logo
The Turkish mega-prison that became symbol of Erdoğan's authoritarianism

The Turkish mega-prison that became symbol of Erdoğan's authoritarianism

The Guardian3 days ago
Silivri was once just a getaway town. An hour's drive west of Istanbul, it was famed for its lavender, its yoghurt, and its summer houses dotted along the Marmara Sea. But to most in Turkey now, Silivri means something different: not the town, but the mega-complex a little further down the coast. This is the prison that since March has held the Istanbul mayor – and rival to president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan – Ekrem İmamoğlu, as he awaits trial for corruption – and now, the place where he has been given a twenty month sentence, in another of the litany of charges against him, for insulting and 'threatening' a public official.
It started taking in prisoners in 2008. Turkish coverage at the time marvelled at the size. Here was a complex – a 'campus', in the new lingo – made of nine separate prisons, spread across almost 1m sq metres, and with a stated capacity of 11,000 people. For the on-site staff alone, there were 500 apartments, a mosque, a market and restaurant, and a primary school for their children. As one prisoner would later write, he would hear them from his cell singing the Turkish national anthem in the playground.
Silivri was meant to replace the dilapidated old inner-city jails. It had, it was breathlessly reported, TV and radios in every cell, more than 2,000 security cameras, and eye retina scans for staff coming in and out. Prisoners had access to an indoor sports centre and two open-air football pitches.
The mega-prison was swept into a broader narrative of the early Erdoğan years – of a country that was modernising fast. And soon events at Silivri would speak to something deeper too, and hopes that Erdoğan was breathing new life into Turkish democracy itself.
For before Silivri was even completed, it began to host a series of groundbreaking trials. Prosecutors had claimed to have unearthed a series of plots among Turkey's old, secular establishment – generals and police chiefs, journalist and lawyers – aimed at overthrowing its elected Islamist government. Hundreds of them were tried at a time in Silivri, not in its courtrooms but in one of its gym halls repurposed for the task, as scores of gendarmes guarded the prison's perimeter. It seemed, for many onlookers, that Silivri was the scene of a historic reckoning with Turkey's past – of the humbling of a secular military elite who had overshadowed democracy for so long.
But by the time the guilty verdicts came in 2012, many in Turkey were having doubts. The indictments, it turned out, were full of inaccuracies, typos and doctored documents. In fact, there was scant evidence that the plots had existed at all. In hindsight, the Silivri trials hinted at what was to come: the use of police and prosecutors, courts and police to go after the government's opponents.
It was all accelerated in Erdoğan's second decade in power, a period marked by not only a failed coup but a state of emergency and a new constitution. A political crackdown brought the arrests of activists, journalists, lawyers, politicians and tens of thousands of ordinary citizens besides. Meanwhile, a moral panic about urban crime led to a huge increase in prison time for petty offences. Turkey's prison population began to soar.
In 2002, when Erdoğan's party came to power, Turkey had about 60,000 prisoners; now it has almost 350,000. In the Council of Europe's latest report, Turkey was said to have about as many imprisoned as the other 45 countries put together. Silivri, built to a capacity of 11,000, was most recently reported to be housing 22,000 people. It is one of the largest prisons in the world.
The conditions have always been austere. As the author Ahmet Altan described – during his own imprisonment after the failed coup – occasionally in the spring, passing birds would drop flowers for their nests into his small and sunless courtyard. Once he took one and put it in a plastic bottle to decorate his cell. The next day, the officers took the flower away.
Lawyers, wardens, former inmates and their families all speak of a system overstretched: of units for 21 housing nearly 50; of meals shrinking, or of mattresses having to be shared out in shifts; or, during weekly exercise sessions on Silivri's much-vaunted sports pitches, inmates trying to organise a game of football with 40 players at a time.
There have always been accusations – denied by the prison authorities – of frequent beatings by guards and deliberate acts of humiliation. In a case three years ago, after an inmate died in Silivri, the prison insisted the cause was a heart attack. His family did not believe it and said his body had been beaten black and blue.
The detention of inmates such as İmamoğlu tends to be different. Kept in isolation, in a unit specifically reserved for its high-profile political prisoners, few report any physical mistreatment.
Instead, the punishment is the Turkish court process itself: pre-trial detentions that can last years; judges and prosecutors under intense political pressure; and even – as İmamoğlu has found out – the possibility that an inmate's lawyer might be detained too.
Today, Silivri has become a symbol of how far Erdoğan is willing to go to stay in power. So much so that the prison's infamous name has found itself part of a Turkish phrase. Silivri soğuk – meaning Silivri's cold – is said to friends, half in jest, half in warning, when they say or do something political deemed to go over the line.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens of criminals become cops in major Democrat city 'after rogue officer lets them through the net'
Dozens of criminals become cops in major Democrat city 'after rogue officer lets them through the net'

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Dozens of criminals become cops in major Democrat city 'after rogue officer lets them through the net'

Dozens of criminals wound up working as officers for the New York City Police Department after the commander overseeing recruitment ignored their checkered past, according to court filings. Up to 31 unsuitable officers were allowed to serve as cops due to 'unauthorized unilateral actions' by former commanding officer NYPD Inspector Terrell Anderson, the complaint states. Many of the hired criminals were initially barred from the department because background checks turned up their arrests, with one of aspiring officer found to have three arrests to their name. Offenses included everything from drug use to prostitution, and a number of driving violations, per the New York Post. However they were allowed to serve after being granted admission by Anderson, according to the filings, which allege he did not have the authority to keep them on the force. And in a stunning twist, many of the officers remain employed and cannot be sacked after the NYPD Police Benevolent Association filed a restraining order to temporarily halt the city's actions, keeping them on the payroll. 'His actions, therefore, were a nullity,' the city said in the filings. Anderson was reassigned following the scandal and is now facing departmental charges, law enforcement sources told the Post. The legal document also slammed the new officers fo, 'not questioning or otherwise determining how they could miraculously become appointed as police officers' when they were previously disqualified. The court filing singled out one rookie cop who was permitted into the NYPD academy, despite having never been employed in any capacity before. That cop, who was not named, was found to have an 'extensive history of poor decision-making and recklessness', but was allowed to serve anyway by Anderson, the filings said. That history with the law included multiple driving convictions for speeding at upwards of 50mph over the speed limit, and an arrest for driving with eight suspensions on his license. The officer was also found to have struck a pedestrian with his car on another occasion. A different officer also reported a number of serious driving offenses including involvement in eight car crashes and driving with a suspended license, alongside multiple arrests for marijuana. That officer slipped through the net because he 'exploited his father's status as an NYPD detective in order to circumvent personal responsibility', according to his reported disqualification notice. Another officer who was allowed into the NYPD had 'reported using LSD and marijuana to cope with stress', the filing said. One of the cops was also found to have allegedly paid a stripper for sexual intercourse in 2017, and then the next year paid a female masseuse to masturbate him, the filings said. One female officer failed a psychological examination after she 'openly discussed arguments and conflicts with other people in a boastful manner.' She reportedly told a psychiatrist that 'what you do to me I'm going to do to you twice and I hope you feel worse than the way you made me feel', but was still allowed in per the filing. Anderson was in charge of screening the candidates as the NYPD's chief of Candidate Assessment Division, but was promptly moved to the housing unit when the scandal was discovered in May. He alleged that NYPD top brass pushed him to keep non-qualified officers in the academy. Anderson's defenders have pointed out that NYPD recruitment numbers have struggled in recent years. NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch previously decided to relax some qualifications in the academy earlier this year in an attempt to beef up numbers. NYPD Capt. Chris Monahan, president of the Captain's Endowment Association, told the New York Post that Anderson was. 'under tremendous pressure to fill NYPD recruit classes.' 'He had a careful review process and didn't place candidates with diagnosed mental health issues in many classes,' he said. 'Inspector Anderson had the authority under previous administrations to hire candidates.' Despite some of the cops' lengthy rap sheets, the city's move to fire them was halted after the NYPD Police Benevolent Association filed a restraining order to temporarily halt the city's actions. A judge then granted an extension for 60 days. Explaining the move to defend the officers, NYPD Police Benevolent Association President Patrick Hendry said: 'These are 31 police officers' lives — their livelihood.' (The judge) understands they have families, bills, rent,' he continued. 'They were just told, 'You're not entitled to any process. You're fired, 24 hours. That is wrong. The entire method — how it was done — is wrong. 'They were deemed qualified New York City police officers. They were called back. They completed what they were asked to complete... These police officers were deemed qualified by the NYPD.'

EXCLUSIVE Ghislaine Maxwell's fascinating prison secrets revealed by Jan. 6 rioter dorm mate... amid shocking claims Epstein madam is set to be 'silenced'
EXCLUSIVE Ghislaine Maxwell's fascinating prison secrets revealed by Jan. 6 rioter dorm mate... amid shocking claims Epstein madam is set to be 'silenced'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Ghislaine Maxwell's fascinating prison secrets revealed by Jan. 6 rioter dorm mate... amid shocking claims Epstein madam is set to be 'silenced'

A former prisoner who shared a jailhouse dorm with Ghislaine Maxwell has revealed how Jeffrey Epstein's former madam would spend her days behind bars. Jessica Watkins, 42, a transgender Army veteran and former Oath Keeper was imprisoned alongside the 63-year-old inside FCI Tallahassee for her involvement in the Capitol riot. Maxwell is serving 20 years behind bars on child sex trafficking charges for her role helping Epstein exploit and abuse multiple minors over the course of a decade. Epstein's victims alleged they were procured by Maxwell and passed around his billionaire friends and associates who regularly visited his homes, which included his private island. He was eventually found dead in his cell from an apparent suicide while awaiting trial. Speaking with the Daily Mail this week, Watkins said Maxwell mostly kept to herself inside the prison, a low security facility in the Florida capital, where she has rebranded herself as a teacher to other inmates. It comes after Watkins said she wanted to get 'ahead of potential narratives' about Maxwell, insisting that 'she isn't suicidal in the least'. Recalling the first time she clocked the disgraced socialite inside, Watkins said she had to do a double take to make sure it was her. She said: 'It's an open dorm, it's a big bay full of bunk beds, there is no cells. I walked by and I seen her there. 'I did a double take because I recognized her face immediately from the news. I was like "is that who I think it is?"' 'My friend who was with me was like "I don't know who is it?", I caught her up on the situation. Started asking around and it was definitely her.' Watkins, who had her sentenced commuted in January, said her and Maxwell would go on to speak several times a week, typically while exercising around the yard. She said that Maxwell brought up her own case a few times and only made one mention of Epstein, her former lover and boss, that she could remember. 'We don't talk about cases as inmates because people will think you're a snitch, it's an unspoken rule among inmates. You don't ask,' she explained. '[Maxwell] did bring it up a couple times but it was very very hush hush. She didn't talk a lot about it. 'She did say that the DOJ had no interest in her until after, her exact words were until after Jeffrey, and then she paused for a second and said died. That was the only time he ever came up.' According to Watkins Maxwell came across as being at ease inside prison, adding that she 'didn't seem unduly worried'. She added: 'The open dorm situation is very good, there's like 40 or 50 people around so if anybody tried anything, there's witnesses. She seemed very at ease, very calm and approachable.' Watkins said that anybody involved in child or sex cases is somewhat protected by the authorities. 'If someone is to retaliate against her they catch an entire indictment and can get like 10 years or something. 'I don't think she feared anything from the other inmates, she was also very helpful. She worked in the law library', she added. In the US correctional facilities offer inmates the resources to access the courts and further understand their legal rights and options with in house law libraries. Watkins said that Maxwell worked inside the one in Tallahassee and provided fellow inmates with the right legal forms and offered advice, even running her own classes. 'She was very concerned about peoples medical well-being and so she did have that kind side to her.' Despite this, Watkins added that Maxwell did make her uneasy, due to her being aware of the nature of her case. She added: '[Maxwell] made me nervous, anytime she came around she made me nervous but she was very nice.' Watkins said that outside of helping others with legal cases, Maxwell spent her time working out and reading books constantly. She revealed the madam has a taste for classic literature. She never recalled seeing Maxwell with a tablet inside or ever spending time inside the TV room, deciding to work on her case or read instead. Watkins also took aim at the food available to inmates as being 'not fit for human consumption' while saying that she recalled Maxwell eating kosher meals. Maxwell is said to have kept to herself, and had one close friend who Watkins identified only as Lisa. Lisa told others she was a doctor before her prison stint. According to Watkins the facility had problems with drug use amongst inmates, particularly the prescription opioid Suboxone and crystal meth. Due to this, she said her and Maxwell bonded over not being hooked on the substances. 'We avoided most of the inmates cause they were high all the time and we didn't want to be around that. She would gravitate towards people who were also sober,' Watkins said. 'We walked the track one day and we were trying to calculate how many people were sober in the prison, I think we came up with 12', she added. The only other details of her private life Maxwell gave out was that her father had worked in the media, according to Watkins. Epstein and Maxwell were previously pictured alongside President Donald Trump in the past, Maxwell only made mention mention of Trump inside once, Watkins added. She said: 'There was something in the news about Trump having Jeffrey Epstein at Mar-a-Lago or something. 'I guess she had done some interview and the media had asked her about President Trump, and she came back and said "well like why are you interested in Trump and not the Clintons?". 'I guess they were far closer, I don't know. It was a passing statement, she never really elaborated on that.' Watkins said that Maxwell was not suicidal, suggesting her former bunkmate could meet the same fate as Epstein who was found dead in a New York City jail cell in 2019. At the time of Epstein's death, which was ruled a suicide, he had pleaded not guilty to the charges held against him. His suicide fueled public speculation that he was assassinated as part of a cover-up to protect other high-profile individuals who were potentially complicit in his crimes. From that, a theory that the well-connected financier maintained a list of clients to whom underage girls were trafficked emerged. The Trump administration backed that notion, with the president himself saying on the campaign trail last year that he would make sure the list was released. An all out MAGA civil war has ensued after Trump's Department of Justice said in a memo earlier this month that, despite fueling theories for years, there is no list. Attorney General Pam Bondi made promises that raised the expectations of conservatives, maintaining this year that the list 'was on her desk'. To some fanfare, right-wing influencers were welcomed to the White House in February and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1'. It later emerged that the information contained in the dossiers handed over was already publicly available. The DOJ also released videos from inside the New York City facility where Epstein died, saying it proved he committed suicide. Critics have pointed to the fact that there is a crucial minute missing from the footage that also does not show the door or, indeed, the inside of Epstein's jail cell. It us a challenging crisis for Trump to maneuver, as he spent the last few years stoking theories and embracing propaganda that he is the chosen one to demolish the 'deep state'. Now that he's back in charge of the government, his supporters who viciously support him have turned on him, demanding answers. He spoke with reporters on Tuesday, saying: 'I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is.' Asked whether Bondi had told him his name was in the Epstein files, Trump said no. He then praised her handling of the case. He went on to suggest, without citing evidence, that the documents were 'made up' by former FBI Director James Comey and former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Maxwell indicated this week that she is willing to testify before Congress about the so-called Epstein list. A source told the Daily Mail: 'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. 'She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story. No-one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows. 'She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth.' Her family have frequently claimed she 'did not receive a fair trial', but legal appeals against her sex trafficking convictions have been rejected by the courts. In a statement this week her family said: 'If necessary, in due course they will also file a writ of habeas corpus in the US district court, SDNY. 'This allows her to challenge her imprisonment on the basis of new evidence such as government misconduct that would have likely changed the trial's outcome.' That new challenge would be 'on the basis of new evidence such as government misconduct that would have likely changed the trial's outcome'. The family argue that Maxwell should have been protected under an agreement Epstein entered with the Department of Justice in 2007, in which they vowed not to prosecute any of his co-conspirators after he 'paid fines, paid 'victims' millions of dollars and served 13 months in prison.' The family wants Maxwell's sentence to be vacated and for her to be referred for resentencing, accusing the court of also 'applying an incorrect guideline range and offense level.'.

Bangladeshis linked to Hasina regime appear to have made UK property transactions in past year
Bangladeshis linked to Hasina regime appear to have made UK property transactions in past year

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Bangladeshis linked to Hasina regime appear to have made UK property transactions in past year

By the time Bangladesh's student-led revolution finally toppled Sheikh Hasina, her security forces had already spilled the blood of hundreds of protesters. Now, almost a year after the country's autocratic leader fled the former British colony into exile, an interim government is struggling to navigate bitter factional politics and economic turmoil. Against that traumatic backdrop, a Knightsbridge townhouse in London, or a mansion on a private road in Surrey, seem worlds away. Yet luxury UK real estate is playing a central role in the drama. Investigators in Dhaka have been sifting through allegations that powerful and politically connected figures under the previous regime exploited senior positions to loot state contracts and the banking system, channelling millions into UK property. In May, the National Crime Agency (NCA) – sometimes called Britain's FBI – froze £90m of property belonging to members of the Rahman family, whose UK portfolio was revealed in a Guardian investigation last year. Three weeks later, the NCA froze more than £170m of assets belonging to Saifuzzaman Chowdhury, a former land minister in the Hasina government who amassed a vast fortune during her tenure that included more than 300 UK properties, ranging from apartments to lavish townhouses. Now, an investigation by the Guardian and the campaign group Transparency International has found that several Bangladeshis who are under scrutiny in Dhaka appear to have either sold, transferred or refinanced UK property since the revolution began. The transactions raise questions about the freedom with which those under suspicion have continued to conduct business in London, as well as the due diligence performed by UK law firms and consultants who helped facilitate the transactions. Leading figures in Bangladesh's interim government are now calling on Britain to err on the side of caution by freezing more UK property assets while the authorities in Dhaka complete their investigations. London property could now play a starring role in what has been billed by some as a long overdue anti-corruption purge – but by others as a politically motivated witch-hunt. The London five-star hotel the Dorchester, where rooms cost upwards of £800 a night, may not seem the most appropriate base from which to take aim at a decadent elite. Yet the Mayfair hotel's plush rooms served as the temporary home of a large Bangladeshi government delegation that visited in early June, led by the interim premier, Muhammad Yunus, on a mission to forge stronger ties with the UK. London is of particular importance to Bangladesh, due in part to the huge diaspora in the capital, but also to the UK's offer of support to track assets that investigators in Dhaka think may have been obtained using laundered money. Ahsan Mansur, the central bank governor who is leading his country's efforts to repatriate assets, wants more measures such as those issued against Chowdhury and the Rahmans. 'We are aware of efforts to liquidate assets and we would like the UK government to consider more freezing orders,' Mansur said. Measures to block transactions would, he said, 'give us hope of following due process to repatriate assets'. His call was echoed by the chair of Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). Last month, Mohammad Abdul Momen said he had asked the NCA to consider freezing the assets of several individuals, amid a flurry of post-revolutionary property market activity. Disclosures to the UK Land Registry show at least 20 'applications for dealing' have been submitted in the past year in relation to property owned by figures under scrutiny by Dhaka. Such documents typically indicate a sale, transfer or change to a mortgage. Three relate to £24.5m worth of property ultimately owned by members of the Sobhan family, the powerful dynasty behind the multibillion-pound Bashundhara business group, a conglomerate that spans cement to media. One, a four-storey townhouse in Knightsbridge, has been the subject of two recent transactions, the purpose of which are unclear. Until April last year, it was owned directly by Sayem Sobhan Anvir, Bashundhara's managing director, via a company based in the United Arab Emirates. Sobhan is among several family members under investigation by the ACC for allegations including money laundering, the Guardian understands. In April, the property was transferred – apparently free of charge – to a UK business called Brookview Heights Ltd. Brookview is owned by a director of Orbis London, a real estate advisory firm with offices in Liechtenstein and Singapore that has acted for the Sobhans on property transactions in the past. The London home appears to have subsequently been sold for £7.35m to a newly formed company, whose sole director is an accountant with no online profile. The accountant is registered as the owner and director of multiple other companies that appear to be special purpose vehicles for multimillion-pound London properties. Land Registry records show that UK law firms have made two more applications for dealing on properties owned by another member of the Sobhan family, Shafiat, including an £8m mansion in Virginia Water, Surrey. A family member did not return a request for comment but has previously said that the family deny 'all allegations of wrongdoing and will robustly defend ourselves against these allegations'. Members of the Sobhan family are among a clutch of UK property owners whose assets the ACC has asked the NCA to consider freezing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Two more individuals have come under scrutiny from the ACC as part of investigations into Chowdhury. Both have engaged in multiple property deals over the past year. One is Chowdhury's brother, Anisuzzaman, while the other is a successful British-Bangladeshi property developer, whom the Guardian has chosen not to name. Land Registry data shows recent market activity on four properties owned by Anisuzzaman Chowdhury. They include the sale of a £10m Georgian townhouse on the fringes of Regent's Park, central London, completed last July. A further three applications, understood to relate to refinancing, have taken place since. Lawyers for Anisuzzaman Chowdhury said he did not believe that there was any legitimate reason for any of his assets to be frozen and that the sale of the Regent's Park property was agreed in 2023, before the revolution. According to reports in Bangladesh, the ACC has previously been asked by the chair of a large local bank, UCB, to investigate whether Chowdhury helped the London-based property developer obtain loans irregularly from the lender. This year, a Bangladeshi court imposed a travel ban on the developer, who denies any wrongdoing. A further three applications for dealing relate to properties owned by the son and the nephew of Salman F Rahman, who runs the Beximco business group, one of Bangladesh's largest conglomerates. Ahmed Shayan Rahman and Ahmed Shahryar Rahman are under investigation by the ACC. The properties, including a £35m apartment in Mayfair's Grosvenor Square, were frozen by the NCA last month. Lawyers for the Rahmans said they denied any wrongdoing. They said 'political upheaval' in Bangladesh had led to allegations being made against many people, adding that they would 'engage with any investigation which takes place in the UK'. Joe Powell MP, the chair of an all-party parliamentary group examining corruption and tax, wants any such investigations to move quickly. 'History tells us that assets can quickly evaporate unless swift steps are taken to freeze those assets while investigations are under way,' he said. Powell welcomed the action already taken by the NCA but urged it to 'expand the net as soon as possible'. The Labour MP leads a group of parliamentarians that is targeting London's reputation as a home for suspicious funds and those who enable the transfer of that wealth, particularly given the renewed focus on oligarchs that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Transparency International is raising questions over the role played by multiple UK firms that have acted for individuals the NCA has already targeted, or who the ACC has named. The law firm Jaswal Johnston submitted applications on properties owned by the Rahmans. A spokesperson said the firm had not been involved in any sales and that it took its due diligence obligations 'extremely seriously'. Merali Beedle, a law firm that made applications for dealing on one £35m Rahman property and another £8m home owned by a member of the Sobhan family, declined to comment. A spokesperson for Transparency International said: 'Professional services firms should exercise extreme caution when conducting regulated activities for clients known to be under investigation. They should perform comprehensive source-of-wealth checks and immediately report suspicious activity to police. 'Without swift action, these funds risk vanishing into the international financial system, potentially placing them beyond recovery.' The ACC declined to comment on its investigations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store