NATO state urges Trump to sanction Russia immediately
On Monday, Trump said that he was 'very unhappy' with Moscow and warned that he would impose tariffs of up to 100% on countries that continue to trade with Russia if a deal to end the Ukraine conflict is not reached before the deadline.
'It should be earlier,' Braze said of the US secondary sanctions during her interview with Politico on Wednesday. It makes no sense to give Russia more time as its forces continue to push forward, she argued.
'The intel and overall assessment have been aligned among the allies, including the Americans, that there is no indication that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin wants peace,' the foreign minister claimed.
The US and its allies must put pressure on Moscow now to return to the negotiating table, she insisted.
The secondary sanctions are aimed at 'weakening Russia's ability to conduct warfare. It is not about the Russian people. It's about the Russian war fighting capacity and what they are doing on the battlefield, that all needs to be weakened,' Braze said.
Moscow has repeatedly stressed its readiness to achieve a diplomatic solution with Kiev, but insists that the settlement of the conflict should be legally binding and address its root causes. It has also expressed regret over not seeing Ukraine and its Western backers make a genuine effort to achieve peace.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov reacted to Trump's warning by saying that 'any attempts to make demands, let alone issue ultimatums, are unacceptable [to Moscow].' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has called upon Washington to instead put pressure on Kiev, arguing that 'the Ukrainian side takes all statements of support [from the West] as signals to continue war, not as signals for peace.'
The Economist reported on Wednesday that international investors do not believe that Trump is going to fulfill his threat, as it would cause an 'inflation shock' and increase tension between the US and China, which the president wants to avoid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
The ideology behind the ‘New America' is more dangerous than it looks
For the past 500 years, the West has reigned as the world's dominant civilization. Though its grip has loosened in recent years, the West – especially the United States – remains the most powerful force in global politics and the international economy. This power, while capable of building plenty, also carries the potential to destroy a lot. Today, a new ideology is taking shape in the West, particularly in the US. Under the right conditions, it could prove as dangerous to humanity as fascism and Nazism were in the last century. The reelection of Donald Trump may mark a decisive turning point, transferring power to people and ideas that are, at best, deeply ambiguous. This 'New America' is not driven by a single worldview, but rather by a convergence of four ideological factions. At the center stands Trump himself and his allies – throwbacks to the era of great-power imperialism. Trump's inaugural speech to launch his second term left little doubt: He called for territorial expansion, industrial growth, and a resurgent military. America, he declared, is 'the greatest civilization in the history of mankind.' He spoke approvingly of President William McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt, both architects of American imperialism. The vision is unmistakable: American exceptionalism, enforced by military might and driven by the logic of conquest. It is the language of empire. Then there are the right-wing populists – figures like Vice President J.D. Vance, strategist Steve Bannon, and journalist Tucker Carlson. Their rallying cry is 'America First'. They champion traditional values, claim to speak for the working class, and disdain the liberal elite concentrated in coastal cities. They oppose globalism, support trade protectionism, and promote isolationism in foreign policy. This faction is not particularly new in American politics, but its influence has deepened, especially under Trump's patronage. A newer – and perhaps more unsettling – element of America's emerging ideology is represented by Silicon Valley billionaires. Elon Musk is the most visible figure, briefly heading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency in early 2025. But the more influential actor may be Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist and early internet pioneer who became an informal adviser to Trump. Andreessen's political turn followed his frustration with Biden-era regulations on crypto and artificial intelligence. In 2023, he published a manifesto called 'The Techno-Optimist', a document that preaches unrestrained technological acceleration. In his view, scientific innovation and free markets can solve all of humanity's problems – if only government gets out of the way. Andreessen quotes Nietzsche and invokes the image of the 'apex predator' – a new breed of technological superman who sits atop the food chain. He writes, 'We are not victims, we are conquerors… the strongest predator at the top of the food chain.' Such language might seem metaphorical, but it is revealing. Andreessen's list of intellectual inspirations includes Filippo Marinetti, the Futurist who helped lay the aesthetic groundwork for Italian fascism and died fighting the Red Army at Stalingrad. The most intellectually developed thinker of the techno-libertarian camp is Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and the data surveillance firm Palantir Technologies. Thiel is no longer a marginal figure – he is now arguably the second most important ideologue of the New America, after Trump himself. Thiel is also a master strategist. He personally mentored and funded Vance, now vice president and possibly Trump's heir apparent. At the same time, he backed Blake Masters in Arizona, although that bet didn't pay off. Thiel reads the Bible, quotes Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, and speaks openly about the limits of democracy. 'Freedom is no longer compatible with democracy,' he has said. He has compared modern America to Weimar Germany, arguing that liberalism is exhausted, and a new system must rise. Despite his libertarian leanings, Thiel's companies develop AI tools for the Pentagon and fund next-generation weapons systems through firms like Anduril. Thiel believes that America has entered a long decline – and that radical technological leaps are needed to reverse it. One of his pet projects is the 'Enhanced Games', a competition where doping and biohacking are allowed. Co-organized with Donald Trump Jr., the event reflects Thiel's obsession with transhumanism and human enhancement. In foreign policy, Thiel views China as America's primary enemy. He has called it a 'semi-fascist, semi-communist gerontocracy' and pushed for complete economic decoupling. Interestingly, Thiel is far less hostile to Russia, which he sees as culturally closer to the West. In his view, pushing Moscow into Beijing's arms is a strategic mistake. The final group behind the New America are the theorists of the 'Dark Enlightenment', or neo-reactionary movement. These intellectual provocateurs reject the Enlightenment values that once defined the West. Nick Land, a British philosopher living in Shanghai, is among the founding thinkers of this school. He predicts the end of humanity as we know it and the rise of posthuman, techno-authoritarian systems governed by capital and machines. For Land, morality is irrelevant; what matters is efficiency, evolution, and raw power. Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug), an American programmer, is another central figure. A friend of Thiel and an insider in Trump's intellectual circle, Yarvin advocates replacing democracy with a corporate-style monarchy. He imagines a future of sovereign city-states run like companies, where experimentation with laws and technologies is unrestricted. Yarvin is clear in his rejection of American global leadership. He believes the US should withdraw from Europe and let regional powers settle their own disputes. He speaks warmly of China, and his views on World War II are unorthodox to say the least – suggesting Hitler was motivated by strategic calculation rather than genocidal ambition. Many of these ideas may seem fringe. But fringe ideas have power – especially when they echo through the corridors of political and technological influence. Carl Schmitt's legal theories enabled Hitler to seize dictatorial powers in 1933. Today, the intellectual allies of Trump and Thiel are crafting their own narratives of 'emergency', 'decadence', and 'reawakening'. What's emerging in America is not a retreat from hegemony, but a reformatting of it. The liberal international order is no longer seen as sacred – even by the country that built it. The new American elite may be withdrawing troops from Europe, the Middle East, and Korea, but their ambitions have not shrunk. They are turning instead to subtler methods of control: AI, cyber dominance, ideological warfare, and technological superiority. Their goal is not a multipolar world, but a redesigned unipolar one – run not by diplomats and treaties, but by algorithms, monopolies, and machines. The threat to the world is not just political anymore. It is civilizational. The superhumans are on the article was first published by Russia in Global Affairs, translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Only one in six Italians ready to fight
Only 16% of Italians are willing to fight for their country in the event of war, according to a survey by the Center for Social Investment Studies (CENSIS) published on Friday. Almost a third of respondents believe Italy will be drawn into a conflict within the next five years, but fewer than one in six of those of fighting age say they would take up arms, the poll suggests. The figure is 21% among men, and 12% among women. The findings come as NATO countries continue to pledge to support Ukraine 'for as long as it takes.' Since the escalation of the conflict in 2022, European defense budgets have reached record highs. Several countries have reintroduced or are considering conscription. Sweden and Lithuania have reinstated mandatory military service; Germany and Poland are debating similar measures. The study found that 39% of Italians identify as pacifists, while more than a third would either outsource defense to foreign mercenaries or flee. Most said they would prioritize survival; 81% would seek bomb shelters, 78% would stockpile food, and 27% would obtain a weapon for self-defense. US President Donald Trump has urged NATO members to meet and exceed spending targets and accelerate arms deliveries to Ukraine, calling for 'a new era of burden-sharing' among alliance partners. Italy has pledged to raise its military budget, which reached $35.6 billion in 2024, or 1.5% of GDP – a 46% increase over the past decade. It acknowledged, however, that it has 'practically no funds' to contribute to Washington's plan to supply weapons to Ukraine. Moscow has dismissed claims that it intends to attack NATO as 'nonsense.' Putin has argued that Western governments are 'deceiving their populations' to justify their soaring defense budgets and to distract from 'their own economic failures.'
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
UK to allow children to vote
The British government is set to lower the voting age to 16, granting more than 1.5 million teenagers the right to cast a ballot in the next general election, due in 2029. The pledge to boost turnout, first made in Labour's election manifesto, is part of a raft of measures in the new Elections Bill unveiled on Thursday. 'By engaging voters early, when they are young, and allowing them to have a say in shaping their future, we will build the foundations for their lifelong participation in our electoral processes,' the official strategy stated, claiming the changes will 'restore trust' in the system. The document argued that if 16-year-olds can work and pay taxes, it is 'right and fair that they should be able to vote.' Registration will be possible from age 14, so young people are added to the electoral roll as soon as they become eligible. The bill also includes simplified identity checks for those without a National Insurance number, and measures for children in care to register. The minimum age to stand as a candidate will remain 18. Critics claim the change could benefit Labour, as younger voters are more likely to support left-leaning parties. A YouGov poll shows Labour leading among 18 to 24-year-olds at 28%, with the Greens at 26% and the Liberal Democrats at 20%. Opposition MPs also questioned the consistency of the policy. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative shadow minister Paul Holmes argued. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner rejected suggestions of political advantage, saying the reform is not about 'trying to rig votes for a particular party,' but about giving young people a voice in democracy. Voter turnout in the 2024 general election was 59.7%, the lowest in over two decades. Lowering the voting age to 16 would mark the biggest change since it was reduced from 21 to 18 in 1969.
