I said we're not going to do a trade deal if you're going to fight and if you're going to fight each other we're not doing a trade deal and you know what, they said, 'No, I want to do the trade deal.' And we stopped a nuclear war.'
Pakistan's government last week announced it would formally nominate Trump for what it called his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the military standoff with India in May.
The American president has also previously offered to mediate the decades-old Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan, who both claim the disputed Himalayan region in full but administer only parts of it.
While the ceasefire continues to persist, tensions simmer as New Delhi refuses to budge from its stance of suspending a decades-old water-sharing treaty with Pakistan.
Pakistan has said any attempts to stop or divert its flow of water by India will be regarded as an 'act of war' and will be responded to with full force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
29 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Trump Says Netanyahu's Trial Should Be Canceled
US President Donald Trump offered support to Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday, saying his trial should be canceled. "Such a WITCH HUNT, for a man who has given so much, is unthinkable to me," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State (of Israel)," Trump added.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Wisconsin Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Challenges to the State's Congressional District Boundaries
The liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to hear challenges brought by Democrats seeking to throw out the battleground state's current congressional district boundaries before the 2026 midterms. The decision, made without explanation from the court, is a setback for Democrats who had hoped for new, friendlier district boundary lines in Wisconsin as they attempt to win back control of the House next year. Democrats asked the court to redraw the maps, which would have put two of the state's six congressional seats currently held by Republicans into play. It was the second time in as many years that the court had refused to hear the challenges. Democrats hoped the court would revisit the congressional lines after it ordered state legislative boundaries redrawn. Democrats then picked up seats in the November election. 'It's good that Wisconsin has fair maps at the state level, but we deserve them at the federal level as well,' Democratic US Rep. Mark Pocan said. 'Unfortunately, gerrymandered maps for members of Congress will remain in Wisconsin.' Attorneys who brought the lawsuits did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment. Republicans hold six of the state's eight US House seats, but only two of those districts are considered competitive. Two requests to reconsider the congressional boundaries were filed with the court, which is controlled 4–3 by liberal justices. One came from the Elias Law Group, which represents Democratic groups and candidates, and the other came on behalf of voters by Campaign Legal Center. Democrats argued that the court's decision to redraw maps for state legislative districts a couple years ago opened the door to revisiting maps for US House districts. They also argued that the current map violates the state constitution's requirement that all Wisconsin residents be treated equally. In 2010, the year before Republicans redrew the congressional maps, Democrats held five seats compared with three for Republicans. The current congressional maps drawn by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers were approved by the state Supreme Court when it was controlled by conservative judges. The US Supreme Court in March 2022 declined to block them from taking effect. And last year, the state Supreme Court rejected a request to reconsider the maps without giving a reason as to why. One of the seats that Democrats hope to flip is in western Wisconsin. Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden won an open seat in 2022 after longtime Democratic Rep. Ron Kind retired. Von Orden won reelection in the 3rd District in 2024. The other seat they are eyeing is southeastern Wisconsin's 1st District. Republican Rep. Bryan Steil has held it since 2019. The latest maps made that district more competitive but still favor Republicans.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the US illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The US Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the US illegally after the state's Republican attorney general Ken Paxton said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit to better understand what this means for the state. Justice Department says state discriminates against US citizens. The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is flagrantly violating a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the US illegally if US citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the US illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against US citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' US Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. More lawsuits could be coming. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least twenty-one states have laws or policies granting them in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least sixteen states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. States deny discrimination against US citizens. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to US citizens in the same circumstances–meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the US Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the US illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as US-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
