logo
Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Economic Times4 hours ago
Donald Trump is the 14th US president of my lifetime, and he claims a unique distinction. Through all the previous White House incumbencies, months went by when even educated, informed British, German, Indian, Brazilian, French or Australian people did not give a moment's thought to America's leader.Sure, we noticed when a president visited our country or started a war or got impeached or had an incredibly beautiful wife who dressed wonderfully. We knew that the US was the richest and most influential nation on earth, and that on the big things we needed to play follow-my-leader. But even somebody like me, who lived in the US for a couple of years, and visited regularly until January 2025, did not lie awake nights wondering what our neighborhood superpower might do next.Today, that has changed. We used to mock nervous nellies who went through life terrified that a plane might crash onto their house. Now, however, we know exactly how the plane-crash neurotics feel. We are mesmerized, haunted, by everything Trump says and does, because nobody can predict his next mood swing. This delights the man himself. All he wants from life is unimaginable wealth and the rest of us bowing to his every whim. He is the Sun King, the epicenter of global attention, because he has shown the willingness as well as the power to make rain or shine in accordance with impulse.Nobody should be allowed to pretend that this is normal. It is absolutely abnormal. It represents political climate change in some ways more bewildering than living on a planet that is getting hotter, because on some days our country — whichever that may be — finds itself microwaved by the White House, while on others it is suddenly exposed to permafrost.
The latest example is Trump's announcement that the US will send new air-defense systems to Ukraine, purchased by NATO members, together with long-range missiles. This is unequivocally a good thing. Ukrainian city-dwellers have been enduring a nightly battering from Russian missiles and drones against which they have become almost defenseless, as the flow of US weapons has slowed. The big question is how serious is the president's change of heart after months of rubbishing Ukraine and its leader — and how long it will last. He himself says he is 'disappointed' by Vladimir Putin, but 'not done with him.' Since the inauguration, Russian oligarchs have been freer to do business in the US, and Washington agencies charged with monitoring their activities have been shut down.Trump has renewed support for Ukraine mostly because he feels personally snubbed by Putin. If that changes, so once again could American policy.
Then there is the global economy. Some of the smartest economists say they are unsure whether US business can survive the roller-coaster ride launched by Trump, most conspicuously through tariffs, or whether the economy will tank. Willful uncertainty about the future of Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, with attacks renewed this week by Trump, further rocks confidence. The respected Martin Wolf of the Financial Times is among those who characterize the Trump tariffs as 'crazy,' an adjective he reprised this week. Mohamed El-Erian, formerly a Wall Street investment whiz and now a distinguished academic, is among those who admits that he has no idea how the Trump story will play out.
We should never underestimate America's resilience and stupendous capacity for innovation. But he writes in the current Foreign Affairs that the only rational course for other nations is to build robust financial defenses and reduce their dependence on the US, while forging new relationships, because there is no early prospect, and perhaps no prospect even after Trump, that the US will resume its historic role as a reliable partner. El-Erian warns both nations and corporations against what behavioral scientists call 'active inertia' — 'when actors recognize that they need to behave differently but end up sticking to familiar patterns and approaches regardless.' The question almost every government in the world is asking itself is whether it dares to defy Trump. Two weeks ago, he warned Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that he would impose 50% tariffs on the country's exports to the US unless criminal proceedings are dropped against former President Jair Bolsonaro, for his 2022 attempt to stage a coup, to retain power after losing the last election. There is no pretense that this threat is linked to trade balances. It is merely a component in what we can call Trump's dictator protection program. He was a warm supporter of Bolsonaro, widely considered an appalling as well as corrupt national leader. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo has close personal relations with the Trump clan. Lula responded with outrage to Trump's threat, saying 'no one is above the law.' His country's exports to the US amount to only 2% of its gross domestic product, but a 50% tariff will undoubtedly cause disruption.
The European Union faces even more serious dilemmas in determining its response to lobbying by Trump, backed by tariff threats, on behalf of US Big Tech. There is an issue here that goes beyond mere commerce. The tech giants profit mightily from running almost open-house content policies, which some of us consider deeply corrupting, especially of the young.
Brussels has been striving to regulate social media, and to punish companies that spread anti-social material. But Trump is batting for the tech giants to enjoy free rein — 'free speech' as he and his acolytes call it — and to be spared from EU retribution. So great is Europe's fear of a wider trade war, that its regulators may yet bow to Washington. It is highly debatable whether the EU will risk deploying its Anti-Coercion Instrument against America, even though tariff blackmail offers an obvious justification for it. Then there is Iran. Will the US attempt to parley with the mullahs about their nuclear program, or revert to bombing? My friends, including one very well-informed Israeli, say that Benjamin Netanyahu suckered Trump into joining his war; that the Iranians, though unquestionably a malign force, were not about to produce a nuclear weapon; and that force alone cannot resolve the problems and threats posed by Iranian regional aggression. But whether Trump will fall out of love with Netanyahu as he now professes to have fallen out of love with Putin, we cannot tell. The president himself does not know what he might do, or not do, next Tuesday. It is the not knowing that scares the world so much — and which makes us talk about Donald Trump almost every day.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Act of terror': US ambassador condemns settler attack on Palestinian church
‘Act of terror': US ambassador condemns settler attack on Palestinian church

First Post

time2 minutes ago

  • First Post

‘Act of terror': US ambassador condemns settler attack on Palestinian church

Although Mike Huckabee is known for his close ties to settler leaders and opposition to Palestinian statehood, his recent comments signal growing unease in Washington over escalating violence in the West Bank read more People carry the body of Palestinian Christian Saad Salama, who was killed in an Israeli strike on the Church of the Holy Family, according to medics, at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital, in Gaza City July 17, 2025. (Photo: Reuters/Dawoud Abu Alkas) The US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, has condemned an arson attack on a historic church in the occupied West Bank, calling it an 'act of terror' and urging Israel to prosecute those responsible. Huckabee, a vocal supporter of Israeli settlements, visited the Christian town of Taybeh on Saturday (July 20), where clerics said Israeli settlers had set fire near a cemetery and a 5th-century church on July 8. The attack damaged part of the grounds near the Church of St George and came amid a surge in settler violence across the West Bank. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is an act of terror, and it is a crime,' Huckabee said in a statement. 'Those who carry out acts of terror and violence in Taybeh, or anywhere, (should) be found and be prosecuted. Not just reprimanded, that's not enough.' The Israeli government has not commented on the incident. It has previously denounced acts of settler violence but has been accused by rights groups of failing to hold perpetrators accountable. Rare rebuke from Trump envoy Huckabee's remarks are one of the clearest public rebukes of settler violence by a Trump administration official. They follow his earlier call on Tuesday for Israel to 'aggressively investigate' the killing of a Palestinian American who was reportedly beaten to death by settlers in the West Bank. That incident, too, was described by Huckabee as a 'criminal and terrorist act'. Although Huckabee is known for his close ties to settler leaders and opposition to Palestinian statehood, his recent comments signal growing unease in Washington over escalating violence in the West Bank, which has surged since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The Trump administration has taken a starkly different line from its predecessor. In January, President Trump lifted sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on Israeli settler groups and individuals accused of attacking Palestinians. Tensions rise amid legal dispute The West Bank, occupied by Israel since 1967, has long been a flashpoint between settlers and Palestinians. Violence by both sides has intensified over the past nine months. The United Nations' top court has ruled that Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are illegal under international law, a position Israel rejects. Israeli leaders argue the territory is vital for national security and assert historical and biblical claims to the land.

India does not need a national language, says KTR
India does not need a national language, says KTR

Hans India

time2 minutes ago

  • Hans India

India does not need a national language, says KTR

Hyderabad: Amid the ongoing debate on the imposition of Hindi, Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) working president KT Rama Rao said on Sunday that India has no national language, and it does not need one. He believes that with 22 official languages and over 300 unofficial ones, India's diversity is its strength. 'Language is not just a tool of communication - it's our cultural identity. I'm not enforcing Telugu on you, so why enforce Hindi on me?' he asked while participating in a discussion on 'The North-South Divide in Indian Politics' at the 9th edition of Talk Journalism in Jaipur on Sunday. Stating that India has carried on for more than 70 years without a national language, he said there was no need for a change now. KTR, as the BRS leader is popularly known, made a powerful case for protecting the federal structure of India, warning against the growing centralisation of power and resources in the Hindi heartland at the expense of southern states. He stressed that representation in Parliament must not be dictated purely by population numbers. He added that the southern states, which have implemented population control and contributed significantly to the nation's economy, should not be punished for their discipline. KTR cited data showing that while southern states like Kerala limited population growth to just 69 per cent since 1950, Uttar Pradesh witnessed a staggering 239 per cent rise. This demographic imbalance, he warned, is now set to translate into a political imbalance through the proposed delimitation exercise, which could see South India lose parliamentary seats even as North India gains. 'Population alone cannot be the basis for the redistribution of seats or delimitation. It will lead to the centralisation of policies and fiscal resources. The more political parties start feeling that the Hindi belt will decide who becomes the Prime Minister, the entire focus will be on making policies that suit the Hindi belt, and the rest of India will be left in the lurch,' KTR cautioned. Citing unfulfilled promises made by the BJP-led Union government, such as the increase in Assembly seats in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh under the AP Reorganisation Act, KTR questioned the Centre's credibility. 'They hurriedly increased seats in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam for political gains, but ignored South India. Why should we trust them now on delimitation?' he asked. The BRS leader also raised concerns over recent controversies around electoral roll revisions in Bihar. He noted allegations of nearly 5 lakh voters being struck off the rolls, warning that such practices undermine India's democratic foundations. 'This is deeply worrying. In the last Bihar elections, the losing margin was just 12,500 votes. What happens if voter suppression decides an election? Even one Indian being denied the right to vote is unacceptable in the world's largest democracy,' he said, calling on the Election Commission of India to act swiftly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store